Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Survey: Microsoft customer satisfaction takes second quarter hit

By | July 15, 2009, 4:27am PDT

Summary: Customer satisfaction for Microsoft’s applications and operating systems took a hit in the second quarter, according to a report by VendorRate, an outfit that tracks vendor satisfaction. It’s unclear why Microsoft’s scores fell so much. VendorRate tracks the wisdom of crowds and ranks vendors on 10 criteria such as service, reliability, budget and effectiveness. VendorRate didn’t [...]

Customer satisfaction for Microsoft’s applications and operating systems took a hit in the second quarter, according to a report by VendorRate, an outfit that tracks vendor satisfaction.

It’s unclear why Microsoft’s scores fell so much. VendorRate tracks the wisdom of crowds and ranks vendors on 10 criteria such as service, reliability, budget and effectiveness. VendorRate didn’t seem to have any answers as to why Microsoft took such a big hit, but the numbers tell the tale:

  • Microsoft’s server and infrastructure had a second quarter score of 55 out of a possible 100, down 17 percent from the first quarter.
  • Operating systems had a score of 67, down 9.5 percent from the first quarter.
  • Microsoft applications had a score of 64, down 18 percent from the first quarter.

The bright side: Verizon Communications had the worst vendor score overall at 61.

Does this mean trouble ahead for Microsoft? Not necessarily. VendorRate collects data from IT pros at various tradeshows and it’s possible that it hit a few where the crowd was hostile toward Microsoft. For now, Microsoft’s score is worth monitoring—it could be a blip or a start of a trend. At this point, we just don’t know.

Here’s the overview from VendorRate’s full report:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
44
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Survey: Microsoft customer satisfaction takes second quarter hit
makrekwe43-24353610246223524542078755276719 Updated - 6th Nov
Howdy, I personally ravens jerseys the despite the fact baltimore ravens jerseys back once again started raven jerseys off on looking into your site ?C hi and thanks in your own top-notch have the desired effect.
0 Votes
+ -
I kid. Of course, I never really thought of being a satisfied Microsoft Customer. Then again, I never really thought I had a choice. A company can either do business with Microsoft or try and do business with Linux or some alternative. Macs even use Microsoft Office for this reason.

Microsoft Satisfaction will probably continue to drop until Windows 7 leaves the gate. Not saying that will be the only thing that changes, but Vista has been frustrating enough for me that I just simply don't want to deal with it.
0 Votes
+ -
I have a feeling these dropping "popularity" numbers are just a reflection of consumers getting fed up with being forced to pay more for an OS than their entire computer is worth. With the prices of decent computers dropping every year, Microsoft can't keep charging more and more for an OS. It's not like today's OS does anything revolutionary compared to an OS from 10-15 years ago. All they did was move some buttons around, plug some security holes, and fix some long-term safety issues.

Frankly, Windows 7 still lets you do precisely the same functions that Win 95 or even Win 3.1 did. You can access hard drives, printers, scanners, the Internet, play games, etc., just like you always could. Taking over a decade to change the GUI and fix some engineering flaws in your product doesn't make it ok to find a shady way to charge twice as much for the complete OS. Breaking the price into two pieces where you buy a crippled OS and then upgrade it to get the rest doesn't make the price any lower. No desktop OS should cost $400 retail when you can buy an entire desktop computer for that. Server OS, maybe. Desktop, no.

Even people like me who actually LIKE Windows 7 (and Vista) have begun to despise Microsoft immensely. You can make a good product and still be despicable company who takes advantage of consumers. Prior to Vista, I always upgraded all of my computers to each new version of an OS. Not anymore. Despite liking Windows 7, I won't buy it simply because it comes from Microsoft and I hate the idea of giving them any more of my money. So, maybe their dropping popularity numbers just reflect a lot of people like me who are fed up with Microsoft treating consumers poorly simply because OEMs are their cash cow.

In fact, I will no longer buy any retail product from Microsoft until they change their marketing tactics and pricing schemes for their OS. The repeat of the Vista "multiple crippled versions plus upgrade" tactic was just the final straw that pushed me into the anti-Microsoft camp after using MS products for as long as the company has existed.

I'm not buying their products anymore and I've been helping my friends, relatives, and neighbors setup and learn alternatives to Microsoft, as well. I also spread the word about Microsoft's ripoff tactics to anyone who will listen. The groundswell of resentment is growing. If Microsoft doesn't need consumers, then we don't need them. Apparently Microsoft has forgotten that even CEOs are consumers when they're at home, and eventually, how they are treated as a consumer will affect their corporate purchase decisions.
0 Votes
+ -
Well said!
jacarter3 15th Jul 2009
You echo my sentiments exactly. I have found that each new iteration of Windows has made it harder to manage and administrate while adding few core features. They add a lot of additional "features" that were at one time 3rd party applications and are usually inferior to those existing offerings. But the 3rd party vendors fail soon after because a significant chunk of their market was suddenly swept away by these "free" alternatives.

The biggest hypocrisy is that MS condemns "free" software but constantly adds functions to their OS that were at one time the life's blood of smaller software vendors. In the process, Windows keeps getting bigger, clunkier and less stable. I guess that Anti-virus is the next target in their sites. Imagine the irony, MS offering software to protect their very own vulnerable products. I would laugh but it's too sad.

Oh, lest we forget, Windows 7 will be the most secure version of Windows ever! Talk about setting the bar at a very low level. And how many freaking times do they expect us to fall for that line anyway?

I have done very well at avoiding purchasing any MS products for the past several years except perhaps XP Pro Retail and Office 2003 Standard. These will probably keep me productive for another 3-5 years. Especially if I get that new laptop with the XP Pro downgrade disk set...
0 Votes
+ -
Cause MS OS's and Apps Suck
itguy08 15th Jul 2009
Simple really, high TCO, lots of issues, and every
problem pretty much results in "rebuild" or
"Reinstall"....

MS really needs to look at their apps and make them more
usable and reliable.

0 Votes
+ -
If they suck so much
timiteh 15th Jul 2009
Why competitor can't manage to significantly increase market share in many fields where Microsoft is keeping(O.S) or even increasing(Server,B.I) its market share, like O.S market ?
Could it be that much of the negative perception people has of Microsoft come from brainwashing from the blogosphere whom a significant share is pathologically anti-Microsoft ?
0 Votes
+ -
However we do expect MS to supply quality products at reasonable prices. Unfortunately, their monopoly status prevents this.

As for why we don't switch to another OS. A lot of the MS faithful have tried and some and even switched to alternate OS platforms. However, "Lock-in," which MS excels at, prevents a majority of us from switching. I have many expensive, engineering oriented apps that have no version or counterpart in any other OS and require Windows.

Also, go to the local brick and mortar store and try to buy anything other than a MS Vista based computer. Some of these have a token Apple machine or two lying about but the sales staff will invariably steer the potential buyer to Windows machines where there is a much larger _apparent_ set of choices and away from the Leopard machine that they don't know how to use anyway.

Did you read about the recent DDoS attacks on US and South Korea networks? What you never read about was that these botnets were entirely MS Windows PCs. Maybe that's part of the reason for dissatisfaction?

Why am I dissatisfied with Windows? Maybe it's the OS, maybe it's the crappy apps that are all based on .NET to allow just about anyone that can program basic language programs create what look like professional applications. There's a gazillion of these crappy applications in the wild and some are quite expensive. They use poor programming techniques, library cores and a little bit of logic to create software that abuses the registry and good, secure programming techniques. While we must use Windows to run these, we can also be glad that they don't run in any other OS (mainly due to lack of talent in the programmer pool to write an OS agnostic application).

Since I must use Windows to do my job, I am now looking to buy a new laptop with XP Pro downgrade disks before Win 7 hits the streets and this option is lost. I have tried Win 7 and found nothing but frustration with it. Mainly in the further dumbing down of the interface that compensates with wasted screen area to provide Aero "effects" to amuse those with limited attention spans and the generous use of "Junctions" in the file system (something in Vista but I never even bothered to evaluate Vista) that appear to allow unintended access to files on the Win 7 files system that are not explicitly shared.

I still haven't seen a compelling reason to move to Win 7 just as I never saw one with Vista. And don't try to tell me it's more secure. I have heard that lne way too many times over the last 10 years to give that any serious regard. In fact, it's so trite that it's funny now...
0 Votes
+ -
Did Microsoft write them?
mdemuth 15th Jul 2009
>>I have many expensive, engineering oriented apps
then what does ""Lock-in," which MS excels" mean?
MS has nothing to do with your vendors lack of support for other OS's.

Also, are you saying that you are locked in by a solution that works?
How sad...
0 Votes
+ -
is written by MS. All of the MS development tools are based on .NET APIs that are designed to hide the Windows base set of APIs that remain hidden to the user and competition. Other than MS development tools, what other development platforms create Windows software?

Just this week I updated a very expensive 3D CAD application that literally broke several other applications during it's buggy 5 hour download and install. Now I have a folder under "My Documents" named " Visual Studio Tools for Applications." Get the picture yet, junior?

If you don't know what "lock in" means then I can understand why you can't understand all of the techniques used by MS to block your choices that might not include their products. Apple is almost as good as this and getting better all the time. After all, they have seen and experienced MS playbook for quite a while and seen how successful it is to limit the customers choices.

And I am saying that I am locked in by a solution that frequently doesn't work and requires hours of my time to repair, re-install, or find work arounds. I am saying I am very dissatisfied with MS and its products. That's my experience with MS in the latter half of the first decade of this millennium. Prior to that, I was a happy and loyal (Microsoft Partner Program) customer of MS. Not anymore...
0 Votes
+ -
It sounds like the problem is the way the engineering apps were designed, not the OS. As far as your earlier assertion that .NET developers use bad programming practices, I think that is an invalid and opinionated statement. It's possible to make a quality production using .NET, but just with like any other language it takes experience and discipline.

The reason you don't find these applications on Linux or Apple is not Microsoft's fault. If there was a market for engineering apps on Linux, someone would make them. Microsoft's responsibility to it's employees and it's shareholder's is to gain and retain marketshare. Whether or not they are engaged in monopolitic behavior is another subject. However, Microsoft is not to blame for a third party right crappy applications.
0 Votes
+ -
Guess you either
jacarter3 15th Jul 2009
can't read or that you can't comprehend. A solid majority of published application code comes from the libraries included in .NET and supplied by MS. So yes, in a way, MS wrote most of those apps.

As for lack of demand for engineering applications on 'nix. There are many including MatLab for the Debian based Leopard OS X.

You mistake lack of availability for lack of demand. These CAD vendors compete only in the Windows market because they own their respective user bases and the cost of the software is several times that of any PC or OS choice. Mostly they compete by getting users to switch licenses operating under the valid assumption that anyone switching must be using Windows because the competing product that they're hoping to replace do too.

No one knows what the demand for those applications might be on a 'nix OS because no one has bothered to approach that market.

And face it, no one selling software for any OS really cares about software quality. If development costs increase to make truly robust software, then profits shrink. They know most peole look only at "features" and not the quality or reliability of the product. The vendors also know that they don't have to give any refund (so they don't) and no one can sue them for damages or unanticipated costs because of the license terms.

Until low quality costs the software vendors money, they will never care about it at all - just like MS doesn't.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know what you think you are gaining by insulting me. Sure Microsoft wrote the libraries that make up the .NET development platform. Do you know for a fact that it's bugs in that code that is causing you trouble, or are you just speculating? Most likely the issues are in the code written by the third party software vendors. But who knows? You seem willing to blame Microsoft without having all the facts.
0 Votes
+ -
The problems that I had
jacarter3 15th Jul 2009
with the software had absolutely nothing to do with the CAD aspects, CAD elements, CAD features or numerical calculations of the software. These problems involved only internet protocols to the customers update engines, module registration and installation management. All of these are functions provided by .NET architecture and have nothing to do with the actual logic needed by the CAD model and user interactions with the same.

I have had very similar problems with other applications that rely heavily upon the .NET framework. Since this is all proprietary code, I cannot prove that .NET is the underlying common problem, but my instinct sure points that way.

BTW I don't care if you feel insulted. I guess that I was wrong to assume that you can't comprehend. I should have realized that you will continue to refuse to accept that .NET is buggy, always in a state of change and is certainly not quality software. Personally, I feel that being unable to comprehend is much better than having a completely closed mind...

Just so you feel better I will say that which you obviously hold most dear: "MS is a great company that creates nothing but superb products and it's everyone else's fault if they all have problems actually using it."

Too bad it's totally a lie and quite a load of malarkey...
0 Votes
+ -
Closed Minded
bmonsterman 15th Jul 2009
If you could give me a specific example of a .NET bug, I might change my mind, but you can't. You don't code in .NET, you use something that uses .NET. So, when you have a problem with that application, you assume .NET is the problem. Anyway I wish you luck with your problems and I hope you find a solution.
0 Votes
+ -
Wish Granted!
jacarter3 15th Jul 2009
There are lists of .NET bugs.

I won't bore you with a complete list of the lists but here's the 1st one that I found with a simple search (not using Bing):

http://www.jelovic.com/dotnetbugs/

Hopefully it's closed for renovations and not from lack of use...
0 Votes
+ -
dude...
bmonsterman 15th Jul 2009
First of all...that list referenced bugs fixed by the 1.1 release of .NET. The current version is 3.5...so it's waaay old. Second of all these are problems you experienced...again...it's here-say. You haven't personally coded something and ran into a bug. If it's a known issue, it would be posted on MSDN. You apparently don't know what you're talking about and will post anything to support your point. I'm done with you.
0 Votes
+ -
Verdict: Closed due to lack of use...
jacarter3 15th Jul 2009
No I don't code with .NET - I stopped with the MFC and Visual Studio 6.0.

So I didn't do a comprehensive search. However, no one believes that any software product is bug free. If you do, seek counseling soon

I explained that the problems with my apps were infrastructure based (installation, communication and module registration) that weren't app specific. I believe that they ARE .NET issues, probably .NET configuration issues because it never ceases to change.

You don't have to believe me. I don't even have to be right either. The important thing is that I have continuous problems with Windows applications that are .NT based and wish I could avoid it. That's my perception and my basis for dissatisfaction. Get over it and stop apologizing.

BTW don't read this because you're done with me.

X/
0 Votes
+ -
Yes you are
30YrVet 16th Jul 2009
Why say you're not pathalogically anti-Microsoft and then post the rant you just posted? You are, and you want to rant about them because you are "forced" to use MS software at your job. Change jobs. Go to work for IBM or Apple or Sun or Oracle or any of the other companies that don't use MS products, and quit whining.
0 Votes
+ -
If I were to blame this on anything...
Michael Alan Goff 15th Jul 2009
I would blame it on the fact of perception. You
see, after controlling the desktop for so long,
and for a while I would say that the average
user wouldn't use anything but windows, they
get the idea that everything else is inferior.
They used Linux in 1999 and they think that it
simply didn't get any better.

They don't have enough money for a Mac, that's
another reason.

Now, I am not saying that Windows is in any way
bad. I liked Vista, I really like 7. Not so
much with XP, but meh, it was better than ME. I
guess what I'm saying is that "market
share=/=quality"
0 Votes
+ -
Because of MicroSoft Sheeple?
Bruizer 15th Jul 2009
Sometimes the easier answer is the answer.
0 Votes
+ -
"Sheeple..." how cute...
30YrVet 16th Jul 2009
You just won my heart over to your elitist cult of software supermen. Obviously, anyone who doesn't think like you, which must be extraordinarily perceptive, are just dumb, mindless drones. Thank you for lifting my eyes to heaven. Sigh... can I have your autograph?
0 Votes
+ -
You have to take into account
GuidingLight 15th Jul 2009
the fact that it is people like you that attend these trade shows.

"rebuild" or "Reinstall"....?

We do that only if we lose a hard drive or motherboard, beyond that the systems work fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Would it be any different if it was Linux
GuidingLight 15th Jul 2009
at an Apple conference?

Seriouslly, a trade show would be the last place I would look for a customer satisfaction survey, no matter what the product in question is.
0 Votes
+ -
UK consumers.
planruse 15th Jul 2009
see Microsoft as the top brand ahead of Google and Apple

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8149460.stm
0 Votes
+ -
Simple. Lock In
itguy08 15th Jul 2009
Want to migrate OUT of Exchange? Good luck.
Want to migrate TO Exchange? MS will basically pay
you to do it and do all the work.

Want to migrate FROM Windows? MS will low ball you on
the licenses so they are basically "free". See
Netbooks

Want to go away from Office? Oops we don't document
the formats so most of your formatting goes away.

See a pattern here?

And if you have not noticed - MS's marketshare is
slowly going down. Not hugely but it is going down.

Ask GM how loosing marketshare worked out for them.
VendorRate didn?t seem to have any answers as to why Microsoft took such a big hit

So then these numbers are not accurate and we can all this a bunch of FUD. Most likely it was a group of Microsoft haters that got together to skew the results. Everyone I know has been more than satisfied with Microsoft's products including everything from the apps to the OS. It was probably a bunch of linux users, a couple of the LUGs got together just to make Microsoft look bad but in reality it only makes them look bad for doing such childish things.
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
I wouldn't say the figures...
Larry Dignan 15th Jul 2009
aren't accurate. I have taken the service for a
spin before and the granular comments are
helpful about implementations. As I said it may
have just been a blip or something bigger. And
over a quarter, the sample size is large.

http://www.vendorrate.com/SearchResult.aspx?
SEARCH=Microsoft

It's a subscription service though so the
comments aren't there. Will dig deeper to see
what the complaints are centered on.
FUD, FUD and more FUD. Spreading FUD is all they can do to stop us. .
0 Votes
+ -
OUR success????????? (nt)
Economister 15th Jul 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, our success!
In-Action Man 15th Jul 2009
Loverock is a successful person didn't you know? Only those who are admitted in the Boss's office can be hit by a flying chair, and Loverock is hit by one on a regular basis. He even helped me rehearse the monkey dance.

So I guess we can all agree and say that Loverock Davidson is a successful person, can't we?
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Is that really the reason?
Michael Alan Goff 15th Jul 2009
I'm not saying that MSFT is actually losing the
customer support battle, but I am saying
something I've been saying for a while to
everyone I know.

"The average IQ of the average user is
dropping."

The only issue I have ever had is the people
with the thick accents, which I have trouble
understanding.
0 Votes
+ -
Impossible!
maskman01 15th Jul 2009
You said it yourself. No one uses linux because you need to always recompile the kernel, can only play one sound at time, can't install applications and the telnet port is open. Since no one is using it then who could sabotage the numbers?
those all voted again and again, skewing the results, and they did it on purpose only to make us look bad.

Those Linux people are mean spirited, they are bad!!!
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly!
Ole Man 15th Jul 2009
Why should they be terrified of Linux, and spend millions to oppose it? Everybody knows Linux is a virus that nobody wants. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/01/1658258
davidebsmith writes: "In an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer says that Linux and the open source movement is "good competition" because it will "force [Microsoft] to be innovative," but calls Linux "a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches." He also says that the inclusion of IE in Windows has been "great ... for innovation in the software industry" (except for Netscape) and that MS's new copy protections are just "bumps in the road" to "help customers understand when they are crossing the line . . . so they can't do the wrong thing." And he says a few more amusing things, also."
0 Votes
+ -
slip and slide is dangerous
pgit 15th Jul 2009
The slip and slide should be taken off the market. I just saw a young girl, perhaps 6 years old, hit a dry patch on the thing after diving onto the thing running full bore. Talk about friction burn, 1/2 her back is a big red raspberry now. Enjoy the summer, eh?
0 Votes
+ -
Lovey..did Mike Cox give you the ok to
SoYouSaid 15th Jul 2009
pi** and moan like a little cry baby? Lovey face the facts your M$ world is loosing more market share every month. What can you expect with a jerk like Balmer at the helm ..... the best he can do is jump up and down on a stage and look like a baffoon. And their you go again calling the Linux folks a bunch of lugs, how sad ....... you need to pick up your tempo (FUD), because Google (Linux) & Cisco (Linux)are eating more and more M$ shorts everyday. The playing field is getting leveler and leveler everyday Lovey. Keep happy Lovey
This stems from the negative campaign against Vista. It was very successful in making people think Vista was terrible before/without even trying it. I bought a laptop & was leary about it having Vista based on what I had heard. Upon using Vista, I was waiting for all the negatives to happen. They didn't. I find that Vista blows away XP, despite what others are posting.

From what I understand the "problems" were pretty much fixed after SP1. But this didn't stop the negative stigma that Vista still has (I think unfairly).The perception will probably change once Windows 7 is released in October, followed by Office 2010 next year.
The full report states that the sample size was over 1500 participants. That might be a significant number is it was 1500 for Microsoft and 1500 for Verizon (even then it is a small fraction of the number of customers both interact with in a single quarter). Given that the sample size was so small I'm afraid that noise is being interpreted as signal. Certainly it's interesting reading but I hope all of the company's present on this survey are able to get some distance from the numbers. At best this is an interesting anecdote.
0 Votes
+ -
I've got to say that I feel the same
stevey_d 15th Jul 2009
Vista is terrible. They keep forcing XP updates still, which I don't like either. And Office2007 is terrible.

I love by comparison Apple, OSX, iWork, iLife, iPod and iPhone.
They are all excellent products.

I'm less hot on Sony, Dell, which I keep having problems with. I just want tech to work. And Macs do that.
0 Votes
+ -
Adverting Campaigns?
David Blomstrom 15th Jul 2009
Gosh, do you suppose all those bizarre ads featuring Jerry Seinfeld and vomiting PC owners might have backfired? Or maybe people are just getting fed up with Microsoft's endless FUD and Bill Gates phony philanthropy.
Is that your list of bugs? You think switching to Java would solve that? They have just as many bugs. I program in both languages, and get bit by issues all the time. It's still up to the 3rd party developers to figure out workarounds. Heck one version of JRE came out and broke Java Webstart Apps, whoops. It happens, they are human developers as much as the next. Are you sure you're not working with some Java apps that are running in Windows? or are you actually developing using .NET and finding these problems in an app you are creating?
"Microsoft haters stacking the deck?" NOT A CHANCE. I'm the CEO of VendorRate, and we built our service on the entire Microsoft stack. In fact, our development team loves Microsoft! Unfortunately, many of our B2B IT raters did not love them in Q2.

We are vendor agnostic. We report on the scores we receive; we don't tilt the playing field in favor on one vendor over another. And we don't take a dime vendor sponsorship money!

We'd like to count your vote, too. Please add your voice to our Q3 report!

We invite any IT professional to come rate their IT vendors...hardware, software, services, consultant, or reseller.

Rick Schaefer
www.vendorrate.com.

Dude...that was .NET 1.1. 3.5 is the current version. And it's just some random persons compilation and it has nothing to do with what you're experiencing. Give me a break. Don't just google...
0 Votes
+ -
Slightly off topic but...
thatcomputerman 16th Jul 2009
'and that MS's new copy protections are just "bumps in the
road" to "help customers understand when they are
crossing the line . . . so they can't do the wrong thing." '

Funny how most MS software gets bent or broken and then
torrented around the world isn't it.

Copy protections...

They are there for the hackers to play with and half of
those probably work for MS. And when the protections are
bent or broken, MS then just shove it out onto the torrent
field to increase the take-up of their 'wares.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Survey: Microsoft customer satisfaction takes second quarter hit
makrekwe43-24353610246223524542078755276719 Updated - 6th Nov
Howdy, I personally ravens jerseys the despite the fact baltimore ravens jerseys back once again started raven jerseys off on looking into your site ?C hi and thanks in your own top-notch have the desired effect.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix