Cell phone as desktop computer
Summary: This is a bit of a crazy idea, but it constitutes part of the reason I keep harping on about the importance of full-blown desktop operating systems in cell phones. Yes, it creates developer consistency, meaning that the same skills used to develop apps for desktop computers map directly to cell phones applications.
This is a bit of a crazy idea, but it constitutes part of the reason I keep harping on about the importance of full-blown desktop operating systems in cell phones. Yes, it creates developer consistency, meaning that the same skills used to develop apps for desktop computers map directly to cell phones applications. And yes, it means that developments in the desktop OS can be rolled out much faster to the cell phone, as the two environments are, for the most part, one and the same (not exactly, as you have different form factors / UI conventions, but you catch my drift). Both of these things accelerate the important role cell phones are going to play in our daily lives as these devices get more and more powerful.
Think about that growing power. Today, iPhone storage maxes out at 16 GB. Imagine in 10 years, when it could max out at 1.6 terabytes...or more. At those levels, people will start to carry around whole video libraries, every document they have ever created, and, of course, ALL of their music.
Obviously, the application story will have evolved in that time. Applications usable while riding on a bus will still need to accomodate the small screen of a mobile device. With that kind of power, however, a mobile phone in theory could act like an ultra-mobile computer.
This a variation on a theme I discussed back in 2005, where I wondered whether you could store an entire operating system freeze-dried on some kind of USB dongle-sized device that could be plugged-in to a "docking station" to provide important things like a keyboard, mouse and computer screen. Well, a cell phone isn't much bigger than my hypothetical USB dongle (and standalone usable, to boot), and I see no reason why it couldn't be "docked" just like that hypothetical USB device could be docked.
People could buy such "docking stations" for their homes (quite cheaply, I might add), but more to the point, they would be a rather cheap way for coffee bars, restaurants, and other public locations to offer the kind of "sticky" features that incentivizes customers to return. Most long-haul airlines now have screens through which they offer video services embedded into the back of seats. Imagine if the food tray had a touch-sensitive keyboard embedded into it, and the armrests had a place to plug in your phone?
Clearly, the UI when docked would be different, but that's why it is so important that both iPhone and Google's Android initiative are based on full desktop operating systems. Some applications would be suited for the small screen, and others would only be usable when docked (though I bet most would offer functionality in both modes). It does, however, seem quite a feasible extension of trends in the smartphone industry.
Smartphones, in other words, wouldn't just be phones anymore. They would become ultra-mobile computers, and that is very interesting.
If Microsoft could do something like this, they would clearly have an advantage, given their desktop market share.
[Additional Note] Just caught this bit at the end of a post by Mary Jo Foley:
From recent executive remarks, it sounds like Microsoft is trying to get Windows and Windows Mobile to be more in sync. Might this mean with Windows Mobile 8 — which Microsoft has told certain folks will be built from scratch — Microsoft might make Windows Mobile a “real” version of Windows, with the same core as Windows client?
Let's hope so. I think if they don't, Microsoft will have missed a rather large opportunity.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Good stuff
Things are moving this way.
Ummm
Aren't you really saying that it should be ANYBODY but Microsoft?
If you read carefully, he is including OSX as one of the bad guys.
I guess I would not go that far, and only say that I hope that the application apis, protocols, and file formats are open, so all applications run on all devices.
Which is a good way to make sure
You see, in the real world, people do things to make a profit.
In the real world...
"You see, in the real world, people do things to make a profit."
It's a major reason why people do things, but hardly the only one, unless you're construing "profit" very broadly. Back when I was using OS/2, I noticed that there were very few commercial developers for it, but all kinds of free stuff was available, mostly produced by OS/2 users looking to fill a need (primarily their own).
S. Jobs said something similar not too long ago
thought we'd see most big
advances come from "devices"
rather than normal computers.
The conversation then moved to
how they fit OSX on iPhone.
If I see a bottleneck to the
scenario, it would be screen and
keyboard size. Providing docking
stations all over the place would
be quite expensive, especially
when compared to a user owned
notebook simply connecting to a
network.
Relying on just the iPhone type
device without the docking
station, would not satisfy the
majority of users who use the
computer for work output.
I get the impression...
[i]If I see a bottleneck to the
scenario, it would be screen and
keyboard size. Providing docking
stations all over the place would
be quite expensive, especially
when compared to a user owned
notebook simply connecting to a
network.[/i]
How expensive would it really be? I'm not talking high-res screens, just basic screens. It would certainly cost less than a full desktop computer. You are right: giving a laptop WiFi access is cheaper than providing a docking station, at least from an up-front standpoint (though the consumer is paying less). On the other hand, a mobile user carries their internet access around with them.
To my mind, it just moves the costs around a bit, and with economics of scale, things could get much cheaper still.
[i]Relying on just the iPhone type
device without the docking
station, would not satisfy the
majority of users who use the
computer for work output.[/i]
I agree, which is why the docking station is absolutely critical. It makes the phone a true desktop replacement...
...though not completely. Desktop computers can still be more powerful. Where I see desktops moving to is a form of home server. It will still be used for heavy-lifting things like games, but it may not be the primary interface device for a lot of people. Given the fact that cell phones go with you everywhere, I can see a lot of general computing tasks being moved to a cell phone (properly docked, that is).
Providing "docking stations" all over could be dirt cheap. How much does it
There's a big maintenance cost
stations with screens would
require cleaning. Just look at the
amount of grunge you
accumulate on your own
keyboard and mouse from skin
oils. Then think what a PITA it is
cleaning the keys on your
keyboard and multiply that by
several times a day - depending
on the amount of use and the
number of stations.
The above scenario also
introduces liability to the docking
station provider - being sued
because someone got sick from a
keyboard carrying germs. That
might no seem like much, but it's
another added cost.
The screens would also require
cleaning.
The provider has to be able
justify a good bit of added
benefit to his business before
investing in the rollout, the maintenance and the liability.
There is minimal maintenance. Hotels already supply the TV, soon to be all
Cyber cafes have been using public keyboards and mice for a long time with no health issues.
RE: Cell phone as desktop computer
Very insightful article John. Your posts are noticeably better after
But, you post is directly related to another:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9168
Maybe rather than carrying screens with us, we will just carry the computer, and there will be a lot of screens in offices, hotels (HDTV screen doubles as computer screen), homes, etc. Just pick one and connect your phone that is more powerful and has more storage than todays computers.
And, MS WILL want to get into this market, but they need to give up on limiting the functionality of CE, and let people embed a full blown desktop OS for the price of what OEMs now pay for CE. It will also be a long time before you can embed Vista, talking technical reasons only, but the pricing issue will be a big problem for MS as well.
RE: Cell phone as desktop computer
No interest in 3' screen of a cellphone
John, do you remember....?
It was modular also attached to a shell of a laptop or a docking station for workstation/desktop environment..
I don't remember what it was called or how to look it up......?
Anyway not a big deal to add a phone, etc to that and away you go....
A little more looking >...the MetaPad in '02
Yep, these are the phases of diffusion of innovation. It can take years.
We still have all of the political / technical / social issues to overcome for this particular concept. Eventually we WILL have a lot of devices on the market where you attach wirelessly to a display such as an lcd projector, probably with Wireless USB. It will be so dirt cheap that just about everybody will add that feature to their displays eventually.
RE: Cell phone as desktop computer
George Gilder made a similar observation when he was a keynote speaker at an conference held by PMC Sierra Semiconductor in Vancouver, British Columbia in summer of 2000. Notion was the cell phone is the computer, holding "everything of import", interconnected to a screen/keyboard/mouse via Bluetooth and to the network via WiFi. Plus you can do limited functions via the on-phone keyboard and screen (limited by screen size, etc).
Not quite there yet, but you can see there from here.
Stan Hanks
Thanks...
I was trying to explain WHY I thought they were so important, and why I think it is critical that Microsoft get on that page soon.