Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Wikileaks suspends publication of secrets amid 'financial blockade'

By | October 24, 2011, 5:13am PDT

Summary: Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, said today that the organisation would cease publication of secrets to focus on lifting the “financial blockade” by major U.S. banks.

LONDON – Julian Assange announced today at a press conference in the British capital, that it would suspend the publication of secrets to focus on raising funds to continue operations.

Speaking today, Assange told reporters that Wikileaks must “continue to fight the blockade” imposed by major U.S. banks.

The Wikileaks founder introduced the event in front of a backdrop of Visa, Bank of America, Mastercard and PayPal logos displayed upside down.

The ‘financial blockade’, which began in December 2010, only ten days after the initial release of the U.S. diplomatic cables, caused Wikileaks to lose 95 percent of its revenue, Assange said, adding that the organisation has been running on cash reserves for the past 11 months.

In a statement, Wikileaks said: “In order to ensure our future survival, Wikileaks is now forced to temporarily suspend its publishing operations and aggressively fund-raise in order to fight back against this blockade and its proponents”.

“The U.S. government itself found that there were no lawful grounds to add Wikileaks to a U.S. financial blockade. But the blockade of Wikileaks by politicised U.S. finance companies continues regardless”, he added.

Wikileaks’ financial troubles began after the ‘Cablegate’ releases, where the organisation published tens of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables from embassies around the world. As the largest leak of classified material in U.S. history, many organisations Wikileaks had used restricted or denied the self-styled media organisation from its services.

This led to Anonymous, the hacktivist group associated with public message boards and forums, to backlash against the companies with denial-of-service attacks.

PayPal, Visa and other major U.S. banks aside, other technology companies like Amazon had pulled the plug on Wikileaks, claiming reasons such as breaking terms of service, to avoid potential conflicts of interest whilst operating under U.S. law.

In September, after a row with the Guardian newspaper, which led to a password being published in a book by a Guardian journalist, Wikileaks published the full unredacted cables from the Cablegate files.

Wikileaks began pre-litigation action against the financial blockade in Iceland, Denmark, the UK, in Brussels, the United States and Australia.

Assange is currently fighting extradition at appeal level as he remains on bail. His appeal outcome is expected in the coming weeks, which may lead to his prosecution in the United States.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from CNN, the Huffington Post, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
52
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Wikileaks suspends publication of secrets amid 'financial blockade'
Mahegan 12th Dec
@William Farrell Yes Iyou are, actually. Banks are propped up by government. By law, they are not allowed to "refuse service" just because they don't like the customer.
What about freedom of speech now? Or is it only relevant when the target is Muslims?
@khawaja.umar.farooq@... This isn't about freedom of speech, it is stolen documents that were lableled as confidential and top secret...
@Peter Perry
Freedom of the press is a bit more apropo.
0 Votes
+ -
@hoaxoner the idea that wikileaks is now "journalism" is new packaging. Wikileaks began with the goal of being nihilisticc gadflys, not journalists.
@Peter Perry So... if Top Secret documents that show the US Govt breaking the law shouldnt be publicized?
@Peter Perry Agreed, the man is not a hero he's pretty much scum IMO.
  • Flagged
@Bodazapha, is it OK if the cops search your person and house without a warrant if they think you've committed a crime?
@khawaja.umar.farooq@... You are so correct! Freedom of speech when it suits and freedom of religion when it's the approved religion.
@khawaja.umar.farooq@...
Free speach is live and well. Also live and well is the idea that speech has consequences. Wikileaks found this out after the fact. My Mom used to tell me, "Be careful of what you say!"
Disgracefully, PayPal has also suspended the account of The Expendable Project (http://www.expendable.tv)

This is the project which is exposing the Australian government's grotesque sale of the human rights of Schapelle Corby.
0 Votes
+ -
You play with the bull...
Hallowed are the Ori 24th Oct
... sometimes you get the horns, Asshat.... er, Assange.
0 Votes
+ -
He yells "we're releasing bank documents because we (wikileeks) don't like the way theses mean banks operate and want to bring them down", yet still expects the banks to process wikileaks payments for them, ?

Am I missing something here?
0 Votes
+ -
My thought as well.
Bruizer 24th Oct
@William Farrell

He does corporate and international espionage and wonders why the organizations/groups he targets have issues with him. I question Assange's motives and his ability to reason well.
@Bruizer ; Personally, I think 'asshat/assange' just needs to be put to sleep. This puffy elitist liberal twerp hasn't earned the right to out anyone other than himself, and maybe Mikey the bad movie maker,
@William Farrell Yes Iyou are, actually. Banks are propped up by government. By law, they are not allowed to "refuse service" just because they don't like the customer.
0 Votes
+ -
So they won?
guihombre 24th Oct
The cut his funding using extra-legal means, and so Wikileaks then does exactly what the people who cut the funding wanted?
None of those companies support or defend the Constitution. They are supporters of fascism and brutal government oppression.
@Dr_Zinj says "They are supporters of fascism and brutal government oppression."
They are supporters of their own businesses. Why should they assist in the promotion of an entity that aims to hurt their business and publish their trade secrets or private data? If I could stop someone from very publicly bad-mouthing my business by cutting off their services or funding, why wouldn't I?
0 Votes
+ -
Bull
Dr_Zinj 25th Oct
@dh1760
We're talking about an organization that goes after government misdeeds; not corporate espionage. Only in the cases where those companies were breaking the law was Wikileaks spreading the dirty laundry for all to see.
It is not their job to defend the constitution. It is there job to make money for their share holders. If an entity is working against this interest (i.e. wikileaks), why would you expect them to support them.
@sgtm8@...
But KKK is still a valued client of Visa.
Is that because they are more in line with the interest of Visa ?
0 Votes
+ -
Nice, really nice.
somereader 24th Oct
Those companies are using my non-US money to protect US interests. What is illegal about publishing classified information outside the US? (If you are not part of an organization that has an agreement to protect documents released to it.)
Did US newspapers never published classified documents from other country's? How should these one-sited actions of some US organizations be called?
(Remember, also in the US a ban would be contrary to press freedom and US newspapers did print from it.)

If I continue to be client of one of those companies outside the US, will I be paying my own censor? Will I have to follow also US laws that where never voted in my elected house of representatives.
0 Votes
+ -
Dont' be so naive!
adornoe@... Updated - 24th Oct
Nations have agreements or treaties, whereby, they protect each others' interests, and from those agreements, if a law is broken in a country that affects an ally in another part of the world, the consequences for the law breaker will be the same as if that person was caught violating the law within the offended or victimized country.
@adornoe@...
So you can add international law to the list of things you know nothing about, yes pontificate on.
There is no such agreement in any of the European or Asian nations that affects the publication of US classified data.
0 Votes
+ -
Deux: No common sense, again!
adornoe@... Updated - 26th Oct
Look, you ninny!

It's not about specific agreements or specific treaties. It's about countries having agreements to protect each other when their laws have been broken by a citizen of any of the respective countries. Thus, the Assange can be extradited to the U.S. for prosecution because he broke U.S. laws, even though he's not a U.S. citizen. The U.S., likewise, might extradite a citizen of the U.S., as an example, if that citizen caused harm to Australia while breaking Australian laws.

From Wikileaks:

Extradition law in the United States is the formal process by which a fugitive found in one country or state is surrendered to another country or state for trial or punishment. For foreign countries the process is regulated by treaty and conducted between the Federal Government of the United States and the government of a foreign country.

Extradition involving foreign countries
United States of America has extradition treaties with the countries shown in light blue

Generally under United States law (18 U.S.C. 3184), extradition may be granted only pursuant to a treaty.[1] Some countries grant extradition without a treaty, but every such country requires an offer of reciprocity when extradition is accorded in the absence of a treaty. [2] Further, the 1996 amendments to 18 U.S.C. 3181 and 3184 permit the United States to extradite, without regard to the existence of a treaty, persons (other than citizens, nationals or permanent residents of the United States), who have committed crimes of violence against nationals of the United States in foreign countries.[3] A list of countries with which the United States has an extradition treaty relationship can be found in the Federal Criminal Code and Rules, following 18 U.S.C. 3181, but this list may not be completely accurate.[4]
@adornoe@...

Look you ignoramus, Assange is NOT a US citizen, and as such, he is not subject to US laws re: publishing confidential or classified information.
Asshang-ole will finally shut up? Will Asshang just whine and say send me money to fight legal bills.


Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al, (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) will have international impact due to the fact that the Federal Communications Commission allowing of both Microsoft Corporation and Google Inc to display Neeleys nude and figurenude art before minors and unauthenticated viewers by wire will be ordered ceased. Regulation of wire communications described in USC 47 153 (52) will be ordered begun even when called the Internet for disguise or honest mistake.

I can't wait to see Wikileaks gone as they are criminal. Assange should die in jail.
@Curtis-Neeley

And you should grow up.
Try to use some common sense for a change.
@adornoe
Try to use any sense at all.
Clearly the man fails to understand the concepts of confidentiality and secrecy.
Now some of the corporations that he chose to diss aren't playing nice with him.
Well, "Boo-Hoo"
0 Votes
+ -
@da philster
Um, which corporations would that be? Wikileaks released US gov't info, NOT corporate data.
But go ahead and keep making up facts in your head.
Read up, and come up to speed.
@adornoe

ibid
@da philster
Visa et al acted against Wikileaks without any conviction or court order.
Up til then Wikileaks had no attacks of any kind against Visa and Pay Pal.
Wikileaks still has not been convicted of any crime.

Visa has KKK on its list of clients; they process contributions to KKK.
Do you really mean that KKK is so much "cleaner" than Wikileaks.
This is the same Wikileaks that got praise from H. Clinton when they released Chinese dirty laundry.
How the tune changed when Wikileaks released some US dirty laundry.
Can you pronounce "Double standards" ?
@hkommedal Ha ha ha, you think H. Clinton giving praise somehow means crap to any of us? The fact she did give them praise would make me think badly of Wikidick even if I knew nothing about him.

As far as your claim about Visa and the KKK, care to back it up with proof? It may or may not be trued but it's not my responsibility to verify your claim or to give a reason for Visa listing them as a client and continuing to work with them if it is true.
It's interesting that these groups relied on these orgs, like paypal, or standard banks in the first place. What did they think? 'yes, we rebel against the the banks and and Institution etc, but yet we'll still use them, because they're convinent' in one respect they look very ridiculous. On the other they seem like a huge oxymoron.
@endure4him2save

Being that Wikileaks did no such thing, what is your point?
@deusexmachina????
Don't disturb his "Foxed" information, please.
Read up!

You're also defending the indefensible.
0 Votes
+ -
@adornoe

I have no need to read up. It is quite clear I know more about this particular topic that you know about, well, anything.
(And that's not saying much.)
@endure4him2save Can you say hypocrite? Pretty sure Wikidick can't.
My God, so many people have become mindless automatons. Speech must be made absolutely free or else how do we hat what is truth and what is a lie after the fact if the person telling us then censored the document in the first place. That is why when given the free choice the founders of the US after their experience with the British Kings' form of "free" speech made sure it would absolutely so in the US, that was until those that sought to usurp that nation found ways to stifle it.
0 Votes
+ -
@mario@...
This is about a corporation's right to choose what it supports. He is still free to post whatever he does, they just don't want to pay for it anymore.
Just as you now have the right to not do busiiness with those corporations if you don't agree with their actions.

Again, this is not about freedom of speech.
0 Votes
+ -
@harrim47
This is not about support, this is about patronage, and no, public corporations are NOT free to arbitrarily restrict whom the interact with.
@harrim47
Yeah, right.
They choose to support the KKK instead.
Does that not tell you that there is the smell of rats somewhere.


Update:
It looks like Visa and Pay Pal no longer process contributions to KKK. Thanks for that.
They DID do it last year, as I checked it up.
When I looked at KKK's site now, they inform you that Pay Pal no longer process their contributions: http://kukluxklan.bz/support.html

The Visa sign is gone as well.
0 Votes
+ -
Any corporation has the right to not do business with someone the deem to be harmful or detrimental to their business. It is not an "arbitrary" choice; it's a choice to protect their business and sometimes to protect their other customers.
0 Votes
+ -
hkommedal: Delusional, much?!?
adornoe@... 26th Oct
Either that, or, you're still in grade school with that kind of attitude.

Next, you're going to accuse the bank executives of having mothers who wear army boots.
0 Votes
+ -
@adornoe

Actually, not they don't. For instance, no company in the U.S is free to refuse to do business with black people, even if every single other person that company does business with will with 100% certainty refuse to do business with said corporation if they do. Regardless of whatever "business interests" come to bear, they are not free to refuse to do business with them.
In this specific case, there are a number of banking and financial regulations preventing such behaviour.
0 Votes
+ -
Catatafish
tappette 25th Oct
Aww, and here I thought it was just Lemmiwinks who shut the whole enterprise down.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix