The touch computing digital divide: Is the mouse dead?
Summary: Microsoft kills its Courier dual screen tablet. HP's Slate may be on the rocks. Apple's Steve Jobs pans Adobe for catering to the mouse crowd. And HP buys Palm in a move to grab the WebOS. The common thread: The mouse is dead.
Microsoft kills its Courier dual screen tablet. HP's Slate may be on the rocks. Apple's Steve Jobs pans Adobe for catering to the mouse crowd (among about other reasons). And HP buys Palm in a move to grab the WebOS, which will presumably power smartphones as well as tablets from the company.
The common thread: There's a digital divide in the tech industry between operating systems that are touch and gesture based and applications geared toward the trusty mouse and keyboard.
The last 72 hours in tech-ville have been very interesting. There are multiple takes you can do. On the surface, you can always go with the corporate war approach: Apple vs. Adobe and HP vs. everyone in IT and HP alienating Microsoft as a partner. Or you can go with the mobile OS domination hook. After all, Microsoft's Courier is dead and HP's Slate could be in jeopardy because Windows 7 doesn't quite cut it as a system for a tablet. HP bought Palm for the WebOS and was very clear that the operating system will be on tablets. Mobile OSes---iPhone, Android and now WebOS---will rule the tablet roost.
However, all of these skirmishes boil down to a debate over the future of computing. The gesture and touch is replacing the mouse. If you're a developer you may have to ultimately pick a side.
Say what you will about Jobs' ode to Adobe's Flash, but the Apple CEO nails it when he lays out a touch computing world.
Flash was designed for PCs using mice, not for touch screens using fingers. For example, many Flash websites rely on “rollovers”, which pop up menus or other elements when the mouse arrow hovers over a specific spot. Apple’s revolutionary multi-touch interface doesn’t use a mouse, and there is no concept of a rollover. Most Flash websites will need to be rewritten to support touch-based devices. If developers need to rewrite their Flash websites, why not use modern technologies like HTML5, CSS and JavaScript?
Even if iPhones, iPods and iPads ran Flash, it would not solve the problem that most Flash websites need to be rewritten to support touch-based devices.
Now that's a loaded statement for sure, but if you strip out a little chest thumping the message is clear: We're headed to a touch-based world.
And when you boil down the HP-Palm acquisition you get the same feeling. Todd Bradley, executive vice president at HP, said there will be multiple form factors for tablets and home content consumption devices. HP has been playing with touch interfaces and Palm's WebOS would seal the deal.
It's not surprise that touch enabled operating systems are beginning to dominate everything outside of the PC. Tablets, smartphones and other newfangled devices will be all about touch. Two generations from now the mouse could be an artifact.
Motorola co-CEO Sanjay Jha talked a bit about converged devices on the company's earnings conference call. Those devices will likely be powered by another mobile operating system---Android.
I had always assumed that mobile operating systems would move upstream a bit as new form factors emerged. What I didn't bet on is that the mobile operating system would be potentially a dominant force that could make the mouse extinct.
The operating system at some point will need a rethink. The days of cramming a PC operating system on a new form factor---you don't see Apple trying OS X on a tablet---are just about over.
The big question is what will happen to software if touch dominates computing. Rewriting consumer applications and Web sites is one thing. But the enterprise application rewrite effort is almost impossible to ponder. Those rewrites are one reason that the touchscreen revolution is expected to bypass the enterprise---at least for now. In the not-too-distant future you may see a mouse as an entirely corporate affair with touch devices at home.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Not sure....
So yeah for certain things its the greatest fit for others not so much. Its not really a one size fits all solution. Thats just my opinion.
I agree. Plus for graphics, a mouse or
I have to agree
All I have to do is look at my daily job, even my daily personal use and ask, "if I had unlimited hardware, what could I do mouse vs touch?".
Most of my computing requires a mouse.
you are not thinking 4th dimensionally...
remember microsofts table top computer? or the sphere computer? R&D and every major tech company is already working on mouse free computing, it is just a matter of getting to a reasonable cost for computers, and making it simple to use. watch the weather on MSNBC (I know, sorry it is another M$ product, but you don't tend to see apple doing anything, except putting macbooks in movies) and watch the news, the news and the weather people are using multiple GIANT touch enabled screens that are apparently just as sensitive as anything that apple has made. (where is this in the consumer mobile world, I don't know, probably a patent issue). just watch them for a while as they "pull up" the screens they are talking about, or fling them off the display to close them, I was very impressed the first time I saw it. And yes I am sure there is a guy on the side with an additional attached display to the same computer, and he is setting all of it up with a mouse... pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
My main point is, the world HAS gone mouse free, we just can't afford it yet! so they are not marketing it or releasing the products to major retailers.
The only good thing about a touch scree in if you
holding your arm up for 8 hours...
I remember reading somewhere that a company making a tablet pc had put a touch interface on the back of the device that was used like a touch pad, but was the exact size of the screen, and where you touched the back corresponded to the location on the fron that was affected. the device itself sounds like it'll bomb... after all, where are you going to hold it? but there is a way companies are "trying" find an alternate way to interface with your screen instead of putting your hands in front of it...
You have nothing to worry about.
I remember Bill Gates was going to have us all sitting in the office shouting instructions at the computers.
Engelbart & English FTW
Bumping this basic but effective design concept with sticky fingers and mindless jabber prattle isn't going to come easily for the PC masses, other than where choice is limited - like hand held devices with their miniature form factors. Much in the same way the keyboard is the direct progeny of the typewriter, another device from yesteryear with a well thought-out design and ensuing track record adapted for computer use.
Yammering away for all to hear, and gooeying up one's monitor screen, remain second fiddle choices to the status quo as I see it, even well into the 21st century.
RE: The touch computing digital divide: Is the mouse dead?
For any environment where you have a desk available, a mouse/keyboard combo is faster, more accurate, doesn't smudge your screen, doesn't inhibit your vision while using it, and is VASTLY more ergonomic.
Too true...
TO get a good sense of this, walk into any Best Buy / Fry's Electronis and take a look at the display model of the HP Touchsmart - ouch!
The mouse can not die because of touch
For gosh sake even Apple has understood that even if iPad is mainly a consumption, a true keyboard could be needed for a significant amount of users.
Only horizontal or almost horizontal touch based such as Surface can offer a minimum of productivity with only touch based interface.
And even then the productivity use cases of surface like devices are quite limited.
We shall see if Natal like tech could enable a comparable productivity to keyboard+mouse but sincerily i doubt that.
RE: The touch computing digital divide: Is the mouse dead?
Touch in the enterprise? Only where it makes sense
Keyboard still better
Not gonna happen on desk
RE: The touch computing digital divide: Is the mouse dead?
False dilemma.
Touch is nice for some things, but:
-It isn't accurate enough to replace a lot of mouse
based activities.
A big concern for accuracy is that a lot of touch
based devices (those with capacitive technology) can't
be used with styluses.
Also, you don't really want to have your fingers over
the screen for everything. A lot of games don't work
well with the touch interface, and I don't imagine
that walking up to a big screen TV and messing with
onscreen controls is gonna be a big hit.
-PCs aren't dying. Just because you have a mobile
device available doesn't mean you'll stop using PCs at
home or at work. The best way to write lengthly
documents is still on a full size keyboard, and the
best way to watch movies and play games is still on a
large display.
Keyboards and mice are still the best controls for
large screen devices. Touch is nice for the smaller
form factors, but not so much for the large form
factors.
IMO this is just a big false dilemma. Touch is nice
for when you're mobile and don't want to break out a
laptop, but when somebody sits down for an extended
period of time, they expect to be using a laptop or
desktop, and it simply doesn't make sense to use
touch.
False dilemma -- The formal fallacy kind
//S
Re: Is the mouse dead?
keyboard. I'd rather deal with a click-able keyboard
on my desktop then eliminate my mouse.
The biggest complaint I have with a keyboard is
Keyboard Shortcuts and inadvertently hitting one or
more keys and having something happen to my work. Once
I wasted hours undoing a shortcut when my work
suddenly went to death screen blue with white text.
Get rid of Keyboard Shortcuts but never the mouse.
RE: The touch computing digital divide: Is the mouse dead?
<a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslisohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslichat</a>