Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010

By | May 27, 2010, 12:03pm PDT

Summary: With spring models finally rolling out and no big trade shows on the horizon until the fall, now is a good time to take stock of what your digital camera dollar will buy. Check out our list of the Top 10 compact digital cameras on the market today.

With the pace and volume of new compact digital camera announcements increasing exponentially, it’s hard to get a handle on what to buy at any given point in time. The newest point-and-shooters on store shelves haven’t been reviewed by all the experts, but highly rated older models are tough to find as manufacturers try to move consumers along the upgrade path. As we approach the middle of 2010, though, we have a moment to catch our breath. Spring models announced earlier in the year are finally rolling out and with no big trade shows on the horizon until the fall, it’s a good time to take stock of what your digital camera dollar will buy today.

To help you make some sense out of the madness, here’s my list of the top 10 digital cameras currently on the market, in roughly descending price order. Suggested list prices range from $400 for the first three cameras (on this page) to $110 for the least expensive (on page 4), though you’ll likely find lower street prices for many of these cameras. [Check back soon for my list of the top 10 digital SLR cameras.]


Image Gallery: Check out photos of the Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010. Samsung DualView TL225

1. Canon PowerShot S90
Something of a cross between the Canon PowerShot G series of enthusiast compact cameras and Canon’s ever-popular Digital Elph line of sleeker, more pocketable point-and-shoot cameras, the PowerShot S90 has been a tremendous success since Canon introduced it last year. By combining a larger sensor (comparable to those of the Canon G11 or competing Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3) with a bright, wide lens (28-105mm equivalent, f/2.0-4.9), the S90 delivers great image quality and flexibility, along with higher-end features such as manual controls and raw image support. Packaged in a slim, Elph-like body measuring 3.94×2.30×1.22 inches and weighing in at just over 6 ounces, the S90 is much sleeker and more compact than other cameras with such a robust feature set. The icing on the cake is the very useful Control Ring around the base of the lens that provides quick and intuitive access to a plethora of manual settings.

[See a photo gallery of the S90 and a gallery of sample photos shot with the S90.]

[Read the review] [Check prices]

2. Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
As an avid traveler, I’m a big fan of the compact megazoom. Panasonic pioneered the category back in 2006 with the launch of the Lumix DMC-TZ1, but it was the DMC-ZS3 that won me over to the category completely, with its extra-wide 12x zoom lens (25-300mm equivalent) and gorgeous 460,000-dot, 3-inch LCD.  Panasonic was smart enough not to mess with a good thing when it introduced the successor to the ZS3, the Lumix DMC-ZS7, earlier this year.  Although the ZS7 does bump resolution up from 10.1 megapixels to 12.1 megapixels (which in my opinion is unnecessary and possibly undesireable) it retains the ZS3’s extra-wide 12x zoom lens and bright, sharp LCD. In fact, the only major differences are improved autofocus speed and image stabilization, and the addition of full manual controls and a built-in GPS receiver. The GPS feature lets you quickly and easily geotag photos and identifies over 500,000 landmarks (with area information for 173 countries or regions).

[See a gallery of sample photos shot with the ZS7.]

[Read the review] [Check prices]

3. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2
Like the ZS7, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 is a follow-up to an excellent camera from last year, in this case the Lumix DMC-TS1, Panasonic’s well-received entry into the waterproof point-and-shoot market. Again, Panasonic has updated the camera without messing with success. The TS2 is now waterproof to a depth of 33 feet (up from 10 feet), shockproof against a drop of up to 6.6 feet (up from 5 feet), and adds freezeproofing down to 14 degrees Fahrenheit (both cameras are also dustproof). The TS2 also benefits from the same improved autofocus technology as the ZS7, which makes for noticeably quicker performance. Though the TS2 dubiously bumps resolution up to 14.1 megapixels, it retains most of the other admirable specs, such as the wide 28mm to 128mm equivalent lens and the ability to record AVCHD Lite HD video.

[Read the review] [Check prices]

Go to numbers 4 through 6: Top cameras for $300 »

Topics

Janice got her hands on a Nikon Coolpix 900 back in 1998 and has been a digital camera enthusiast ever since.

Disclosure

Janice Chen

Janice Chen has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Janice Chen

Janice Chen is an editorial consultant and has been covering technology for over two decades. Serving as editor in chief at CNET and Computer Shopper magazine for many years, she oversaw product coverage for the CNET and ZDNet websites. She has appeared on most of the major morning TV news programs and was featured weekly on CNN Headline News' Hotwired segment recommending personal tech ranging from digital cameras to notebook PCs. Prior to that, she appeared with Anderson Cooper on a monthly technology segment for ABC World News This Morning. Quoted in numerous publications such as the New York Times, USA Today, and People magazine, Janice has also evaluated tech products for BusinessWeek, USA Weekend magazine, and Parenting magazine among others.

Janice got her hands on a Nikon Coolpix 900 back in 1998 and has been a digital camera enthusiast ever since. A graduate of Cornell University, she resides in Maplewood, NJ, with her husband (a professional photographer who shot his last roll of film in 2003) and their two daughters.

Talkback Most Recent of 15 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    After reading your post I have made up my mind to buy a Canon Powershot S90 for myself. The star quality of this camera is the useful Control Ring that makes it unique in its category. Free Business Cards
    ZDNet Gravatar
    elijahbel
    28th May 2010
  • I wouldn't buy ANY of these...
    Call me a fuddy-duddy, but I don't care for camera's without an ocular view-port. I don't like my camera's with only an LCD screen...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    TechrepLath
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    @Tim Lathouwers
    You and me both. I used to miss a lot of pictures in bright sunlight because I couldn't see them on my LCD. Now, I hardly ever use the LCD on my Canon A640.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mlsmith3@...
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    @Tim Lathouwers While I do like a viewfinder, an optical viewfinder is pretty much out of the question on these modern P&S cameras. Take my Panasonic TZ5, now a few years old... that's delivering a 10x zoom. You never had 10x zooms back in the rangefinder days.. they make sense on SLRs and camcorders -- gotta see through the lens.

    And while the viewfinder's a fair must-have for me on a "serious" camera or camcorder, I have this TZ5 in my pocket, for those times a camcorder or full SLR rig is not practical. Compromise is an inherent property of this sort of camera.. even if it's your only one, you're looking to maximize the functionality of that one camera while minimizing cost and size. You have to go larger just to find room for an electronic viewfinder.

    As well, I think the days of "viewfinder-only" cameras are long gone. Back in the 70s and 80s, you expected only viewfinder, maybe with an optional "sportsfinder" available on a high-end Canon or Nikon. Having added camcorders to my vast array of cameras back in the early 90s, I learned the value of the external screen, too. Some folks, growing up on this, never even miss the viewfinder. I do wish they'd consider the option of transflective LCDs or some other tech for daylight visibility (with a camcorder, it's pretty easy to add a hood if you need it, but not too practical on a tiny P&S).

    Lag time has been improving steadily on these. I used to shoot film with an EOS RT... one of the fastest cameras ever, with a shutter lag of 0.008sec. My first serious digital was a Canon Pro90IS.... you really had to learn the rhythm of it, because the shutter lag was nuts. Typical SLRs run around 0.100sec-0.140sec... so 0.200 in a P&S is not horrible.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dave@...
    28th May 2010
  • Absolutely agree
    @Tim Lathouwers
    I vowed to not buy a digital camera without a viewfinder--and then my wife won one! A $150 Olympus at the time, and it does take surprising good snapshots, but I cannot comfortably frame and focus holding a 2.5" LCD out in front of me. I really like low light, creative shots, but I feel the need to brace the camera against my face, and my arm/body against something steady--the LCD doesn't do it for me. I realize that most modern cameras with viewfinders have digital, not optical, finders but it is still better for me to focus when I can effectively block from view everything but what I see in the finder. YMMV.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    frabjous
    4th Jun 2010
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    ColdFusion_z
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    Ditto TL:
    Viewfinder is ESSENTIAL - without it it's just a toy.

    Also, eliminate lag time - .2 seconds is still too long.
    I don't need face or smile recognition or GPS.
    I do need manual control, faster lenses,
    A VIEWFINDER- preferably with a small CRT.
    Also a tripod mount and flash socket for
    an external strobe. A decent image stabilization
    system is nice to have.
    Get those right without having to spend a grand on
    a decent DSLR and you'll get my attention.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Regats
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    All cameras need a decent viewfinder. An LCD image is not a good choice for a camera that costs over $50. I'm very disappointed that point and shoot cameras are so flaky about this. I'm looking forward to the SLR reviews.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ITOdeed
    28th May 2010
  • Compact Digital with an optical viewfinder
    The Canon PowerShot A1100IS 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Silver) offers the best of both worlds in my opinion. It has both an LCD screen for close-up work and an optical viewfinder. Rechargeable AA batteries (not included) give good life and fast recycle times. Street price can be as low as $130, so you don't need to pay an arm and a leg and have a bulky SLR to take great digital photos.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    lewisedge
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    @lewisedge Where did you buy the A1100IS from. My current vendor choices says it discontinued and cannon's website doesn't offer it direct anymore.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    tovy.thomas@...
    12th Jul 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    BUMMER!! No viewfinders. I wouldn't buy 1 either. It's difficult to see LCD screens at my age. Plus you lose a little joy from actual having to take a photo.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    isuzu803
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    Janice Chen has lost any credibility with this report. Her opinions are contrary to almost every serious reviewer of digital cameras. From personal experience, her high rating of the Sony DSC-TX1 shows she doesn't have a clue. I have owned 8 Sony digital cameras over the years, and this model was so horrific that it is the first camera I have ever returned. The video wasn't bad, but the picture quality was reminiscent of an old Kodak Brownie. It's almost impossible to get decent quality out of a camera that uses a fixed lens with mirrors. EVERY review I've read of the Samsungs praised the ingenuity of the "dual view" and unanimously panned the picture taking quaility of the camera. Perhaps Janice needs to see an eye doctor.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Gary1225
    28th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    @Gary1225 This report is not incredible. This report is just not for you or enthusiasts like you. This report is for the clueless. There are a lot of people out there who like to take photo but don't take it seriously. These are the kind of people who don't care about the horrible image quality of Samsung TL225/ST550 or Sony DSC-TX1. They just want cheap, fun, light-weight cameras.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    visoot
    29th May 2010
  • RE: Top 10 compact digital cameras of 2010
    I am no camera bug, just like to take pictures -- like in Nevada and other sunny places. Tried using only LCD and two things happen, either sun washes LCD or angle yourself and get reflections. Also head rest gives better stabilization than stabilization. LCD is great (essential) but big LCD is dumb because can't edit photo without the high resolution of computer screen.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    GOD@...
    1st Dec 2010
  • sachin dixit
    Hi,
    This is really a great thing about the cameras and i think cameras are the biggest requirement now a days. Here i have seen so many cameras and truly speaking that all those were really awesome.
    Anyways keep it up and keep continue with your valuable thoughts.
    singapore cheap digital cameras
    ZDNet Gravatar
    sachinsero
    10th Jan 2011

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources