Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

WWDC 2011: Apple iCloud will be free, iTunes Match replaces pirated songs

By | June 6, 2011, 11:34am PDT

Summary: Ever since it was announced last week that Apple CEO Steve Jobs would present iCloud at WWDC 2011, there has been a deluge of rumors and guesses as to what it might be. Now, we have the answers.

Ever since it was announced last week that Apple CEO Steve Jobs would present iCloud at WWDC 2011, there has been a deluge of rumors and guesses as to what it might be. Now, we have the answers.

Jobs noted at the keynote that the cloud has “demoted” the PC and Mac to just mere devices, and iCloud will step in as the “center of your digital life” and digital hub. Those are some lofty goals, but that is where Apple thinks computing is headed these days.

MobileMe, which Jobs noted was not Apple’s “finest hour” (to say the least), is basically being reworked from the ground up and turned into iCloud. Actually, it doesn’t really even exist anymore (at least in Jobs’ memory).

The idea behind iCloud is simple: iCloud stores content and then pushes it wirelessly to all of a user’s devices. That goes for contacts, calendars, new emails, etc. Basically almost everything you sync in iTunes via USB can be done via the cloud now. Users can only backup data using Wi-Fi connections, which might seem limiting but it should save anyone from outrageous data costs.

The big focus on iCloud centered around music. For days, weeks, whatever - everyone has been wondering what Apple was going to announce regarding a cloud-based music streaming service. However, we didn’t get what most people expected.

The first surprise was that there will be no charge for multiple downloads to multiple devices. The key word is “multiple,” not unlimited. Users can just hit a “Purchased” button in iTunes on their various devices and push what is already purchased and downloaded to nine other iCloud-enabled gadgets.

Secondly, iTunes for iCloud isn’t actually a competitor for Google Music, Amazon’s music service or anything else like that. There isn’t a subscription-based model involved here, but rather the usual purchase model that already exists. The only difference now is that users can just push the songs to multiple devices wirelessly and much easier.

The closest it gets to the streaming service is the new iTunes Match. Users who have pirated MP3s on their computers can try to go back to the honest and good side of things by using this software that scans the hard drive and then matches the titles to 256Kbps AAC, DRM-free tracks. (That must be where Apple’s latest deal with the music industry came in.) Jobs promised this scan would take only “minutes” and that it costs $24.99 per year “regardless” of the amount of songs.

Some of the other tidbits included in iCloud include a @me.com account, a no-ads promise, and a new feature in the App Store that shows the user its previous purchases (i.e. mobile apps, iBookstore items, etc.) that are waiting to be pushed down to other devices.

Apple also appears to be targeting a more business-minded bunch with the new Documents in the Cloud function. This feature incorporates the iWork suite (Pages, Numbers, and Keynote) and follows the idea of the cloud: users can work on projects using one of these apps using an iPad and then pick up where one left off using a PC. iCloud will also sync up the Camera library among multiple devices using Photo Stream, which pushes the last 1,000 photos taken on any of the iCloud-enabled devices to the rest. These images will be stored to their own album, but they’ll only be kept there for 30 days. If a user wants to keep them, then the selected images must be moved to a different, specified album.

Although it was widely rumored that Apple would charge $25 per year for iCloud usage (versus the $99 MobileMe yearly subscription fee), Jobs said that iCloud will be free. Yes, free - except for that whole iTunes Match fee if you opt into it.

Like iOS 5, the developer preview will be available starting today, and the full version will launch this fall. iCloud will offer 5GB of storage space, but purchased music, e-books and photos don’t count towards that total.

Related coverage on ZDNet:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
135
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: WWDC 2011: Apple iCloud will be free, replaces MobileMe
tringo007 28th Sep
Together with almost everything which appears to be developing within this specific subject matter, a significant percentage of viewpoints are generally quite refreshing. However, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your whole theory, all be it exhilarating none the less. It would seem to everybody that your comments are not totally validated and in reality you are generally your self not really wholly convinced of your argument. In any event I did take pleasure in reading through it. no essay scholarships
iCloud seems to be a logical move for Apple. It will store stuff sans PC. That eliminates the need for their device owners to HAVE PC's. Since its free, eventually, I predict that the ability to sync with PC's or Macs will be eliminated. After many more users are tied to iCloud, then Apple will add a few features and then start charging. Ka-ching, you are hooked to Apple and they have your money.
@mstrsfty
to own a PC right now to do that, so it's not a new concept, but yes, a nessacery one moving forward.
@Will Pharaoh: I watched Jobs presentation of iPad 2 from early March just yesterday, so I can compare it: from very first seconds of the just published video of today's presentation: Steven Jobs appeared more frail, exhausted, and his voice was shaking at some moments -- not because he was emotional, but because of seemed *extreme* weakness -- for the first time I have ever heard him.

I hope this will pass and he will get robust and healthy again, but this, for now, means that things might actually be going to the bad direction.

To be honest, I am really worried about this. More than about any advancements of progress announced. For the sake of humanism at least.
0 Votes
+ -
Words
dhays 6th Jun
@Will Pharaoh
etc, not ect. (etcetera), necessary not nessacery.
As for the topic of discussion, I don't really care what Apple does, I have not jumped on their bandwagon, nor Amazon's, nor Google's. I do buy from Amazon and have an unused gmail account (because of my phone), but nothing Apple.
0 Votes
+ -
@DeRSSS :The man has pancreatic cancer. He's made it much longer than the average patient (maybe because he has access to medical care the average patient does not) but there is no cure for it, so he's wasting away and frantically trying to accomplish his visions before he departs. I wish him well. But you're going to have to get used to the idea of Apple not having Steve to lead it.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't see that
rbethell 6th Jun
@mstrsfty With the work Jobs showed on Lion, its pretty clear that the Macbook, the Pro, and the Air are meant to be premium-class clients for iCloud. Apple doesn't care what device you subscribe to iCloud with.... it just hopes that its sold you that device, be it an iPod Touch or a 17" Macbook Pro.
0 Votes
+ -
@mstrsfty,

... was software installed on your Mac or PC, which turned your computer into a private cloud, which allowed you to access your media and private files from anywhere. God help Apple if it has a Sony type network breach on its hands, and its customers' media and personal document files are taken over by hackers.
@mstrsfty
But can I downloiad from the "iCloud" to my pc or other device in a non-AAC format?

plain
0 Votes
+ -
No. But why would you?
Bruizer 6th Jun
@rhonin

AAC is better than MP3 and is playable on almost any device.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why would you?
max_wedge Updated - 6th Jun
@bruizer, no, AAC has better compression than MP3, but qualititative differences depend on personal preference. Also, if you are comparing 320Kbps AAC to 320Kbps MP3 then yes AAC is better, but jobs is giving us 256Kbps AAC for our (cd ripped) 320Kbps MP3's. I prefer 320Kbps mp3 over 256 Kbps AAC personally. So that's why I would rather upload my music collection than music match from itunes. Indeed when I buy music online, I buy it from bigpond music where I can get it as a 320Kbps mp3

AND, MP3 is more widely supported than AAC, which plays on "almost" but not "every" device.
@mstrsfty 90% of my home user customers have media collections way in excess of 5GB. So iCloud is the cloud you have when you are not really having a cloud. Yeah, it's free, but it's not gonna let people do away with their computers.
@max_wedge
Apple doesn't want to do away with computers/phones/iPads. That's where they make their money, since they aren't charging for iCloud.
@max_wedge Guess you didn't see the part where the media that you have won't apply to the total. It's stuff outside the media based data that applies to the 5GB.
@max_wedge Where did that stat come from? Not saying it isn't true but I have never seen it and would be surprised if it were true.
@max_wedge To clear this up for you. Jobs said Apple will essentially store a "memory" of up to 25,000 songs for their users and allow them to download that file to their devices via the cloud. They're not storing actual MP3s. He said they have a library of over 13,000,000 songs so he feels sure that if you have it in your library, that they have it in theirs. Photos, documents, and files such as that count towards the 5GB.
iCloud seems useful. What's more to it?

Florida Mortgage Rates
Mortgage FL
Florida Mortgage
Together with almost everything which appears to be developing within this specific subject matter, a significant percentage of viewpoints are generally quite refreshing. However, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your whole theory, all be it exhilarating none the less. It would seem to everybody that your comments are not totally validated and in reality you are generally your self not really wholly convinced of your argument. In any event I did take pleasure in reading through it. no essay scholarships
So is it piracy if I own a CD, rip it and keep the track on my phone? Why should I need to pay for music I own? What happens if I quit paying the $25/year?
0 Votes
+ -
@rshol

Apple definition of piracy is that you didn't buy the file from iTunes. The music cartel's definition of piracy is that you didn't pay *enough* or *often enough* even if you technically followed the rules.
I find the concept of considing mp3s to be pirated to be offensive. My mp3s are ripped from physical cds that I have purchased, or are mp3s downloaded from artist sites as they make them available. I don't want my library considered pirated, nor do I want my mp3s replaced by aac files...
@terry flores

I don't recall Apple (Jobs) labeling it as pirated music. I believe it was the Author that did so.
@terry flores: Yup, and that is why the music industry as we know it is dying.

In the future, recorded music will simply be a way for performers to promote their LIVE PERFORMANCES. The day when an artist could sign a major label contract and only tour a couple weeks a year or even every few years are gone.

Record companies: The days of vast profits and near monopolies are gone. Of course I haven't heard ANYTHING published by a major label that I'd be willing to own a copy of in ten years or more. I haven't been in a record store in years, and what recordings I've bought, I've handed my money directly to the artist.
@terry flores Agreed. Most of my MP3s are from CDs, records, share-friendly artists and reel-to-reel.
0 Votes
+ -
How daft can you get?
Laraine Anne Barker 6th Jun
All the music on my iTunes comes from my own CDs, with one exception--a download bought from Hyperion. By your definition, Apple would therefore accuse me of being a pirate!
@terry flores: Actually Apple never mentioned piracy at all. It apparently does not care. But if you want to use their service to share them, there will be a fee. You can of course just keep doing what you do today and NOT use the service, and Apple could care less. So quit your whining everyone!
@terry flores *like*

@NBrazil, so the fact that record labels are getting 58% of the split of iCloud revenue doesn't have anything to do with legitimising your pirate tracks? If labels get 58% of every 25 bucks a user spends music matching their mp3 collection, that strikes me as a royalty fee... Apple only gets 30%, which is what you are paying for the service.

However that said, I assume (big if but let's see) that the music matching doesn't affect your existing mp3 files, it simply adds these tracks to your cloud from the itunes collection without interacting with your mp3 beyond the scanning process.
0 Votes
+ -
You don't have to repay
jaypeg 6th Jun
@rshol

The $25 is just for the iTunes Match service which gives you access to matched titles via iCloud across all your Apple devices. You don't have to buy this, you can just keep on loading your mp3s to each of your devices manually.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't see the value.
Tigertank 6th Jun
@jaypeg
$25 a year is not a fortune, but it is still $25 to listen to music that I already purchased and already am listening to across all my devices. I guess if you are the types that updates your playlists on all your devices everyday, then you are the the target demographic. For me it is weeks or months between updates. I won't be using the iCloud.
@Tigertank There are obviously going to be people that this is a good fit for and those that it isn't like yourself. What I think is one of the best parts of the whole iCloud service is that it's free unless you want the matching option. You say you won't be using it because of the $25/yr fee but didn't mention if you even needed the matching service or not.
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah, it was Rachel King who called them "pirated". Apple just said it would match your ripped songs with 256kbps versions from their library. I wonder what happens if the song isn't in there.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple uploads it nt
Bruizer 6th Jun
@klockheed
@klockheed - Jobs made it quite clear that in the case where they cannot match your local song, they will upload it
@rshol
You're paying for the iTunes Match service, that's all. It simply eliminates the need to upload all of those ripped tracks if Apple already carries them on iTunes. Anything that Apple does not carry, you can still upload.

And I assume that you can still upload the tracks to iCloud if you want. But, considering that most people have much slower connections going upstream than downstream, the track matching step can save a lot of time (and with broadband providers moving towards data caps, it also saves on broadband usage).
0 Votes
+ -
@rshol

You are paying for the service and convenience.
@Bruizer but record labels get 58% of the icloud revenue, so yes, you are paying for the music.
@max_wedge No, actually Apple is paying the record labels to cover both their and the user's a$$es on the duplicate copies of song. If you had to pay for each song that wasn't already purchased from iTunes they you would be correct but that is not the case. The annual fee is to use the matching service and Apple is paying 58% of that fee as a CYA.
@rshol The iCloud features page of the Apple website says nothing about piracy or DRM. The purpose and value of iTunes Match will be to spare you the need to upload a track from your iTunes library to iCloud if the the iTunes Store already contains a 256 Kbps recording of the track. If it doesn't, then Match will upload the track from your library.
@rshol You don't have to pay for it. The $25/yr fee just makes it easier to get that media on all your devices. You are paying for Apple to match the ripped songs with what is already in iTunes, then pushing a copy to all your devices without having to upload it in the first place.
@rshol If you stop paying the $25 a year, you'll just lose the ability to download the track from the iTunes store via any of your devices at any time you wish. Since the introduction of the truly digital age of music, there has been no law stating you couldn't have your files in multiple locations. There were only laws governing distribution of those files to paying/nonpaying persons.
AAC? I prefer mp3 or other formats.
Looks like I would have to convert all the songs....
I'll stick with my mp3 versions...
plain
@rhonin
Besides, the Amazon CLoud Player works great across all of my devices that I play music on.....
@rhonin There is no requirement to convert. The deal is if you have lets say 5000 mp3 files on icloud client number 1, the match service plans to compare those songs against songs already in the iTunes store. If they match, then rather than transferring from client number 1 to lets say an ipod touch, it will directly download to the second client the matching AAC version stored, leaving your original MP3 version on your PC or MAC, untouched and unmolested
0 Votes
+ -
@rhonin

Why stick with a poor format?
@rhonin And what was the likelihood that you would have ever used iCloud no matter what the format? That's what I thought so your post was pointless and irrelevant.
Given the uncertain security of the cloud, why would I want to move something out from behind my firewall to put it on Apple's cloud?
@johne37179 Then don't use it.
According to the keynote, there are 3 ways to get music you ripped into iCloud: 1) Sync with a Mac/PC via cable or WiFi, 2) Purchase the music from iTunes, 3) Music Sync. If you don't want to pay anything, just sync with a computer.
M biggest concern (not for me but others I know) is how this will all work with 3G/4G....
They have a data limit. I hope there is a way to turn on/off these functions that can impact this.
sad
@rhonin I guess you missed the part that said it was WiFi only.
@kstafferton
Looks like I did.....

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix