ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

With release of Buzz, Google makes Microsoft look like a copycat

By | February 12, 2010, 10:02am PST

Summary: Google’s unveiling of Buzz leaves Microsoft looking like a copycat, even though Redmond has been working on social element to Outlook for some time.

In the world of business, there is no standard way of releasing new products and services - every company does it differently. Take, for example, three tech powerhouses and their different approaches.

Apple makes big announcements by summoning the tech press to some flashy event while the folks managing the Web site and the retail stores get ready for Steve Jobs to announce that the products are available today. (OK. the iPad and a few others have been the exception - but, for the most part, it tends to work out great for us instant-gratification types.)

Google, on the other hand, releases products before they’re actually ready, slapping on a “beta” label as if to say, “Go ahead and start using it and we’ll work out the bugs together.” And people do just that - they download, install, put the product through test runs and chime in with their their praises and complaints. And then, with that information, Google makes tweaks and updates to keep refining their products. That’s what happened with Google Buzz this week.

Then there’s Microsoft, which tends to give sneak peeks at technology that the company is working on - but that no one will be able to get their hands on for months to come. Oh sure, some of the stuff looks compelling but - yawn - by the time it actually arrives, it’s lost some of its fanfare. It’s not always true - Windows 7 was an exception and the new version of Windows Mobile will likely draw plenty of buzz when it finally lands.

I got to thinking about all of this today because TechCrunch put up a post that suggests that Microsoft is about to go Google Buzz on us and unveil the Outlook Social Connector it hinted at back in November as part of the beta rollout of Office 2010. The product, as the name suggests, would bring a social element to Outlook that makes it kind of like Google Buzz but with more of a business-centric focus.

My colleague, Mary Jo Foley, asked in her own blog post following the announcement of Buzz whether Google was actually chasing Buzz, even though Microsoft’s social endeavors got very little mention in mainstream coverage of Buzz. In a way, Google actually might have been chasing Microsoft. But Google crossed the finish line - at least the “unveiling” line - first. So the question of which company was actually doing the chasing is up for debate.

update: Foley correctly notes in the talkbacks that Outlook Social Connector is, in fact, already available as part of Office 2010 beta. A post on the official Outlook blog from November confirms it. There’s also a video embedded in the post to explain OSC. It’s worth checking out. (additional update below)

In a nutshell, this is part of the problem with Microsoft’s approach. Sure, Microsoft was first to talk about integrating social networking into the mail client. But in a typical Microsoft kind of way, the company takes months and month to work on their products before actually letting them see the light of day. The idea, of course, is that the company isn’t the type to release something before it’s ready for prime time.

And yet, in most cases, whatever Microsoft releases will inevitably be buggy and will immediately need a patch or update.

Redmond may think this approach works but I don’t think it does. At this moment, I’m not a fan of Google Buzz, which means that when I hear about Microsoft’s attempt to rollout a “me, too” product (even if it’s not really a “me, too”), I can’t help but cringe. Sure, I may change my mind about Buzz once the aspirin kicks in, but how does that help Microsoft? From here on out, anything Microsoft introduces will be put on a comparison chart next to Google Buzz.

And don’t even get me started on how Yahoo gets no respect for its efforts on this front, either. That’s a completely different post.

All I’m saying is that Microsoft, which used to be seen as one of the most innovative companies in technology, is consistently setting itself up to be perceived as a “Me, too” type of company - a follower instead of an innovator.

In the old days, when software was sold to consumers in a boxed-CD package, it needed to be 110 percent ready to go - and then patches and updates would come later. Today, there’s this thing called the Internet and it allows users to instantly download the software and start using it before it’s fully ready. Slap the proper “beta” warning on a product so people know that there may be some hiccups.

Sure, Google is taking some heat for the confusion around Buzz - but two days into it, the company released some updates and made some fixes to address those concerns.And it’s also able to share some numbers on the instant engagement among users - 9 million posts and comments in those first two days and 200 posts per minute coming over mobile devices.

In that sense, Google comes out smelling like a rose - innovative, quick to release, quick to update and quick to get some traction with Google Buzz. By contrast, when Microsoft finally pulls the trigger on Outlook Social Connector, it will end up looking like a copycat.

update2: The update above notes that Microsoft’s Outlook Social Connector is already available as part of Office 2010 beta. Still, I don’t think this changes the argument much. I can’t recall much fanfare around this Microsoft announcement and I think that says something about Microsoft’s entry into this new “trend.” It was sort of a whimper. It definitely didn’t stick out and grab attention the way Buzz did. In a competitive market, that’s a disadvantage.

update3: There are reports today that Microsoft will unveil - or better yet, demo - Windows Mobile 7 for the first time next week. The devices running that software won’t be available until later this year. Once again, there’s still a wait.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sam has been a technology and business blogger for more than 18 years.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than 18 years. He's a member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a graduate of California State University, Fresno.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: With release of Buzz, Google makes Microsoft look like a copycat
jfreedle2@... 11th Mar 2010
They would only look like a copycat to the people who do not know better, and people will know that in truth Google is the copycat.
apart from the rest. With Google's model, they can
try things instantly on a massive scale as they
just
did with Buzz. Sure, there are huge risks involved,
but, the constant and instantaneous evolution means
that products get better much faster and get much
more user feedback.

Microsoft's old model of rolling things out in
major versions can not survive much longer with
others moving products at Internet speed.
0 Votes
+ -
That's right Donnie Boy
Ron Bergundy 12th Feb 2010
Come on we both know that M$ is old and slow.

So what if rolling thisgs out at the speed of the internet has a large negative impact on us end users - thats the price to pay for advancement!!


I bet the moment they saw this Ballmer pulled all the "developers" form Winblobile and had them start copying BUZZ!! M$ is last again!!
0 Votes
+ -
Which makes you wonder...
A.Sinic 14th Feb 2010
... why their Google Docs wordprocessor is still a puny featureless cripple when compared to "Word for DOS" from twenty years ago.
0 Votes
+ -
BUZZ fail...Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha...
0 Votes
+ -
Ad Hominem troll-talk?
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
You attacked DonnieBoy and Google by way of Buzz.

Yet you had nothing of value to say?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
TechCrunch's post is wrong
Mary Jo Foley 12th Feb 2010
Sam, Sam, Sam....

The Connector is out in beta already and has been since November 2009. They only have LinkedIn as a provider (so far) and a commitment to Win Live. But the SDK also is out, so anyone can build one.

Here's the info (and the exact same diagram from TechCrunch -- imagine that) in my post about this from Tuesday:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=5208

November 2009 vs. February 2010. Hmmm. Who is copying whom? happy MJ
0 Votes
+ -
an SDK does not a product make
randy.baker@... 12th Feb 2010
So I can connect with LinkedIn, or write my own SDK with the MS tool and we should consider that on par with Buzz?!? This just proves the point that MS doesn't get it...
0 Votes
+ -
MS doesn't...
GuyAlanDye Updated - 12th Feb 2010
...get what?

"This" doesn't "prove" anything, dude.

Buzz, in it's present form, is a dud.

Of course, me saying it doesn't make it any more true than anyone else spouting "MS doesn't get it".
0 Votes
+ -
I agree 100%
Ron Bergundy 12th Feb 2010
M$ NEVER gets it - they're M$!

Google gets it and more - they're the ones moving the world forward, not Apple or M$ - they're becoming "has-beens".

Apple gets it for kids, but Google gets it for everyone else, business and the public alike.

BUZZ will be THE M$ killer very soon.
0 Votes
+ -
Partially right.....
i8thecat 12th Feb 2010
MS is more like how IBM used to be.. Big, Clumsy, Slow to change and respond.. Basically complacent with market share with ego's the size of sky scrapers... They have just enough sense to be scared and are desperately allocating resources to try to lock onto the next big thing, but they are failing and flailing, and flopping?

MS was once an underdog? With Windows 3, they were onto something? They were small, young, agile, but weren?t really considered contenders in the world of business and consumer PC market? But they were quick and shifty, they had a good OS and they were able to lure SW developers to the table which gave them the killer app?

Google is a small company that grew into a search giant? Google is like a dog that just had 4 balls thrown out for it? Not knowing which one to chase? They desperately want to be a success at something other than a search giant. But they lack innovation as much as Microsoft does? Google hasn?t offered anything new and revolutionary? They aren?t moving anything forward. The one arena they have a shot at is in Office Apps? If they can make an excel/outlook/word killer that is not in the cloud, and can be ran by companies in house, then they have a shot at second glory and will kill MS.

Cloud computing will fail once it starts getting hacked? If not by companies dumping it on their own, then by government mandate for unsafe business practice on behalf of consumers.

Apple is the only contender rising in the ranks right now? They are creating markets out of thin air and driving others to copy as much as they can get away with. Social networking will be dead in a few years? People will tire of the maintenance involved with updating, logging on, etc. Buzz is only about 4 to 5 years too little, too late? And a social connector in Outlook??? Nah? That?s gonna flop as well? Most business people hate chat and want communication buffers that allow them to work without constant interruptions.
0 Votes
+ -
Mary Jo, save it...
silent.griffin 12th Feb 2010
Sam was able to turn Google Buzz into a MS hate feast article. I mean to do that you have to overlook a lot of things:

1)Google Buzz, like Google Wave, is an overly hyped product with no real innovation (Friendfeed much?) yet Sam was able to point the fault to MS.

2)As you pointed out, Outlook Social Connector has been release for months now but he's still adamant not to accept his mistake.

3)"Then there?s Microsoft, which tends to give sneak peeks at technology that the company is working on - but that no one will be able to get their hands on for months to come"

Are you kidding me? Windows 7, Visual Studio, MS Office, SQL Server.

Wow. Just wow.
0 Votes
+ -
For what it's worth...
SamDiaz Updated - 13th Feb 2010
I did the install of Office 10 Beta and OSC. The only thing I see is Sharepoint, not LinkedIn. And certainly, none of the biggies - Twitter, Facebook, etc.

silent.griffin: Microsoft talked about Windows 7 forever and a day before it was finally released. And this post wasn't necessarily meant to "compare" Buzz to OSC. No where in my post did I 1) sing the praises of Buzz or 2) blame its shortcomings on Microsoft.

Instead, this post was meant to point out, by comparing the LAUNCHES of Buzz and OSC, how Microsoft typically moves slow to launch products that were announced months earlier.
This just really shows the brilliant potential of web
apps. Google can pretty much instantly upgrade their
software to all users. With a conventional local app like
Outlook, an update has to be pushed out as a new version
to every single user, at the users discretion and
timetable. But Google took what started as a pretty
simple web mail client and has now added things like
chat, voice calls, video chat, and now social messaging.
Hard to compete with that approach.
0 Votes
+ -
@ArtInvent - Observant points!
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
Once upon a time, Bill Gates was preaching the future of computers was through the Internet.

Google seems to have harnessed that idea well.

Microsoft seems to have lost its way because it is stuck in its past methods of tireless announcements of vaporware, much-hyped expensive but buggy products, continuing to steal innovative ideas from little guys, steam-rolling their competition, and distrusting their customers.

For a huge corporation with hundreds--or is it thousands--of software engineers, it is amazing that Microsoft still releases buggy products. Perhaps it is because they spend all their time trying to build-in hidden methods to spy on customers and try to find "pirateware," instead of producing really good, timely products at reasonable prices. Microsoft's strong-arm tactics no longer work.

Years ago, my sales training taught me that those who focus on making money rather than caring about, listening to, understanding, and meeting the needs and wants of customers will lose their sales. This describes Microsoft.

Microsoft is dying.
0 Votes
+ -
people already know that
Linux Geek 12th Feb 2010
no need to remind us how M$ pillages IP from others.
Google's specialty is rushing buggy, incomplete, and/or ill conceived products/services to market.
0 Votes
+ -
Better than being late
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
to market (like Microsoft) or never getting to market at all (again, like Microsoft).

Moreover, Google makes sure that everyone knows when their products are beta and not-ready-for-stable-use. The complainers of this methodology are those who fail to grasp (or do not care) that Google encourages customers to get involved in producing products that customers actually want.
From my perspective, Microsoft has never been an innovator. The Windows OS was a "Me Too" product, and the features they have added over the years are mostly the same.
What Microsoft has been REALLY good at is marketing and polishing these "innovations" for consumption.
I have a serious question.

Has Microsoft ever rolled out anything that wasn't an out and out copy
of some other company's product? I've been watching them for years
and I can't think of anything.

Best I can tell, Microsoft's entire business model is based on being a
copy-cat, using monopoly power to force customer acceptance, and
then selling upgrades.

They really have only three viable products; Windows, Office, and
Servers. The rest of their stuff is either unprofitable, insignificant, or
both. The three viable products are, ahem, rather long of tooth.

The big question I have is this: How long will Microsoft be able to
hang around? With Steve Ballmer leading the charge I would think they
might depart sooner rather than later.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree.
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
Not only was MS-DOS a copy of someone else's operating system (Digital Research and CPM), but Bill is reported to have stolen other company's work in preparatory school. Stealing IP has been his major contribution to technology and controlling the market has been his major contribution to monopolies.

Steve Balmer (Mr. Balmy) is...well...just another bully.
0 Votes
+ -
10/10 for Google.....
carlsf@... 12th Feb 2010
Instant feedback and comments which are acted on by Google in REALTIME.

Microsoft not even starters....
Their software is a hash/mash copy of other products.
Refurbished to suit MS's idea of what is required, NO USER INPUT, new interfaces which no one likes.
When released on the users BUGGY, UNFINISHED, and takes months to fix the problems.
COST is astrominical.
0 Votes
+ -
BUZZ fail...Bwha-ha-ha-ha-ha....
transposeIT 15th Feb 2010
Google: The king of perpetual beta software...If it's broken, don't complain coz it's beta, you idiot...We can never do anything wrong. ROFL...
0 Votes
+ -
Grow up.
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
You have nothing of value to say?

Oh...I get it...you are jealous!
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
with every one of your points.

In particular, whoever came up with and sold the emperor his new clothes (the Ribbonbar) should be "fed to the lions!" wink

If Microsoft products were priced reasonably, the software piracy market would scarcely exist because the majority of users would buy the products to get updates and the included support.

However, WGA is Microsoft shooting themselves in the foot by assuring their customers that Microsoft cares only about their money.
I wish the OSC worked for me. All I see is an option for a Sharepoint Server, nothing else; not even LinkedIn. It seems Microsoft can't be bothered to include other languages and dictionaries in the Office 2010 beta; how lame can you get? I do like the new Office, but I wish they would include all the extras with them as well. It's kind of hard to evaluate software like this if I can't work in the way I normally would when all the options are available.
0 Votes
+ -
Yep
razzledazzle 12th Feb 2010
GOOGLE: Replacing crap with more crap, in "real time". Amazing.
0 Votes
+ -
Another troll?
Isocrates 21st Feb 2010
What value are you adding to this conversation?

Are you a coward? If you have a beef with Google, take it up with Google.

This conversation is for adults.
0 Votes
+ -
You described MS wrong
sfaid 13th Feb 2010
I feel Microsoft normally releases exactly the same as Google. A product full of bugs! Only difference is MS charges a bucket of money for the buggy product.
They would only look like a copycat to the people who do not know better, and people will know that in truth Google is the copycat.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix