ie8 fix

Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

Can Intel Cedar Trail Atom processors, along with Google Chromebooks, resurrect the netbook?

By | May 12, 2011, 4:57am PDT

Summary: Pity the poor netbook. Once tech’s darling, it’s been the primary casualty in the industry’s tablet PC mania. But can Intel’s newest Atom CPUs, along with the roll-out of Google Chromebooks, give the category a second wind? You probably already know about new Chromebooks coming from Acer and Samsung, which will run Google’s Chrome OS and [...]

Pity the poor netbook. Once tech’s darling, it’s been the primary casualty in the industry’s tablet PC mania. But can Intel’s newest Atom CPUs, along with the roll-out of Google Chromebooks, give the category a second wind?

You probably already know about new Chromebooks coming from Acer and Samsung, which will run Google’s Chrome OS and be available from $349 or in a new $28-per-month rental pricing scheme. These run using Intel’s current dual-core Atom CPUs.

But Intel also has a new Atom platform coming in the fourth quarter, Cedar Trail, that boasts improved specs to meet the challenge of AMD’s low-end, low-power Fusion processors. The most notable spec change is that the Cedar Trail Atom N2800 dual-core processor will be able to handle up to 4GB of RAM instead of the 2GB that current Atoms can manage. Both the Atom N2600 and N2800 will include support for Intel’s WiDi wireless display tech, which allows streaming from your netbook to a TV without cables. (Unfortunately, resolution of the streamed content maxes out at 600p instead of 1080p HD.)

The chip giant is also moving away from its own integrated graphics for Cedar Trail, apparently choosing to go with PowerVR’s SGX545 GPU instead. Intel’s previous GMA 500 and GMA 600 were based of the SGX535, but the clock speed of the new graphics chip will be doubled to 400GHz for netbooks (600GHz for Atom-based desktops) and support DirectX 10.1. That should help to address one netbook weakness: lackluster (at best) graphics performance.

Will a better-performing netbook at the same sub-$400 price point entice you to buy one? Can netbooks do anything else to compete in the new tablet PC world? Let us know in the Comments section.

[Image: VR-Zone]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

ChromeBooks are Laptops, not Netbooks.
Mah 22nd May 2011
The current Google supported ChromeBooks are laptops and not netbooks since they have large screens and full size keyboards. The minimum specification is also higher than current Windows 7 netbooks despite the lower resource requirements of Chrome OS, and have hardware 2D and 3D video acceleration, browser and Flash graphics acceleration. There are two reasons for this.

1) to ensure that there is no cannibalisation with Android tablets. Android is more portable and so smaller form factor, while Chrome OS is for luggable laptop form factor devices.
2) Google wants to ensure a fast performance for browsing, games, and media consumption. Windows 7 netbooks drop in popularity is largely due to the poor performance and poor user experience of the Windows 7 desktop on the low end hardware specification of netbooks. Google doesn't want to repeat this on Chrome OS.
instead of netbook. 10 inches is just too small.
0 Votes
+ -
Our managers
wolf_z 12th May 2011
*LOVE* their netbooks with cell-modems. happy

The form factor is almost perfect, the use of the cell phone network for data coupled with a real keyboard, a real Windows OS (and full terminal server access) in a secure package? More please!

Sure, 11.6" (1024x768) beats 10" (1024x600) but I'm not sure 11.6" isn't a netbook too. If the screen size is the only difference then calling something a netbook instead of a notebook is just a stupid branding exercise, not an actual distinction.

But given the remote places out in the field where our managers need full corporate access, netbooks fill the need perfectly. They aren't too bulky, unlike say a 15" notebook, yet they aren't too crippled, like an iPhone/Android.

Are they for everybody? Of course not, especially ones without cell-data capability. But then again, not everybody needs constant access to corporate network resources either.
make all the difference in the world. 10 inches is just too small. and the keyboards just a little too cramped. Getting rid of the Windows security problems and complexity is a big plus for ChromeBooks.
0 Votes
+ -
Trade Windows security issues...
wolf_z 12th May 2011
@DonnieBoy

...for Google security problems. And don't tell me Google doesn't have any--think "Aurora". happy

So anyone using a Chromebook becomes a big fat target for having all their data sucked up through a straw.

Can't happen? That's what Sony thought...that's what Google thought...

After all, the *POINT* of Chromebook is all user data in the cloud. Hacker holy grail.
0 Votes
+ -
Who wants this?
Robert Hahn Updated - 12th May 2011
I don't understand why Google thinks that Chrome stands a chance. There is a narrow window of time remaining in which real Windows netbooks are too slow to avoid being called "sucky" but that window is closing as both Intel and AMD rush to market with faster, lower-power x86 chipsets.

Who, besides the vast army of people who use Ubuntu now, will want Chrome on a netbook when they can have Windows and all their apps for pretty much the same cost?

I think the issue is whether the netbook really has much of a market in a world where tablets are getting more capable, and laptops are getting smaller and lighter. It seems to me if what you're really after is extreme portability and light weight, you go with the tablet. If you're really a "manager out in the field" who wants a computer, the laptops will be here soon enough. The netbooks are sorta sandwiched in the middle looking for a home.
0 Votes
+ -
Manager in the field
wolf_z 12th May 2011
@Robert Hahn

You may have misunderstood my post. Our managers are using 10" Win 7 netbooks, not Chomebooks.

Laptops (13" and larger) are too bulky and heavy when folded up. You can put a netbook in a briefcase and have room for other stuff. You can't do that with a 13"+ laptop.
The netbook didn't go anywhere. Tabets just decreased their usage. I see the same amount of new netbooks around right now that i saw four years ago.
400GHZ and 600Ghz huh? Sounds mighty fast. I might just sell my graphics card and get one of these setups instead wink
0 Votes
+ -
The current Google supported ChromeBooks are laptops and not netbooks since they have large screens and full size keyboards. The minimum specification is also higher than current Windows 7 netbooks despite the lower resource requirements of Chrome OS, and have hardware 2D and 3D video acceleration, browser and Flash graphics acceleration. There are two reasons for this.

1) to ensure that there is no cannibalisation with Android tablets. Android is more portable and so smaller form factor, while Chrome OS is for luggable laptop form factor devices.
2) Google wants to ensure a fast performance for browsing, games, and media consumption. Windows 7 netbooks drop in popularity is largely due to the poor performance and poor user experience of the Windows 7 desktop on the low end hardware specification of netbooks. Google doesn't want to repeat this on Chrome OS.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix