Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

iBuyPower launches Performance Lab, pre-tests select desktops and laptops for gaming performance

By | July 28, 2010, 4:02am PDT

Summary: Computer review sites have long posted benchmark scores of systems running popular games, but iBuyPower is taking that approach in-house by opening its Performance Lab. It’s testing select pre-configured desktops on their performance in three games, then publishing the results with the rest of the buying information on its Web site. The games tested include the [...]

Computer review sites have long posted benchmark scores of systems running popular games, but iBuyPower is taking that approach in-house by opening its Performance Lab. It’s testing select pre-configured desktops on their performance in three games, then publishing the results with the rest of the buying information on its Web site.

The games tested include the new and ultra-hyped Starcraft 2, along with Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Modern Warfare 2. Systems were tested at three different settings, and you can find the FPS results on this page. Desktops were tested at 1,920×1,080 resolution, while laptops were tested at 1,280×1,024. iBuyPower says it tests each setting for several hours multiple times, and then publicizes the average results.

Of the six new systems, the $1,999 Lan Warrior 2 offers the best performance, earning 77 frames per second (fps) on the Ultra setting of Starcraft 2 thanks to its ATI Radeon HD 5970 graphics. On the low end, the $975 Battalion 101 CZ-11 Ultra tops out at 16fps for Battlefield Bad Company 2 at High setting. Oddly enough, the $1,489 Battalion 101 W860CU actually outscores the SLI-packing $2,339 Battalion 101 X8100 at Starcraft 2 on Ultra and High settings.

According to iBuyPower, “These frame rates aren’t guaranteed, but they should give you a decent idea of what games are playable on the system.” There’s no doubt that many system manufacturers test their configurations internally, but iBuyPower is now among the few that publicizes those scores. Of course, getting independent benchmarks that compare a system’s performance to its competitors are still more valuable, and you may not get the same performance on the system you wind up purchasing, but any additional buying information is always helpful during the buying process for a gaming system, where you are literally overwhelmed with component choices.

Do you think this is a good move by iBuyPower to publicize its systems’ gaming scores? Should other companies do the same? Let us know in the Comments section.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources