Sun starts to think different; plants private equity seed

Sun starts to think different; plants private equity seed

Summary: Why would a company with $2.6 billion in cash lying around as of Dec.

TOPICS: Oracle

Why would a company with $2.6 billion in cash lying around as of Dec. 31 raise another $700 million from one of private equity's biggest players?

That's a question worth a little reading between the lines since a few folks are perplexed. To be sure, Sun Microsystems' turnaround has taken another big step--the company reported fiscal second quarter earnings $126 million, or 3 cents a share, on revenue of $3.56 billion. But the investment by KKR Private Equity Investors, L.P., the publicly traded fund of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) is more notable by far.

KKR, best known for its 1989 buyout of RJR Nabisco, has a massive portfolio that's well diversified. The private equity trademark is to buy undervalued assets, restructure and then cash out via sale or IPO.

That track record means Sun is up to something with its KKR partnership. One thing is clear: Sun, on the heels of its partnership with Intel, is thinking differently these days. Here are a few reasons why Sun may have linked arms with KKR:

--Sun wants to play the going private card. By partnering with KKR, Sun builds up its war chest and sends a clear message to investors: If it makes sense we'll go private. This move wouldn't be unheard of--there is a lot of private equity sloshing around and it has to go somewhere. Meanwhile, private equity firms will pay up for technology companies. For technology companies looking to revamp, going private can make sense. Seagate made a similar move a few years ago.

--Sun wants to go trolling for acquisitions. In a statement, Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz said "we intend to use proceeds from this placement to pursue strategic opportunities for growth. We're looking forward to working with KKR to leverage its expertise, assets, global reach and relationships." Translation: Sun may go shopping.

--Sun needs to think different. The company has a strong intellectual property portfolio and could use KKR's guidance to monetize it. Don't be surprised if select assets get spun off into smaller companies.

Now KKR isn't giving Sun $700 million for nothing. The sum is evenly split between convertible bonds--debt that converts to stock at some point--due in 2012 and 2014. KKR will collect some interest in the meantime.

But the bottom line is this: KKR sees some value in Sun and its dollars say more about the company's turnaround than Schwartz ever could. 

In the Schwartz era, which began in April 2006, the stock has steadily been climbing out of the sub-$5 cellar, topping $6 in after-hours trading today. Another few quarters of profits and Sun will be allowed to take the "beleaguered" label off its forehead.

Topic: Oracle

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Yes, Sun should monetize its IP portfolio.

    There's a lot of money waiting to be made. But don't tell Mr. Schwartz about the assets or he'll give them away.
    Anton Philidor
  • My Take

    There is a definite possibility of spin-offs of Sun IP. Sun acquired a lot of IP over the last ten years (Teraspring, Centerun, Pirus, Nauticus, etc.), and Sun, because of cost cuts, is limited on what it can do with some of that technology.

    I also believe Sun may look to acquire more core technology, probably around advanced networking and managed services.

    Basically, this may all be part of a portfolio management play.
  • SUNW

    As a sort of basics guy I was happy to see Scott McNealy cast himself as a manufacturer, and as a Canadian I liked the ice hockey mania he brought to the company. So either I was sorry to see him hit hard times. I wish him well in whatever he does next.

    As a general proposition Sun looks underpriced to me, probably sold down by panic over the fact that Solaris is no longer the way-out-in-front Unix box it was back when Scott was getting his photograph on the front of Fortune mag. Shee-yit, it doesn't have to be a 100-1 p/e ratio manic proposition: just being a solid manufacturer is a worthwhile thing to be. I'm buying.