U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
Summary: The U.S. government forced Google and a small Californian ISP to hand over data belonging to a Wikileaks volunteer, reports say.
The U.S. government used a controversial electronic eavesdropping law to force Google and a small Internet service provider into handing over email account data of a Wikileaks volunteer, the Wall Street Journal reported overnight.
Using a controversial law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act -- which allows the government and law enforcement to obtain email and phone records without a search warrant -- one of the companies fought the order through legal channels, but lost.
Both Google and Sonic.net, a small Internet provider based in Santa Rosa, California, were forced to turn over data to authorities, with Sonic resisting and fighting the warrant. The ISP told CNET that "we did manage to unsearl the specific order in order to provide it to Appelbaum", but could not offer any more details as the "the case remains under seal".
In response, according to security researcher Christopher Soghoian, Sonic.net has now "adopted a 2 week data retention policy for IP logs".
Search giant Google declined to comment on the issue, on whether it complied with the order or resisted, the Wall Street Journal said.
(Source: Ria Novosti)
Jacob Appelbaum, a Wikileaks volunteer and central to this case, had his email account searched for contacts and people he communicated with, rather than the contents of the emails that were sent and received, according to reports.
Though he has not been charged with any offence, the newspaper added, others report that he had been subject to interrogation at airports, nor has the government told Appelbaum why he is under surveillance.
The order Google received dated to the start of this year, January 4th, 2011, directing the search giant to reveal the IP address from which Applebaum logged into his Gmail account, along with the email addresses of those he communicated with dating back to November 1st, 2009.
Wikileaks angered and embarrassed the U.S. government with the release of the U.S. diplomatic cables this year and last, leading to the largest cache of classified material released into the public domain to date. Eric Holder, attorney general, is still investigating an "active criminal investigation" against the whistleblowing website.
Twitter fought a similar court order to hand over private information of Wikileaks supporters, including that of Appelbaum, as part of its ongoing investigation into the U.S. diplomatic cables leaks.
It is no secret, however, that under such investigations, government is more interested in who one communicates with, rather than the contents of such documents or email -- allowing law enforcement to build up a wider network of those involved and potential suspects, rather than warranted and difficult-to-obtain court orders, which can often tip off those involved to react with legal action.
Google started disclosing the number of requests it had received from the U.S. government in 2009. Including search warrants, subpoenas and requests under the controversial Electronic Communications Privacy Act, it complied with over 90 percent of those received.
Related:
- How 'National Unfriend Day' can prevent terrorism
- After WikiLeaks, White House tackles 'insider threat'
- US subpoenas Wikileaks tweets, and why this could affect you
- Wikileaks 'insurance' file decrypted: Names of informants exposed
- Wikileaks blames newspaper over 'insurance' file password disclosure
- CNET: Justice Department ramps up WikiLeaks e-mail probe
- ZDNet Special Report: Whistleblowers or terrorists? The Wikileaks story
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
It's his involvement in TOR
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
Eric holder and those who appointed him are not in the GOP. Sorry hippie
Not so secret
Since they haven't arrested him, at most he's a "person of interest" to them, or merely a witness.
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
Orders that are applied to broad fishing expeditions are more likely to be contested by companies, but they end up in compromises, not in overturning the order. If there is any "difficulty" in the process, it is getting the agent to exert some minimum amount of effort in writing the request in the first place.
Here's a question
how do you get a court order to search a suspect's email using a computer system compromised by the suspect?
Wouldn't he find out?
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
Criminals WITH badges are the worst kind. The Constitution is there to protect Americans from OUR government! Get off the couch and stand up for America!
Wikileaks is an evil vile corruption of free speach.
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act is un-Constitutional
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
Get Rid Of All IP Logs
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer
RE: U.S. issues secret, warrantless court order for email data of Wikileaks' volunteer