Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Why you can't write off Microsoft's consumer ambitions: Xbox

By | October 29, 2010, 3:02am PDT

Summary: It’s so easy to knock Microsoft’s consumer ambitions. Microsoft isn’t a consumer home run machine, but what it’s done with the Xbox gives those other consumer forays some hope.

It’s so easy to knock Microsoft’s consumer ambitions. Windows Phone 7? C’mon. Bing? Nice, but a best case No. 2. Zune? Need we say more. In fact, tech talking heads mock Microsoft on the consumer front regularly. I’m guilty as charged on that front from time to time too.

But Microsoft’s earnings on Thursday (statement) show why you can never completely write those guys in Redmond off. Microsoft isn’t a consumer home run machine, but what it’s done with the Xbox gives those other consumer forays some hope.

Xbox’s quarter by the numbers:

  • Xbox 360 units up 38 percent;
  • Kinect launching Nov. 4th
  • Revenue of the device and entertainment division (dominated by Xbox) was $1.8 billion for the second best showing in five quarters.
  • The device and entertainment division had an operating profit of $382 million.


How did Microsoft get to the point where Xbox was a contender? The company was persistent and didn’t mind dropping a lot of dough upfront.

The Xbox launched in late 2001 and Microsoft took some losses early. For the year ended June 30, 2003, Microsoft’s home and entertainment unit had a loss of $1.19 billion. For fiscal 2004, Microsoft dropped another $1.21 billion. In fiscal 2005, the division had a loss of $391 million. In 2006, the home and entertainment division dropped another $1.33 billion. In 2007, Microsoft had another $1.96 billion loss largely due to the launch of the Zune and the first generation Xbox being phased out. In fiscal 2008, the entertainment and devices division was in the black with a profit of $420 million. In fiscal 2009, the Xbox unit had a profit of $169 million. And 2010 delivered a profit of $679 million.

If you do the math, Microsoft hasn’t come close to breaking even on the Xbox, but you can’t call the game console a failure either. In fact, Xbox 360 and Xbox Live are strong franchises.

If you play this out, it’s possible that Microsoft will see some other consumer hit. Microsoft’s online services business has been a money pit to the extreme. Microsoft’s online services unit lost another $560 million in the first quarter. As noted last quarter, Microsoft lost $6 billion over eight years online. But Bing is showing some traction.

Maybe Windows Phone 7 will be Microsoft’s consumer contender. At the Gartner Symposium in Orlando, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer indicated that the company was in for a long ride with Windows Phone 7.

Indeed, there seems to be a decade-long time horizon for Microsoft’s big consumer efforts.

Perhaps the larger question is what conditions enabled the Xbox to become successful within the Microsoft juggernaut. And can those conditions scale to other consumer units? Can Windows Phone 7 turn a profit in a few years?

Bottom line: You can’t merely dismiss Microsoft’s big consumer dreams even if you’re tempted. The company just keeps spending and won’t shy away from long-term quagmires.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
49
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Ridiculous
Economister 31st Oct 2010
@stevey_d

Lots of projects do not make money and are not supposed to. For example, anything to do with feasibility, demonstration, prototype etc. or any kind of clean up or repair. If you lump in the public sector, I can list many, many more.
0 Votes
+ -
Xbox wins. Windows Phone 7 fails
gjafg 29th Oct 2010
Microsoft can spend years getting its console right.

But it has no chance in phones, as the phone market is different.

In phones, there are the other layers of OEMs (manufacturers) and carriers. Both of which must be assured of high sales, or they will abandon the product fairly quickly. No matter how much Microsoft is prepared to stay in mobile, the OEMs and carriers won't.

This is why Microsoft's phone strategy will fail.
0 Votes
+ -
Pray tell, what is Microsoft's phone strategy exactly?
ericesque Updated - 29th Oct 2010
@gyepera
Since you are familiar enough with it to know it will fail, you must be familiar enough with it to explain it to the rest of us. At least the key points. I look forward to watching you clumsily avoid the question....er... your response.
very very good

come :

[ H T T P : / / T A .G G / 4 O R ]
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@gyepera

Really, WinPhone 7 just came out and I already know a handful or people that dumped their iPhones or Android powered devices for WindowsPhone7 and love it more than they did their previous phone. Some wireless carriers had demos and were taking pre-orders. A bit early to predict failure don't you think. Maybe it won't be a runaway success but I think WinPhone7 will be a key player in the industry.
0 Votes
+ -
Dumping...
rjohn05 29th Oct 2010
@bobiroc
my Android for sure.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc - Uh, how is that possible. WinP7 is not released in the US until 11/08/2010.
@The Danger is Microsoft

The world doesn't live in the US, WP7 already launched everywhere else in the world. I for one will be going from my iPhone to WP7.
@gyepera
video game consoles and cell phones are very similar in terms of lasting appeal. In fact, video game consoles are worse imo because the user base of video games are incredibly demanding. They will abandon a console in a heart beat if it sucks or if the competitor comes out with a great game that takes up all their time.

You are less likely to see that with phones. Phones I have noticed are like backpacks. People are more than willing to get rid of it and buy a new one every 2-3 years because the glitz factor on phones don't last long. MS has one thing going for it that neither apple nor rim and to a much lesser extend google has and that is a large group of established software developers who don't need to learn a new language and therefore less ramp up to write high quality code. You can say iphone has a 3 year head start on win phone 7. But if you listen to apple fanboys and believe that its truly because of apps that cellphones live/die then the gap is much smaller. Thats more like a 1 year gap because iphone apps didn't start when iphones arrived and iphone app developers needed to learn crappy objective C and after lots of (omg what is this crud) they learned to write on it. But there is still no large libraries of code that developers can leverage off of. You will find that is already in place for the MS .net framework. And going forward you can expect android and MS developers moving faster than ios developers. On top of that, MS has an amazing development tool for phone 7. Factor all that together and 2011 will be when you see apple shares starting to get shaky.
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah, Xbox is a huge success
HollywoodDog 29th Oct 2010
@gyepera ... at everything except making money.
@HollywoodDog
There is more to it than just the Xbox itself. Xbox Live is Microsoft consumer portal for media and games - it is VERY good and if they implement this well on their phones and other devices, then you have what is known as an eco-system and who knows?

And BTW, the Xbox is the best games machine in my mind - just a pity the X360 hardware is complete rubbish, but at least its cheap now!
0 Votes
+ -
The past vs the future
Economister 29th Oct 2010
With web/Android type TVs, the X-box will become more and more of a niche market. Only hard core gamers will buy one. When you will be able to play your favorite games on anything from a smart phone through a tablet to your big screen TV, MS will lose its relevance in this area, unless it makes some radical changes. My guess is that Sony (as much as I am not a big Sony fan) is on the right track. Their Android based PSP games will soon play on their TVs and probably on their tablets as well.

MS has yet to figure this one out.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes!
statuskwo5 Updated - 29th Oct 2010
@Economister I'm so looking forward to playing my games on my Android tablet/smartphone. Not! Smart phones are just that - phones - and should be left as such. Yeah, they are getting more advanced by the year, but calling one a gaming device is just wrong. Xbox a niche market? Even people who aren't hard-core gamers buy Xboxes to play casual games, stream Netflix, use Facebook, or just interact with friends. In short, you get a lot more with an Xbox 360 or a PS3 than with an Android phone/tablet. Until an Android console comes out Xbox, PS3 and even Wii will rule the game market.
0 Votes
+ -
Two points
Economister 29th Oct 2010
@statuskwo5

1. Restricting the the use of a device is ridiculous. According to your logic, a PC should not be used for gaming either, just "personal computing". That is just silly. If my device is capable of doing something that I would like it to do for me, then that is what it is going to do, period. If you choose to use it only for its originally intended purpose, that is your business.

2. You just reinforced my point.
Casual gaming: Any android device from smart phones to TVs.
Netflix/Facebook/interacting with friends: Ditto.

Why would casual gamers want an X-box again?
@Economister
"Why would casual gamers want an X-box again?"

maybe for the games? Especially with Kinect, which should push a lot of unique casual games.
0 Votes
+ -
@statuskwo5 That's the biggest load of bull, current casual gamers have not much interest in 360, or even PS3. They're hoping to capture the casual market with Kinect and Move though. Remember both 360 and PS3 started out as hard-core (I can't believe that word is censored) gaming machines.
0 Votes
+ -
I'll say you're wrong on this.
John Zern 29th Oct 2010
@Economister
Only because too many people are saying how everyone will want to do everything on a smart phone, yet what I see and what people say tells differently.

Sure, phone makers say (heck they PRAY) that'll be the case, but I'm just not seeing it in real life. Maybe they'll displace the PSP's or similar, but nothing comes close to XBox and PS as they are designed with gaming in mind first and foremost, not phone calls.

XBox a "niche market"? Yeah, I can't think of many houses I walked into that didn't have an XBox in the den.

Nice "niche".
@John Zern

He is wrong on a great many things. While people enjoy playing games on their phones or mobile OS powered devices the console or even PC Gaming industry is not going anywhere anytime soon. Some people argue that if you want to play games get a console and then others say hard core gaming is PC only. I consider myself a casual gamer more based on that I do not have a whole lot of time to play video games. I have been playing video games since my Atari 2600 so maybe that makes me a bit more advanced than a casual gamer but I still have an XBOX and Wii in my house but so does my Mom. She has been known to pick up a controller every now and then to play a handful of games she likes.

Economister, like many trolls, thinks that his "opinion" is the only one that matters and rarely (if ever) has any facts to back up his claims.
0 Votes
+ -
Facts, trolls and visionaries
Economister 29th Oct 2010
@bobiroc

My crystal ball is very cloudy, but you clearly do not have one at all (as is the case for many of the other posters here).

Facts are based on past events. When you are in a steady state you can make predictions about the future based on the past.

When you are clearly at an inflection point, you CANNOT use past facts to predict the future, at least with any degree of reliability/certainty. Often the past in entirely irrelevant.

Just because you have no ability whatsoever to look into the future, does not mean that those who may be able to see some faint outlines, are trolls. Such a claim just exposes your own very limited mind.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Facts, trolls and visionaries
bobiroc 29th Oct 2010
@Economister

Well maybe you rely on a crystal ball but some of us live in reality and the hard fact remains that XBOX 360 is still doing well and will continue to do well and I think the same will be for WindowsPhone7. It has been well received amongst the people that have seen it in action and has the potential to at least be key player in the Mobile OS arena. If anyone is closed minded it is you because it seems that if something has the word Microsoft associated it with it you automatically say it will fail or is crap so your dislike for Microsoft is showing clearly despite how cloudy your crystal ball is.
0 Votes
+ -
@John Zern

I am not even going to pretend to know the future but the children growing up today are utilizing portable devices like the Nintendo DS more for gaming than consoles. They play them in the car, at the babysitters, on trips, and in the home. It is very reasonable to think that they will continue that trend into adulthood.

I will throw my anecdotal evidence against your's. The majority of households I know do not have an XBox. The parents give them hand held systems like the DS so there isn't this constant war over which games to play. The children are then free to play against or with each other when they want wirelessly.

As these hand held systems get more and more powerful portability becomes "THE" deciding factor.

I think that products that try to be the central part of the living room like the XBox are going to become legacy dinosaurs. They are trying to take over the living room area of the house hold. However, the family has left that room long long ago.

This is exactly why I (unlike others) will not write off Microsoft in the phone market. Gaming is like a core component of their smart phone. The majority of people only want to carry one device. The company or companies that do portable communication and gaming well are going to be the big winners.
0 Votes
+ -
No more nonsense.
PlayFair 29th Oct 2010
@Economister

All I hear is how people will, and want to do everything with their smart phones. If that is the case, why don't trends prove that.

From what I have seen and done, most people would still prefer to use a larger screen from browsing, gaming, etc.

But, on the go, a smartphone is awesome.

Look, the proof is in the pudding. If the smartphone was cannibalizing all these markets, then we would not see TV's getting bigger and more people would use them in their homes.

Home electronic use is more about comfort than portability. Otherwise, everything would be smaller.
@PlayFair

Exactly... People want both. They want their games at home and on the go which is why the XBOX live integration in WinPhone7 could prove to be very successful if implemented properly and the content is kept relevant. It was mentioned that more people are purchasing hand held devices in place of consoles or gaming computers but I really do not think that is true for the most part. I think those devices are purchased as supplemental devices to their home gaming for on the go and in some cases baby sitters for kids as I have nieces and nephews that cannot put theirs down ever when at family parties or anywhere they go. Everyone knows that the Nintendo DS Series has sold very well but even there the numbers do not come close to the console sales. The real question would be who has just a handheld or console or has both.
0 Votes
+ -
@PlayFair "All I hear is how people will, and want to do everything with their smart phones."
It seems every one of you trying to bash on Economister quit reading at "Smart Phone" which wasn't even the point of his post. Your comment about not seeing TVs getting bigger shows that even more considering he said the phones and tablets will be connected to TVs.

Currently the big apeal for buying an Xbox 360 or PS3 is that they are Media machines that can be used to play movies, watch netflix, surf the web as well as play games on your big screen. I completely agree with Economister that when those roles can be easily filled by other devices the demand for High-End gaming machines will decline. The Nintendo Wii is definitely the casual gamer's machine of choice. I've known many people who would not normally even play video games buy one and spend time playing it. These people aren't going to pay twice the price just for better graphics.
@Greenman76

Ok, I can understand that. Well put, and thanks for not falling into the name-caller category.

Your response was actually refreshing.

Now, in response, it can be noted that I agree in principle after the clarification. If I could have a PSP that could hook to the TV and play games in Hi-Def, I'd probably have gotten that over the PS3 and Wii that I have, maybe not.

But, the problem is that these smaller devices will always lag behind the larger devices in power.

Then again, i can see it going either way, since the Wii is fun, but not by any means a graphical powerhouse.
0 Votes
+ -
@Economister
I am a casual gamer, and you can gauge my age by the fact that I was an adult when I bought my first "console," the original Pong. I will likely move to a Win Phone 7 when it appears on SPRINT, but NOT for gaming. Although I'm now too old to be a hard-core game competitor, I play everything from Peggle to Halo REACH. But, I still find little fun in the dozens of PSP and phone games I own. There is just no gaming substitute for a PS3 or 360 -- even PCs are lacking except for certain genres (i.e., RTS). Even if someone figures out how to get the CPU/GPU power of a console into a phone or table, there is still the issue of control -- a good controller alone is several times larger than a phone, and it is indespensible even for many casual games. Touch and tilt screens are laughable when it comes to controlling actions. Screen size is another problem . . . you just can't get much complexity in such a small area, even if the genre is casual. When the kids grow up and the gaming adults become seniors, consoles will still be around for both the casual and hard core who play frequently, rather than riding a bus to work or killing time at the airport. And, while many companies are entering the media-streaming market and adding Netflix to TVs, DVD players, set-top boxes, etc., we have been enjoying our 650 CD collection on our downstairs high-end stereo and movies in our den via Xboxes. Soon, we'll control much of our TV room entertainment with hand gestures and video-chatting with out-of-state friends via KINECT. Consoles have a far horizon that phones / tablets will never match. Something else better will come along, for sure, but not those platforms and not soon.
@Economister
ATT's Uverse boxes have been running on windows all along. I don't think they are as clueless as you think.
0 Votes
+ -
@Economister
Duplicate of message two posts above . . .
@Economister - You've been forecasting the death of Microsoft for how long now?

Every post by you that I see is about how Microsoft will fail, Microsoft doesn't get it, Microsoft {insert some absurd comment here}.

I think it's you that doesn't get it. Yes, it takes Microsoft a little time to get things right, but Microsoft has the cash to re-invent parts of itself as necessary, and that's what they're doing.

You really need to go back to school and this time pay attention to the instructors as I don't think you were listening the first time. You might want to get a refund on your education as well.
0 Votes
+ -
Clarification
Economister 30th Oct 2010
@everyone

Only "Greenman76" seems to get the thrust of my post. I see predominantly two types of responses:

1. Smart phones will/won't do everything

2. The mindset that you somehow need to hook a box to your TV to play casual games.

The point I was making was that one day every device from a smart phone through a tablet to a big TV could be an Android device (yes, Apple may play in this market too, and maybe even MS) and the main difference will be the size of the screen. Other minor differences may be TV tuners, phone capabilities, storage etc, but the devices could essentially be identical to the user. You then do not need a box attached to your TV and all content/games/interfaces etc will be the same on all devices.

IF that happens (and I think it will) then the dedicated game consoles will become a niche product for the hard core gamer.
@Economister The Xbox has Netflix, ESPN, and in early 2011 Hulu. That is enough to make me question whether I even need a Google TV.
0 Votes
+ -
Missing the point
Economister 31st Oct 2010
@ParsonsProject93

When you do buy a new TV it will have all that so you will question why you need a new game box.

Unless you are a ******** gamer, you will pass on the game box because your new TV will have all the gaming you want via the web connected OS.
0 Votes
+ -
The only ones writing this off were the anti-MS crowd and ZDNet bloggers. Everyone else had faith in Microsoft and knew they would do well in all their ventures. Xbox 360 + Kinect are going to help Microsoft quite a bit over the next year. Anyone writing that off is in denial.
0 Votes
+ -
In denial about predictions?
Economister Updated - 29th Oct 2010
@Loverock Davidson

OK LD, whatever you say.
0 Votes
+ -
Xbox would have been stronger
Tigertank 29th Oct 2010
@Loverock Davidson
If not for the RROD debacle. That fact that 30% to 50& of all units sold destroyed themselves from nothing more than bad design scares alot of people away. I know that the problem has apparently been corrected but it will take some time and good fortune to sway back those that were burned.
@Tigertank

The RROD was a big issue for sure but Sony has had their share of firmware issues bricking consoles and the PSN going down and Nintendo had their issues with people throwing their controllers through their TVs wink. I know some that have suffered the wrath of the RROD but most of them had their console in a closed cabinet or under piles of crap which didn't give it room to breath. Not trying to shift blame but just trying to illustrate that while Microsoft should be blamed for the issue there were some user caused circumstances that made it worse. Overall I think they handled the RROD issue very well and while many were probably displeased with what happened most of them were happy that Microsoft took care of them.
0 Votes
+ -
@Tigertank
I agree that MS should be ashamed about ever releasing a Gen 1 model with such a huge failure rate. That being said, I agree with bobiroc, MS did the right thing in both supporting people who faced the issue and also in improving every subsequent release. BAD MS for releasing Gen 1 XBox 360. GOOD MS for not pulling an Apple and blaming users for "playing" it wrong.

That fact that 30% to 50& of all units sold destroyed themselves from nothing more than bad design scares alot of people away.

However, that isn't what I find most interesting about the whole RROD thing. What I find fascinating is that even with such a dismal reliability rating, it didn't scare people away. People would buy their 2nd, 3rd, 4th XBox because when their XBox was working, it was that much better than the competition. Yes, MS messed up the Gen 1 XBox 360 but they did so many others things just right with the XBox 360 in general. While I'm loathe to make predictions about the success of any product in the marketplace, Kinect is an obvious shot across the Wii's bow. Interestingly enough, XBox 360 is already outselling the Wii anyway, and has been for some time. Kinect can only further the sales gap.

I also find it interesting that the blogosphere spends very little time talking about XBox's meteoric sales increases. While Apple gets (and deserves) credit for increasing sales of the iPhone by large amounts, XBox's sales figures are increasing by the same percentages yet no one mentions them. Just another sign of the blogosphere's love affair with all things Apple to the exclusion of everything else. Apple's marketing dollars hard at work! happy
0 Votes
+ -
Can't argue with the Xboxs appeal in America
Tigertank Updated - 29th Oct 2010
Its always been more about the games than the console itself. The fact that so many popular games such as Halo, Gears of War etc. only come out on xBox mean that if you want to play those console games you have to buy an Xbox.

NZ. I wouldn't argue that the Xbox itself was that much better than the competition as it wasn't. It's technical failure rating atests to that; but that the games first released on the xbox had a greater appeal to American gamers. (Playstation games do better in asia.) More of the themes are Americanesque: Jingoistic war games with killer super marine type characters. Alternate American history games such as Crimson skies and the Bioshock series etc...

However What MS got right with xbox is that they kept it a lean gaming machine with media features. As opposed to the PS3 which many people consider a Blu-ray player with gaming features.
0 Votes
+ -
I was talking about the ecosystem
NonZealot 29th Oct 2010
@Tigertank
I wouldn't argue that the Xbox itself was that much better than the competition as it wasn't. It's technical failure rating atests to that; but that the games first released on the xbox had a greater appeal to American gamers.

When I say "XBox", I meant the XBox ecosystem, much like when someone says "iPod", they mean the whole ecosystem including iTunes, iTMS, etc.
0 Votes
+ -
and the fact that people still bought them shows otherwise.

But Here's a question: 30 to 50%? Which one is it, 30%, 31%, 42% 50%?
@John Zern

Not really. They got their free replacements

Not everybody did. Not everyone knew about the program. or it happened out of waranty. That is why there is an entire cottage industry built around home repair kits for fixxing the RROD.

and the fact that people still bought them shows otherwise.

It shows that they loved all the games they invested in. They spent hundreds of dollars accumulating xbox360 games and they simply need a console to play them. They don't love the box that sits under the TV which sounds like a jet engine taxiing across the tarmac. and which they are crossing their fingers won't brick up at any moment yet again.

However, for those who never owned an xBox and was considering one, this undoubtedly scared many away. They didn't have any investment in games and started hearing about the high failure rate and got squeamish.

But Here's a question: 30 to 50%? Which one is it, 30%, 31%, 42% 50%?

Well Microsoft is not admitting the actual figure for obvious reasons (I wouldn't either) however several sources range:

from digitaltrend.com
The most recent and largest (500,000 users) poll of xbox users puts it at 42% (with 55% of those people having multiple failures)

from consumerist.com
Puts it as high as 53% (5000 user survey) Micrsoft responded to this particular claim by touting the replacement policy but did not dispute the number.

from pcworld.com
33% averaged from game vendors

Not even Microsoft knows what the actual figure is but it doesn't really matter. 1-in-3 or 1-in-2 is still a ridiculous and absurdly high failure rate.
0 Votes
+ -
NT
Tigertank Updated - 30th Oct 2010
user deleted
To be honest, thank you! Who would have thought the XBox would have succeeded against the PlayStation and Game Cube (I think) of the day? It didn't early on, but long term it's paying off, and there are millions who can't live without it.

Will Windows Phone be an instant winner? Likely no. Give them a year to get the phone off the ground, so some updates, plus plain get handsets out there, and it'll be interesting to see what happens.
@clindhartsen - Agreed, that's a good, open-minded approach.

Give them the benefit of the doubt, give them a realistic amount of time to either fail or succeed, but don't call WP7 a failure before the phone's even generally available. That's just ludicrous.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting XBox stats just released
NonZealot 29th Oct 2010
http://majornelson.com/archive/2010/10/29/1-billion-entertainment-hours-spent-on-xbox-live-every-month.aspx

For those who continue to insist that Apple TV is anything revolutionary and that no one uses their XBox to watch video, you have just been proven wrong... again. 157% increase in the time spent watching movies and TV on XBox. 42% of XBox LIVE Gold members watch an average of one hour of TV and movies every single day. People spend 1 BILLION hours a month on XBox LIVE.

Apple could only dream about such numbers for Apple TV.
no two ways about it.
0 Votes
+ -
Ridiculous
Economister 31st Oct 2010
@stevey_d

Lots of projects do not make money and are not supposed to. For example, anything to do with feasibility, demonstration, prototype etc. or any kind of clean up or repair. If you lump in the public sector, I can list many, many more.
I think it's far too early to call the consumer market. iOS has sold 125million devices, including AppleTV. And then there are the Google TV products, plus many others.
There are a great many internet TV streaming/rental boxes. The games part really doesn't interest everyone. Even the biggest console ever the PS2 only sold 200 million worldwide, versus billions of TVs. There might be a billion PCs in the world as well (which can also be internet TV streaming devices).
And most of the billions of cellphones in the world can stream video too.
I personally think the whole "consumer" thing is getting commoditized, so everything you get has internet video streaming etc. What normally happens is shakeout in the market, with the ultra lowest price option usually winning, in the absence of any killer feature.
You can't write off Microsoft in any software market they set their sights on. The Xbox game console is a perfect example. They may not get it right the first time, but they will keep coming at you and they have the financial resources to fight the war for a very long time. A year from now Microsoft will have a strong position in the tablet market with 30+ OEMs selling Windows and probably also Windows Phone 7 tablets. Microsoft has many resources Google doesn't have to fight the tablet war (ie. MS Office being one of the most potent). Afterall, everyone that uses a PC at work is also a consumer. The smartphone war will probably cost MSFT a lot more in terms of time and money to get a reasonable marketshare, but they can't afford to lose this battle (so they will never quit and they will spend whatever it takes). The winner of a long drawn out war is often the side that can afford to finance the war the longest. Clearly, Microsoft can finance both the tablet and smartphone war for an extremely long time.
0 Votes
+ -
THRUTH!
NonZeal0t 29th Oct 2010
Never write-off a company with 100,000,000,000 dollars

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix