Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

Intel to offer optional protection plan for overclocked Core processors

By | January 19, 2012, 5:13am PST

The additional protection plans offered by electronics companies are often of dubious value to consumers, but Intel has just launched one that may be a good value if you like to tweak your processor.

Its new Performance Tuning Protection Plan is designed to provide a replacement CPU in the event of “failures caused by operating the eligible processor outside of Intel’s published specifications” — i.e, overclocking. (Intel’s three-year standard warranty still applies for processor failures while used under Intel’s published specs.) Chips eligible for the plan include all Core processors that are unlocked (which have a K or X suffix) and ones that use the LGA2011 socket. The plan works for only the original component, so you cannot receive another processor if you fry the replacement one.

Unlike many other plans of this ilk, the pricing seems reasonable, especially considering that you’ve probably spent hundreds of dollars on your processor in the first place: From $20 for the Core i5-2500K to $35 for the new Sandy Bridge-E Core i7 CPUs like the i7-3960X. Note that there is a 30-day waiting period before you can redeem your processor.

While Intel still does not endorse overclocking in any official way (nudge, nudge), the unlocked processors and this protection plan show a growing understanding from the chip giant about the importance of overclockers to its bottom line.

The one bit of bad news about the new services is that it a pilot plan that is only being offered for the next six months. So don’t delay if you want to purchase the plan, and perhaps strong customer interest will convince Intel to continue it after the pilot period ends. You can find more information from the company about the Performance Tuning Protection Plan here.

Would you consider purchasing the Performance Tuning Protection Plan for your overclocked Intel processor? Let us know in the Talkback section.

[Via HotHardware]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Talkback Most Recent of 4 Talkback(s)

  • ZDNet Gravatar
    CobraA1
    19th Jan
  • RE: Intel to offer optional protection plan for overclocked Core processors
    @CobraA1 It's just pointless. Intel has no method of knowing if you overclock or not and I have never had a warranty denied me on a device over this. Shoot, I even overclock my phone and Verizon has taken it back three times once specifically because the processor burned out. This is just a way to get money to cover something they covered already.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Socratesfoot
    19th Jan
  • Largely vapor promotion and selling
    Any gearhead with hands-on experience in the overclocking field knows that built-in CPU protections and overhead margins will safeguard the chip on the red line first, as opposed to the host platform. A motherboard with its myriad of components and weak link circuitry will give out far quicker and more often than practically any modern processor when pushing spec ranges.

    You heard it here first. Save your money.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    klumper
    20th Jan
  • Yawn ... I had a o/c protection plan years ago
    @klumper .. it's called an AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle), it's the ancient creature powering my main desktop of the last 7 years (the system i'm typing this post from).

    To give you an idea, I've had it overclocked most of it's working life: currently it's @: 240 x10; V/c:1.55, stable & zippy. The m/b is an ASRock K8 Upgrade. My other rig has a WinFast 760GX m/b with the same cpu.

    ... yeah, so like you, i'll pass.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    thx-1138_@...
    21st Jan

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources