Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

Early benchmarks show AMD Fusion Ontario APU to be a potential Intel Atom smasher

By | January 11, 2011, 3:35am PST

Summary: AMD is staking quite a bit on its new Fusion architecture — which combines CPU and GPU in an Accelerated Processing Unit, or APU — and the first independent benchmarks for a Toshiba NB550D netbook using the C-50 “Ontario” APU should encourage the chipmaker. Dutch site Hardware.info compared the C-50 to Intel’s Atom N550 netbook processor, [...]

AMD is staking quite a bit on its new Fusion architecture — which combines CPU and GPU in an Accelerated Processing Unit, or APU — and the first independent benchmarks for a Toshiba NB550D netbook using the C-50 “Ontario” APU should encourage the chipmaker.

Dutch site Hardware.info compared the C-50 to Intel’s Atom N550 netbook processor, the primary competition to one of AMD’s low-power entries. In two of the four benchmarks the testers used, the Fusion chip smoked the Atom: It nearly doubled the N550’s PCMark Vantage - Gaming score (1,380 to 697) and destroyed it by more than tenfold in 3DMark06 (1,769 to 153). The site didn’t (or couldn’t) run the PCMark Vantage - TV and Movies test for the dual-core Atom, whereas the dual-core Fusion processor scored 1,046. The only test that the Intel chip won was Cinebench 10 (1,466 to 1,271).

The results suggest that the C-50’s integrated Radeon HD 6250 GPU is far superior to the N550’s GMA 3150, especially considering that it supports DirectX 11 graphics while Intel is still stuck at DirectX 9. At 8 watts, the AMD processor also sips slightly less power than the 8.5-watt Atom. One question still unanswered is how the battery life of the Ontario chip fares in the wild. But overall, this is good news for a company that could use some after its CEO resigned yesterday.

[Via GuruHT]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Early benchmarks show AMD Fusion Ontario APU to be a potential Intel Atom smasher
bitcrazed 11th Jan 2011
@Richard Flude - now that Intel have a license for nVidia's IP, perhaps we'll see some dramatic improvemments in up-coming Atom and Ix chips.
Perhaps CineBench is biased towards Intel? happy I can't wait to get my hands on Acer Iconia 10.1" tablet running Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
What about the NVidio Idon chipset?
TexasJetter 11th Jan 2011
I would not expect the best graphics from the GMA 3150. A better comparison would be against the Atom/NVidia Ion chipset combo.
0 Votes
+ -
But the combo isn't in the same market
Richard Flude 11th Jan 2011
The lack of decent Intel GPU (particularly H.264 acceleration) is killing the usefulness of the Atom.

NVidia Ion is not price competitive.
@Richard Flude - now that Intel have a license for nVidia's IP, perhaps we'll see some dramatic improvemments in up-coming Atom and Ix chips.
The real question reference the Atom is, how will the new cross licensing agreement between Intel and Nvidea affect future Atom products. Intel never has been a Graphics "Tour de Force"
0 Votes
+ -
Intel/Ion combination
justanitguy 11th Jan 2011
@TexasJetter
I think it is appropriate in this case; you are talking apples to oranges when you add an external vendors (Nvidia) product. It would be like saying an Intel Mobo has excellent graphics while using an ATI video card; the mobo has crummy Intel IGP yet you are rating the graphics based on the add-in card. In the situation you propose, you are comparing Fusion's integrated graphics to an Intel processor with added Nvidia graphics (Ion).
All of the benchmarks run were graphics ( Vantage - Gaming, 3DMark06, Vantage - TV and Movies, Cinebench 10). I don't think it's any mystery past generation Intel integrated graphics were downright lame so it's certainly not surprising to see atom get beat badly in graphics tests. I'd like to see some general purpose tests to go with this- and of course the big factor with any atom/low power chip is what is battery life like? Seriously I think in terms of importance with a device that would use an atom or similar chip the priority goes something like: cost, battery life, general performance, graphics performance. So from this test we know in the lowest priority category (at least lowest priority for the typical buyer) fusion wins. It may win in other categories too, but that remains to be seen, and is it reasonable to suggest that perhaps the reason the other categories weren't advertised is because they weren't very good?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix