Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

AMD's dual-GPU Radeon HD 6990 is new king of desktop graphics cards

By | March 8, 2011, 3:51am PST

Summary: AMD has finally launched the long-anticipated followup to its Radeon HD 5970, its dual-GPU monster graphics card. Like its predecessor, the new Radeon HD 6990, code-named Antilles, combines two GPUs in a single package, and the result is the fastest graphics card you can buy. The Radeon HD 6990 manages to cram two Radeon HD 6970s [...]

AMD has finally launched the long-anticipated followup to its Radeon HD 5970, its dual-GPU monster graphics card. Like its predecessor, the new Radeon HD 6990, code-named Antilles, combines two GPUs in a single package, and the result is the fastest graphics card you can buy.

The Radeon HD 6990 manages to cram two Radeon HD 6970s on a single PCB, bringing a total of 4GB of GDDR5 RAM to your desktop. It features two different modes that let you choose how you use its power; you simply flip a switch to change the BIOS configuration to overclock mode, which ups the engine clock speed as well as the power demands. Not surprisingly, the card requires a pair of extra PCI Express connectors in addition to a minimum 750W power supply unit (1000W recommended if you’re crazy enough to buy a pair of these and put them in a CrossFireX configuration).

So how fast is the Radeon HD 6990? According to HotHardware.com’s benchmarking, it absolutely destroys the Radeon HD 6970 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 single-GPU cards in 3DMark11, scoring over 3,000 in the Extreme preset. With most games, it delivered an average 50-percent boost over the GTX 580 and often more over the 6970. And, according to Anandtech, it does indeed run Crysis — the site concludes about the card’s Crysis: Warhead performance that “full Enthusiast settings at a playable framerate is finally in the grasp of a single card.”

In its factory setting, the Radeon HD 6990 appears to keep heat basically under control, but noise was another matter: It’s loud and it’s the price you pay for all that power on one board. Speaking of cost, this bad boy will set you back $699, or the price of a budget desktop system. Nvidia is rumored to present an updated dual-GPU solution soon, the GeForce GTX 590, so if you have the cash to blow on this card, you may want to wait a few weeks to see what the competition has to offer.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.
23
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: AMD's dual-GPU Radeon HD 6990 is new king of desktop graphics cards
Jimster480 9th Mar 2011
@Tanstaafl56 Well if thats what your doing. This card really isnt for you anyway.
I just find it hard to picture diehard gamers dropping 700$ on this card right now. It's fantastic, powerful, and would make any of your other gamer friends envious with geekdom, but it is loud, power-hungry, and a case hog. Let's see what Nvidia has to offer first. Anything less power hungry and quieter is a winner in my book.
@Bates_

You're obviously not a diehard gamer... lol
Agreed. Diehard gamers want to live inside their video cards. $700? That's nothing. It's less than a house payment!
DROP_IT_ON_WHAT ??
.
.
MW2-limited graphics
Black Ops? - Crap stutter
Bad Company2 - limited graphics

Arma2 - maybe
BF3 - I can wait until autumn.
@Bates_
They've been doing it for over a decade now. Why would it be any different now?
@Bates_ I'd love to get my mitts on this for video editing and animation. I bet it screams. Time is money...
@wazungu
I was thinking the same exact thing!
@Bates_ This card is the definition of Diehard gamer kit. Nvidia's offering won't be any cheaper, if they can even make something faster
The imagination is the limit...
In the game of one-upmanship, the real losers are the customers.
@pk.pal

Not really. Such cards are an extremely marginal % of the market. Don't believe me, just have a look at Steam's latest hardware survey:

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey

People will run on very old hardware. Another eye opener for me was the list of top sellers under $10:

http://store.steampowered.com/browse/under10

The original Counter-Strike (CS), a mod released in 2001 of a game released in 1998 (Half-Life2) selling this well today is a bit shocking to me. CS never leaves that list.

No, customers aren't losers... many have just left for the consoles in order to not have to deal with "my hardware is too weak."

The biggest issue with any PC gaming review is that if a review gives a game a 9/10, the question becomes "Does my hardware have enough horsepower to give me the same experience?" For many, the answer to that is "No". Which is a big reason consoles are much bigger business when the studios have a hit game on their hands.

-M
@betelgeuse68

Customers get what they want, then they win. It's the diehards that move the industry. The free riders deride the pre-order crowd, but a lot of titles probably would never make it to final release without them.

Actually, if hardware limitations were the reason gamers switched to consoles, they would be losers. Consoles have extremely limited hardware. The FPS players default to it, because they like to know that everyone else will have equally weak hardware. That's why Microsoft won't let the PC players play with the console players. The PC players slaughter the console players. If you want Dragon Age II to look it's best, you will not be getting it for the PS3 or 360. Eventually, a game is going to support an "extreme" setting or something with 4MP on display port with the latest Direct X and shaders, and then the consoles will finally budge forward again.
@betelgeuse68
I see a niche waiting to be filled. Budget (read, "cheap") games requiring weaker hardware with more imaginative and entertaining gameplay.

Plants vs Zombies and Angry Birds are popular for a reason...
@betelgeuse68 These days even $70 Graphics cards can play basically every game in medium to high settings (which is already better graphics than consoles). And basically everyone has a computer. CPU's are generally fast enough even if you have one from 4 years ago. PC Gaming is alot cheaper than you think.
A little too rich for the average consumer, but the video production house will like it !
$699 - Perhaps in 3 years when it's just another video card I'll be able to afford one...
0 Votes
+ -
Well...
dragosani 8th Mar 2011
Hopefully this card will be less than the MSRP.

You can currently buy 2 6970s (2GB version) for less than that MSRP.
If there's one thing Radeon cards have always lacked for me is it's driver support, particularly with Linux. I can take any nVidia card and run it across any platform and it's a breeze to run on a Linux machine from the get go.
@scscully@... ringer !!!
I have had 5 ATI cards and 6 Nvidia cards over the last 8 years.
I had trouble with only one ATI card.
Nvidia was hassle for 5 cards.
@JOHN_TUOHY

Who was the manufacturer? I've had an equal number of ATI and nVidia die on me, 2 a piece. Lately, I've been getting XFX manufactured versions of both, ATI for my AMD motherboards and nVidia for my nVidia motherboards. I still have all of them going all the way back to my 6900.
@scscully@... really? you must be an ubuntu user. last i checked, there are open-source 3d accelerated drivers for ATI cards available in almost all repos and preinstalled on most distros, while nvidia cards need either proprietary drivers or the experimental mesa drivers (which by now are pretty good, but still are quite new)... perhaps i am wrong but i think not
I'll stick with my FirePro for the time being, Autocad and 3D Studio rock with it.
@Tanstaafl56 Well if thats what your doing. This card really isnt for you anyway.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix