Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

The art of blog: credibility is in the eye of the beholder

By | September 19, 2009, 5:30pm PDT

Summary: While, in the past, analysts and journalists ruled the roost when delivering controversial and impactful information to the world, the new crowd of industry bloggers are taking their share of the spotlight, once they have successfully leveraged their industry network into a social-media setting.

Pink_eye Mark Stelzner roused some passions last week with a great blog post discussing how some traditional media are highlighting the need to regulate bloggers with possible “conflicts of interest”.  For example, Workforce Magazine’s online article discusses the impact of controversial HR bloggers, such as Cheezhead’s Joel Cheesman.

At the heart of the debate are the issues surrounding which industry entities are more credible for regaling information to the marketplace.  My take is that everyone has potential conflicts of interest, and blogging has leveled the playing field across industry entities (journalists, consultants, analysts / marketeers, vendors and users/practitioners). 

While, in the past, analysts and journalists ruled the roost when delivering controversial and impactful information to the world, the new crowd of industry bloggers are taking their share of the spotlight, once they have successfully leveraged their industry network into a social-media setting.  And while there is a real case to be concerned about the odd manipulative blogger furthering their own specific agenda, my take is that we’re in a new media world, where bloggers are earning trust and credibility over time with their respective audiences.   Let’s be honest here - every corner of the industry is potentially conflicted - here are some examples:

1. Magazines which sell advertising space to vendors adjacent to favorable articles that hightlight their products and services.  This has been commonplace for decades;

2. Analysts that produce case studies, or favorable write-ups, of their paying vendor clients (gasp!);

3. Consultants that take money from vendors for consulting or research work, and still run vendor-selection evaluations that involved those from whom they take money (shock! horror!);

4. Vendors which leverage compelling rose-tinted content to sell their own products (how could I dare suggest that?);

5. Users/Practitioners that have been influenced by their own past or present vendor relationships and lack a broader view of their industry (c’mon… we’ve all seen this). 

Bloggers are appearing from all these five mediums, and it doesn’t matter so much what they do for a day job - what matters is the credibility and style with which they deliver their blog-talk.  For example, when I began this blog, I worked for a management consultant, and since switching over to the analyst world two years’ ago, have seen very little difference with the audience regularly visiting here, or the tone of debate.  If anything, working for a reputable analyst brand can sometime hold you back from far-reaching opinions, if you’re not always backed up by some sort of datapoint.  

Most successful bloggers today seem to be coming out of consulting businesses (for example Deal ArchitectHuman Capitalist, Inflexion Point, Software Insider and SpendMatters) than any other business.  The next challenge is for some of the leading minds in vendors to use the blog-platform more effectively to air industry issues, not to mention experienced practitioners.  If anything, vendors are the least conflicted, as you know exactly what their agenda is.  When dealing with other entities, their agendas are not always so obvious, and you just have to roll with your own trust of the writer.

All-in-all, the judgment over the credibility of a blog is tied more to that individual airing his/her views, as opposed to their day-job. If a blogger is judged to be overly-biased, or obviously conflicted, other bloggers are always quick to point this out and challenge that blogger’s credibility.  Credibility is in the eye of the beholder, and bloggers who’ve earned their chops put theirs’ on the line every time they post.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: The art of blog: credibility is in the eye of the beholder
makrekwe3101-24353669781485155705239570023808 Updated - 5th Nov
Precious information, mulberry shop really a a small amount of many thanks for that creator. It will difficult for me from mulberry bags this day forward, nevertheless continually, this particular proficiency and moreover mulberry bag importance can be confusing.
0 Votes
+ -
Considering it's often all opinion anyways, I don't give anybody that much credibility.

The biggest thing I want is not so much a "lack of bias" but rather an abundance of facts. Facts, when combined with logic and a good dose of research to make sure important stuff isn't left out, will speak for themselves.

Which is hard to find these days, as it seems most bloggers or people in similar fields don't care about facts.
0 Votes
+ -
sad...
privatejarhead 19th Sep 2009
i (sadly) have to agree here since most of the blogs I ever see are those of bigotry and complete passion for some item/person/policy/etc. It's growing harder and harder to see a blog which posts links to its proofs. Oh well...never trusted online blogs anyways; that honor goes to published news sources.
Sorry Private,
Most bloggers by default have more credibility than many of these published news sources.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree..
planruse 20th Sep 2009
Trying to find a well researched and thought out blog is getting rarer everyday. I find the ones at arstechinca to be on average much better than the ones here. Posts by Ed Bott are normally well researched and dare I say Paul Murphy can write an intelligent piece now and again even though his bias against Microsoft falls off the end of the scale!
0 Votes
+ -
It is ALL opinion
Patanjali 20th Sep 2009
History IS opinion.
Science IS opinion, especially as taught in schools.
Economics is opinion.
99.999% of what is written on the WWW is opnion.

Newspapers are opinion. TV is opinion.
Though pictures, video and audio are given credibility as they are records of what has been, even if there was some judicious editing and association with accompaning opinion.

Yes, they MAY have some 'facts' on which they base those opinions.

In the end, one has to hone one's own BS meter and not get caught up in the glamour of one's own opinion.
I had a very interesting debate on twitter a month or so
ago about this issue with Heidi Moore, journalist formerly
of WSJ and The Deal. Since I blog on the Big 4 audit
industry, she had mistaken impression I was in bed with
them rather than holding their toes to fire as I do. I think
the 'professional" journalist attack on blogger credibility
comes from fear and loathing of competition rather than
some additional risk they haven't always had themselves in
the traditional media world. I'm actually more independent
and objective than any major media journalist because I
get no paycheck from Murdoch or any other mogul.

http://retheauditors.com
0 Votes
+ -
Refences anyone?
Marketing@... 22nd Sep 2009
Has the practice of citing references gone by the wayside? It seems most of the links found in various blogs are to other blogs, articles, etc. What about the authoritative citations we were all taught to make in school?
0 Votes
+ -
Facts or truth in full context
katrillionaire@... 25th Sep 2009
something the leftist propaganda media lacks. ABC, NBC, PBS, CNN, CBS are all controlled by the demorat party and are 100% communist propaganda. We want truth not some lapdog of leftist government that licks the demorat party's balls and anus.
Well I think that "making" yourslef credible is the wrong mentality here. If you want to be percieved as credible on the internet, then you should jsut be credible. Here is a good resource on this: http://www.internetcredibility.org
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The art of blog: credibility is in the eye of the beholder
makrekwe3101-24353669781485155705239570023808 Updated - 5th Nov
Precious information, mulberry shop really a a small amount of many thanks for that creator. It will difficult for me from mulberry bags this day forward, nevertheless continually, this particular proficiency and moreover mulberry bag importance can be confusing.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix