Maybe the HP/Microsoft Slate needs Ubuntu or Moblin to be less of a yawn

Summary: Obviously Steve Ballmer is not going to announce HP's first offering in the "slate" category (it's a tablet, folks, but if he feels the need to call it a slate, whatever) running the latest Linux distribution made for MIDs, netbooks, and, well, slates. Unfortunately, by simply shoehorning the Windows 7 interface (albeit a great desktop/notebook UI) into an interesting and relatively novel form factor, the announcement of HP's slate was just a big yawn.

Obviously Steve Ballmer is not going to announce HP's first offering in the "slate" category (it's a tablet, folks, but if he feels the need to call it a slate, whatever) running the latest Linux distribution made for MIDs, netbooks, and, well, slates. Unfortunately, by simply shoehorning the Windows 7 interface (albeit a great desktop/notebook UI) into an interesting and relatively novel form factor, the announcement of HP's slate was just a big yawn.

Let's think about the iPhone vs. Windows Mobile interfaces. Windows Mobile looks remarkably like a little version of Windows. The iPhone, however, may have the underpinnings of OS X, but has a unique interface truly adapted for the form factor. Similarly, for anyone who has ever used Moblin or Ubuntu Netbook Remix, an interface that capitalizes on the size and touch capabilities, as well as the intended uses of the device is mighty refreshing, assuming users can get past the it's-not-Windows factor.

Educationally, the Slate has a lot going for it. Small and light, multi-touch enabled, and relatively inexpensive, this could be another bit of useful 1:1 goodness coming out of CES. However, in addition to a Windows interface that is poorly suited to a novel, but increasingly important form factor, touch-optimized educational software is not only hard to come by, but can be expensive.

On the other hand, the use of Ubuntu opens up these slates to a wide variety of free educational software with a growing body of touch- and stylus-enabled software. Add to that (or, more correctly, subtract from that) the licensing cost of Windows 7 and suddenly these tablets get cheaper, more robust in terms of software offerings, and easier for digital natives to use given a more appropriate interface for the device and suddenly a somewhat disappointing device becomes far more compelling.

I'm convinced, as are most other tech bloggers, that the tablet form factor is here to stay. This is a good thing. However, what we really need are interfaces that exploit the tablet rather than highlight its compromises. Moblin and NBR are mighty fine places to start.

Topics: Hewlett-Packard, Hardware, Tablets, Software, Operating Systems, Open Source, Mobility, Microsoft, Laptops, Windows

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

68 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • somewhat of a Poor Argument.

    Unless you just prefer Ubuntu or moblin then it would be even more of a yawn.

    What type of free software can you get on linux that you cant on windows?
    jdbukis@...
    • The problem is that the Win7 interface is designed for Desktops, and the

      tablet platform calls for a new interface. But,
      you really need to look no farther than Windows
      mobile to understand this a little better. MS has
      had YEARS to work on it, and it is still the
      ugliest, least functional, most boring smart phone
      OS on the planet. And then to put the ugly, butt
      head CEO on stage made the "slate" announcement
      even more ridiculous.
      DonnieBoy
      • And the *N*X UI isn't

        It doesn't matter what OS underpins slate/tablet type devices, none of the current generation of UI's are designed primarily for touch. The only potential exclusion here is the UI on Apple's iPhone which rests on top of a substantial subset of OSX.

        Gnome/KDE are no more touch-friendly than Win7's UI is.

        That's why Ballmer rightly pointed out that NUI - Natural User Interfaces - are going to be needed to make such devices truly usable in the absence of keyboards etc.

        Remember that MS has been researching this field for many years now - I think it'll be interesting to see what starts coming down the pipe over the next year or two as Natal, new multi-touch capabilities, etc., make their way into mainstream touch devices.
        de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023
        • Yea, MS has been researching "natural" user interfaces for phones too!!

          And, guess what, Win Mobile SUUUUUCKS!!!
          DonnieBoy
        • Also, KDE and Gnome are only TWO UIs for Linux, and, will NOT be used for

          tablets. Nobody but MS is stupid enough to try
          to shoehorn a Desktop GUI onto a tablet!!
          DonnieBoy
      • Windows Mobile is better than all the rest, together

        I find the Windows Mobile interface more functional and user friendly than any and all of the other interfaces I have seen on a phone to date.
        jfreedle2@...
        • other interfaces I have seen

          Have you ever _tried_ any other interface than Windows Mobile? Have you done any more than pick up a phone with a different UI and put it back down because you couldn't find the start button?
          aspir8or
    • Somewhat? Its all a poor arguement!

      He's a linux fanboy and sits here and praises it and Google in hopes of landing a job with either one.
      Loverock Davidson
      • pot calls kettle "black"

        dude. At least he uses factual data.

        And he has the stones to post non-anonymously...

        I think you should start a public blog.
        piperdown
    • it isn't about what type of free software you can get...

      as it isn't what destinations can reach with one
      car or another; as all cars will take you
      everywhere.

      I think it's more about what do you prefer the
      nice design of Lamborghini/Porsche or the
      reliability of Volvo/Mercedes... While you get
      where you want to go, it's only a personal choice.
      benitodarder
  • Exactly!! Putting Butt Head Balmer on the stage to announce Windows 7 on

    a tablet computer was a HUGE flop. They FIRST need
    to show a version of Windows7 that has an
    interface tuned for a tablet. But, even then, the
    idea of Windows on a tablet is BOOOOOOOORRRRING.
    DonnieBoy
    • Exactly, they should have gotten the fat neanderthal GPL author up there...

      licking the chicken juices off his fingers as he shows the turd brown, butt ugly ubuntu interface and turn it into a freakshow.

      It's ok you don't like MS Donnie, but your posts are pathetic and lacking any real knowledge.

      Tell me, why is the windows 7 interface not suited to a smaller screen?
      I got my wife an HP mini 311 running full Windows 7 Home Premium and it's the best little 2lb notebook with an 11.6" inch screen I have ever seen.

      Your constant "BUTT" jokes and stabs at MS for no other reason than the sake of it are what is BOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRING.
      Your posts have always painted a picture of one of most intolerable bores imaginable and now you are just being a total tool.
      xuniL_z
      • Brown as the brown matter that fills your skull but with a difference

        your matter not just poop brown, no, it is the real thing.
        The Mentalist
        • How quaint.

          What a nice little way of calling me a sh*thead. Thank you for that wonderful peek into your character.
          xuniL_z
      • Hey man, really sorry, poor Stevie does NOT deserve the jokes.

        Or does he???
        DonnieBoy
        • Not saying Ballmer doesn't deserver anything.....

          I don't care for the guy myself and would love to hear they are ditching him.
          But I don't see the point in railing on MS regularly...your posts are not always just about Ballmer.
          What good does it bring anyone here, unless the ABM people get off on it endlessly and never tire of it. That's pretty shallow and weak.
          You know you are preaching to the choir here, so why waste your time.
          You do have insightful comments when you are not trying to just wail on MS.
          xuniL_z
          • Same applies to the NBM fanatics

            They go on and on about anything not made by MS being complete
            rubbish as if God had personally told them that their opinion is truth.

            This sort of posting, from any kind of fanatical fanboy, is just a waste of
            space, very tiresome, and contributes absolutely nothing.

            Interestingly, there seem to be many more fanboys in the MS camp. I
            count 10 (so far), but only 3 in the opposing camp.

            If only they would ALL go away and leave the rest of us in peace, then
            these Talkback blogs would be far more worthwhile to read.
            rahbm
          • This is a blog about HP and Bing partnership.

            Those of use who use the software that is best suited for the job, using our best judgements, client demands and availability for a particual job and don't attach ourselves to one CAMP like a leech or a republican to his party are tired of the endless ABM crap thrown in ever blog about an MS product.
            I believe this deal has very little impact on Linux users, for example and no interest for Apple users, yet they show up just to post things like calling Bing, "BONG" and just the endless MS is evil, MS sucks, MS this/that.
            I can tell you that any Ubuntu blog may have a few Windows people and if it's me, I'm just giving back what I've got everytime I've tried to post seriously in a Windows related blog.
            The ABMers swoop in and attack anyone that tries to ask a serious question or is interested in a new MS product.
            The ABM crowd here is much larger than the NBM crowd here and they never, ever would say they happily use MS software for anything, or put down one of their own even if that person is an idiot. I have said many times how Linux and Apache, for example, are perfect for certain jobs and Windows is perfect for others.
            By and large I use Windows and I don't want to hear how much of an idiot I am for doing so and how I'm dealing with the devil each time I post.
            I have become jaded by the non-stop ABM attitudes that are overwhelming here. Any Windows specific blog brings out the ABM gang in droves to post what amounts to garbage.
            Windows users are much more open to different systems and 99% of the Windows using public has never heard of zdnet.com and never remark either way, they don't have the time because they are profesionals in their own fields using Windows to get their jobs done efficiently and effectively.
            The vocal minority of ABMers are on every blog like zdnet at all times of every day spewing forth the exact samme rubbish they were spouting several years ago.
            What you call fanboys here are just people that think the HP/Bing fit is a good one and ABMers of all people should be FOR competition, considering Google is close to monopoly status, but they prove their hypocrisy here by bashing on HP's "stupidity" to deal with MS rather than the reality that it will force Google to work that much harder and bolster competition. ARen' you sick of the kind of double standard and hypocrisy?
            You didn't factor which posts were here only to be a negative force and which were not.
            If you've been here long enough, you know that ALL polls which would show feelings toward Microsoft show a huge majority of anti-MS posters to Windows posters. It's a good 80% anti-MS to 20% MS favorable.
            xuniL_z
  • HP needs to dump windoze and embrace Linux

    Otherwise their 'slate' will be a flop with windoze on it.
    Linux Geek
    • That'd put HP out of business

      Y'see, there's this stuff called money. You use it to pay your bills, pay for your raw materials, pay your staff, invest in new products, market and advertise your products, etc.

      If HP dropped Windows and went entirely to Linux instead, customers wouldn't flock to Linux, they'd abandon HP and flock to Dell/Acer/Asus/Lenovo/Sony/etc.

      This was quite nicely demonstrated by Linux losing 95% of their market share of netbooks to XP. Customers were happier to pay $20 more for an 8 year old OS that was nearing end of life than use a free OS that doesn't run any of the apps the customers want to use on their netbooks.
      de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023