ie8 fix
madison

From datacenter to desktop: Hardware Rules!

By | January 13, 2012, 4:58am PST

Summary: Software innovation continues to drive the engine that is the face of computer technology, but the underlying hardware is what makes it all possible.

On Tuesday, Christopher Dawson and I squared off in our Great Debate series to argue the question of hardware innovation. With the focus at CES shifting from interesting developments on hardware to the latest in cool software applications and the cloud, did hardware really matter anymore? I took the stand that hardware innovation was not only alive and well, but also critical to the development of the next generations of software. And by a 4 to 1 margin, you agreed.

That’s not to say that Chris didn’t make some very valid points; as we move to cloud-based services, the core performance of our cloud access device becomes much less of a factor in the user experience. But we are nowhere near that point yet, as Internet access speeds, bandwidth caps, and concerns about security and reliability are still issues that have yet to be fully addressed. And the user experience is largely defined by the software interface to the hardware, making software much more obvious to the user.

But hardware is the technology that enables all of the software excitement that users see, be it on a personal device or from a cloud service, and it is the continuing development of hardware technologies that grant software developers the opportunity to let their imagination run wild. I’m sure that looking back at our debate in just a few years will have us shaking our heads and wondering how we even considered that hardware innovation was no longer a major issue.

Chris and I did agree on a few points, though not 100%. We both feel that hardware innovation is alive and well in the datacenter, though he feels that there are still too many waste cycles due to the lack of software that can fully utilize even the current generations of multi-core, multi-threaded CPUs.  And we both strongly believe that the continued growth of mobile technologies and, to a certain extent, cloud utilization, by those mobile devices, is heavily dependent on hardware advances in the area of battery technology.

So take a look at the “Great Debate - Hardware: Does it really matter anymore?”  and weigh in with your opinions.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

With more than 20 years of published writings about technology, as well as industry stints as everything from a database developer to CTO, David Chernicoff has earned the term "veteran" in the technology world.

Disclosure

David Chernicoff

David does not invest in the technology he covers. As a freelance author and technologist he has had contract work with many vendors in the industry. Beyond the term of these short-term contracts there is no business or fiduciary arrangement with any technology vendor. David does not enter into contracts that would limit his freedom of expression in any way, nor is he remunerated for discussing any vendor. All comments in his blog writings are solely the opinions of David Chernicoff.

Biography

David Chernicoff

With more than 20 years of published writings about technology, as well as industry stints as everything from a database developer to CTO, David Chernicoff has earned the term "veteran" in the technology world. Currently the principal of an independent consulting business and an active freelance writer, David has most recently been a Senior Contributing Editor for Windows IT Pro magazine, having also been the Lab Director for Windows NT Magazine, Technical Director of PC Week Labs, the author or co-author of a number of books on different versions of Windows, a plethora of eBooks on various technology topics, and of approximately 3000 magazine articles in print and on the web.
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Neither: both should be eclipsed by ...
johnfenjackson@... 13th Jan
... the architecture.

Take storage for example.
RAID was invented in 1988, allowing the combination of hardware and software to handle larger storage volumes, speed up data access and improve protection from data loss.

Over the years this architecture has been bastardised to the extent that enterprise storage is now hugely expensive and propietary. The best we can do is RAID6.

Consumer or prosumer efforts are limited to products like Windows Home Server or DROBO. The former is a dismal failure with the latest version only handling one disk! The latter is essentially an expensive implementation of RAID5 with some good usability enhancements.

What went wrong? The global corporates corrupted the architecture to preserve their revenue streams, trading on the fear of data loss.

Now consider ZFS. The architecture removes size constraints, handles new corruption sources and extends the RAID principle.

Next consider symform. It might be called RAID96/64. Data fragments are stored in multiple places around the world, on cheap commodity disks ... only the index resides in the cloud making it efficient and cheap, in contrast to the expense of AMAZON EC2 or DROPBOX which simply move the old inferior enterprise architecture to the cloud (OK, they are a bit better than that).

Lastly consider Windows 8 Storage Spaces. Here M$ appears to be heading in the right architectural direction again ... but SS is really ZFS wannabe.

My search then is not for new hardware or software ... but for new architectures.
0 Votes
+ -
Placeholder
johnfenjackson@... 13th Jan
NT
0 Votes
+ -
Neither: both should be eclipsed by ...
johnfenjackson@... 13th Jan
... the architecture.

Take storage for example.
RAID was invented in 1988, allowing the combination of hardware and software to handle larger storage volumes, speed up data access and improve protection from data loss.

Over the years this architecture has been bastardised to the extent that enterprise storage is now hugely expensive and propietary. The best we can do is RAID6.

Consumer or prosumer efforts are limited to products like Windows Home Server or DROBO. The former is a dismal failure with the latest version only handling one disk! The latter is essentially an expensive implementation of RAID5 with some good usability enhancements.

What went wrong? The global corporates corrupted the architecture to preserve their revenue streams, trading on the fear of data loss.

Now consider ZFS. The architecture removes size constraints, handles new corruption sources and extends the RAID principle.

Next consider symform. It might be called RAID96/64. Data fragments are stored in multiple places around the world, on cheap commodity disks ... only the index resides in the cloud making it efficient and cheap, in contrast to the expense of AMAZON EC2 or DROPBOX which simply move the old inferior enterprise architecture to the cloud (OK, they are a bit better than that).

Lastly consider Windows 8 Storage Spaces. Here M$ appears to be heading in the right architectural direction again ... but SS is really ZFS wannabe.

My search then is not for new hardware or software ... but for new architectures.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix