ZDNet Education

Christopher Dawson

EDUCAUSE takeaway #2: Open source is alive and well

By | October 30, 2011, 8:25pm PDT

Summary: Except on the desktop

I, like about 4 million other people in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast, am sitting here without power. My 4G card just died, but should be able to charge enough off my laptop in the next few minutes to at least post this piece once I finish writing it. The power outage, though inconvenient, is at least forcing me to sit in one place long enough to reflect back on the mid-October EDUCAUSE conference, from which I’ve only had time to give you one takeaway (essentially that learning management systems are everywhere, but Pearson’s new Google Apps-integrated LMS isn’t nearly as big a deal as most of us initially thought).

One thing that I found interesting, though, was the ubiquity of open source software just about everywhere except the desktop. There were open source learning management systems (Instructure Canvas, Sakai, and Moodle were stars), open source databases, open source content management systems, open source server software, you name it. And yet everyone was walking around with iPads, Macs, and, somewhat less frequently, Windows laptops. Not a single person asked if the software my company was demonstrating was compatible with Linux. Developers, engineers, and marketing types alike on the showroom floor were Mac-ing it up, and, among instructors and college staff, Windows 7 and OS X were the only operating systems I observed.

Moodlerooms in particular has done an awesome job of not only pushing the open source Moodle LMS forward but also finding cool ways to monetize it and make it even more useful for schools. Their booth was huge and their presence and reach with educational customers even bigger. Companies hosting, promoting, or developing open source software were among the event’s sponsors, as well.

But not a single gunslinger, wielding an Ubuntu desktop could be found.

Why? I have a few theories.

Long-time readers will know that I have long promoted the use of open source software in education for potential cost savings and powerful free tools for instruction, learning, and management. Where schools spend countless dollars on anti-malware software, Linux desktops generally have little need for anything but the simplest, free antivirus applications. Ubuntu’s software center is loaded with everything from mathematical modelling software to student-centric organizers, all for free. So why won’t desktop Linux take off among college students and faculty, a decidedly progressive and savvy bunch of computer users?

Here are those theories I mentioned:

  1. It’s the applications. No matter how much time students spend in the cloud (be it doing actual work or just hanging out on Facebook), Word and PowerPoint reign supreme as the content tools of choice. You can talk till you’re blue in the face about LibreOffice, but without Word or PowerPoint on an OS, it tends to be a nonstarter for a very large group of users. Same goes for Adobe’s Creative Suite which is available very cheaply to academic institutions and which sets the standard for graphic arts and multimedia.
  2. iTunes: Yes, I know iTunes is an application too and yes, I know that you can manage iOS devices with open source tools. I even know that iTunes (especially on Windows) isn’t the most awesome piece of software ever to come out of Cupertino. But Apple has an incredible ecosystem lock and iTunes just makes it so darned easy for students, whose primary pastimes are music and gaming, that Linux is just too much of a barrier to simple access to their tunes.
  3. OS X and Windows 7 are pretty great. They both have their niggles, but the need for an alternative just really isn’t there for the average student/professor.
  4. College computer labs are dead. Linux, often in the form of Edubuntu or LTSP for thin client installations has found some big fans in K12 (myself included) where multiple computer labs major cost centers for most schools. On most college campuses, computer labs are generally empty. Everyone has a laptop and the lab is something of an anachronism.
  5. College students are almost always digital natives, adeptly moving among mobile and desktop computing platforms. That said, very few members of this generation are tinkerers, for better or for worse. If the computer or smartphone works, why invest time in additional setup?

So open source software continues, as it has for a long time, to drive the back office of education. It continues to innovate on the server and platform fronts and is even making inroads into corporate and K12 desktops. For colleges, however, the highly distributed, heterogeneous nature of on-campus computing means that few perceive any benefit in the Linux desktop. So unless Windows 8 is a major flop or Apple products start to suck, there simply won’t be any students or staff asking “Does that work on Mint?”

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer and consultant with years of experience in educational technology and web-based systems. In 2011, he became the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network SaaS provider.

Disclosure

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., by day and a freelance writer and educational technology consultant by night. Well, most of his colleagues at WizIQ are based in India, so really he's working with them whenever he can stay awake. He has worked for his local school district as a teacher and technology director, for the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, and for Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen-IDEC, Inc.). He has also consulted with STATNet and Cytyc Corporation and retains close ties with X2 Development Corporation (now owned by Follett Software, the supplier of the student information system he administered for several years). Follett is paying him a monthly honorarium to act as a presenter for their "SIS Voices for Student Achievement" community (he produces occasional blog posts and hosts a monthly webinar on the use of student information systems to inform data-driven instruction and school-wide change. He regularly purchases and/or recommends Dell hardware. This is because Dell makes good hardware and has truly committed itself to education in innovative ways, particularly with their "Connected Classroom" initiative. It isn't because he has dealings with the company through his role at WizIQ (which he does) or because they have provided him with long-term loans of a variety of equipment for in-depth testing (which they have). Intel (reference designer for the Classmate PCs he has implemented in his local schools) has provided him with long-term loans of Classmate PCs for testing, as have Dell and Lenovo with their educational offerings. He may report on any of these companies as his experiences with them have direct bearing on educational technology; positive reports are not necessarily an endorsement and he receives no direct financial compensation from these companies or any others. Intel paid all expenses for his attendance at the 2009 Intel Classmate PC Ecosystem Summit which he attended as the sole representative of the technology press. He was invited to attend in 2010 but his wife would have killed him if he spent 3 days in Vegas geeking out and left her home alone with a new baby. Acer provided him with a 50% discount on an Aspire One netbook in early 2009 after he tested it for 30 days through their educational seed program. He liked the netbook at the time but it has since broken and sits unused in his office. Canonical sent him Ubuntu lanyards, t-shirts, and mousepads for his kids. He stole one of the lanyards and proudly hangs his keys from it and occasionally features his 8-year old wearing an oversized Ubuntu t-shirt on his Facebook profile. Gunnar Optiks sent him a pair of computer glasses to evaluate for a holiday gift guide. He is wearing them now as he types this because they never asked for them back and they rock out loud. Seriously - they work brilliantly and make it much easier to spend 20 hours a day staring at an LCD. If they ever asked for them back, he would fork over the $99 and buy a pair. Microsoft gave him 2 free copies of Office 2010 professional, a desktop clock, and a useless book on Office 2010 when he attended the launch of Office/Sharepoint 2010. He occasionally uses the SharePoint lanyard they gave him instead of the Ubuntu lanyard for his keys, but feels dirty afterwards. Adobe provided him with a pre-release version of the CS5 Master Collection for evaluation and ultimately provided a full, licensed copy for ongoing testing of educational applications of this admittedly expensive software. Like the Gunnars, if the license expires or they come out with CS6, he'd actually go out and buy it himself. Which is saying something, because he's actually pretty cheap. Any other companies wishing to send him cool things to evaluate, wear, or otherwise adorn his kids are more than welcome to; he promises to disclose it here if he keeps any of the stuff. Finally, because WizIQ is a virtual classroom and learning network provider, Chris, as VP of Marketing, frequently interacts with, seeks out deals with, and directly or indirectly competes with a whole lot of LMS, SIS, and other Education 2.0 companies. In general, he'll limit his reporting about these companies to news that does not impact his relationship with them or with WizIQ. If he reports on them, it's because what they are doing is newsworthy or worth the attention of his readers and not because he's trying to broker some deal, damage competition, or otherwise advance his position in his day job. LMS and SIS companies, along with other online learning communities, are a pretty important part of Ed Tech. If he stops reporting on them completely, there won't be a whole lot left. He'll be sure to call out any overt conflicts of interest if they are unavoidable. Finally, Follett Software Company pays him a little tiny honorarium every month to present on their SIS Voices webinars and to write the occasional blog or discussion thread for them. Since Follett recently bought X2 (maker of an awesome web-based SIS that Chris just happened to have used, served in advisory groups for, and frequently reported on), this is probably also worth disclosing.

Biography

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson grew up in Seattle, back in the days of pre-antitrust Microsoft, coffeeshops owned by something other than Starbucks, and really loud, inarticulate music. He escaped to the right coast in the early 90's and received a degree in Information Systems from Johns Hopkins University. While there, he began a career in health and educational information systems, with a focus on clinical trials and related statistical programming and database modeling. This focus led him to several positions at Johns Hopkins, a couple-year stint in private industry, teaching high school math and technology, and 2 years as the technology director for his local school district. Most recently, he started his own consulting business and is now the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network provider. He lives with his wife, five kids (yes, 5), 2 dogs, and a hateful cat in a small town in north-central Massachusetts. Although he is no longer teaching, his roles with WizIQ and ZDNet allow him to continue helping students and teachers add value to education with technology rather than merely adding to the bottom line.
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Open Source Education Awareness
groenpj 2nd Nov
Thinking globally, open source Education software solutions can help billions around the world. We just need to keep letting people know high quality free & open solutions exist. Please share link to non-profit COSI Open Education http://education.cositech.net
0 Votes
+ -
Open is struggling
Tim Acheson Updated - 31st Oct
The fact the article feels the need to comment on the health of open tells us more than if it had not.

Open source has utterly failed to compete with less open alternatives. Open's best bet is rising support from organisations like Microsoft.

Incidentally, the fact that the author percieves Macbooks everywhere reflects his interests more than anything else.

Is open source going out of fashion?
http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2011/jul/open_going_out_of_fashion
@Tim Acheson Really? You think so? Have you ever seen a blog running Drupal, or Wordpress? Yeah that's running on the open-source Apache server using open-source PHP as the scripting language, powered by the open-source MySQL database engine. Running on the open-source Linux operating system most likely. Do you really think open-source has "utterly failed to compete" with IIS or MSSQL? What about Google? Nearly their entire business runs on an open-source backbone, as does Facebook, Twitter, Linked-In and even Flickr and Amazon. Oh, and the NYSE runs Linux too. That's a lot of dollars powered by open-source.

How about that DVD player in your living room, or that 52" television, or even your home wireless router. Probably all running Linux or FreeBSD. Open-source.

That Android thingy you might have heard about... yeah, it's open source (well, mostly.) So tell us again, with desktops and laptops becoming less relevant in the world through mobile computing and cloud, how again has open-source failed to compete? It's companies like Microsoft and Apple who are struggling to stay relevant in the post-desktop age of computers. Do I think either will be eliminated? Of course not. It's competition. And with both of them bashing Android phones and Linux computers I'd say open-source has gained their attention.

Tim, I think you already know that your site running on Windows Server 2003 is one of the rare examples of someone running a blog on proprietary software. And you actually pay for the privilege. Or does Microsoft fund you to post your anti-Apple anti-Linux rants that dominate your blog? You want to know what's really funny? Your blog's Windows host (I checked) is actually running on Xen-Cloud. That's right, your own proprietary website runs on top of an open-source virtualization system.
"One thing that I found interesting, though, was the ubiquity of open source software just about everywhere except the desktop." and "But not a single gunslinger, wielding an Ubuntu desktop could be found."

I happen to run an old IBM ThinkPad using Ubuntu, but Mr. Dawson is correct in stating that while open source (including Linux) is omnipresent elsewhere, in education it is rare to see it as the operating system used by educators or students. And that same situation exists in business when we think about productivity applications. My opinion only, but Apple did a great job promoting their operating systems to education and the graphic arts, while Microsoft targeted business and the general public. Apple's approach to marketing looked more to future growth by getting young people hooked on their operating systems and software.. isn't there some old adage or proverb about catching them early, or is it something about indoctrination of children?
0 Votes
+ -
The Linux desktop in advanced education
Rabid Howler Monkey 31st Oct
Some time ago I did a random search of operating systems supported (e.g., ResNet help desk) by colleges and uni's. Some actually prohibit, by policy, the use of desktop Linux as funding pressures allow them only to support one OS, usually Windows and, sometimes, Mac OS X. While others take the approach that if you can install and maintain desktop Linux, more power to you. A few even provide recommendations on securing the Linux desktop for those individuals choosing to run the platform.

Another perspective is mirror sites for distros. For example, Debian:

http://www.debian.org/mirror/list

You will find *A LOT* of .edu sites in this list. Overall, from this perspective, I'd say that Linux is doing quite well in advanced education. Is it mainstream? No. But, it's definitely out there.
0 Votes
+ -
Labs are dead?
Bucky24 31st Oct
Not in the school I come from. Half our CS classes had a mandatory lab segment, and any chunk of code we wrote had to run on lab computers. I was in the labs quite often simply because it was easier to go there and be able to work with a GUI text editor than to open half a dozen ssh windows in order to work on my projects. I knew a lot of people who wrote code on their laptops then found out it wouldn't run on the lab computers a day before it was due.
@Bucky24 +1
0 Votes
+ -
I really don't think so! It is because people have plain inertia!
Q: If they move from Windows to MacOS, why not to GNU/Linux? (that is stable as MacOS *nix core, and customisable as non of the other two systems is).
A: because they think cheap (or free) is no good software!
You can easily run MS Word, Powerpoint and other software under Linux (in WINE, for instance). So why don't you migrate to any major Linux flavour, buy your MS Office package, and install it under Linux?
Again: inertia and bad press for free/open source software.

PS: check www.poseidonlinux.org to see a good educational (complete) system.
What a lot of geeks, especially on the blog and magazine beat, don't get, is that all of your points except the computer lab one applies to consumers. Especially your last sentence on point 5.

"If the computer or smartphone works, why invest time in additional setup?"

Which is why Apple destroyed the old phone market. And is working on the casual computer market. With some help from Android. happy
@raleighthings Beg your pardon but consumers have computer labs as well: Public libraries, Kinko's, other computer rental services, etc. My limited observation has been that they most often run Microsoft Windows as their OS.
0 Votes
+ -
6. Sorry, Chris, but...
Isocrates Updated - 1st Nov
you ignored a relevant reason for open source's desktop failure in pre- and post-graduate academia: Social acceptance. I believe that if open source desktops were made an academically social fad, they would replace proprietary systems.
0 Votes
+ -
6. Sorry Chris, but... cont'd
Isocrates 1st Nov
Expanding my Theory #6, this will require development of a desktop (including the applications needed and desired by academia) that looks and acts in a fashion that appeals to academia, which obviously requires some market research. This is a huge market in the Western world alone but even larger throughout the worldwide academic market. Although donations can provide some support, grants are quite lucrative, and Google's proven advertising model should encourage many interested parties to pursue this market.
I was going to say corporate promotion and realized that any entity, including for profit and not for profit organizations, can create a promotional campaign. Even an unorganized social media campaign could promote open source desktop use into a reigning status. Chris, you provided your own solution when you asked, "why won???t desktop Linux take off among college students and faculty, a decidedly progressive and savvy bunch of computer users?" Someone simply needs to reach and awaken the progressive savviness of that bunch. A social movement, like Occupy, should work. If it could happen in the 1960s, it can happen now. All it takes is fomenting a resistance to the status quo. In that regard, thanks for your own efforts toward that objective.
All of these are good points. But sadly, Desktop/consumer "open" in my opinion ('Desktop' even though that's more and more a misnomer) will be stuck in 1st gear so long as the attitude in the article prevails: lots of handwringing about all the external forces arrayed against open source on all sides. Not a single point (out of 5) looking inwards, towards any inkling that there could be some issues with the way open source operating systems work, how they are designed, how the end-user, the individual person interacts with them. Partly because open source still fails to compete in the area of design; design requires control, and that's the opposite of open. The things that make open source so strong in the back end can hamstring it in the user-facing areas. Open source is great when in the hands of an expert who can customize everything, or when it's used as the framework for someone else's design (for example, in a web app or an 'appliance') where the 'openness' is hidden. But it continually fails in the in-between. And it's not just inertia, peer pressure, advertising, or money. The failure of most open source developers to see 'design' as anything more than 'adding features' continues to hamstring them, and the fact that it's not even seen as a problem makes it much, much worse. I seem to be making this point again and again to people I work with, yet this huge blind spot remains. Please, just for a second, dear Brutus, stop to consider that the fault might not lie entirely with the stars.
As a follow-up, I think that @tonymaro 's recent response really illustrates my 'problem' with underlying assumptions of the article. Look at the examples given: Open source works great where there's an expert running it (cloud virtualization, web application hosting) or where the openness is locked down and hidden (routers, stock exchanges) or where it's wrapped in a non-open interface (most Android phones, TVs, DVDs). Can a totally open source solution ever really compete on the 'desktop'? Perhaps the question is if it really needs to. Is it really necessary to have Linux on the desktop? Perhaps it just isn't a battle that open source is well-placed to fight. Open is, in fact struggling on the desktop. That can't be 'spun'; by all rights a decent percentage of college students especially should be using a distro on their laptops. The predictions have been saying so for years and years. And year after year there's excuses like this list. As is stated, Linux and open source in general is doing well in other areas. In my opinion, many of the people who make open-source software generally still think of 'design' as an elitist presumption and consider mainstream 'end users' with little more than distain. So how can they be expected to worry about something like user-centered design? Maybe open source cheerleaders should just stop worrying about taking over the desktop. As can be shown, there are many other battlefields. And the nature of open-source means that if you really want to run an open-source OS, there will still be some around for you to install, even if you do it as a member of the .1 percent.
0 Votes
+ -
@xxyl Did you...
Isocrates 1st Nov
end up on the opposite side of your original argument?
0 Votes
+ -
Thinking globally, open source Education software solutions can help billions around the world. We just need to keep letting people know high quality free & open solutions exist. Please share link to non-profit COSI Open Education http://education.cositech.net

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix