madison

Microsoft, Apple, and the death of the desktop

By | March 25, 2008, 11:08am PDT

Summary: In his article titled “Dear desktop, welcome back“, Ryan Stewart claims that “the desktop is exciting again in a number of interesting ways.” Unfortunately (for Microsoft, Apple, and others with a vested interest in the desktop), most of his points actually lead me to the opposite conclusion. For example, Ryan writes: This dustup between Safari and [...]

Microsoft, Apple, and the death of the desktopIn his article titled “Dear desktop, welcome back“, Ryan Stewart claims that “the desktop is exciting again in a number of interesting ways.” Unfortunately (for Microsoft, Apple, and others with a vested interest in the desktop), most of his points actually lead me to the opposite conclusion. For example, Ryan writes:

This dustup between Safari and Mozilla? It’s over a desktop application! Why? Because the desktop is important. It’s the most valuable place. From there you can control the search path, you can control the experience and you can keep rolling out updates. It’s easy to leave a webpage and never come back. But uninstalling a desktop application? A browser? That’s harder.

Installing and uninstalling and maintaining anything on the desktop (be it Windows or Mac or Linux) is hard, and more and more people won’t bother. Why? Because there’s a better alternative. Another way of saying this is, the browser is the new desktop.

Case in point: My wife has been complaining lately that her “computer was slow”. She’s running Windows XP on a Dell machine, so first I checked out the usual suspects. Viruses? Nope. Spyware? None found. Crapware? Already gone, from the day after we got the machine. Startup programs?The browser is the new desktop. Removed a few but it didn’t help. I started the task manager, but saw nothing suspicious. No processes using CPU or disk I/O. But still, she said it was slow.

So I watched what she was doing. She brought up the browser to check web-based mail on gmail.com. She used google.com to search for something for our kid’s classwork. She went to cartoonnetwork.com and webkins.com to play games with the kids. And so forth. Notice a pattern here? Everything was in the browser. It was the *browser* that was slow, not the computer. In her mind, the browser was the computer.

The problem turned out to be too many plug-ins in the browser. She had a Upromise plug-in, a Google toolbar plug-in, a Real media plug-in, and a bunch of other plug-ins I didn’t even recognize. I turned it all off, restarted the browser, and poof, “the computer” was several times faster. Cue fanfare.

My point is that even with the technical limitations under the covers–things like browser incompatibilities, offline storage, JavaScript memory leaks, etc. (all those things that developers pull their hair out about)–the convenience of internet-delivered applications is just so compelling that all other issues are falling by the wayside. In the span of a few years, we’ve witnessed a major paradigm shift in the way computing is surfaced to users.

Sure, there will always be some niche applications that need an old-fashioned desktop. Right now, those include 3D interactive games, graphic design tools, software development tools, and some office productivity tools. As web technology gets more and more powerful, though, expect those to slip more and more into obscurity as internetworked alternatives replace them.

We’ve already passed the tipping point, Ryan. We’re not welcoming the desktop back; we’re saying our goodbyes.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Burnette is a software industry veteran with more than 25 years of experience as a programmer, author, and speaker. He has written numerous technical articles and books, most recently "Hello, Android: Introducing Google's Mobile Development Platform" from the Pragmatic Programmers.

Disclosure

Ed Burnette

Ed Burnette is a Manager of Mobile Development at SAS. However the postings on this site are his own and do not represent the positions, strategies, or opinions of his employer.

Biography

Ed Burnette

Ed Burnette has been hooked on computers ever since he laid eyes on a TRS-80 in the local Radio Shack. Since graduating from NC State University he has programmed everything from serial device drivers and debuggers to web servers. After a delightful break working on commercial video games, Ed reluctantly returned to business software. He currently develops enterprise software for Android phones and tablets.

In his copious spare time, Ed writes and speaks about all kinds of technology and software. His most recent books include the Eclipse IDE Pocket Guide from O'Reilly and Hello, Android: Introducing Google's Mobile Development Platform from the Pragmatic Programmers.

Talkback Most Recent of 293 Talkback(s)

  • All my apps are desktop
    Home apps:
    Tax software - desktop
    Email (Thunderbird)- desktop
    Games - desktop
    Office apps (MS or OpenOffice) - desktop

    Work Apps:
    Financial App - Desktop
    Office App - desktop
    All end user apps specific to our environment - desktop
    email - desktop

    Number of web based apps used in my home or work environments = 2 or less.
    IT Admin apps - 75% desktop

    That is fairly typical for most of the people that I know the desktop won't die anytime in my working career. I'm in my low 30's so that is another 40 years from now
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jfp
    25th Mar 2008
  • My apps
    Home: I have a desktop I don't use. My wife gets on it for email, message boards, MySpace and Facebook.

    Laptop: MacBook. I use Firefox, iTunes, and Adobe Suite. I have NeoOffice (OOo) but I'm moving more and more to google apps.

    Work: Office (Outlook, Excel, Word), Adobe suite (InDesign, Photoshop, Acrobat Pro), Firefox, accounting software and one more app that is built in a browser. Our vendors don't send out CDs with their software anymore, it's now a website you log in to.

    Of this entire list, only Adobe suite and iTunes isn't available as a web app (inside Firefox of course).
    ZDNet Gravatar
    glocks out
    25th Mar 2008
  • And, when Google ads a Java Runtime to Gears, you will see a ton more
    available as online applications that also work offline. For home usage, we are fast moving to the possibility of being 100% web applications.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    25th Mar 2008
  • Except in rural areas
    where the 'net experience sucks, or is really expensive, or both. From our perspective, trusting a browser to be your computer is sheer idiocy.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ajole
    26th Mar 2008
  • Very true, rual areas were the last to get reliable electricity from the
    grid too.

    But, with offline abilities, that will help make up for the slow and unreliable connections as well.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    26th Mar 2008
  • We still don't have reliable electricity
    and while the phone works 99% of the time, it can't sustain more than 9600bps. Satellite is it. Until someone comes up with a viable wimax business plan for us, my stuff is staying right here. Oh, I live only 60 miles from Wash DC and in the supposedly .net hub of the east coast. You would be surprised at how much of the country fits this model.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jonniva
    18th Apr 2008
  • Electricity is Reliable? I'm still waiting.
    I'm only 2 miles from the city limits in a small subdivision. I installed a 9500 watt generator in March of 2000. Since then I have put over 120 hours on it due to power outages. My Internet (10 Meg on cable) and pone (land line) have been far more reliable. Although great for individual problems, I've found cellphones next to useless in real emergencies (All circuits are busy)
    ZDNet Gravatar
    rdhalsteatzd
    20th Apr 2008
  • Actually some of the rural areas were fine...
    even before the depression! In my home area where I grew up the folks made cooperatives that built their own wires for phone and power.

    My grand dad had to take down the copper wires he had jury rigged to serve the same purpose. Even his system was very reliable, even compared to some city black out rates!

    Don't discount us country bumpkins, we gitter-done! Not just sit around and complain about it!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    JCitizen
    18th Dec 2008
  • Trust A Browser??
    I agree trusting any browser is not something I will ever do!!!!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    VinceS_z
    26th Mar 2008
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    btljooz
    26th Mar 2008
  • Heck no!!
    I don't want 100% of my apps & games to be be dependent on connectivity.

    Sure, there are uses for this idea but not so much that everyone will go on an exodus to 100% web apps.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    BlazingEagle
    26th Mar 2008
  • I won't either, even though I dumped Outlook and Eudora a long time ago
    All my email is now web based, but that's about it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    hasta la Vista, bah-bie
    27th Mar 2008
  • Or on a plane, or the Developing World, or O'Hare Airport Where it's $6.95/
    day to use their wifi, or the small Midwestern communities my family and in-laws live in....

    No way is the desktop dead, until the world's blanketed w/free wireless broadband - which will never EVER happen now, thanks to Verizon and AT&T buying the 700 MHz spectrum!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    drprodny
    26th Mar 2008
  • Exactly
    Many Americans still use dial-up, and Web-based apps are no good for them. But who cares about those hicks?

    As a dial-up user myself, it appears nobody cares about those who are stuck browsing at 56K. I'm about ready to install an image-blocking extension in Firefox, as so many sites these days take forever to load (including this one).

    Web-based apps? Don't make me laugh!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Greenknight_z
    27th Mar 2008
  • You're right!
    No, we really don't care about the "hicks" on 56K dialup.

    This is going to seem tangential, but why is Windows having problems nowadays, and has been for years? Could it be because of it's insistence that legacy applications and hardware are supported and integrated with no problems? It bloated everything, and the entire system suffers as a result. They tried to prop up the lower 5%.

    Our internet connections are like that at this point, as are the programmes that run on them. Simply put, our speeds are becoming greater, and we can do more and more with the internet than we have before. We can no longer cater to the shrinking minority that hangs onto legacy ways of doing things, be it internet connections or what have you. By your mantra, we could say that we should slow down and wait for those that are still using 2400 baud modems.

    There comes a point where we have to cut off the stragglers.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    superbus
    18th Apr 2008

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources