Intel: Sandy Bridge repairs ahead of schedule

Summary: The delay of new PCs using Intel's second-generation Core processors may not be as long as initially thought. Intel said some customers will use original 6 Series chipset anyway while production of the updated Sandy Bridge chipset is going better than expected.

The delay of new laptops and desktops using Intel's second-generation Core processors may not be as long as initially thought. In a statement last night, Intel said that some of its customers had decided to go ahead and use the original 6 Series chipset, which has a minor design flaw, and that production of the updated Sandy Bridge chipset was running ahead of schedule.

This wasn't too surprising.

The glitch, which has to do with the SATA ports that connect the processor to the hard drive and other components, will only impact performance of less than 5 percent of PCs, and even then only after years of use under certain operating conditions. Moreover it only affects two of the six SATA ports on the chipset. In its statement, Intel said only computer makers that "committed to shipping the Intel 6 Series Chipset in PC system configurations that are not impacted by the design issue" will be able to use the original chipset. Translation: Don't use the bad SATA ports.

Intel also lucked out a bit. The design flaw is in the chipset, which is manufactured on an older 65nm process, and not the CPU, a more complicated design manufactured on an advanced 32nm process. It also showed up in one of the later steps in the manufacturing process. All of this makes it much easier to fix. Intel now says it will begin shipping the chipset with the fix implemented in mid-February. Last week Intel said it could take until April to get to volume production on the repaired chipset, though in a conference call executives said they hoped to be able to "pull-in" production since the fix was relatively easy.

The "Sandy Bridge to nowhere" will still go down as Intel's costliest mistake to date with a total price tag of around $1 billion. By the time it discovered the problem, Intel had already shipped around 8 million chips to customers, though only 500,000 or so had actually purchased one of the first systems, which were only available with quad-core processors. My colleague, Sean Portnoy, covered how the computer companies were addressing this in this post. But it sounds like Intel has moved quickly to correct the error, and it now looks like we should start seeing mainstream laptops with Sandy Bridge dual-cores within a few weeks.

Topics: Hardware, Intel, Processors, Storage

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

7 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Intel: Sandy Bridge repairs ahead of schedule

    Four of the six.
    rseiler
  • A sliver blunder lining perhaps

    At least it can be seen as proof that Intel has finally learned its lesson, no matter how costly, about keeping silent - or spinning disingenuous webs - from its earlier 486 SX/DX + 487SX and P5 FPU fiascos.

    Um, let's overlook the costly wreck that was the Itanic altogether. ;)
    klumper
  • RE: Intel: Sandy Bridge repairs ahead of schedule

    I chatted with Intel tech support and they said that Intel is not going to "compensate" any users who were supporters of thier new technology. I had to sent my MB back due to an issue but Newegg was very quick to credit me, but I am without an system untill motherboards get into the retail channel. I have learned my lesson on this one. Wait until the tech is mature before buying it. Shame on you Intel for not supporting the, as you say in your press release "reletivity few" early adopters of your tech.
    tomsurfnj
    • RE: Intel: Sandy Bridge repairs ahead of schedule

      Compensate? What does Intel have to do with Newegg? I'm sure if you bought your board from Intel, they would have taken it back and refunded you as readily as Newegg did.
      rseiler
  • Do you guys do corrections?

    It's 4 of 6, not 2 or 6 ports. Only ports 0 and 1 remain unaffected.<br><br>Interesting how you describe the design flaw as "minor" than proceed to state that it will be Intel's most expensive fix in it's history of products. If you consider that minor, what would be a major design flaw for you?
    mrxxxman
  • My Guess

    Is they are lying playing the public like they always do Intel is know for non forthright manner and are even selling their old chips that have this and how many other defects to gullible OEMs but don't worry they won'tfail until the warranty is over
    wizardb@...
  • Use Linux then you don't need these new CPU&quot;s

    I love Linux because Linux will run on old Hardware. In the last year I've been given 9 working PC Towers and 2 Laptops because their owners believed the Marketing Men's hype that you need these duo-Core i3, i5, i7 CPU's to be productive on a PC... If all you do is write a letter, surf the net, facebook and twitter, listen to music, watch a movie on your PC and noth much else, trust me you don't need a new computer just a new operating system. Before you go out and buy that new PC try Linux on the old one first. What do you have to lose anyway. So it all goes wrong and your old PC won't work at all. Buy the new PC. Linux is soooo easy to install these days so there's more chance of success than failure. You get a free Apps store as well. Don't want to download Linux go buy "Linux Magazine" it comes with the Install DVD included for around $13 USD not bad hey!
    John Biles