ZDNet Education

Christopher Dawson

Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint

By | August 12, 2010, 3:00am PDT

Summary: The art and technology of presentations has evolved considerably in the last 20 years. The importance of serious communication skills to go along with those presentations gets more important every day.

I‘ve been spending a lot of time in PowerPoint lately. One of my clients is working on some strategic planning and nothing begs for slide decks like a strategic plan. I’m not being entirely tongue-in-cheek. Slide shows, whether created in PowerPoint, OpenOffice, Google Apps, Zoho, SlideRocket, or any other tool can have incredible value as communication aids, long- and short-term documentation, discussion guides, you name it. But as I hammered away at a couple of presentations, it occurred to me that most of us in education are doing a miserable job of teaching the art of presentation.

I happened to work with a real PowerPoint guru today. While I can wordsmith until the cows come home, perfect messaging, and even toss together some helpful graphics (SmartArt is my friend), this woman could singlehandedly wipe out the scourge of death by PowerPoint. Of course, she’s a graphic designer. It’s her job to make things look pretty. But the presentations she created weren’t just pretty. They were effective. The boiled a lot of information down into graphics and text that could support one heck of an extemporaneous speech or group discussion.

That 5×5 rule I mentioned above? My dad taught me that rule. 25 years ago. A business teacher mentioned the same rule to me a year ago. Where our students are hopefully going after they graduate (you know, higher education, good jobs, that sort of thing), the 5×5 rule no longer applies. Bullets hardly even apply anymore. Communication, with slides as one of many important media, is the single most important skill we can give our students. Teaching PowerPoint 101? That doesn’t count.

Teaching public speaking with an emphasis on the effective use of visual media with time spent in a computer lab learning time-saving design features in the tool of your choice? That’s how to teach communication.

PowerPoint, no matter how you feel about Microsoft, is perhaps a more important industry standard than even Word or Excel. Don’t get me wrong: I like Google Presentations and use it for interactive presentations and shared documentation all the time. However, it (and OpenOffice Presentations, for that matter) simply can’t compare to the rich and easy tools in PowerPoint 2007 and 2010. SlideRocket gives you a different, but almost as compelling toolset, but PowerPoint remains the gold standard for good reason. It deserves a place in students’ and teachers’ toolkits.

However, it’s just that: a tool. It’s no substitute for creativity, writing skills, and public speaking skills. It’s a backdrop that can guide a speaker and an audience and remind them later of key ideas, but without fail, the flashiest, best-designed PowerPoint deck won’t keep an audience engaged without a strong speaker presenting it.

The 5×5 rule and the bullets for which it cries out are dead. Presentations are alive and well, even if they are part of a webcast or online meeting. Regardless of the industry, strong presentation skills, combined with a reasonable sense of graphical design, can go a very long ways towards making a career.

For those of you who left PowerPoint 101 behind, share what you’ve done to make sure that students walk away with both the soft presentation skills and the hard multimedia skills to succeed.

Further reading: “Thoughts about presentations
over on the Virtually Speaking blog

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer and consultant with years of experience in educational technology and web-based systems. In 2011, he became the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network SaaS provider.

Disclosure

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., by day and a freelance writer and educational technology consultant by night. Well, most of his colleagues at WizIQ are based in India, so really he's working with them whenever he can stay awake. He has worked for his local school district as a teacher and technology director, for the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, and for Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen-IDEC, Inc.). He has also consulted with STATNet and Cytyc Corporation and retains close ties with X2 Development Corporation (now owned by Follett Software, the supplier of the student information system he administered for several years). Follett is paying him a monthly honorarium to act as a presenter for their "SIS Voices for Student Achievement" community (he produces occasional blog posts and hosts a monthly webinar on the use of student information systems to inform data-driven instruction and school-wide change. He regularly purchases and/or recommends Dell hardware. This is because Dell makes good hardware and has truly committed itself to education in innovative ways, particularly with their "Connected Classroom" initiative. It isn't because he has dealings with the company through his role at WizIQ (which he does) or because they have provided him with long-term loans of a variety of equipment for in-depth testing (which they have). Intel (reference designer for the Classmate PCs he has implemented in his local schools) has provided him with long-term loans of Classmate PCs for testing, as have Dell and Lenovo with their educational offerings. He may report on any of these companies as his experiences with them have direct bearing on educational technology; positive reports are not necessarily an endorsement and he receives no direct financial compensation from these companies or any others. Intel paid all expenses for his attendance at the 2009 Intel Classmate PC Ecosystem Summit which he attended as the sole representative of the technology press. He was invited to attend in 2010 but his wife would have killed him if he spent 3 days in Vegas geeking out and left her home alone with a new baby. Acer provided him with a 50% discount on an Aspire One netbook in early 2009 after he tested it for 30 days through their educational seed program. He liked the netbook at the time but it has since broken and sits unused in his office. Canonical sent him Ubuntu lanyards, t-shirts, and mousepads for his kids. He stole one of the lanyards and proudly hangs his keys from it and occasionally features his 8-year old wearing an oversized Ubuntu t-shirt on his Facebook profile. Gunnar Optiks sent him a pair of computer glasses to evaluate for a holiday gift guide. He is wearing them now as he types this because they never asked for them back and they rock out loud. Seriously - they work brilliantly and make it much easier to spend 20 hours a day staring at an LCD. If they ever asked for them back, he would fork over the $99 and buy a pair. Microsoft gave him 2 free copies of Office 2010 professional, a desktop clock, and a useless book on Office 2010 when he attended the launch of Office/Sharepoint 2010. He occasionally uses the SharePoint lanyard they gave him instead of the Ubuntu lanyard for his keys, but feels dirty afterwards. Adobe provided him with a pre-release version of the CS5 Master Collection for evaluation and ultimately provided a full, licensed copy for ongoing testing of educational applications of this admittedly expensive software. Like the Gunnars, if the license expires or they come out with CS6, he'd actually go out and buy it himself. Which is saying something, because he's actually pretty cheap. Any other companies wishing to send him cool things to evaluate, wear, or otherwise adorn his kids are more than welcome to; he promises to disclose it here if he keeps any of the stuff. Finally, because WizIQ is a virtual classroom and learning network provider, Chris, as VP of Marketing, frequently interacts with, seeks out deals with, and directly or indirectly competes with a whole lot of LMS, SIS, and other Education 2.0 companies. In general, he'll limit his reporting about these companies to news that does not impact his relationship with them or with WizIQ. If he reports on them, it's because what they are doing is newsworthy or worth the attention of his readers and not because he's trying to broker some deal, damage competition, or otherwise advance his position in his day job. LMS and SIS companies, along with other online learning communities, are a pretty important part of Ed Tech. If he stops reporting on them completely, there won't be a whole lot left. He'll be sure to call out any overt conflicts of interest if they are unavoidable. Finally, Follett Software Company pays him a little tiny honorarium every month to present on their SIS Voices webinars and to write the occasional blog or discussion thread for them. Since Follett recently bought X2 (maker of an awesome web-based SIS that Chris just happened to have used, served in advisory groups for, and frequently reported on), this is probably also worth disclosing.

Biography

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson grew up in Seattle, back in the days of pre-antitrust Microsoft, coffeeshops owned by something other than Starbucks, and really loud, inarticulate music. He escaped to the right coast in the early 90's and received a degree in Information Systems from Johns Hopkins University. While there, he began a career in health and educational information systems, with a focus on clinical trials and related statistical programming and database modeling. This focus led him to several positions at Johns Hopkins, a couple-year stint in private industry, teaching high school math and technology, and 2 years as the technology director for his local school district. Most recently, he started his own consulting business and is now the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network provider. He lives with his wife, five kids (yes, 5), 2 dogs, and a hateful cat in a small town in north-central Massachusetts. Although he is no longer teaching, his roles with WizIQ and ZDNet allow him to continue helping students and teachers add value to education with technology rather than merely adding to the bottom line.
37
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
lkm32 25th Aug 2010
@botje
exactly! ... These past years I have drifted to using simple slides with graphs and pictures with minimum text. That way the audience uses the powerpoint as what it was meant to be ... a reference not an outline.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
Rahul Mulchandani 12th Aug 2010
I suggest the following books to add-on to this article

- Beyond Bullet Points
- The presentation secrets of Steve Jobs
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
Roque Mocan 13th Aug 2010
@Rahul Mulchandani
... and Hitler :P
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
Roque Mocan 13th Aug 2010
@Rahul Mulchandani
Ah, and with the presentation secrets of Steve Jobs: use the words "magical", "today we re-invent - or invent"...
0 Votes
+ -
nice article, but, from the title, I thought it would be about tips for improving PowerPoint presentations. that said, I agree - the snazziest presentations would fail woefully without the right communication skills. Now, how about that title?
0 Votes
+ -
@nsukky@...

Use Keynote instead of Powerpoint... (There is a reason there is a Mac behind the stage at every Microsoft public event).
0 Votes
+ -
@i8thecat
I think he was saying that any tool wouldn't help without communication skills (Yes, not even Keynote)

btw, Powerpoint (especially 2010) blows Keynote out. It has very useful templates, displays perfectly on external screens, and is overall more powerful. Keynote seemed a bit too casual for me. (this is a side note and personal preference ... please reply to the main comment)
0 Votes
+ -
Ummm....how about an example?
alsw 12th Aug 2010
Bullets are dead? Okay, but how about an example from your guru that shows the current thinking on slide design?
0 Votes
+ -
@alsw Like most power point presentations, this blog makes a few unsubstantiated and un-illustrated assertations in an authoritative fashion, in which you the listener have no immediate way of questioning the material. By the end of the presentation, you have forgotten the questions you wanted to ask because the points made were, in fact, bland, cliche, jargon-y nonsense, or already obvious....not even worthy of debate even if such a thing were truly welcome. And lack of debate and rigor is what the .pptx STYLE of presentation is all about. Hence it will remain king.
0 Votes
+ -
Kill the FX
Userama 12th Aug 2010
You know those movies that have lots of special effects, but very little plot? Yeah, there are lots of them. Don't let a presentation become like one of them. Forget the whiz-bang transitions, the twirls, the zooms. They're distractions. They should be dead--like bullets. "Starkly simple" is a good guideline.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree completely. Just because the effects are there, does not mean you should use them. They distract and they waste time.

And whatever you do, don't come into a meeting after spending 5 hours on a PowerPoint, when a simple set of bullets in a word document that you whip together in 10 minutes can be more effective. If you are making a presentation for a customer, then make it professional. If you are making a presentation for 3 of your colleagues, then spend as little effort as possible to get to the point. Don't try to impress me with wasted time!
0 Votes
+ -
The Bullets are Dead. Long live the Bullets...
Monday_Galileo Updated - 12th Aug 2010
@zingozax

@zingozax

I agree as well. After seven years of presentations in post-secondary, short and to the point with a few handouts is what I had concluded. At first, I would make dazzling slides with pretty pictures and hyperlinks and all that jazz, but I believe that I resorted to this technique in lue of the inevitable questions and the answers that would have to follow - tried to eat time up as well - gave that up because I love lectures and all the questions. I think I 'got confident' when I said to myself that I quite, I know my crap - "BRING IT ON!`
I firmly believe that most (99% most) do not like the whole `public speaking thing`, and that is a shame because when I listen to someone speaking, a slide hardly comunicates what the presenter is trying to convey with the gestures and body language (smiles, frowns, raised puzzling eyebrow, etc).
Although, I have to say that eboards are really coming into their own if you are going into a meeting. Cheers all...
0 Votes
+ -
Powerpoint has turned us into morons
trickytom2 Updated - 12th Aug 2010
It's true. Nobody in America can give a presentation without fifty dry, redundand, overly-complex PowerPoint slides running behind them.

We all sit there in the dark, pretending to be interested, when all we really want is someone interesting to talke to us and follow-up with an executive summary.
0 Votes
+ -
The trouble with bullets is that only one relationship is implied by the list - ordered, maybe with hierarchy (lower levels). Maybe what you want to say is "do A, B and C and you get D," or "A, B and C are part of D." Maybe you're describing a cyclic process. Or something more complicated.
Thinking about the relationships will sometimes suggest a more interesting and informative way to present the points. SmartArt helps here by suggesting possibilities. Or use physical or other analogies (your cup is half full, etc.).
0 Votes
+ -
Some recommend
kellycarter Updated - 12th Aug 2010
This article should have mentioned "Beyond Bullet Points" (see http://www.beyondbulletpoints.com/), which advocates a storytelling approach versus bullets. It argues that developing a presentation using bullets is a good way to organize your thinking but an inferior way of presenting your intended message. It argues that nothing is more natural or easy to understand for humans than stories. To be honest, I have read both the older and newer versions of the BBP book, tried to apply the storytelling concept for business presentations and found it to be quite difficult to do. Feedback from my audiences has been mixed so far, probably because they are accustomed to bullet-based slides, and I'm not so good at the storytelling approach yet. Still, I recommend you give BBP a look.
0 Votes
+ -
Only when I read 'Brilliant Presentation' by Richard Hall did I realise how bad I was at presenting, and thus why despite having some key messages, my audience always fell asleep.

I am better now at 'telling the story' but although my Powerpoint skills have not improved, my slides and overall presentation has, resulting in getting more decisions going my way, from board approvals to sales. And I still use bullet points, just fewer of them and they mostly contain pictures, not text.
0 Votes
+ -
@botje
exactly! ... These past years I have drifted to using simple slides with graphs and pictures with minimum text. That way the audience uses the powerpoint as what it was meant to be ... a reference not an outline.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
scanders_us@... 12th Aug 2010
For me the issue has always been that PPTs tend to lead to listing issues, events, and resources as if that was enough. The idea is to PRESENT something, not just inventory it. It's not that bullets are the problem, it's the thinking behind their use. One SHOULD think about what you want people to DO after seeing (and hearing) your presentation. Evaluate each slide for how it moves your audience towards the action you desire. Make the imperative clear from your slide (don't bury the message, consider putting it in the title). But I also consider how I'd deliver the same message without using any slides and I highly recommend that - have an "elevator" version, and a "greaseboard" approach, and a "dinner conversion" approach.

Personally, I find most communication classes do a fair job of this whether you use triangle-thinking, OBQA, or some other organizational method, one shouldn't confuse the tool with the dialog. Too many people think that learning a presentation tool automatically means they can communicate effectively because they can master the technology. And, reflexively, they believe that it is the responsibility of those teaching them the tool to teach them communication. But if you took typing in school you know that they didn't teach you to be a writer - they just taught you to type.

Effective communication is a skill that more people should develop. But to think that they will do so because of a certain technology is more than a little naive. And to suggest that they just need to use a different widget (more graphics, less bullets) is really only adding to the real problem.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
Monday_Galileo 12th Aug 2010
@scanders_us@...

QBQA?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
scanders_us@... 12th Aug 2010
@Monday_Galileo Opportunity(ies)/ Barriers/ Questions/ Answers - it's a methodology for organizing problem solving. What is our opportunity? What are the barriers to achieving said opportunity? What questions will we need to answer in order to remove or obviate the barriers? And, of course, the answers. There's a lot of technique to using it, but that's the 15 second version.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
rttedrow@... 12th Aug 2010
Everyone I know from business and government detest PowerPoint presentations [i.e., "Death by PowerPoint"]. First you make up the presentation, then copy and distribute it to meeting attendees, then project the thing on the wall and then read it to the audience! Why does this make sense? Can't anyone read?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
pllamonica@... 12th Aug 2010
After many thousands of presentations from PPT to Plex:
Rule 1) Unless the attendees are blind don't read the slide, they can read.
Rule 2) If you can put enough info on a slide so that a person reading nothing but your slides can get the entire point of the presentation there is way too much on the slides.
Rule 3) Slides should be trigers, memory helpers if you like, that attendees can use to help them what you are saying. (like putting a like up that says nothing but "All People Seem To Need Data Processing" back when I was teaching that stuff)

I like playing with non-linear presentations like Plex (RIP) and Prezi to make things a bit different.
0 Votes
+ -
PowerPoint, as stated, is a TOOL used to guide the (hopefully) two way conversion that is there to transfer knowledge to the people attending.

I gave a history presentation on the 8th Air Force in WWII to 14 to 18 year old Civil Air PAtrol cadets and their parents - and the planned 45 mintues turned into 1 1/2 hours since I got them engaged by using PPT (with bullets) to get them engaged by NOT putting everything into the page but used it as a general guide to let them know what is sort of coming and to engage them. Even the parents were asking questions - which is always a good sing (and some of the regular Air Force officers too!) - since it was me who was conveying the most information and knowledge not PPT slide deck.

Tom Philo
0 Votes
+ -
I use powerpoint heavily as a communication tool.
Bullets have their uses, but even more useful is the footage rule - your Dad said 5' when monitors were crappy/non-existant, but with today's monitors, a 10' rule is imperative - if you can't read it 10' away from your monitor - neither can your audience.
The bigger problem I see is the old "overhead" mentality when people create presentations - black text on white backgrounds. The light push-thru effect is magnified in a powerpoint presentation, and what worked for overheads is a visual killer for powerpoints. Since most of the presentations I have to deal with are going on TV and will denegrate in transmission, I have 5 rules:
1. Dark Background, with light, contrasting font.
2. No bright reds - they bleed.
3. San serif fonts, no smaller than 24 pt, & BOLD everything. Use Font sizes & varying fonts to emphasize or minimize.
4. Put in the important data - the stuff you want folks to retain, but don't overload with junk. 'KISS' IT.
5. Space - the essential frontier. Cramming is for exams, not presentation slides.
And @rttedow - no one reads anymore- they skim or peruse, nor can they spell or use grammar properly, which is why I have hope that ebooks will effect change in that!
0 Votes
+ -
If you want to stay in the presentation 1.0 world, keep talking about PowerPoint as a Gold Standard. If you want to be in the presentation 2.0 world start looking at examples like those from the UK Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA). Web site: http://www.thersa.org/home
At there website you can watch the hour long presentation by the speaker or they have a presentation that boils the talk down to 10 minutes and is 20 times easier to remember.

Look at the presentation on the of Crisis of Capitalism ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0&feature=player_embedded ).
0 Votes
+ -
Presentation techniques are each unique in their ability to communicate. It is the presenter that bears the real message to the audience. My company advocated to its management the Sears methodology of presentation. Even then, it takes a good presenter, but the technique served as an aid to the presenter.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
dieseltaylor 12th Aug 2010
Powerpoint is too too often a substitute for a good presentation.

The first thing is consider your audience and the message you are trying to get across. Personally I am all in favour of an aide-memoire for AFTER the presentation but if your prepared speech and presentation is not enough to grip your audience adding PPT's will not save it.

Some technical issues map be helped but then hinge your speech to that slide because it REQUIRES the graphic. Spend at least twice the length of the presentation on your preparation - and that excludes slides.

Powerpoint is often a playpen for people who will not work on their verbal and performance skills. And which do you think is the more long-term useful?
0 Votes
+ -
BTW There is a great presentation [Powerpoint powered wink about Killing the Bullets: http://www.slideshare.net/karagos/kill-bullets-presentation
0 Votes
+ -
Not entirely new: Do you depend on the slides for the briefing or do the slides depend on you? The answer will vary based on the speaker's subject knowledge, ease in front of an audience, and whether or not the speaker practiced the briefing before going live. Last minute changes hurt.
0 Votes
+ -
It's the Content, not the Presentation
Druzhshchienschkyy 12th Aug 2010
Over the past two plus decades I have sat through too many presentations of one sort or another that have very little meaningful content at best. If there is real content, this can be related in markedly less time than the one hour that is usually allotted. The majors companies have these presentations geared to a grade school level when the level of the audience is light years beyond. If the presenting company is all that on top of their offerings they can tell me in thirty words or less on the phone, or some other method and I will get back to them if they have a real product or noncaptive service.

About six months ago I was invited to a presentation and evening dinner at a very high-end Atlanta hotel. The presentation and round table discussion lasted about three hours and was directed to Fortune level C suite executives. What was being presented was almost infantile. The round table discussion later was just as uninformative. I did receive gift as a token of their appreciation and my valuable time. Value of the presentation zero. When I got back home I opened the bag and found a cheap pen and notebook set that was made in China. So much for what they think of my valuable time. The other day I received a call from one of their outsourced sales professionals wanting to know what more information I needed to give my approval. Answer, "Nothing. You never answered key questions or made any substantive points, and until you do, do not call back and keep bothering me."

Once the content is there the rest falls into place. If there is no content then what is seen is meaningless filler. One big topic that is most often omitted is price, with others being delivery after receipt of order, etc., etc.. Before anyone authors any presentation suggested required reading should be "The Elements of Style" by Strunk and White. Most of these presentations are like movies, there are very few good ones.

While I was typing this I was listening to a presentation on another system. Same thing, lack of content, and when the presentation is over I will write up a report that basically outlines the fact that there was no real content and what the tech company was trying to sell was yet another me too product with a different wrapper.

All the Best,

Vladimir************
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
Tedscribe@... 12th Aug 2010
PPT is a tool and like most tools they work well in the hands of the skilled craftsman; in this case the skilled presenter. Bite the Bullet!
0 Votes
+ -
Authoring Does Not Equal Great Presentations
nat_robinson Updated - 12th Aug 2010
While PowerPoint is a fine, albeit dated, desktop authoring tool it doesn't do a great job of supporting the business of communication. SlideRocket addresses the workflows around your communication by enabling collaboration with your peers, simple and secure connection with your audience and the assembly of stunning and dynamic visual communications to tell your story. PowerPoint = presentation authoring, SlideRocket = business communication collaboration. Try it free and experience the difference for yourself www.sliderocket.com.
0 Votes
+ -
@nat@...

"albeit dated"

Please name for me at least 1 thing that "non-dated" presenting tools do that PowerPoint 2010 does not.

There is no way PowerPoint is not at least on par with other presentation tools. There's no way I'd call it "dated."

". . . by enabling collaboration with your peers, . . ."

In PowerPoint 2010, check. The online services that come with Office 2010 work well in a collaborative environment.

You can even broadcast your presentation online and live while presenting it.

". . . secure connection with your audience and the assembly of stunning and dynamic visual communications to tell your story."

Yup, in Office 2010 as well. The new hardware accelerated transitions and numerous improvements makes PowerPoint one of the best in this area.

"SlideRocket = business communication collaboration."

You need to try PowerPoint 2010 before claiming it isn't.

"Try it free"

Without supplying personal info, thanks. Come back when you have a truly free way of trying it.
0 Votes
+ -
Great post and good conversation here. Working on the Office team here at MSFT, I've seen a lot of really cool and some really boring presos. I think Chris is right in that the days of bulleting are over. To me the best presos are the ones that allow for interpretation using conceptual images with only a couple of words to make a point.

Specific examples are always helpful. There is a relationship between the slides and the presenters ? both need to be in tip top form for this to work. While a bit old, the makeover still resonates: http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1081502. Echo and Geetesh proved a simple and concrete example of improving slides. Key takeaway is simple but does escape people in the heat of getting ready for the next big meeting: less text, more images. The skill is in how you do that?
0 Votes
+ -
Took a graphics design class at one time, and several communications classes - one with an absolutely fantastic professor. Agree with this article.

. . . and yeah, especially with Office 2010, there's really no match for PowerPoint.

What you can do with the now-hardware-accelerated transitions, videos, effects, and numerous features for designing slides with is incredible, and frankly blows the doors off of competition like OpenOffice.org.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bullets are dead. Long live PowerPoint
cmjohnston@... 18th Aug 2010
I suggest you read "Presentation Zen" by Garr Reynolds and "slide:ology" by Nancy Duarte of Duarte Design. Nancy created the presentation used by Al Gore in "Inconvenient Truth" and I believe has done a few of the Steve Jobs keynotes. Garr used to work for Apple and learned from the best. If you want to see good examples of presentation watch those by Seth Godin, Lawrence Lessig, and any of the TED presentations. You CAN do a good presentation without a single bulletpoint.
0 Votes
+ -
Icons can enhance your message
kelbysj 19th Aug 2010
Further to this great conversation, a new post from the PowerPoint team offers up some cool ways to use icons/visuals to make your content more stimulating. Have a look (http://bit.ly/b0njUS) and let us know what you think. If you've got some examples of cool presos that resonated with you, please do share.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix