Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

Future Google Chromebooks to switch from Intel Atom to Core series processors, push prices above $500

By | July 21, 2011, 4:30am PDT

Summary: With its Chromebooks, Google has been trying to revolutionize computing by switching to a browser-centered model. As a result, it doesn’t necessarily require the beefy parts that a Windows-based laptop needs to deliver the fastest performance possible, relying on an Intel Atom N570 processor to power systems instead. But that apparently hasn’t stopped plans for some [...]

With its Chromebooks, Google has been trying to revolutionize computing by switching to a browser-centered model. As a result, it doesn’t necessarily require the beefy parts that a Windows-based laptop needs to deliver the fastest performance possible, relying on an Intel Atom N570 processor to power systems instead.

But that apparently hasn’t stopped plans for some upgraded specs for future Chromebooks. According to DigiTimes, Google is looking for Chromebook partners to upgrade from the N570 to Intel’s mainstream Core series processors for better performance and security. Apparently, Acer, Asus, and Samsung are on-board with the decision, and will start create new models for 2012 release.

Here’s the kicker: Google is hoping that by offering the faster CPUs, it will be able to push the price of Chromebooks beyond the $500 price point. But how much more will consumers be willing to pay for something that runs Chrome and Web apps and that’s about it? Especially if the N570 handles everything fairly well already.

Would you be willing to pay more for a Chromebook with a faster processor? If not, what would a new Chromebook need to have in order for you to pay more than $500 for one? Let us know in the Comments section.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.
34
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Future Google Chromebooks to switch from Intel Atom to Core series processors, push prices above $500
jtf639 26th Aug
So I can spend $100 more for the thing to boot up in 4 seconds rather than 8?

(Love my Chromebook)
0 Votes
+ -
Thats Dumb
cramleir 21st Jul
This would be one heck of a misstep if true. I thought chromebooks were supposed to pioneer disposable computing?
@cramleir
Has Google actually said the price is going up? Google is getting a 10%-20% discount on the i3 presumably because of volume orders as a result of Chromebooks selling well. That should mean Google can keep the price at $500, at which level the existing Chromebooks are selling well.
@Mah Are they actually selling well? I had not heard that at all.
@non-biased
They have been within the top 5 on Amazon's best seller list since introduction, so they have been selling well, despite the high price, and limited advertising. The discount must be a rebate for volume orders which OEMs anticipate for Chromebooks.
So raising the price? Bah. If it were *$50* it might be worth considering, but not for 10x that!
0 Votes
+ -
Google Chromebooks are crap...
iPad-awan Updated - 21st Jul
they offer no real benefits. I wouldn't bother with the hassle that comes with a Chromebook even if Google offer me $500. Yeah, that's right Google should pay you for using their crappy products because they are stealing your private data everytime you log on.

No way should should anyone pay more than $50 for this Crapbook.
LOL Google just doesn't get it. Charge more for a laptop that does less.
I think for $500 I'd want local storage and a real OS.

Then, if you really wanted to, you could just run Chrome.
0 Votes
+ -
...until the chromebooks get more functionality I just don't get it. I can get a notebook with win7 and do everything that a chromebook does, plus actually have native programs, for close to the same price. Not sure what the deal with these is, anyone with a web browser can use HTML5 apps.
@dwb124 compared to the garbage called Chromebook.

So now Google wants you to pay extra for power the their browser only OS can't use.
0 Votes
+ -
Not a bad idea
yowzah 21st Jul
Chromebooks are pretty decent, but web apps are going to develop further and as they start to implement such things as Native Client, more offline capabilities and offload some of the work onto the gpu then we're going to start to see web apps performing more like native apps.

When that happens, I'd prefer having a Chromebook with the necessary processing power that would enable the Chromebook to handle tasks from those apps with great ease and so I think upgrading Chromebooks with more processing power is a good idea...
@yowzah
The CPU does already. For a browser based OS, you don't need that much CPU power, GPU and video acceleration is more important. I suspect the iCore processers are being chosen not for the CPU, but for the better graphics and video acceleration chipsets integrated with the CPU.
0 Votes
+ -
TOO BAD
Hasam1991 21st Jul
Too bad for Google, my next laptop is the new MacBook Air from Apple, why spend 500 for a Samsung product??? MBA is much better and faster.
$500 is way too expensive for one of these things. Google needs to find an OEM that will put out a decent Chromebook for less than $200. ($50 as posted above is funny, but not realistic.) This would turn some consumers heads. Especially those that have light internet-based computing needs, such as web surfing. webmail. facebook and some light games, that find a full-blown OS too complicated to maintain.

I'd just get a highly-discounted laptop (refurbished, redistributed, scratched & dented, etc.) and install a desktop Linux distro followed by Google's Chrome browser.
@Rabid Howler Monkey
I agree, they should create an ARM based tablet/notebook, that runs Chrome OS and Android. Sort of like the ASUS transformer.
@Rabid Howler Monkey
$200 is possible with netbook style performance compromises. $300 is more realistic for a WiFi version with reasonable video and graphics acceleration and reasonable battery life. However OEMs don't seem to want to sell low end devices - they try to push up the price. The current Chromebook is selling well, so the OEMs think they can push up the price since they get higher margins on high end hardware.
They're probably expecting to finalize NativeClient and may unleash a bunch of high-powered native apps that run on Chrome.
0 Votes
+ -
$500? Are you kidding me? I'd get a real notebook with a real OS for that price.
0 Votes
+ -
Threshold
johnfenjackson@... Updated - 21st Jul
There seems to be some sort of threshold below which vendors are unwilling (unable?) to go: $300 for a PC, be it desktop, netbook or thin-client device. Until Google cracks this the Chromebook will appear idiotic.

What I want is a base unit for $125-150 tops, into which I can plug a monitor of choice ... to be used as a thin client or pure web endpoint.

Anything else is incomprehensible.

Perhaps your source is wrong. Surely it is more consistent for Google to be looking at ARM?
@johnfenjackson@...
Portable Native Client and Flash on ARM are being worked on. When that is sorted out, I am sure we will see Flash based Chromebooks.
Why go with the Core models? Why not AMD's Fusion E-350 or C-50 chips? Get dual core, bettter than Atom performance, much better graphics performance, and probably be cheaper and definitely less power draw than Intel Core chips. The Fusion chips have been doing so well AMD actually went out of stock on them for awhile, and HP's DM1Z got rave reviews as what a netbook was meant to be, has much higher specs than the Samsung Chromebook (3GB mem, 320GB hard drive, etc.), and costs a little less.
0 Votes
+ -
@jgm@... Anything beyond a cheap Atom is just plain overkill. Chromebook uses a barebone OS that basically does nothing.

To use a car analogy, it is like installing a more powerful engine in a car with a transmission that can't handle the extra torque.
The death knell of ChromeOS. You won't be missed.
0 Votes
+ -
Google is getting dumber
Gis Bun 21st Jul
They just shot themselves in the foot - or maybe not.
Why they even bothered trying to release netbooks with Chrome OS on it would have most people scratching heads considering that the consumer didn't want Linux on netbooks to begin with.
Now Google is thinking of getting them on stronger laptops [we'll assume not netbooks] but this will drive up the price and could even make it pricier than some Windows based laptops.
But as I said before, Linux netbooks died because the consumer didn't want them. Putting them on a regular laptop will probably be a big bust.
So has Google spent the last couple of years or so developing an OS nobody will want?
0 Votes
+ -
Genius
facebook@... 21st Jul
Create the most expensive thin client on the market. That will drive customers to you. After all, if it is the most expensive thin client on the market, it must be the best. Genius logic. Way to go Google.
@facebook@... "After all, if it is the most expensive thin client on the market, it must be..."...Apple's? happy
0 Votes
+ -
Ipads get away with it.
meski.oz@... 21st Jul
@Hasam1991 Ipad2's start at 579[1] and seem to sell for that. Google are probably looking at that.

[1] going up to 949
@meski.oz@... First of all the iPad (1 & 2 ) start at $499 and they also do more than a Chromebook. Try using a Chromebook when you don't have an internet connection yet the iPad will work just fine using installed apps.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm waiting for a ChromeBox desktop with a Core processor.When I am mobile I have my Android phone and tablet. I need high security for stock trading. banking, etc. It should be much less expensive, no battery, no screen, no keyboard, etc,
@Ronim I do appreciate the morning laugh, talking about high security and Google products in the same post happy
When I wander around Fry's looking at all the laptops that you can get for less than $500 these days I have wonder if Google is really out of touch with reality. I can imagine some IT dweeb who uses Linux on his home built desktop buying one for his mother so she won't have to use the evil products from Microsoft or Apple. But I can't imagine any other scenario by which a chrome book would actually be bought,
Another retarded idea from Google. C'mon guys what happened to you people in Mountain View? You really used to be cool, but now... I don't know what to think anymore. Android is tanking because you didn't take care of it, tablets for Android barely have enough apps to make it worthwhile, and now this? What has become of Google?
So I can spend $100 more for the thing to boot up in 4 seconds rather than 8?

(Love my Chromebook)

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix