Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

Google's Chrome OS netbook: The good, the bad and its prospects

By | December 15, 2010, 7:56am PST

Summary: Google’s Chrome OS is off to a rough start and the prototype Cr-48 netbook has been greeted with mixed reviews. But don’t write-off Chrome just yet.

Google’s Chrome OS is off to rough start. It arrives just as growth of netbooks seems to be cooling off–and just as Android smartphones and tablets are taking off. A former Googler predicted it would be dead within a year. Free software advocate Richard Stallman described Chrome OS as part of plan “to push people into careless computing.” And ZDNet’s Mary Jo Foley wonders just “who the real Chromebook user is supposed to be?”

To make matters worse, Chrome is running late. When Google announced it a year ago, the company promised the first netbooks would be available in time for the holidays. But building an operating system is no easy task, and with lots of bugs left to stamp out, the first Chrome netbooks from the likes of Acer and Samsung won’t appear until mid-2011.

In the meantime Google has released a prototype netbook, the Cr-48, to get Chrome into the hands of application developers and reviewers. It is a move that has worked well with Android. The Nexus One wasn’t a commercial success, but it did push handset makers and carriers to launch more powerful smartphones at a faster pace. (With the Nexus S, which is available starting tomorrow, Google is doing it once again.) Chrome is a different beast, though. The browser-based OS is very different from Windows 7 or Mac OS X, and the Cr-48 has raised as many questions as it has answered. (TechCrunch, covering its bases, called it “both insanely awesome and shockingly awful.”)

The Cr-48, as nearly every reviewer has noted, looks very similar to the old black MacBooks right down to the chiclet keyboard and the large, button-less ClickPad. But it is really more of a large netbook with a 12-inch display, an Intel Atom single-core processor and, according to published teardowns, a 16GB SanDisk SSD (there’s no hard drive). The rubberized black-plastic case is less than an inch thick and the Cr-48 weighs 3.6 pounds–about the size and weight of a typical 12-inch ultraportable.

Since the hardware is just a prototype, the final Chrome netbooks are likely to look different (though the basic specs probably won’t change all that much). It’s more interesting to read reviewers’ impressions of the Chrome OS since it offers a very different user experience. Several themes–both positive and negative–have popped up in reviews:

The good:

Quick setup
When you first boot the Cr-48, you enter your Google credentials (the netbook snaps a picture for your profile) and you’re good to go. All of your bookmarks, extensions and applications (Gmail, Calendar, Docs) are up-to-date and in sync with your PC(s) and other devices. If you’ve ever used an Android smartphone, you know this is a great feature, especially if you are a heavy user of Google services.

Short boot time
The Cr-48 boots in 15 seconds and wakes instantly from standby. That is certainly faster than Windows laptops, but it is about the same as the MacBook Air. Moreover, as Laptopmag.com points out, when you include the time to enter your Google credentials–required at start-up–it really takes more like 25 seconds to get up and running. Still that’s a big improvement over my Windows laptop.

Long battery life
Google claims the Cr-48 will last for 8 hours and can remain in standby for up to 8 days. It’s tough to test this because there’s no apparent way to turn off the power settings that automatically dim the display after a few minutes. But most reviewers have found that the Cr-48 seems to last a full day–and perhaps even more with the 3G radio turned off–which sounds great.

Wireless built-in
The Cr-48 has both WiFi and a 3G modem for wireless broadband, and it is designed to be always connected. In this sense, it is similar to what Qualcomm, Nokia and others used to call smartbooks (though an Atom-based netbook won’t have the same standby time as an ARM-based smartbook or tablet running Android or iOS). Google has cut a deal with Verizon to offer 100MB of 3G data per month for free. The other monthly plans include 1GB for $20, 3GB for $35, and 5GB for $50. You can also purchase an unlimited day-pass for $9.99. Integrated wireless WAN isn’t a new feature in laptops, but with deployment of faster 3G and 4G networks and the introduction of wireless broadband in other devices such as e-readers and tablets, more users will want it.

Innovative keyboard
The changes that Google has made to the keyboard are controversial–some reviewers like them, others find them self-serving and confusing. Google replaced the Caps Lock with a Search key (which automatically opens a new tab in Chrome), eliminated the Function keys and Windows Command key, and added keys for browser commands such as Forward, Back and Refresh. These changes might take a little getting used to, but on balance they make a lot of sense given how much time we all spend in a browser, and it would be nice to see similar experimentation on Windows PCs and Macs.

The not-so-good:

Nothing but browser
The Chrome browser basically is the OS–or at least its interface. This keeps things simple, but it is also very limiting. You can’t minimize or re-size Chrome windows because there’s no graphical user interface behind it. You can open multiple tabs or multiple browser windows and cycle through them, but that’s about it (there are one or two applets such as Google Talk that remain visible on top of open windows). The file system is rudimentary. There is no equivalent to Windows Explorer so you can’t view folders (except for the Downloads folder) or copy files from one location to another. Similarly when you insert an SD card or USB drive, you can upload files to an online service but you can’t save them to local storage.

Limited settings
The System Settings menu has a series of tabs for modifying basic options such as the date and time, language, home page and default search provider. You can also change the look and feel of Chrome by downloading and installing new themes. But Chrome is missing many of the settings you’d find in the Control Panel or other parts of Windows. For example, you can’t view basic system specs (processor type or amount of memory), change the power settings or check how much free storage space is remaining.

Few apps
The Cr-48 comes with a handful of pre-loaded applications including Get Started, Gmail, YouTube, Google Maps, Google Talk and two games. You can install additional apps and extensions from the Chrome Web Store (chrome.google.com/webstore). Some major apps such as Skype and Evernote are not available, but the selection will surely increase over time. Chrome runs only Web apps, meaning that they are really interactive Web sites and not applications that you download and run locally. Some Web apps, including new ones using HTML5, should work offline, but this is still an emerging standard. You can watch videos or play games that use Adobe Flash, but you can’t use Netflix’s streaming service because Chrome does not have a Microsoft Silverlight extension.

Slow performance
Every reviewer has had issues with the performance, even in comparison with smaller netbooks using an Atom processor. Basic services such as Google Talk and Pandora seem to slow down the system. Adobe Flash is one of the big culprits here. The performance on sites such as YouTube and Hulu is sluggish, and in some cases the Flash plug-in fails to work at all. Adobe admits that Flash Player 10.1 support on Chrome notebooks is a “work in progress” and promises that fixing it is a top priority.

The hardware needs work
Like most netbooks, the Cr-48 has only a handful of ports including VGA, one USB connector, a headphone jack and an SD card slot. There’s no HDMI, no DisplayPort, and no powered USB/eSATA. Apple got beat up for leaving Ethernet off the MacBook Air, so it is only fair to note that Google has done the same with the Cr-48. Driver support is a challenge even for Microsoft (remember the Vista launch?), so it isn’t surprising that this is a work in progress on Chrome. Some USB peripherals may work and many others will not. The ClickPad also seems to be crying out for better drivers: several reviewers said it veered back and forth between non-responsive and overly-sensitive. Finally, the keyboard isn’t backlit and there is no keyboard light.

Printing is problematic
Speaking of drivers, you can’t print directly from a Chrome netbook. Instead you use Google Cloud Print service, which is currently in beta, to send the print jobs to a Windows PC connected to a printer. Of course, this implies that you already have a Windows PC and aren’t relying on a Chrome netbook as your primary PC. There’s another catch: Cloud Print won’t work with your Windows PC if it is using the latest version of Chrome 8. Instead you have to install a developer build of Chrome 9, which is less stable than the beta or “stable” versions. (ZDNet’s Larry Dignan sorted it all out here.) Despite these hassles, Cloud Print seems to work as advertised and it is a reasonable workaround for those using a Chrome netbook as a companion device.

That’s a long list of issues, but I wouldn’t write off Chrome just yet. True, the user experience is very different from a typical laptop, and Chrome OS doesn’t have many of the features in Windows 7 or Mac OS X. Furthermore tablets will almost certainly continue to grow at the expense of netbooks running all operating systems. But the Chrome netbook is a niche product specifically designed for users who want a device with a keyboard, but are happy to live entirely in the cloud. As carriers launch faster 4G networks and developers release more HTML5 applications, that niche should grow.

One big question mark, though, is the price. If they are priced below their Windows counterparts (Verizon or other carriers might subsidize it, pushing the price down even further), Chrome netbooks could have a fighting chance.

Hands-on reviews of Google’s Cr-48 Chrome netbook:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

John Morris is a former executive editor at CNET Networks and senior editor at PC Magazine.

Disclosure

John Morris

John Morris is a former executive editor at CNET Networks and senior editor at PC Magazine. He now works for a private investment firm, which may at any time invest in companies whose products are discussed in this blog, and no disclosure of securities transactions will be made. No investment advice is offered in this blog. All duties are disclaimed.

Biography

John Morris

John Morris is a former executive editor at CNET Networks and senior editor at PC Magazine. He now works for a private investment firm, which may at any time invest in companies whose products are discussed in this blog, and no disclosure of securities transactions will be made. No investment advice is offered in this blog. All duties are disclaimed.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
44
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google's Chrome OS netbook: The good, the bad and its prospects
Queuecumber 27th May
I'm sensing a lot of confusion here, the chromebook isn't supposed to be a computer (e.g. a replacement for a laptop, PC, ...) its really just intended to be the internet that you carry around, and it does this well, I don't think anyone expects it to be used as a primary computer. While its true that any other machine can access the internet, it remains to be seen if the chromebook does anything faster or better. If its really cheap, then maybe it'll make more sense for someone who does most of their work or keeps most of their files online.
Also, I see a lot of people concerned about security. Again I see this as not intended to replace a main computer which should be used for your secure files. This way, only files that don't need security, or files that you will be temporarily working on while away from the computer, need to be kept online and used on the chromebook. On a side note, I haven't really heard too much lately about google having security problems. I'm sure its happened, but it hasn't happened to me, or anyone I know, and I feel that is true for most people.
All in all, this doesn't seem like a bad idea. It will work for some, but other clearly wont like it: the same way everything works. Mainly, though, it is very different from devices that people are used to. People were even critical of the TV when it was first being developed. While I too am skeptical, I'm keeping an open mind, and I urge everyone else to do the same. This could be a very good idea and you wouldn't want to miss out. The future of computing is on the internet, and while we aren't there yet, this might be a good first attempt.
not exactly be "only a browser".
insta fail..... people are realizing netbooks are junk. everyone followed the pack now they arent sure why they did.
@bspurloc
my friends and family using their netbooks more than their main computer right now and taking them everywhere dont think their junk. You should specify that "you" consider them yunk.
0 Votes
+ -
Slow performance? Wow: Google just released
John Zern Updated - 15th Dec 2010
their version of Vista!
@John Zern

Actually, the analogy would be Windows 3.1. They haven't really made a gui based OS before, and this is just something they run to support existing code. So, really this is like running 3.1 on top of DOS.
@John Zern
slow performance is because of the flash sandbox, which they are fixing right now.
@DonnieBoy

Wow... Really this is classic... GFail takes Linux and writes it their way. They give you what they think you deserve which is pretty much nothing but a browser and everything running through them. Mind you I like Windows, Linux and OS X but putting all your eggs in one basket doesn't sound like a good idea. This looks like some playschool kids toy for babies that get excited by screen flashes when they press buttons. This is NOT A NOTEBOOK! This is a netbook with a lousy half arsed attempt at an OS. Someone said it was like Windows 3.11 but really it is not as you have no true terminal access nor drive structure access. Ubuntu is brilliant and lots of work was put into it and still is... ASUS and other manufactures have made simple OS's similar to this from Linux with no issues or trials like my original EEE PC 4G 7" netbook which came with something similar bug free though and back in 2007. Now here we are in 2010 and GFail is making so much hype over this crap when ASUS did pretty much the same thing way back and it went no where but back to Windows.

The best option in my opinion if you wanted a cheap speedy awesome netbook would be look at Asus 1215N which is powerful enough to run Windows 7 and Starcraft II at 30 fps. It also is N525 Dual core with HT and 1MB cache at 1.8Ghz. It supports DDR3 memory as well has 250GB HDD which you can upgrade to SSD or just go cheap and easy with a 500GB 7200 RPM HD all in a similar shell as this one but with software and support which the world runs on. The other benefit is you can dual boot Win7 and Ubuntu 10.10 and have plenty of storage as well as use portable storage as well as cloud storage... Damn but who would want options? Seems like another GFail product forcing idiotic ads in your face.
@DonnieBoy

Oh and lastly...

I remember reading another article yesterday about how flash blows on this device... I wouldn't say it is all of Adobe's fault as in the Ubuntu Distros Flash seems to work just fine even on a lesser powered netbook without a hitch aside of some typical Linux bugs which usually can be worked out easily but with this you're stuck waiting for the people who half a$$ed this product to make it happen. If it already is being pushed back like it is now over something that should be so simple that ASUS accomplished years ago then if and when this hits mainstream there will be a lot of GHate going on. GFail does well pushing their crappy phones and should stick to that instead of making a big deal out of this pile of crap OS that everyone will get and then turn away from GFail.
@audidiablo
You should note that with this move google is helping linux more than ever (specially in kernel support). They're bringing web 3.0 to the masses and making the web technologies / apps as powerful as traditional ones (even more).
I wont be forced to use windows anymore if i dont want to. I will be able to access all my web apps in any OS (normal linux, mac and cOS).
0 Votes
+ -
Limited Settings
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate 15th Dec 2010
If by Limited you mean there are not enough of them to be found, perhaps that is intentional and engineers are making by design a device which requires little or no configuration, yes?
0 Votes
+ -
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate So it's okay when Google does it but when Apple does it they are called "Big Brother" at best... cue the double standards.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate
i would suspect that as a test unit, they dont want people going crazy with the settings. It would only send them in more support requests and bug reports that they haven't planned on dealing with at the moment. Am sure those missing settings will come in time after the beta.
0 Votes
+ -
This
Cylon Centurion Updated - 15th Dec 2010
"Similarly when you insert an SD card or USB drive, you can upload files to an online service but you cant save them to local storage."

THere are so many words I have for this right now, I'll skip over, but needless to say. This is a HUUUUGE no-no.
You don't keep ANYTHING online you don't want there, but Google isn't giving people that option. It's all or nothing, and that my friends is the biggest reason why this OS will fail miserably.

Stallman is right on when he says people will loose control of their data. Google does not deserve my trust or my data. Period.
client. So, just relax and realize that there will be exceptions to the rules. But, Google starts out with the most secure, and then you make exceptions one at a time. With Windows, you start out with the most insecure, letting every program do virtually everything.
0 Votes
+ -
No one
Cylon Centurion 15th Dec 2010
@DonnieBoy

But you has shown anything that there will be local storage. I just quoted the article saying there wouldn't. Which do you think I'm going to believe more?


Hint: Not you.
0 Votes
+ -
DonnieBoy. Have all the reviewers skipped over that?
Plus where is the info on c/c++ programs through native client? (I'm interested to read up on that.)

And are you that worried already? its been out a couple of days and your best argument for it, is digs against Windows?

You know it's doomed when thats all you can say about it.
@DonnieBoy

Wishing doesn't make it so Donnie wink

Why anyone would buy a brain damaged notebook is beyond me. If you are that enamoured of Google just get a cheap Windows notebook or netbook and just run Chrome exclusively. That way you even get local storage and printing as well.

How many fails is Google allowed? Has anything worked since search and Earth?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Google's Chrome OS netbook: The good, the bad and its prospects
Pete "athynz" Athens Updated - 16th Dec 2010
@DonnieBoy Yeah a whopping 16GB of local storage... to pull a quote from this article: But it is really more of a large netbook with a 12-inch display, an Intel Atom single-core processor and, according to published teardowns, a 16GB SanDisk SSD ( theres no hard drive ) . Emphasis mine to point out the relevant part of the article to DonnieBoy who somehow keeps missing this crucial bit of information.

I'm with Cylon Centurion on this one... There is more than one source saying there is no or very limited local storage and only you claiming that there is local storage and I'm going to believe the ones with direct hands on experience than believe you.
@Cylon Centurion, John Zern, tony etc.
Having recived my Cr-48 last night I can assure you all that there is local storage. The reason "most" reviewers haven't mentioned it is that in order to access it and utilize it you have to enable the flags the in the "about:Flags" settings.

I haven't put the storage through all its paces, but I have created a local "Music" folder and download some .mp3s to it. Once they were there, a little "play" arrow appeared next to them (thanks to the Media Player flag) and I could play songs from a small widget in the lower right corner of the screen.
except most morons put personal info all over facebook etc and wont understand the dumbness of this. it is as inept as online backups for companies. nothing like total loss and having to download data for 24+ hours instead of offline hd's
@bspurloc

You said it, the "morons put personal info all over Facebook". With Google, you don't have the choice of putting. If you use any of their products, they are scraping the data about you and your usage and building their own profile on you. With Facebook, you build the profile. With Google, they build the profile.

And then, they use the info to sell ads, or eventually, stalk young girls, or put it on Wikileaks.
@Cylon Centurion 0005

Uhhh, this is a FREE device for concept testing. If I were running the test, I wouldn't let the beta users getting a free device undermine the test by utilizing local storage either. It DOES come with 16GB of local storage which is superior to a hard drive in half a dozen ways, so users can likely expect that functionality to come online at a later date.

How is it possible that this device is being analyzed like a production model? There are so much more interesting questions than whether or not it has printer interoperability. Do you realize that HP discourages it's employees from printing?
@Cylon Centurion 0005
They plan to allow offline storage, but they want people to give feedback on the online experience for a while. But you dont have to take my word for it, you'll see it later during the year.
0 Votes
+ -
i do not hate MS nor Google they just so far have not met my needs/wants nearly as well as Apple. Though do own an XBox 360 and before that an XBox. Now the whole Chrome concept is new and not traditional so i have to wonder if it might be me not seeing the advantages of this OS? For me only time will tell suppose but as of yet i'm not seeing it, still there is always time and development and who knows i just might someday:)

Pagan jim
no advantage was listed. it is just a crippled netbook. a cell phone does the same thing. google has lost a sense of direction in realizing they cant write an OS that supports games etc so they took the netbook route. unix does all this already and more.
@bspurloc

You can run Unix on a desktop, too. I think the reviewers are wasting time looking at the hardware. Google isn't making ANY of the hardware. They're planning on OEM'ing the whole thing. I expect it will be a Macbook Air for the masses, 90% of the features for 10% of the price.
@James Quinn

It's essentially a thin client scam using proprietary hardware trying to reproduce running Chrome on a real OS. It's not very successful as the lack of local storage and the printing difficulties show. You can currently buy a netbook or notebook with Win 7 very cheaply, so why anyone would buy one of these things unless they are giving them away, I have no idea. Put Chrome on a Win 7 notebook and you have a much better deal, if you are committed to Chrome.

Never had an Xbox before Jim, I'm a kb/mouse gamer. but got one to try out the Kinect - fantastic. I'd highly recommend you try one out.
@tonymcs@...

The point was made, and is a valid one, that with Win7, no matter how cheaply, you are always going to have external security worries. Much better to use a Linux flavour. With Chrome, you have the internal security problems. Google does not want anybody but themselves to steal your personal information.
0 Votes
+ -
I think printing will be a problem.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 15th Dec 2010
It necessarily requires a second PC, that is on, with Windows, connected to the printer, running Google's cloud printing software to accept the printout from the cloud? OK, how do I scan a document. I am using a Chrome notebook, I get off the couch, fire up a Windows PC connected to the printer, crap, I have to download an update to the cloud software, put the document in the scanner, go back to the notebook, crap, oh yeah, dynamic IP, go press "connect to cloud", ahhh, cool, Google can now scan my document and present it to me at my notebook. So why not just use a machine where it works locally?

How many holes can you drive through that just to get a document printed. I feel they have to support the printer connected to the machine plain and simple. Does anyone here think for even a hint of a second a business is going to be stupid enough to open their firewall port(s, and which ones) to allow for "cloud printing"?

On everything else, this is entirely not for me, I just don't trust, like or believe in the cloud for anything but fluff (entertainment).
@TripleII

Why do you still print things? Do you work with the government a lot? They like things printed. It has a lot to do with their chronic budget and contract mismanagement. At what point do we acknowledge it is no different from endemic corruption?
Like Pagan jim said, maybe I'm just not seeing the advantages, but it seems to me that having no/limited local storage and file management on a portable device is problematic. Managing large files across a 3G-type connection would be painful, and not have a connection for some reason would really limit the usefulness.

Maybe having something local that syncs up to an online storage repository on command would help. I also think it might be nice if it could be synced up to storage of my choice, where I could choose something shared from my house where I might have all of my data for all my PCs.

I dunno, while I'm sure it is good for some things, I'm not convince it will replace the use of traditional laptops until some additional infrastructure is available (higher speed wireless, etc.).
Talking about a wate of R&D!

First, Android hasn't been a huge success. Just a minor one. It has issues.

Second. Chrome OS is a Linux distro. People hated LInux in 2009 when netbooks first came out. They prefer Windows. So what has change?
0 Votes
+ -
Can't wait for GoogleCAD
osreinstall 15th Dec 2010
Performance will be stellar. - wink

No-Go Symptoms:
Performance
Copyright
NDAs
Privacy
Reliability
Non Expandability
Last but not Least: A fully functional Win32/64 computer on the net to print, that it is supposed to replace. Why not use the Win32/64 computer to do everything including the ability (if you want to ) run Chrome and its apps. Chromebook looks like a problem masquerading as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. By the way Donnieboy, I like Win32/64. 64 is the future & it works for me, so you tell your boss Eric Schmidt, "No Thanks".
0 Votes
+ -
Wow
Cylon Centurion 15th Dec 2010
@osreinstall

Where is he? Usually he'd be here spitting off how no one prints anymore, maybe something about having a legacy printer sitting in the corner connected to a circa 1995 PC for those that do, and that Office is only good for printing.
Oh and that x86 is dying and those that do you use it, carry around circa 1993 laptops that get as hot as the sun with 30 minute battery life....
0 Votes
+ -
Some folks like to carry on without facts.
osreinstall Updated - 15th Dec 2010
@Cylon Centurion 0005

To show you how wrong Donnieboy is, x86 code is not 64 bit. It is 32 bit code which is obsolete but not the 64 bit code, although 64 bits will run the x86 code. That is because all processors are risc including AMD and Intel. Those two processors have the x86 extension instruction set that is used when in 32 bits but bypassed in 64 bits. Even the old x86 processors were risc and had x86 extension instruction set but couldn't run the 64 bits.

Sending a google print to the mothership so it comes back to your networked computer that has a printer on it to do the job. Why not send the print wireless to the printer that is 802.11g ready? Cut down on bandwidth. Sounds like they want to know everything about you and own your stuff.

Must be all that koolaid he drinks in the Google cafeteria.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm sorry but I can't help but recall ALL the nay sayers at the start of the year condemning Steve Jobs decision to abandon Flash support. Now, Google has given it a try. Not only that, Google was going to make Flash an integral part of its OS and not just a plug-in.

How did Google do? Hmm. Let's quote from the article above. "...Adobe Flash is one of the big culprits here. The performance on sites such as YouTube and Hulu is sluggish, and in some cases the Flash plug-in fails to work at all. Adobe admits that Flash Player 10.1 support on Chrome notebooks is a work in progress and promises that fixing it is a top priority."

Flash is sluggish. Flash "sometimes" fails. Flash support is a "work in progress". Oh yes .. where have I heard those sayings before?

In April, I suggested Flash would be irrelevant in two years. I'm thinking now that I was overly cautious in that opinion.

Perhaps Google should just drop Flash now .. before its too late.
@kenosha7777

But you omitted the preceding sentence when you started quoting the article:

"Every reviewer has had issues with the performance, even in comparison with smaller netbooks using an Atom processor. Basic services such as Google Talk (Google's own app, mind you) and Pandora seem to slow down the system..."

I'm pretty sure if they can get Flash performing on Android, it will run fine on ChromeOS. Another tidbit of the article you failed to focus on in your anti-adobe, pro-apple post: "But building an operating system is no easy task, and with lots of bugs left to stamp out..." as shown here:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium-os/issues/list

the problem is not simply with Flash, as you suggest. Steve Jobs is STILL an idiot for black-listing a major player, and you're still an idiot for following him like a sheep.
0 Votes
+ -
@SonofaSailor
Tests have shown flash to slow down Macintosh performances as well. TESTS you see. Sure Chrome has further developments and upgrades a plenty to go. Sure Google Apps need improvement. None of that means Flash is a good choice. Actually I would say this if your product has issues why add more? The iPod, iPhone and now iPad has shown Flash is NOT needed hence the customer satisfaction surveys who show the users of these devices are very pleased with them.

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
@SonofaSailor

I am pro Apple. I'm not "anti every thing else". And I'm definitely not a sheep.

But speaking of idiotic .. only an idiot clings fast or defends a failed, outdated or buggy technology.

By the way .. I was only offering a way for Google to improve their product with the suggestion to drop Flash support.

And .. I never implied Chrome OS was defective .. only that it was saddled with a component best left out.
@kenosha7777

First of all, flash is great but also blows. Honestly they need to move forward with HTML5 and H.264 streaming... Better HD experience, smaller file sizes and no need for 3rd party crap. Google is going to force flash so you get the best experience with idiot ads that zoom all over your computer for the best buggy crash experience leaving the most inept users at a terminal crash window they will never understand.

Google shouldn't drop flash per say but more so the lame attempt at making an OS. They should cut their losses and keep focused on phones and their snooping.

Apple wasn't totally wrong for dropping flash... It is one of the best ways to be hijacked and yes that does happen with Apple computers as well just not nearly as common as on the Windows platform.

The best thing I see is when the inexperienced users all clamor over ChromeOS and put all their pollution in the clouds it will produce acid rain to fall back on them when Google gets hijacked and everyone that was just that inept has everything compromised in one swoop.

Anyone else notice how GDocs looks like MS Office 1.0?

http://images.techtree.com/ttimages/story/101355_winword.jpg
Personally I think Google will work out the kinks and this thing will fly with a lot of users who want a very simple computer experience that requires no real intervention on their part. All the apps etc will automatically update themselves, they will be able to go to any Google OS PC and use it as their own etc. Where I can see it really working well will be with people who live in poorer parts of the world because it could be made to be so inexpensive.
I was lucky enough to have a Cr-48 appear on my porch last Friday so I've lived with the device for a week now. It doesn't do everything, but it's become my primary device. I continue to do a few things, like edit photos in high-resolution, on my desktop with 24" monitor, but for most things, it's the Cr-48. The instant-on, instant-off is nice and the notebook transfers between Wi-Fi and 3G transparently. Size and weight are just right and the keyboard has nice positive feedback. And yes, Virginia, there is a local file system and you CAN store files locally. I've enabled the experimental local file system and music player, and while they're definitely fairly early in development, you can see what Google is going to deliver.

I can already get to a lot of my company's functions too, and when the Citrix receiver comes out next spring I'll probably be able to do everything.

And while I prefer Google apps, I've also tested out Windows Live, Yahoo etc. as well as some corporate app and they appear to work. You're not stuck with Google if you're using a Chrome OS device.
Google would LOVE for people to become completely dependent on it---while it has TOTAL access to everyone's browsing habits and personal data. Please don't fall for it.
I'm sensing a lot of confusion here, the chromebook isn't supposed to be a computer (e.g. a replacement for a laptop, PC, ...) its really just intended to be the internet that you carry around, and it does this well, I don't think anyone expects it to be used as a primary computer. While its true that any other machine can access the internet, it remains to be seen if the chromebook does anything faster or better. If its really cheap, then maybe it'll make more sense for someone who does most of their work or keeps most of their files online.
Also, I see a lot of people concerned about security. Again I see this as not intended to replace a main computer which should be used for your secure files. This way, only files that don't need security, or files that you will be temporarily working on while away from the computer, need to be kept online and used on the chromebook. On a side note, I haven't really heard too much lately about google having security problems. I'm sure its happened, but it hasn't happened to me, or anyone I know, and I feel that is true for most people.
All in all, this doesn't seem like a bad idea. It will work for some, but other clearly wont like it: the same way everything works. Mainly, though, it is very different from devices that people are used to. People were even critical of the TV when it was first being developed. While I too am skeptical, I'm keeping an open mind, and I urge everyone else to do the same. This could be a very good idea and you wouldn't want to miss out. The future of computing is on the internet, and while we aren't there yet, this might be a good first attempt.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix