Book Review: End of Business as We Know It, Brian Solis

Book Review: End of Business as We Know It, Brian Solis

Summary: I NEVER write book reviews. NEVER.Until now.I decided that I REALLY wanted to write one because I found Brian Solis' book, "The End of Business As Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consumer Revolution" not just compelling and interesting, not just a book by a dear friend, but a genuinely important book.

SHARE:

I NEVER write book reviews. NEVER.

Until now.

I decided that I REALLY wanted to write one because I found Brian Solis' book, "The End of Business As Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consumer Revolution" not just compelling and interesting, not just a book by a dear friend, but a genuinely important book.  And, truthfully, compelling and interesting don't particularly or necessarily lead to "important." But in this case they do.

Let me tell something about Brian first so you understand the book.  Why? The voice of an author matters. If the voice isn't in the book - meaning you can't say "wow, its like I'm having a conversation with the author" and you don't get a feel for who the author is by how the book's narrative is being told, then it won't be a good book. Even if its important.

Brian Solis is one of the most significant social thinkers in business. He is someone who set out to reinvent how public relations was done, after he realized how important the social channels were going to be - and he did that. He did that so well, that PR 2.0, is associated with him. He did that so well that he has advocates across the world including a number of well known celebrities - as  you can see by who writes the forewords to his books - Ashton Kutcher, Katy Couric, etc.

He is also a master story teller with a relaxed and entertaining style that actually comes across. He does something else that entertains and provides a lot of value too - he uses a lot of references to pop culture.

Whaaaaa? Why is that important you say?

Every individual thinks differently. Each of us has our own set of metaphors that triggers emotional states associated with them and ideas that are reflected in them. For example, in the U.S. when I spoke in the past, I would talk about natural leaders (related to an experiment in psychological warfare done by sociologist Kurt Lewin in the 40s).  My equation that got the light bulbs going off was "For those of you who watch 'Lost'  - Jack."  In Europe, that didn't work.

Like or hate pop culture, it is the world that we inhabit and it plays a profound role in how we do things. How many times do we say, yeah, that's like the movie - and often science uses movies for the prototypes of ideas for devices and designers use them for their ideas for "futurist" style.  So pop culture is a reference point for triggering a lot of different things. Brian judiciously uses celebrity culture to get across key points about the changes that we are undergoing.  This is no coincidence, nor is it a coincidence that a Katy Couric writes the foreword to his book.

His style, his ability to use entertainment metaphors and similes and examples, his conversational approach all help to make this very forward thinking book about a complex nascent subject of great importance - social business -and a highly digestible one.

But, style notwithstanding, the value and importance of EOBAU is driven by its content;  and what Brian says in the "End of Business As Usual" (EOBAU) is exactly what 21st century businesses need to hear.

I'm not going to regurgitate what he says constantly and call that a review. I want to take a look at the essence of the book and then you should all go out and buy it and make it your go-to book on how to handle handle your brand.

He does some of what you would expect in the book - speak of the connected consumer, brand co-creation and collective commerce - in other words, identify with some real clarity, the aspects of the new and social business world that we are now beginning to inhabit.  But to some degree, though not as elegantly or entertainingly, so have several others in one fashion or another.  But what EOBAU is able to show uniquely and most importantly, is that the strategies that we have to carry out are strategies for customer engagement and that they MUST take into account the emotional side of the customers and of the business. This is NOT a negotiable position. That on the one hand, connected customers are expecting to be uniquely treated and on the other hand the business is responsible for creating shared experiences that are the foundation of the new business models that are needed for what he calls "an adaptive business."  Witness these two paragraphs:

"...The adaptive business earns relevance by then connecting with customers and those who influence them based on this intelligence directly through contact and indirectly through products, services and processes. This is how a business becomes one with the customers defining new market opportunities.

The emergence of these new media touchpoints creates new opportunities for engagement. But engagement in the human network requires a new outlook, a new approach, and a new model for conveying empathy and leadership and creating magical (PG: emphasis his) and shareable experiences."

One thing that I'm glad to see is that this dovetails quite nicely with my far less elegant definition of the 21st century general business model which in its essence says that the company has to provide the products, services, tools and consumable experiences that allow the customer to sculpt the kind of experience and interactions that they want with the company.

I would be remiss I didn't examine briefly his treatment of Social CRM which is not long but significant. Here is a key sentence in the beginning of the discussion - and one that I think needs to be emblazoned in the brains of the corporate world - and of the social and CRM practitioners out there.

"In the rise of social media, the need for CRM to socialize became paramount....As a result the role of sCRM is to support the creation and sustainability of collaborative experiences and engagement that deliver and nurture value."

But how do you do that when you're dealing with a company that's done things the way they are doing them forever?

Key to Brian's concept of the new social business is the culture of the company which has to not just adapt but to change to meet the demands of the connected customer and the human network.  More so than any other book of its type, he drives home what has to be said, which is that culture change is a necessary and irrevocable requirement for the transformation to an adaptive business that can actually be engaged with its customers.  He warns (yes!) "Any organization that focuses on operations, margins and efficiencies over customer experience will hasten the erosion of market relevance."

The problem with taking this approach to business - the idea that engaging customers in a way that encourages them to participate in the creation of what they need to remain engaged in the business - is that it can smack of pie in the sky.  This is something to be desired, but not possible, or "it sounds great, but...", the naysayers mantra goes.  But EOBAU takes that into account. Monsieur Solis makes it quite clear that there have to be realistic models, strategies, programs and objectives to make this something that is meaningful and achievable and that we're not just talking about culture change in the abstract but also in real terms. He makes clear via the examples of companies like Zappos and to some extent, Dell. He also looks at what kind of enterprise framework is needed to effect these changes.  One thing I'm glad to see is that he isn't talking about democratizing the corporation via leveling the hierarchy, which, as much as I'm sure we'd all like to see some of, ain't happening ever.  Instead, he talks about the senior management of the company empowering employees to take actions and to encourage interactions with customers.  He looks at it through the lens of a holistic model, but recognizes that a. most businesses aren't using a holistic model yet and b. you have to get there; you don't just "do" it. As opposed to those who love "leveling the hierarchy" - he makes a fundamental point.

"The executive management team responsible for the direction of the brand is, of course, at the center. That is where leadership, culture and a holistic view of empowerment take shape."

He then proposes a Center of Excellence that would be responsible for the execution of the plan for the new business model from processes to culture shift down to the individual business unit.

In other words, he is viewing what is a new world within the context of a world in transition, not a shift from black to white without any grey in between, which is sadly what you read from a lot of the so-called "influencers" as opposed to the true business leaders like Brian.

But its not just the organizational framework as EOBAU makes clear throughout. Its also the psychology and behavior of the individual customer.  This isn't just a matter of recognizing that it matters or even "listening to the social web" with an ear to understanding it. Its a matter of institutional accountability for it - making sure that there is a set of repeatable practices that the company provides that accounts for the ever shifting behaviors of its customer groups and individual customers - and that there are programs that are designed for that. That is the essence of customer engagement.

He takes a good look at the psyche and personality of the connected consumer and the commensurate demands they are now placing on business in channels that weren't available a decade ago and are now ubiquitous - which changes how businesses must react to them.  He understands that what customers value isn't the same as what businesses value, yet, the adaptive business has to take all that into account. Businesses are at a disadvantage to some degree because customers aren't taking profitability, revenue and shareholder value into account when they are deciding how they want to engage with a business. But businesses have to take the "personal values" of customers into account and thus, what moves those customers, when they are deciding on how they want to be engaged and how they want to engage with those customers. So the customers have a decided advantage in the situation.  He also understands that when a business makes the changes it needs to make to become customer-centric, that there has to be some reason for employees (customers at work so to speak) to want to be empowered - incentives. He identifies a set of "experience types" that customers/employees connect to ranging from achievement - the ability to accomplish great things to  appreciation - "recognizing good intentions and the role you play in day to day outcomes."  These are the kinds of experiences that when provided and then reinforced help make the cultural transition to a social business at a company more successful

What that means is that you have build the programs for change to make sure that they are institutionally embedded and continuously realizable. This could include communications plans, training, incentivizing employees, etc.  Again, making sure that the self-interest of those who are expected to interact with the customers is taken care of.

The book covers a lot more than I can ever get into but I hope this at least provides you with a flavor of this incredibly entertaining and invaluable work.  Brian Solis nails how business is changing and the fact that it is changing not changed yet. Thus what companies need to do is to recognize the changes, recognize the process of change and to take the time to recognize who their customers are and what they are thinking.  What you have to do is go out and buy this book.  Then listen, learn and act.  You and your company will be the better for it.

Way to go, Brian, my man.

Topics: Dell, Enterprise Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Derivative

    The idea outlined seems to be nothing more than the Customer Focus initiatives of the 80's, or the principles of good account management, ... and similar: updated slightly to allow for the fact that in the 21st we are now more connected.

    While I am certain customers would like businesses to be more focussed on their (emotional) needs, rather than monopolisation and shareholder value ... I think the largest IT corporations are in fact going the opposite way. As in the disaster movie 'The Day After Tomorrow' there are a few enormous storm centres forming over the planet intent on sucking energy into their vortices: Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, ... and ORACLE on the business front ... headed by ruthless senior management, not averse to the odd billion dollar punishment following a global coup.

    Of course all the small fish can play nicely ... until being swallowed up in the inevitable market consolidation backed by the sharks.
    jacksonjohn
    • RE: Book Review: End of Business as We Know It, Brian Solis

      @johnfenjackson@... Actually, I think that isn't the case. The tech corps are in transition. They are beginning to grasp the fact that the customers can apply their ability to scale in channels to their advantage and thus, when they want to engage companies, the companies need to respond to that. There is no doubt that shareholder, rather than stakeholder value still commands a disproportionate amount of the largest companies efforts but that is changing. Witness IBM's investment in transforming itself into a "social business" that is based around empowered employees and engaged customers. Their action is not unique as companies like Oracle, SAP, salesforce and Microsoft among many others are trying to become more customer-focused than they have been in the past. I've seen it day to day and have had them all as clients at one point or another and thus seen it from the inside. Some have great management who buy in. Others have a far greater struggle because of intransigent or simply stupid senior management that doesn't know how the wind blows. But there is nothing inherently evil in "big." Most companies are trying to get big - not stay small.

      As far as Brian's book. This IS a reassertion of customer focus for the 21st century but with a customer who is far more demanding than the (so to speak) 20th century customer and in a world that is quite socially, politically and economically different than the world of the 80s - so its not a "slight" update; its a significant in-context look at what it takes to be customer-focused now.
      pgreenbe
  • Consumers are the last thing on their minds

    Frankly I don't think the large companies have ever been so out of tune with their customers. The are interested in shareholder satisfaction, market dominance and personal gain - the customers, if they figure at all, are a very poor fourth and as for ecology - it has no place in their thinking whatsoever.<br><br>Apple and Samsung are locked in an expensive legal battles with one trying to oust the other to maintain exclusivity, and both companies producing new hardware containing features they left out of the previous versions - good examples are the ipad 2 with its previously missing camera and iphone 4gs with SIRI that could have been sold or given away to all iphone users.<br>Customers want QUALITY, COMPETITIVE PRICING, LONGEVITY AND GOOD SUPPORT - the last three of which are things that are directly at odds with most company's short to medium term plans. Phones and tablets could be like PCs with plug in modules for upgrading, they could all be wholly compatible using similar batteries, memory cards, chargers and connector cables - that would be in consumer interest - BUT no they want lock in to their brand and they want you to buy a new phone at least every year. Companies that put customers first tend to be small and make only moderate profits - err isn't that how it should be?
    cymru999
    • RE: Book Review: End of Business as We Know It, Brian Solis

      @cymru999 As I just said, companies are in transition. Some are out of tune and others aren't. There is a clear perception gap between what companies think that customers want and what they actually want. Just see IBM's report on "From Social Media to Social CRM" part I. But regardless of the gap, there is enough going on in the business world to signal change and that the changes that have occurred, especially in how we communicate are irrevocable and that businesses have to be responsive to those changes or suffer a bad fate, shareholder value notwithstanding. That is not a choice. You can be angry at them or drive them to change. Nothing is unchangeable. So, the idea is try to get those companies out of tune, in tune. As I said to the prior commenter, there is nothing inherently bad about being "Big." It creates problems, dilemmas, cultural issues if the management is poor or out of sync with the world or if the interests of the company shareholders supersede the interests of the companies stakeholders which include customers and employees, not just the shareholders. The problems are in the content, not the form.
      pgreenbe
    • Well said

      @cymru999 I would add that there is no new business, there is just business. Connecting with customers has always been a goal (at least in the superficial "I'll pretend to care way") to close the deal. Where so many companies go wrong now is the lack of future thinking. The profits for the executive are short term and all too often are at the expense of customer loyalty to the brand (GM, are you listening?). There is no need for executive to think long term, because they know they will have moved on with their golden parachutes and stock options that are through the roof from their "pump and dump" approach. No bleak future for them. For the company however, the number of never to return customers piles up (HP, are you listening?). Time to separate the stock from the company! Time to stop executive gambling! Time to get back to the real work.

      PS: then again, what do we expect from an economy that has been running on internet fumes and lottery feaver.
      happyharry_z