ie8 fix
madison

Calxeda is up in ARMs over Intel

By | June 15, 2011, 6:49am PDT

Summary: ARM-based servers might be a key to datacenter energy savings.

After Intel’s recent official dissing of the concept of the ARM processor in the datacenter, Calxeda (formerly Smooth Stone) announced 10 new software partners for the ARM-based datacenter servers. They also reiterated their position that it is the costs of power that will drive datacenter operators to their server designs and that they will be able to accomplish many common datacenter tasks using only 1/10th the power consumed by competitors systems.

Rather than taking the approach that Intel is pursuing with their next generation 64-bit low power Atom processors Calxeda is building a 32-bit, four-core ARM A9 variant, that combined with its in-house developed interconnect, memory controller and 4 GB of memory will draw less than 5 watts for a complete server node. They plan to squeeze 120 of these 4 core nodes into a single 2U rack server, which they claim will deliver performance equivalent to today’s 40U rack of conventional servers while using only 1/10th the power and at half the equipment cost.

It looks like the Calxeda design is not a massively parallel computer, or even some form of NUMA device, but should be thought of a squeezing that 40U rack of independent servers down into a single 2U box. Given how many servers are used in this fashion in datacenters offering hosting servers and the potential cloud marketplace, this doesn’t seem like a bad idea.

Very importantly, one of the 10 software partners that were announced is Canonical, the company that does the commercial distribution of Ubuntu Linux. This gives potential customers, who are already likely Linux shops, a familiar face when the servers do eventually publicly launch. These early adopters and partners are expected to receive hardware by the end of the year.

This really is a wait and see situation. If Calxeda is able to deliver on their promise, they could quickly become the server of choice for commercial hosting providers already on Linux, as there will be easily demonstrable energy savings on a simple 1 to 1 replacement basis as existing hardware ages out. And the cascade effect of requiring that much less power for servers means that the datacenter becomes more efficient to operate and becomes much more expandable without doing anythingto the existing physical infrastructure.  This could be an incredibly compelling business case for cloud providers if Calxeda can pull it off.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

With more than 20 years of published writings about technology, as well as industry stints as everything from a database developer to CTO, David Chernicoff has earned the term "veteran" in the technology world.

Disclosure

David Chernicoff

David does not invest in the technology he covers. As a freelance author and technologist he has had contract work with many vendors in the industry. Beyond the term of these short-term contracts there is no business or fiduciary arrangement with any technology vendor. David does not enter into contracts that would limit his freedom of expression in any way, nor is he remunerated for discussing any vendor. All comments in his blog writings are solely the opinions of David Chernicoff.

Biography

David Chernicoff

With more than 20 years of published writings about technology, as well as industry stints as everything from a database developer to CTO, David Chernicoff has earned the term "veteran" in the technology world. Currently the principal of an independent consulting business and an active freelance writer, David has most recently been a Senior Contributing Editor for Windows IT Pro magazine, having also been the Lab Director for Windows NT Magazine, Technical Director of PC Week Labs, the author or co-author of a number of books on different versions of Windows, a plethora of eBooks on various technology topics, and of approximately 3000 magazine articles in print and on the web.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
19
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Calxeda is up in ARMs over Intel
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
path that takes away ARMs power advantage while keeping their own processing advantages.By the time these are out intel chips will have them beta at both games. Game, set, and datacenter to intel...
@Johnny Vegas: ... still more energy-effective.
0 Votes
+ -
We shall see. Time will tell.
DevGuy_z 15th Jun
@DeRSSS The problem is that Intel has its own fabs and is a leader in manufacturing. Not only are they ahead of the competition it appears that the lead is getting extended.

If this keeps up Intel could catch up with ARM on efficiency, not so much due to processor technology but manufacturing technology.
0 Votes
+ -
@DeRSSS

From what I've read, I think you might be right. Intel is pushing forward and trying to get far more energy efficient but ARM is getting faster and Intel might not be able to get to the point where they're low enough with power consumption to best the ARM offerings at that time. We shall we what happens happy
0 Votes
+ -
@DeRSSS I am absolutely in love with it! Gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous!!:D hermes replica bags hermes purses
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Calxeda is up in ARMs over Intel
Third of Five 16th Jun
@Johnny Vegas Of course, the bigger question is whether ARM will be standing still here. Some ARM licensees, such as Qualcomm, have a license to the architecture themselves, rather than specific cores, so they can design custom cores accordingly (in fact, Intel themselves once did precisely this for PocketPC/Windows Mobile/Palm devices).
0 Votes
+ -
You might get less watts per clock cycle, but you'll get less done per cycle with an ARM than an x86 wink
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Calxeda is up in ARMs over Intel
ProfQuatermass 15th Jun
The ARM is a RISC chip so it can run at more cycles per second. Therefore getting over any disadvantage of using 1 cycle to do one simple instruction.
@ProfQuatermass And actually most modern day RISC chips do less cycles per second (maybe you meant more instructions per second). Cycles per second is a function of the clock speed and with exception of the IBM Power line, CISC chips enjoy almost 3x the cycles per second.

And CISC chips (x86) can average 4 instructions per cycle on a single core using pipe-lining. Of course that means lots of transistors so it costs power.

The main advantage of ARM is power.
0 Votes
+ -
So who is building a data center that doesn't use 64 bit?
0 Votes
+ -
@haitge@...

I found that unusual as well.
0 Votes
+ -
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
0 Votes
+ -
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
0 Votes
+ -
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
0 Votes
+ -
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix