ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Without Verizon, iPhone on track to start eating Google's dust

By | September 15, 2010, 4:00am PDT

Summary: Google is seeing such strong momentum with Android that it’s on pace to overtake Apple’s iPhone globally - unless Apple can kick it into gear and get the iPhone on multiple carriers worldwide.

Apple isn’t playing catching up in the mobile space just yet but if things stay at the current tick - and all signs suggest that things will move even faster than expected - Google’s Android will become an even bigger threat to the success of the iPhone.

That’s the word from Bernstein Research analysts Toni Sacconagh and Pierre Ferragu, who say that Google is on pace to overtake Apple’s share in the next five quarters unless… well, you know unless what. Yup, Apple needs Verizon in the U.S.

According to a report on Barron’s Tech Trader Daily blog, the analysts say that one of the key reasons for Android’s success is because the iPhone is still a one-carrier device in large market countries, notably the U.S. Sure, Apple’s device may be available through nearly three times as many carriers as Android devices globally - but Apple needs deals with some of the world’s largest carriers if it wants to keep from being run over by Android.

There have been rumors for longer than most people can remember that a Verizon version of the iPhone will come to market next month or next quarter or next year. Of course, those days never seem to arrive. And because of that, potential iPhone customers - myself included - grew tired of waiting and discovered Android. Many of us are now locked in among the Android faithful. Still, even if Apple releases a CDMA version of the iPhone early next year (the latest rumor), there’s no guarantee that it will be with Verizon. Why? The answer is in this quote from the Bernstein report:

We believe Apple needs to strike distribution deals with these carriers, even if it has to sacrifice some pricing power since doing so would still be accretive to company gross margins, and take away the strong foothold it currently provides to a potentially formidable competitor.

Even if it has to sacrifice some pricing power? Apple? Steve Jobs? Ha!

It was widely suggested way back when that the iPhone wasn’t on Verizon to begin with because Jobs and company couldn’t cut a deal with Verizon over control over the iPhone’s apps. Has that changed? Is Steve Jobs willing to cut that sort of a deal to get his mighty mobile device on the shelves at Verizon stores? Is Verizon willing to cut such a deal, considering the traction with a lineup of high-profile Android devices, such as the Droid, Droid Incredible, Droid X, Droid 2 and others?

The analysts note that the daily run-rate for Android phone sales has more than tripled in the last seven months, jumping from 60,000 phones per day to 200,000. The estimate is that 53 million Android phones will ship this year and that Android alone will drive the entire sector above its projected growth.

Oh, and the analysts also warn Symbian and RIMM to either step up their game - and fast - or risk “an accelerating erosion” of customers who will eventually migrate toward other platforms. No mention of Windows Mobile 7 or HP’s WebOS, which it obtained when it purchased Palm.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Sam has been a technology and business blogger for more than 18 years.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than 18 years. He's a member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a graduate of California State University, Fresno.

69
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Without Verizon, iPhone on track to start eating Google's dust
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Gentleman, amazing mulberry bags web site web page post. Just wherever could be the website's RSS feed?
0 Votes
+ -
Not because of Android
People 15th Sep 2010
Just like the Macintosh, it's not about marketshare. If you notice, Apple makes great profits and is an investor jewel. Apple cares about Android only as a benchmark in UE. As long as they sell their product they can care less about marketshare because they are turning a profit. Android is about marketshare because that is the only way to measure the OS's acceptance. When Apple cannot any longer profit from the iPhone, things will change. Seriously, just pay attention to Apple's history. It's not like they are hiding some Ace somewhere.
@People - but I don't think that's really what they had in mind. Apple will be relegated to around 10-20% market share because their business model absolutely prevents them from gaining more than that. One manufacturer controlling both hardware and OS, no licensing of the OS to other companies: there are just way way way too many other gigantic companies out there with resources and motivation that are inevitably going to want a piece of mobile computing.

Mobile computing is not like pocket music players, a relatively simple niche marketplace where one company had a chance to dominate. The mobile communications and computing platform is just too gigantic and pervasive and vital and important to the world market for one company to have that kind of exclusive control and dominance.

Still, complete control of even 10% of the world mobile computing environment is more than enough to keep Apple handsomely profitable for many years. It's a good plan for profits. It's just not a good plan to control significant market share. Their main problem will be to maintain developer interest, in the same way that Mac OS and Linux have trouble attracting all the best apps with their limited market share.
0 Votes
+ -
@ArtInvent
But I'm curious, why do you NOT think that is what they had in mind? I mean, clearly, they could own the market if they wish, but they don't. Why?
0 Votes
+ -
Profitability or Market Share?
alexkhan2000 17th Sep 2010
@ArtInvent

I think we all know that Apple is more interested in dominating the profitable segment of a market that it competes in than the entire market itself. Like you say, there are too many other big players out there and the great majority of the market needs the cheap low-margin commodity stuff. Apple is not interested in supplying $300 computers and free throwaway feature phones that come with a carrier contract.

Apple's global handset market share is only around 3% but the company rakes in nearly half of the operating profits. It's similar in the global PC market where Apple's share is only 4% (around 9% in the US) but Apple's profit share is estimated to be around 35%. It comes down to: would you rather sell 1 million units of something to make $100K or sell 100K units of something similar to earn $1 million. Apple chooses to do the latter because they can provide a unique user experience through the software/hardware integration and carefully crafted and maintained (i.e., "closed") ecosystem.

So it's obvious that Apple is not interested in scraping the bottom of the barrel in either the mobile or PC markets. Actually, all of Apple's competitors want a bigger piece of the high-end pie since that's where the high-margin profits are. After all, they're all in it to make money. They would *all* prefer to be in Apple's position of raking in such profits but they know they can't, so they have to provide more features for less money if they're going to sell their wares.

Pressure is on Apple to maintain their position as being the innovative leader in the markets they compete in. Whether perceived or real, this position is absolutely vital for Apple to maintain their margins and the critical mass necessary to keep the developers working on the iOS/Mac platform. Apple isn't interested in majority market share. They'd have to completely change their business model to play that game and Apple just isn't built for that. It's about being perceived as a high-end alternative from the mass market mainstream, which is exactly where Apple sits in the PC market.

More so than gaining market share, Apple needs to stay one or two steps ahead of the competition for them to continue charging the premium that consumers are willing to pay for what Apple offers. Being a "leader" is much more important to Apple than being seen as the "biggest" or selling the "most." It's a fine line that Apple has to walk on since market share does matter in terms of maintaining developer interest but, ultimately, being on the cutting edge will be more vital for Apple to maintain its "cool" status and high margins.

What works in Apple's favor is that technology is relatively cheap to the consumer these days. Whatever you get now (whether that's a new iMac or an iPhone) will be so much better than what was available just few years ago. Sure, the same goes for the PC and all the other phones, but people are willing to pay a little more (relatively speaking) for something that provides a great value compared to, say, putting in a new wooden storage cabinet in your garage ($2K+).
I got tired of waiting also and got the Droid Incredible and now you could not pry it out of my hands. Apple waited way too long and now the Droid users find that they are glad they got it. I also choose to bypass an iPhone now because of Apple's politics concerning apps and their development. I just don't like being TOLD what I can do.
@terryzx enjoyin that nascar app? Cause you can't remove it, verizon and google said.

that noise? oh it's just your hypocrisy.
0 Votes
+ -
options
mnkyhead 16th Sep 2010
@jessedegenerate two words for you, root access. Root the phone and you can remove what ever you want. Sure the average user wont root their phone, but the option is there.
0 Votes
+ -
But I thought the whole theory behind android...
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 16th Sep 2010
@mnkyhead... was that you didn't need to root the phone... HMM... the hypocrisy of the ABAers is certainly coming to light.

I am not denying that Android isn't compelling platform, I myself am considering getting an Android phone, I just don't rule out a product because of the company that produces it or the CEO behind it.

Android and the iPhone are both great products, I would consider buying an iPhone, but the cost of the plans and data are too restrictive, where as I can get a Android based phone from Sprint and get the simply everything plan that is nearly half the cost of ATT and Verizon, and still get 3G service.
0 Votes
+ -
Won't Help
Tim Patterson 15th Sep 2010
A Verizon iPhone will do little to help Apple.

People are now talking about Android. iPhone buzz is evaporating. People are figuring out that iPhone = control and less freedom.

Sorry Apple. You'll always have a market with with your faithful subjects but there is no stopping Android. Having used both I can say that Android is superior in many ways.
@Tim Patterson Man... take off the blinders. Who outside of the tech world is talking about Android? Who outside of the tech world is talking about control and freedom? Outside of the tech world people are talking about how awesome the iPhone is, and if they see an Android device, they go, "oh is that an iPhone?", or "is that like an iPhone?" - true story.

And having used both, my Android Incredible is crap compared to an iPhone.
0 Votes
+ -
are you serious?
Peter Perry Updated - 15th Sep 2010
@Metronome49 A lot of non tech users I know bought Android phones because they liked all the features and to quote one friend, "I got my cool new phone."

Beyond that I know like 20 people with iPhones at work and that number is now down to two people... all of the others replace their 2G, 3G and 3Gs phones with Android phones... most went with the Vibrant, Droid X or Evo simply because they were better in many ways and the Apple device was at best playing catch-up in most areas.
@Metronome49 oh and I should mention one of the two remaining iPhone users upgraded to a 4G but the other only plans to keep the iPhone until his contract runs out...

In short, you're talking a 95% decline just at my office... of course Jobs will try to blame everyone else for his failures as the Galaxy Tablet erodes the iPad market share through the holidays.
0 Votes
+ -
When Peter Perry
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 16th Sep 2010
@Metronome49... Talks about the 20 people he knows, he is only talking about himself and his mom.

When people like this start grandstanding about the 20 people they know with iPhones, you can tell they are laying on the BS.

The reality is that the average consumer only change devices based on either cost, carrier, or some serious flaw in the device or service provider. Has little to do with brands and the iOS vs Android c*ck measuring.

Personally I love my iOS iPod Touch device, and would really like the iPhone, but as a consumer ATT is too pricey for me as is Verizon, where with Sprint I can save a quite a bit and still have a modern Android phone.
@Tim Patterson name a few things you can do on your android that i can't do on my iphone. Having used both i can say iOS is superior in many ways. It's app switching / recently used app list is more convient and speeds up my use of the device 2x.

Android has no quality VNC applications, that allow full control for extended sessions. My server's backup software has a iphone app to do restores and start backups, no android one.

the unreal gaming engine is being ported to iOS, not froyo. If you think these software advantages aren't huge, than why are you commenting here?

http://mashable.com/2010/09/15/unreal-iphone-ipad/
0 Votes
+ -
@jessedegenerate

Jesse - where to begin? First, not all of us are techies, so if your VNC is your primary use for your mobile device, than it's quite possible the iOS is your only solution.

For many of us "regular users" out here, Android has many free features that require either A) rooting/unlocking of the iPhone or B) paying more for apps. Examples include:

- free turn-by-turn voice navigation
- free wifi hotspot functionality
- free USB tethering (no added charge by AT&T w/ Nexus One)
- free MS Office document support
- free Adobe PDF editing/viewing support
- attachment of ANY file to any email from and Android device's drive (maybe this has been updated in iOS, but on my 3G - attachments were limited to 1 photo, and photos only - no other file types were supported)
- attachment of UNLIMITED quantity of files to an email
- native integration of Google Voice (which has a plethora of its own capabilities on top of the Android OS)
- flash support
- Chrome to Phone PC-to-phone browser sync support
- support for custom launchers (don't like the Android launcher? download any custom one you want - or write your own)
- from an advanced user standpoint, rooting is easy, which provides an array of options from a custom OS standpoint
- and lastly - but probably most importantly - comes the device's primary function. I think we can be honest and say that the iPhone is a great device that just isn't that great as a phone. Android's radio is phenomenal, and rarely drops a call. Be it the radio, antenna, software, or even AT&T's network - Apple has yet to make their device function properly at it's primary purpose - which frustrates many users to no end. To quote Justin Long, the actor in the Apple commercials... "A lot of things make the iPhone great, except being a phone."

This is a quick short list of items that make me prefer Android. If I had taken more than a minute to write this, I could probably list 20 or 30 more things that make me prefer it more.

But when it comes down to it - it's personal preference. The presence of Google Android is great for the mobile market because it gives consumers choice. That provides competition and makes all developers work harder to improve their product. In the end, consumers win - regardless of the device they've chosen.
@jessedegenerate Let me tell you what the iphone can't do. Take a movie and transfer it to my phone from your iphone! Failed yet? How about using bluetooth, crap! Over the air updates and most things? crap! How about multitasking, REAL multitasking not the "sort of" option you get with ios4 where some anointed apps gets multitasking. Those who compare gaming on phones have lost the battle already, they're grasping at straws, you want to play a real game, get a PC or a console. Remote VNC Pro works as well as the apple app, no diff whatsoever, for hours on end.
Free navigation, googles full suite of location apps, a real desktop on the phone that "I" can customize, a taskbar, I can go on.
Then there's the puritan crap apple plays with its users, if I want porn, jobs should have no say in it, period. end of story. Censorship is bad in any form.
I have a nexus one and my GF has an iphone, I am amazed at how crippled and limited the iphone is, it's like a toaster, it does a few things well but android does EVERYTHING well.
0 Votes
+ -
GIF
os2baba 15th Sep 2010
@jessedegenerate

>> Android has no quality VNC applications
http://www.appbrain.com/search?q=vnc

>> the unreal gaming engine is being ported to iOS, not froyo.

http://www.droid-life.com/2010/09/15/unreal-engine-headed-to-android/

I could have replied to the rest, but lipmonger already did a good job of that.
@jessedegenerate homescreen widgets, oh and now that I mentioned it, homescreens. The i*hones sceen is just a list of apps. all I can say is i*hones have a single personality, and that is Apples. Android allows for you phone to reflect your own personality. Call it trite, but it is a popular idea. i*hone got as far as it did because it was the first "smart phone"(BB doesn't count), and there were no other options. Now there are.
@Tim Patterson
Forget market share. It's profit share that Apple is after and usually gets. Android users can keep their $50 smartphones of the month. They're just wasted activations. The smartphone industry is a business and good businesses make money for shareholders. Android doesn't earn a thing for Google or developers. Android market share is growing in size, but it's hardly worth anything. It'll grow to a certain point and then just fizzle out when Google gets tired of maintaining it for free.
0 Votes
+ -
@Tim Patterson OMG you people are so retarded you can't compare an iPhone to an Android simply because IPhone is a single contained Device hardware, Software a single self contained device. Android is an OS. Multiple Hardware manufactures. It's like comparing a wheat producer to a Bread Manufactures. It's like comparing A Cadillac to the makers of tires. The Fact is that 3million+ have purchase the latest IPhone not a single solitary android device have done nearly that well. So for future reference find 1 Android
Device that sprint Evo or any new supposedly hot Device and compare that one device on it's own merit don't you think it unfair to compare, Motorola, HtC, samsung ect. To one Apple iPhone.
0 Votes
+ -
@rolandrich I think thats part of the point though, is I get to choose different levels of hardware, and you can compare android phones to the iphone, but instead of a caddy, the iphone is more like a company that only produces 1 car, while with android you can pick from an economy model all the way up to a big stupid SUV with a bunch of options you will most likely never use. while the Iphone is basically a ford taurus and thats your only choice. ohhh and BTW, you are only allowed to drive that ford taurus as fast as ford says you can, and you cant install any non OEM parts on it or else you void the warranty, and if they have their way, they will make your starter fry if you try to install any non OEM aftermarket parts on it.
@rolandrich Of course they think it's fair. When you have to flood the market with devices from cheap BOGOs to several nice high end units to compete there really isn't a good comparison to be made. If the Android device manufactures could put out a couple of devices that remotely compare to the iPhone one to one then it would be a game changer but after three years of "iPhone Killers" we have yet to see one. Android has had incredible growth but it will be at a cost. Apple, as said before, could really compete for market share if they wanted but you will never win the race to the lowest price because even if you win the race, your company loses. Apple couple reduce their profits in every market they are in if market share was the ultimate goal but obviously it isn't and from a business stand point they are obviously winning. Apple gains a huge portion of the market share for smart phones early on but that was just by chance and surprised everyone including Apple but was never really their goal. Those that base everything on market share simply don't have anything else to really compete on.
0 Votes
+ -
Having used both Android & iphone
theo_durcan 16th Sep 2010
I can tell Android have a long way to go to get anything working as good as the iphone works. They are in 2 different categories. Still Android is a decent OS, for somebody used to work with MS solutions is still very good.
0 Votes
+ -
please delete.
Uralbas Updated - 15th Sep 2010
Please delete
0 Votes
+ -
Apple's future with iPhone
Uralbas 15th Sep 2010
Depends on innovation. If Apple comes up with a game changer technology, it can still recover lost traction. But it would have to be huge and almost magical, as I know for a fact Android users will get an app that does this soon enough.

Now the bully in town, MS with win 7, have UGLY tiles, but it would be foolish to dismiss its programming abilities. My self included, most are comfortable developing apps within Visual Studio, its a peace of cake to make complicated apps within widows environment.

Google and Apple should address this now before Microsoft can start behaving like the bully it is.

Apple is at a disadvantage here, as objective c is not for the faint hearted. Its reflective capabilities used wisely can become an asset, but the learning curve for a standard joe is high.

Android development on Eclipse is similar to Visual Studio, though setting things up is still cumbersome. Knowledge and documentation of all available libraries is not a nicely organized a msdn is. Setting up web services is cumbersome. SQL connections have improved significantly lately, but its still not a match for Visual Studio. Training videos would help significantly. Specially now that MS. charges for theirs.

App. Inventor is not powerful enough and lacks libraries to become significant payer in its current format. Converting its graphical code to some type of Classical c syntax would increase its adoption.

All in all, Apple and to a lesser degree Android have a rockier future than they both anticipate. Their good fortune lies on the fact that Microsoft is filed with politics and it doesn't understand change until its forced on them.

Hey, wait a sec, Apple behaved that way recently with the Flash Admob controversy, but at least it didn't take them years to realize it.
@Uralbas all i got out of that is your lazy and use visual studio. Android development is just java renamed (why there in trouble for it) and Objective - C is alot like cocoa.

There not springing anything new on dev's, you just didn't do your home work.
@jessedegenera if that's all you got our of it, goes to show out takes one to know one. Rofl

If you only knew. You asume too much and make very little effort to understand.
@Uralbas dev's complaining about java and objective C and over visual studio, now i've heard everything, just a total joke.
@Uralbas

I haven't done any Windows Phone 7 development so can't comment on that. But IMO, Eclipse with the JDT runs circles around Visual Studio with C#. Just the refactoring capability by itself does it for me.

Some of the Android development would be eased if Google released the source code. And it would be nice to have a WYSIWIG editor so you didn't have to launch the app to fix layout issues. But overall, it's a joy to use.
0 Votes
+ -
We get it Sam, you love Android. The reality is Apple is making money hand over fist. That is the goal of any company. Google makes almost no money from Android. Plus with the new V-cast app store, you will see further splintering of the Android base. There is no financial incentive for Apple to get into a race to the bottom with Android phones, i.e. offering 3 for the price of 1 and $59 models filled with dreck-ware.
@Mike Cox

that's to much truth for these blogger mike, your going to explode some heads.

The best is seeing all these verizon heads complain about a walled garden. (hint, verizon is worse than apple in that respect, by about 400 times) There the tea party activists of mobile computing. Enough information to hang themselves.
@Mike Cox Apple is making money hand over fist? they are making your money hand over fist but in the grand scheme of things I think not. They're stock is $269 & Google's is $480. WOW! Google's revenue is $25billion a year. Not Apple. Race to the bottom? You apple fans crack me up. Oh Android are cheap phones being sold as buy one get one free ha ha ha. Wrong. That's just Verizon that does that. I'm with sprint and I've never seen a buy one get one free anything from them. Just Verizon does that, but I guess you need to cut up on Android because you feel bad about being blinded by the indestructible gorilla glass that keeps breaking. or is it the partial web pages you see without flash? Or is it with the declining fan base? or is it yesterday's tech called an iphone 4? Loss of reception, bad proximity sensor, freezing up like MS phones, dropped calls, selective multitasking, and on and on and on. Oh but Steve says it's perfect the way it is because that's how phone should be and you iphans say YES STEVE! PHONE IS GOOD! zombies
@Guyver21

You know what's worse than an apple fan boy? a Google fanboy. You people think your saving the world by bashing a capitalist company for another one. Google doesn't care about you, fyi. There a publicly held company just like apple.

Anyway, Apple stock has been far more giving to it's investor's than Apples. It's split at least two times.

Anyway, since pretty much every part of your comment was completely false, i'll bullet the rest so we dont' have to waste time.

First, buy one get one free promotions are available on Androids from any carrier, including sprint, and AT&T. here's an example. http://shop.sprint.com/NASApp/onlinestore/en/Action/DisplayPhones?phoneSKU=APA6277KT

Second, Yes, googles revenue was 23.65 billion. Great. Apples was 46.71, and MS was 58.69 billion for that Same period. Funny how the impact is different when you provide all the facts.

Enjoy your Nascar apps that you can't uninstall. Oh yeah, and Skype.

wait, you on sprint, so skype doesn't offer it's android client to you, even though it's 100% finished and compatible.

but i thought your garden wasn't walled? Maybe it's sealed? Maybe you have no idea what your talking about.
0 Votes
+ -
clueless
banned from zdnet 15th Sep 2010
@Guyver21
you're another clueless apple hater. so here we go again:

1. apple's revenue in 2010 will be around 60 billion.
2. the price of a share says nothing about the value of a company because the number of outstanding shares is different from company to company. you have to multiply the price of a share with the number of shares to get the overall value of a company. this number is called market cap or company value. as of today: apple 246 billion, google 153 billion.

if you have further questions, don't be shy, just ask.
@Guyver21
You do realize that Apples Market Cap is 250 Billion and Google's Market Cap is 150 Billion right. Stock price alone doesn't tell you much. You need to know how much stock is out there. Also Google's revenue per year is 25 billion, but Apples is 57 Billion.
I'm not arguing Apple is a better company than Google for vice versa, but your argument that Google is better financially is flawed.
@Guyver21

Others have tried to educate you, so I'll just add one thing.

Apple stock has split three times since starting at $22, so their REAL stock price would be $2,160 per that original share.

Google started at $85 and as far as I know has never split. It orbits around $500.

The reason companies split their stock? I think it comes down to psychology.

Apple historically doesn't like having their stock too high.

It's odd that they haven't split again. I think they're planning something...
Every time I see/get to use an iPhone, I drool with techno-lust. But I can't have one, because ATT won't reach my house and is just fraking unreliable. So I sit there, year after year, on the outside looking in, while I use Verizon, and its 2nd-rate devices. I hate my Storm so badly that when my contract's up for renewal next April, I'll probably dismantle it with a hammer right in front of them, and take my chances on a Droid. Not that I expect to be a big fan of that, either. But it's one more piece of kludged-together lame ass tech that I'll be stuck with another 2 fraking years while Verizon and Apple continue their Dance of Death.
@vikingnyc@...

Well... If you go nuts with the hammer, you could accidentally hit your thumb.

What about getting an iPod Touch and a MiFi ? Use SKYPE to route calls to the iPod.

Leave the MiFi, which works on Verizon IIRC, in your pocket.
@vikingnyc@...
Have you looked at the Droid X? Pretty sweet.
It's not going to be Verizon. Apple and Verizon just don't match from a business perspective on too many levels: http://bit.ly/alnh0F
@keyesdav They DO match on a very important level, though.

They like making money hand over fist, which is what a Verizon iPhone would do.
0 Votes
+ -
agreed
banned from zdnet 15th Sep 2010
@keyesdav
neither of those will give control to the other. but the iphone will be on sprint and t-mobile. verizon will go on with android and maybe wp7.
Alas, true (maybe). the only reason I haven't purchased an iPhone is called AT&T. I like Verizon and droid just fine, but I like Apple better, in part because it fully integrates with my Apple-based systems at work and at home. I agree with the commentator who recognizes quite clearly that Apple is an investor's dream. When it appears that it will become profitable, Apple and Verizon will copulate, and I'll buy my iPhone. Until then, I content myself with my PowerBook Pro, my iPod, and my Verizon cell phone.b
@markomd What does the iphone not being on verizon have to do with Android's success? The U.S. is the only place where the iphone is only available on one carrier. So what's the excuse for everywhere else? Canada has the iphone on all carriers and the android and the android is beating out the iphone.
0 Votes
+ -
again
banned from zdnet 15th Sep 2010
@Guyver21
if only you knew what you are talking about, it is getting tiresome.
the iphone is available exclusive on only one carrier in the following countries: us, germany, china, japan, belgium, new zealand, spain, finland, the netherlands, south korea etc.

please, sh** up.
0 Votes
+ -
Total unit sales per quarter from dozens of disparate manufacturers is not the metric that matters for consumers or developers (although even by that metric iOS still beats Android), unless it also leads to increased share in hardware peripherals, software, profit and developer mindshare. Users originally flocked to Windows because that's what all the software was written for and all hardware peripherals were compatible with.

However, more iOS devices ship each day (230,000) than Android devices (200,000) and the iOS installed base is far larger (120 million) versus low tens of millions for Android and with the enormous growth in sales of the iPad and the newly re-designed iPod Touch, that is quite likely to continue.

The Android tablet market is stillborn as Google wants manufacturers to use the Chrome OS and Web apps on tablets instead of Android. As a result Google refuses to allow Android tablets access to the Android Market unless they have expensive cell phone hardware as well.

Developers continue to throng to Apple before Android because of the following facts:
- App developers make 50x the income from iOS apps (1 billion dollars) compared to Android ($21 million over similar time period),
- Piracy levels of 50-97% on Android and easily by-passed anti-piracy measures on Android
- the non-curated free-for-all Android Marketplace has far less quality apps and is chock full of spam apps, bank phishing apps, spyware and other malware turning away customers by the droves.

iOS has the advantages of:
- fully integrated iTunes store which boasts 70-80% marketshare in the music and media markets
- 55% of mobile web browsing marketshare
- almost 100% of the HiFi dock integration market
- 70% of new cars feature iPhone/iPod dock connector and steering wheel integration.

With no individual Android model or manufacturer coming anywhere near the unit sales of the iPhone, iPod Touch or iPad, and no common Android dock connector standard or form factor there remains no motivation whatsoever for hardware peripheral manufacturers to stop giving Apple their virtually undivided attention.

Apple captured 48% of the entire cell phone industry's profit share in Q2 2010 while Android manufacturers like Motorola and Samusung struggled with only 2% and 1% share, and LG plunged into the red. This fact matters to more than just the stock market - consumers don't want to be stuck with an orphaned Palm phone or for that matter, another orphaned Kin or Nexus One.

Now the quarterly unit sales of Android devices may indeed exceed the number of iOS devices sold in the future, but with Android developer income 50x lower than iOS app developers, terrifying piracy rates, a marketplace riddled with spam apps, a growing malware problem and just plain low-quality apps, virtually no hardware peripheral ecosystem and far lower installed base, that metric turns out to be pretty meaningless.

With Google not making any money on Android activations and carriers like Verizon choking off Google's ad-based income by exclusively licensing Microsoft's Bing as the default search engine, and the potential for massive Java licensing fees courtesy of the Oracle lawsuit, the potentially larger unit sales of Android devices in the future is turning out to be a very hollow victory indeed.

It is quite apparent that Google will continue eating Apple's dust where it matters.

-Mart
@marthill Where are you getting your data? list it here please. "However, more iOS devices ship each day (230,000) than Android devices (200,000" you do realize that Android just started? it only really started pushing big time to devices last year. 6 months ago it was activating 60K units a day. In just 6 months it went to 200K units a day. They are moving way faster than Apple. Apple has huge percentages because no one was out there to challenge them. Now Android is eating up their percentages in the market. Apple's iphone will wind up just like the mac. it won't disappear but it will wind up like a myth just like the mac. You hear about them but you don't really know anyone who has one. the iphone in comparison to all the cell phones in the world is almost non existent. They attract certain types of people. People who are afraid of tech seem to gravitate to the iphone. Don't even say the iphone is a great piece of tech because it's not. It's behind most phones in the world and doesn't even work like Jobs says it does. I know some people with the iphone and it's pretty piece of crap.
0 Votes
+ -
man, you are an idiot
banned from zdnet 15th Sep 2010
@Guyver21
of course, you will not see a mac, as long as your hiding in the basement of your mama's house. if you would be on a college though or at a university you'd see plenty of them. everywhere on the streets actually. and no, your sever room doesn't count either.
@Guyver21
Which references would you like? It's all easy to Google.

For example, Steve Jobs gave the 230,000 iOS devices sold per day and the installed base of 120 million numbers at the release of the new iPod Touch on 1st of Sept 2010.

Larva Labs published the analysis of Android dev income on their company website on 21 June 2010 and indicated that Android developers have made $21 million which is only 2% of the $1 billion paid out to iOS developers despite the Android Marketplace launching only 3 months after the iPhone App Store. Larva Labs highlights "how much of a cottage industry the paid Android Market remains, with insufficient sales numbers to warrant full-time labor for paid content"

Gameloft is on record as having stated that they make 400x the sales from iOS compared to Android on 20th of November 2009.

DVD John Lech Johansen, the author of DoubleTwist the popular iTunes replacement for Android, on his personal blog has this to say about the Marketplace:
"Google does far too little curation of the Android Market, and it shows. Unlike Apples App Store, the Android Market has few high quality apps.... just a few examples of whats wrong with the Android Market. Those 144 spam ringtone apps (which are clearly infringing copyright) are currently cluttering the top ranks of the Multimedia category... Developers and users are getting fed up and its time for Google to clean up the house."

I am not arguing that the growth rate of Android hasn't been impressive, but many commentators have been making the mistake of confusing growth from low percentage figures with total growth. For example Net Applications reported that the iPhone's web market share in May 2010 (pre-iPhone 4 no less) grew by 2.5 points (from 30.3 percent to 32.8 percent) vs Android which only grew by 0.9 points (from 5.3 percent to 6.2 percent). So the iPhone actually captured a larger additional percentage of the market than Android over that period.

However, if you use spurious "growth" percentages, Android gets reported as growing 17% versus only 8% for the iPhone despite growing by only a third of the market share points.

Of course this is completely ridiculous as Android is starting from such low figures that any growth percentages sound fantastic even if the actual increase in market share points is actually lower than the iPhone. Very irresponsible reporting.

In terms of age, Android phones have been out for only a year less than the iPhone and the Android MarketPlace is only 3 months younger than the iPhone App Store. The first really popular Android model - the Motorola Droid - was released only a year and a bit after the first really popular iPhone model, the 3G.

Commentators neglect to compare that the iPhone, the iPad and now the new model iPod Touch also continue to experience enormous growth rates and still exceed the sales totals of all Android devices from all manufacturers combined.

Again however, my main point is that unit sales alone are meaningless unless they result in similar growth in software share, hardware peripheral share, developer income, manufacturer profit share, web browsing share etc. With iOS continuing to obliterate Android on all of these counts, Apple will continue to hold the lion's share of developers, advertisers and most lucrative customers.

-Mart
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Without Verizon, iPhone on track to start eating Google's dust
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Gentleman, amazing mulberry bags web site web page post. Just wherever could be the website's RSS feed?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix