Windows 8 tablet hybrids: 'Compromises of convergence'?
Summary: Microsoft and Intel will use Windows 8 to pitch "a tablet when you want it and a notebook when you need it." Will these hybrids fly?
Windows 8 tablet/ultrabook hybrids will reportedly hit retail stores in November. Whether these devices sell will impact the consumer, SMB and corporate markets.
CNET's Brooke Crothers noted that Windows 8 tablets based on Intel chips (ARM too) will land in November. Certainly, chipmakers are upbeat about the Windows 8 prospects.
For instance, Intel's general manager of the PC client unit, Kirk Skaugen, spent a lot of time talking about ultrabooks, including convertible form factors, last week at the company’s investor meeting.
Skaugen's money slide is below.
Meanwhile, Nvidia executives were gaga for Windows 8 tablet/laptop hybrids too. Nvidia plans to roll with its Tegra 3 chip to power Windows 8 on ARM.
Related: Q&A: What BYOD means for IT | Can the enterprise popularize notebook, tablet touch hybrids? | Great Debate: Can the enterprise popularize tablet-laptop hybrids?
Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang said last week:
As Microsoft goes to market, people will understand why we're so enthusiastic about Windows on ARM. They're just very different things. I'll let Microsoft tell you about their plans, but I'm very enthusiastic about it. I think it makes a lot of sense for enterprise. Anybody who has a large part of their work around Windows would really benefit from Windows on ARM tablets.
The promise of these tablet/ultrabook hybrids is that you'll have touch and the functionality of a laptop. For someone like me these hybrids are appealing. But I may be a small market since most folks don't write as much and need a keyboard.
Why is the consumer retail launch so important to the hybrid market? In a word, it's all about consumerization. Should hybrids find their way under Christmas trees they have a realistic shot at succeeding in the enterprise.
However, should these hybrids flop corporations will stick to laptops, consumers won't bring hybrids to work and we'll still have a tablet vs. laptop world.
Microsoft and Intel will do everything they can to market these hybrids, tablets and ultrabooks. Intel is planning on spending more than it did to market the Centrino chip.
Apple CEO Tim Cook isn't convinced that combo tablet-laptop effort will fly. On Apple's recent earnings conference call, he said:
Anything can be forced to merge. But the problem is that the products are about tradeoffs. And you begin to make tradeoffs to the point where what you have left at the end of the day doesn't please anyone. And you can converge a toaster and a refrigerator, but those things are probably not going to be pleasing to the user. And so our view is that the tablet market is huge, and we've said that since day one.
Now, having said that, I also believe that there is a very good market for the MacBook Air. And we continue to innovate in that product, but I do think that it appeals to someone that has a little bit different requirements. And you wouldn't want to put these things together because you'll wind up compromising in both and not pleasing either user. Some people will prefer to own both. And that's great, too. But I think to make the compromises of convergence, we're not going to that party.
Microsoft has been to that party repeatedly. Laptop/tablet hybrids have been attempted before. The wild card for Microsoft will be whether this invite to the hybrid party gets customers to show up.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
So Why Would I Want
EXACTLY... someone gets it...
They really. Should not have called it Windows.. when people who don't know better get these things home and none of their existing software will run on it and there arent even replacement metro apps.. these things are going to get returned like crazy... and people are going to tell their friends not to buy.. I see a huge PR disaster on MSs hands here.. calling it WindowsRT is a huge mistake... should have called it MS Metro or something else.. they are really confusing the market place with that naming... in the way users care about.. It's not Windows..
Microsoft sells hope
Wait for the bright future..
But life is short.
Windows 8 tablet hybrids: 'Compromises of convergence'?
yes, but...
Very Useful
"Too good to be true"
Hybrids are the mopeds of the mobile computer world
With Windows 8, Microsoft is making sure you have a subpar desktop and touch experience. They say they want a consistent experience across platforms. Consistent it is -- consistently bad. Now, OEMS are going to bake that awful compromise into hardware as well! Yay!!!
Why not just call it what it is? Being too cheap to pay for a great tablet and a great ultrabook, and instead buying a cheap piece of garbage hybrid that doesn't doing anything well.
People are tired of being guinea pigs
So, hybrids have failed for the last ten years
The importance of hybrids
As for Tim Cook's view, it is very short sighted. He dismisses the importance of the hybrid to a large segment of computer users, who would prefer single devices, to cover their spectra of business to consumer needs.
Finally, the Tablet PCs past lack of success were primarily due to a deficient user experience and app ecosystem. These issues are addressed in Windows 8 / RT.
Legacy apps don't run on winRT desktop...
people are not understanding.. winRT is really YET ANOTHER completely new mobile platform with only a hand full of apps that run on it..
Legacy apps
In reality
@ bitcrazed
Microsoft has borrowed most of the sandboxing technology they have in WinRT and lots of API concepts from Apple's iOS. When developers who are used to the lax Windows APIs until now are forced to learn new concepts, only to be able to write tablet applications, they may well decide to program for the more prevalent tablet platform, the iPad, or at least for Android. During that process, those developers will learn a lot of new things and will be more prepared to write software for WinRT... although, they may not see any reason to do so anymore.
ultrabooks
Not so much
Waiting on proof
I'm still waiting for someone (anyone) to show me solid proof that a "large" segment of computer users care about this hybrid approach (again and again). Microsoft is famous for doing focus group studies that 'supposedly' shows users wanting a certain device or feature. They've done it with the Kin phone last, polled a couple thousand teens/tweens on the type of phone they wanted. Where's the studies on these awesome new Tablet/Ultrabooks hybrids? If it's so important like you said, then surely OEMs and Microsoft must have done some type of user studies to share with the public.
Really?
Microsoft's fans are certain hybrids will be Amazing...
I am just asking for proof of this large selection of consumers patiently waiting on hybrids. We've had slates, tablet pc, ultra pc (UMPC), UMPC hybrid, and convertible tablets and laptops for over a decade now. All did poorly in the consumer market. What will change this time around? Hybrids will still be significantly more expensive than iPads and other tablets, and one of the main excuses we keep hearing for their failings in the past was cost.