Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops
Summary: The rumored iMac updates are here. Apple also updated its Mac Pro desktop, and released a new input device, the Magic Trackpad, and a 27-inch LED Cinema Display.
The rumored iMac updates are here. Apple's all-in-one hasn't had a major refresh since last fall, but this morning with relatively little fanfare the company updated its site with the new models that include Core i3 and i5 processors, standard discrete graphics and in-plane switching (IPS) displays for a wider viewing angle. Apple also updated its Mac Pro desktop, which can now be configured with up to two six-core CPUs, and released a new input device, the Magic Trackpad, and a 27-inch LED Cinema Display.
The 21.5-inch iMac starts at $1,199 with a 3.06GHz Intel Core i3 processor, 4GB of memory, ATI Radeon HD 4670 graphics with 256MB, 500GB hard drive, slot-loading DVD and wireless keyboard and mouse. The step-up $1,499 model has a 3.2GHz Core i3 processor, 1TB hard drive and ATI Radeon HD 5670 graphics with 512MB. The 27-inch model starts at $1,699 with the same specs. All of these are dual-core processors, but you can also get the 27-inch version with a quad-core, a 2.80GHz Intel Core i5, starting at $1,999.
The revamped Mac Pro uses quad-core and six-core Intel Xeon processors with speeds up to 3.33GHz, paired with ATI Radeon HD 5770 graphics with 1GB. The Mac Pro starts at $2,499 with the 2.8GHz quad-core Intel Xeon W3530 processor, but you can configure it with dual CPUs (up to a total of 12 processing cores and 24 threads), up to 32GB of memory, dual GPUs including the faster Radeon HD 5870 graphics, and up to four drives including 2TB hard drives or 512GB SSDs. The single-CPU quad-core configuration uses Nehalem Xeons, while the single-CPU six-core (the 3.33GHz Xeon W3680) and the dual-CPU configurations with two quad-cores (Xeon X5620) or two six-cores (the Xeon X5650 or 5670) are all Westmeres. The Mac Pros will ship in August.
The Magic Trackpad is pretty much what it sounds like: a multi-touch trackpad that connects to your Mac via Bluetooth wireless. The advantage to this is that it lets you use the same multi-touch gestures that work on MacBooks--swiping to flip through pages or albums, inertial scrolling and pinch-to-zoom-on your desktop The Magic Trackpad is a $69 option and runs on two AA batteries. Like the displays on the new iMacs, the 27-inch LED Cinema Display (2560x1440) has an edge-to-edge IPS display. It also has an ambient light sensor to automatically adjust brightness, a MagSafe charger, iSight camera, speakers, Mini DisplayPort and USB ports. The 27-inch model, which will be available starting in September for $999, replaces the existing 24-inch and 30-inch models, which are priced at $799 and $1,799, respectively "while supplies last."
CNET has more coverage of today's announcements:
- Apple updates iMac line, intros Magic Trackpad
- Apple intros Mac Pro with 12 processing cores
- Apple unveils 27-inch LED display, nixes 30-inch model
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Cooooool! 2 grand for a Core i5 desktop and a mid-range 27" monitor?!
..And while you're at it, do you have a $60,000 Yugo that I can buy?
Sorry.. not a fair comparison..
RE: Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops
That would be "cruel and unusual" punishment.
RE: Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops
...just lining up my vehicle purchase to the typical "Mac Experience".. :)
And yet
RE: Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops
they're beating their own (weak) records
Overall Mac share has only risen a few percent in the last 10 years.
Meanwhile Microsoft is on track to TRIPLE the entire Mac user base in Windows 7 sales within 12 months of its launch.
While nothing you said is untrue, some perspective reminds us how few people are deciding Mac is a fair value proposition.
True and False
More and more people find this to be a fair value proposition...
RE: Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops
Apple's OS X share has not gone up that much over the last 5 years. Go to the various sites that keep track of this.
@vulpine: Unsure where you got your 20% OS market share from. Just about every source that tracks the OS market share still has it under 10%. And your 40% comment makes no sense and really sounds odd.
I've seen some who post comments in various blogs that cry because something is not working in Windows or maybe got some malware [OK, who installed the malware or how did it get there?] and swear that they are getting a Mac. Well, you can tell these are novices. Good riddance to them.
Recent statistics now point out that Apple has taken over from Microsoft as the software vender with the most vulnerabilities in the year ending June 2010. They took in account every software made by Apple, Microsoft, Oracle/Sun, Mozilla, etc. That isn't good.
You make a reasoned argument.
You also may have misunderstood my 400% growth (yes, I meant 400%; i.e. 4 times as many) statement earlier. If you look at total number of Macs sold in the mid-summer quarter say, 3 years ago, Apple sold roughly 4x as many this past quarter and is selling more on a year-to-year basis than any previous period. Where Apple was lucky to sell a few hundred thousand machines in a full year ten years ago, they're now selling almost 4 million machines each quarter. No matter how you look at it, Apple's computer sales have grown far faster than any other single brand and more people are using them than ever. Even on a global scale, Apple is selling between two and four times as many machines as they sold even 2 years ago.
I don't argue the report that Apple seems to have the most vulnerabilities. But I have a question: With Apple so evident in the face of technology reports, why, in the last ten years, has <i>Apple not had one viable malware attack levied against it?</i> I won't deny there have been a few attempts, but as yet, not one has been able to infect more than 0.02% of the entire OSX installed base. Why? Don't try to argue that it's because Apple is such a bit player--Apple's made enough noise over the last ten years that they're anything but. However, for whatever reason, Windows is still the most frequently- and must successfully attacked OS on the market. Bar none. Why?
RE: Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops
God who knows what those Xeons will go for if they are charging $2000 for this Core i5! Need a loan?
OS Market Shares
http://www.neowin.net/news/market-share-windows-7-up-os-x-down-chrome-up-ie-down
http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/01/windows-7-growing-faster-than-vista-overtakes-mac-os.ars
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8
http://theappleblog.com/2010/02/02/market-share-os-x-safari-flat-iphone-os-slows-in-january/
Yes. Even an Apple oriented web site says so. Not a Microsoft plot.
Don't you worry about it...
RE: Apple overhauls iMac, Mac Pro desktops