Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
Summary: There are two very important areas where Ubuntu Linux has significant advantages over both Windows 7 and Mac OS X. See what they are and join the discussion.
I've been using the latest version (10.04) of Ubuntu Linux since April and there's a lot to like about it. I announced earlier this year that I was giving desktop Linux another look, and I went with Ubuntu because it is the Linux distribution most focused on a desktop OS. I have lots of observations about the Ubuntu experience and how it compares to Mac and Windows, but I'm going to save most of that feedback for another article.
Today I want to talk about two significant advantages that Ubuntu has over Windows 7 and Mac OS X. This came up last week because Apple displaced Oracle as the new world leader in security vulnerabilities, according to a report from Secunia. And Ars Technica astutely pointed out:
"The report includes cumulative figures for the number of vulnerabilities found on a Windows PC with the 50 most widely-used programs. Five years ago, there were more first-party flaws (in Windows and Microsoft's other software) than third-party. Since about 2007, the balance shifted towards third-party programs. This year, third-party flaws are predicted to outnumber first-party flaws by two-to-one. Secunia also makes a case that effectively updating this third-party software is much harder to do; whereas Microsoft's Windows Update and Microsoft Update systems will provide protection for around 35% of reported vulnerabilities, patching the remainder requires the use of 13 or more updating systems. Some vendors-Apple, Mozilla, and Google, for example-do have decent automatic update systems, but others require manual intervention by the user."
That leads us to Ubuntu's first big advantage.
1. Comprehensive software updates
In a world where most of the security vulnerabilities are coming from third-party applications, Windows and Mac machines are at significant risk because they run lots of these apps and those apps aren't always updated automatically, which leaves the machines open to attacks.Again, to be clear, both Microsoft and Apple have comprehensive updating systems for their software -- both the OS as well as company apps that run on top of the OS. The problem is with the software (programs, extensions, and plug-ins) from other vendors and the inconsistent methods they use for updating their code to protect against known flaws.
With Ubuntu, there's one comprehensive software updating system. This is possible because Ubuntu has a centralized repository of applications and the only third-party applications that make it into the main repository are the ones that have been tested by Canonical (the company that produces Ubuntu) and are proven to work with the OS. This means that the Ubuntu main repository doesn't always have the very latest version of Firefox, for example, but you can be sure that the one it does have will typically install easy, work smoothly, and remain updated automatically.
There are also other repositories of applications that you can connect to with Ubuntu, but these are supported by the Ubuntu community or by commercial companies. Still, if you trust them and connect to them, then their updates are also automatically run through Ubuntu's Update Manager (below). As a result, Ubuntu offers a much more centralized and effective way to keep computers up to date -- especially if you stick mostly to the software in its main repository.
2. Integrated app store
While managing Ubuntu's software repositories is handled with an administrator tool called Synaptic Package Manager, there's also a much easier way to browse through the official Ubuntu-sanctioned applications. It's called the Ubuntu Software Center and the people I know who have used both Ubuntu and the iPhone typically say, "It's just like the App Store."From a user perspective, the Ubuntu Software Library has a very similar experience to the iPhone App Store or the Android Market. You simply open it up, browse or search through different categories of applications, and download the ones that you want to try. It's basically an app store for the PC.
And, while iPhone and Android have a mix of free apps and paid apps, the apps in the Ubuntu Software Center are nearly all open source and free of charge. Like iPhone and Android, you have to sort through a fair amount of chaff in order to get to the wheat, but it's still a terrific 21st century computing experience. Both Windows and Mac need to learn from the app experience that is driving the mobile device market. Ubuntu has already beaten them to the punch.
If you add that to the fact that Ubuntu does a better job with software updates (a big security boost), then Ubuntu becomes a much more viable alternative for modern PC users, especially those who access most of their services and enterprise apps via a Web browser.
You can also find me on Twitter: @jasonhiner
Also read
- What's the best laptop for running Ubuntu Linux?
- Interview: Ubuntu founder talks 10.04, cloud integration, and Ubuntu on tablets
- The market has rejected Linux desktops. Get over it.
- Open source is filled with freeloaders (ZDNet)
- 10 things you'll love about Ubuntu 10.04
- 10 things I don't like about Ubuntu 10.04
This article was originally published on TechRepublic.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Bogus
Instead, Canonical relies on the community to weed out the malicious elements.
The basic problem persists: How to trust software you download from the Internet. Ubuntus software repository does not (end neither does any other repository) guarantee you that they'll catch malicious submissions.
As clearly demonstrated recently with Firefoxs extension repository where a password sniffing extension was discovered by a mere coincidence.
What will you do when real world evidence insists on disproving you?
Answer: You cry foul and despite all evidence to the contrary you claim it's bogus and hope people won't notice how flawed your opinions are.
Let me remind you that opinions don't make facts and no matter how opinionated and loud you are reality is there to prove that you are wrong.
Right, that's why your opinions ain't matter
It's not necessary to check each line... but the pieces...
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
What would you say any normal user need that is NOT in the repository ?
How about one from the blog:
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
I agree with you totally, how many packages does the above average user really need. For Ha-Ha's I opened up synaptic packager in U-10.04 and it lists 30,100 packages and I'm using 1,648 so it only leave me 28,452 packages left to play around with. That should take me a few days. :-)
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
Be careful not to add untrusted sources, but they don't need to be the official ones.
As for all of those complaining that Ubuntu doesn't fully check every application, where can I get anything even close for Windows? You download the Windows apps from hundreds of unrelated web sites, hoping each is trustworthy, and good luck find all of the updates.
Well said.
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
In your rush to blast the article you missed the entire point. It's at least better to be able to push out updates for vulnerable apps.
ignore
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
Good points.
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
Yes, but...
I agree that probably most of us Windows-types don't "get" Linux. Might I offer this - why is that? Are we really so "hung up" on MS that we refuse to consider Linux? Or do we see things about Linux that we don't like and really can't be bothered exchanging a known set of problems for an unknown set? These are genuine questions, not bait.
I am still considering having a play with Ubuntu - and may even get to it this week! To be fair, I have little problem with Windows - whether XP, Vista or 7 (I've just migrated my last XP machine across to a spare Vista Business license - but think I'll go thru to 7...). It is true that many PC "noobs" are shockers when it comes to maintaining their machines (regardless of type & flavour), but I put the blame for that squarely on the chain stores who market PC of all types (and let's face it, a Mac is still a Personal Computer) as an appliance.
Is Linux REALLY ready for people who have trouble knowing what the left & right mouse buttons do? Is it REALLY "intuitive" in how it works, updates and such? How easy is it to "break"? Again, these are all genuine questions. If the answer to all those is in Linux's favour, what's the problem? My guess that part of the problem is fanboi-ism - the likes of Ubuntu needs to be "marketed" as a OS, not as a religion... ;)
I'll be interested to see how my tinkering goes with Ubuntu (and speaking or marketing - PLEASE get better names! - the Linux ones are so naff and twee that it's embarrassing!) - the last quick foray into Linux 4 year's ago had me spending 30 minutes looking for how to change the screen resolution... :)
The lovely thing about the community weeding out
"Hey, when you get infected, let us know, OK?"
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
It's worked pretty well since the mid-90s<br><br>Now let's compare that to the windoze security mode, shall we?<br><br> ;)
RE: Ubuntu's two big advantages over Windows and Mac
@LTV10
@nick