Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

T-Mobile sings praises about AT&T merger to FCC

By | June 10, 2011, 12:11pm PDT

Summary: Here’s something not too surprising: T-Mobile is touting the benefits of its merger with AT&T to the Federal Communications Commission.

Here’s something not too surprising: T-Mobile is touting the benefits of its merger with AT&T to the Federal Communications Commission.

Earlier this month, several tech giants, including Facebook and Microsoft, and venture capital companies banded together and submitted statements to the FCC in support of the AT&T and T-Mobile merger, which would create the largest carrier in the country.

Now the mobile providers have taken initiative and filed letters with the FCC in support of their own cause and against all the naysayers who want the merger to be rejected. Sprint would be the most obvious in this category as it filed an opposition petition last week.

Tom Sugrue, senior vice president of T-Mobile’s Government Affairs sector, addressed today’s filing in a statement:

As our filing with the FCC today explains, the winners of the proposed merger with AT&T will be consumers, as the extra capacity will enable us to alleviate escalating capacity constraints, increase output, support the next generation of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications, and offer them faster data speeds, extended coverage and fewer dropped calls…We are pleased that the regulatory process is moving forward, and we remain confident that the FCC will weigh all the facts and approve this deal.

Great, so T-Mobile is pleased (at least publicly) about the merger with AT&T. Honestly, what else could T-Mobile reps say? Of course they’re going to try to push the positives to the FCC, and it’s hard to see at this point that the FCC would side with Sprint and say no.

Related coverage on ZDNet:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: T-Mobile sings praises about AT&T merger to FCC
cathrose 5th Oct
With the way the economy is doing these days,I think the best solution for any business in the same market is to merge themselves so they can monopolize and still have the largest share of consumers. Merging of T-Mobile and AT&T will be hard for competitors like Sprint that's why they oppose it. According to Ralph Brown in best friend quotes " "Competition is a consumer's best friend. It offers better prices, better variety and better quality. There are also more employers competing for the services of workers, and it makes it better for workers in terms of wages and benefits." But with the merger,I think AT&T and T-Mobile wants to kill the competition. In the real estate market, competition is nice because there are a lot companies to choose from. A few of these are Manotick real estate and Bracebridge real estate. Real estate companies are always after the consumer's wants and needs in a house and in a community while they earn money for it, so they compete in these areas. But in the telecommunications industry, it seems that they want monopoly so they can control the market.
Yep, that's just what we need Ma Bell back under a new name! Lets give them back their monopoly and go back to leasing rotary phones! Isn't anyone else old enough to remember when you couldn't get a speaker phone, because MA Bell didn't do speaker phones and wouldn't let you hook anyone else's equipment up to "Their" lines!
@leopards "back under a new name"

I belive it would be under the same name seeing as how AT&T was old Ma Bell to begin with.
well said, it's 2011 and we're in the Corporate States of America. it's a damn shame.
0 Votes
+ -
Whatever. My wife and I were both with T-mobile for ten years, but I wan't NO part of At&T. I just paid the $50 ETF and jumped to Sprint a couple of weeks ago (it's nice to have 3G service for once!). My wife's ETF is still at $200, but will be dropping to $100 in two months. After it does she will be joining me.
@toadlife

Actually if this merger goes through Sprint is in big trouble . Just sayin....Whatever ? Indifference probably isn't your friend .
@The_Todd

The worst that could happen is Sprint gets bought by another company and my contract is either honered or terminated with no ETF, so I'm not worrying.

BTW, Sprints network is *WAY* more reliable that T-Mobile's in my area. Not ever having another carrier, I had no idea T-Mobile was so bad.
0 Votes
+ -
Prices won't come down
PB_z 10th Jun
If prices don't come down (which they won't), then consumers don't "win". Simple as that.
This is so sad. I've been a happy T-mobil customer for year. AT&T will ruin them and the consumers will lose.
0 Votes
+ -
Bad, bad idea!
shanedr 13th Jun
These companies are getting too big with too little competition.

Companies with more than 25% of any market should be broken up. Those which would end up with more than 10% of any market should be prohibited from any form of combining assets or mutual marketing.
0 Votes
+ -
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli chat sesli sohbet
With the way the economy is doing these days,I think the best solution for any business in the same market is to merge themselves so they can monopolize and still have the largest share of consumers. Merging of T-Mobile and AT&T will be hard for competitors like Sprint that's why they oppose it. According to Ralph Brown in best friend quotes " "Competition is a consumer's best friend. It offers better prices, better variety and better quality. There are also more employers competing for the services of workers, and it makes it better for workers in terms of wages and benefits." But with the merger,I think AT&T and T-Mobile wants to kill the competition. In the real estate market, competition is nice because there are a lot companies to choose from. A few of these are Manotick real estate and Bracebridge real estate. Real estate companies are always after the consumer's wants and needs in a house and in a community while they earn money for it, so they compete in these areas. But in the telecommunications industry, it seems that they want monopoly so they can control the market.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix