More e-readers - more misconceptions
Summary: You know what most of our administrators and teachers listened to on their way home today? All Things Considered. And you know what they're going to be asking for tomorrow? Kindles to replace all those heavy books in kids' backbacks. Sorry, folks. We're just not there yet.
Like any good Massachusetts liberal, I'm a big fan of NPR. My local NPR station is often playing in my office during the day and it's always a preset away in my car. So it's no surprise that I was listening to All Things Considered, their afternoon news program, on my way home from a conference today. While I walked away with a much better understanding of the ethnic and tribal roots of some of the conflicts in the Middle East, new thoughts about paid sick leave during a pandemic, and serious questions about the resources used on the Ares rocket to be launched tomorrow, I was bothered by one particular segment on e-readers.
E-readers have become an important part of what I cover in this blog, not so much because of what they can do now, but because of what they have the potential to do for education in the future. Color e-ink is on the way and the Nook, coming next month from Barnes and Nobles, uses a color LCD touch screen and the Android operating system to display content related to the gray-scale text. We're getting close to a tipping point on content, as well as hardware, and welcome competition in this field means that e-readers will be useful for more than just your paperback collection sooner than later.
However, the NPR technology segment, called All Tech Considered, in very un-NPR fashion, echoed the misconceptions of so many consumers, as well as educators looking to the current crop of e-readers to solve a lot of very real problems (textbook size and weight, accessibility, cost, etc.). Unfortunately, we're not there yet.
As the featured commentator, Omar Gallaga, said when asked whether he owned an e-reader,
"I have not, not yet. I'm not a subway or rail commuter, but if I was I would probably get one, or if I were a student juggling lots of heavy textbooks I would probably go ahead and make the jump.
Of course, he'd probably be a college student still juggling lots of heavy books and a Kindle, since most of the heavier undergrad texts simply aren't available for the Kindle. Even the Kindle DX, with its larger screen, just can't cut it with graphics-heavy text. Check out this Amazon query for "physics textbook college" (prompted by the Amazon autocomplete feature). You won't notice many Kindle versions of the books aside from a Schaum's Easy Outline (a handy reference, to be sure, but not one of those heavy juggled textbooks).
E-readers still have utility for students. There are many books that students read over the course of their education that are just text, whether literature, non-fiction, or graduate level physics (of which there are actually several such textbooks on the Kindle store; not surprisingly, string theory books are heavy on text). However, it's pretty clear that the NPR correspondent had never tried to use an e-reader for any academic pursuits.
One Princeton student probably put it best when he described the pilot Kindle DX program at his university:
"I hate to sound like a Luddite, but this technology is a poor excuse of an academic tool. It's clunky, slow and a real pain to operate. Much of my learning comes from...bookmarks, highlights, page-tearing, sticky notes and other marks representing the importance of certain passages - not to mention margin notes, where most of my paper ideas come from and interaction with the material occurs. All these things have been lost, and if not lost they're too slow to keep up with my thinking...
The take-home message? We're not quite there yet.
At the end of the feature, the correspondent hit on one other major area of weakness in e-readers, especially for their potential use in schools: DRM. He described shortcomings in lending and sharing books, new applications for reading books on multiple devices, and even described the Nook's "Lend Me" feature. And then he made the ownership mistake:
You own that content, so you should be able to read it in whatever format.
But guess what? You don't own the content. The Amazon EULA is quite clear on that matter. The Sony EULA, though not quite as upfront, is equally clear. The content is licensed to you. And nobody seems to have figured out how to make this sort of licensing work in an educational setting, whether K-12, where books are shared and reused, or in post-secondary, where used books are sold, notes and all.
You know what most of our administrators and teachers listened to on their way home today? All Things Considered. And you know what they're going to be asking for tomorrow? Kindles to replace all those heavy books in kids' backbacks. Sorry, folks. We're just not there yet.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
my thoughts . . .
fan of NPR."
Well, do keep in mind some of us are
conservative.
Please?
As much as I like ZDNet for tech news, it can
be a tad disheartening when there's the
occasional trip down political lane, and ZDNet
does tend to lean "left" when that happens.
Good to see, though, that you're willing to
disagree with them. An open mind is always a
good thing.
"Of course, he?d probably be a college student
still juggling lots of heavy books and a
Kindle, since most of the heavier undergrad
texts simply aren?t available for the Kindle."
Alas, 'tis true :(. I'd jump on a Kindle
immediately if it offered my books - the
savings from the cheaper e-books alone would
pay for it quickly.
But, as it turns out, none of my books were
available. So alas, no Kindle. And I'm getting
closer to graduation, so the amount I'd save is
dwindling and it may not pay for itself soon.
I do listen to Car Talk on my iPod, though. So
I guess I can say I listen a bit to NPR myself,
heh.
Although somehow I don't think Car Talk really
counts.
Liberal Educator?
Well considering
There are some opposing forces at work.
education system.
-Ideally, you want personal education. As small
class size as possible, so the professor can
work more closely with the students. Students
learn best when the education is tailored for
their learning style and level.
-But the more students you have, and the less
professors you have, the greater the profit,
and the cheaper you can make the education.
So there are opposing goals in education. It
has nothing to do with taxes or pay of people
outside the educational system, because it's
inherently an internal problem.
Making the education system more public or more
private isn't going to resolve that issue.
Whether it's paid by the general public or by
the students themselves, it has to be paid.
Obvisouly you didn't consider very hard
Spending per student has been increasing way ahead of inflation, class sizes have been shrinking, and the level of education has cratered. Once they stop agenda pushing and go back to teaching the basics our kids will be much better off...
Interestingly enough
Orthodox (Russian Orthodox, I think? Not sure),
and quite conservative.
But yeah, the trend is true. There does need to be
a bit more political diversity in our educational
system.
RE: More e-readers - more misconceptions
Jason Perlow and Jennifer Leggio are both Libertarians, by the way, if you need a bit of balance!
Chris
And you forgot Rudy
So, what you're basically saying is that
RE: More e-readers - more misconceptions
1. I want color full screens at the same resolution as a paper book.
2. I want to own my single copy, and I don't see that happening soon.
3. I want to read my books 20-50 years from now, which an e-book reader can't make happen for me.
Serious Liberals (like me) only listen to BBC
Lots of great BBC shows are available by podcast, like
NewsPod and Global News Podcast.
Serious open minded people . . .
view.
It helps to listen to stuff you may dislike on
occasion. You're not required to agree with it,
but it helps to know what's out there.
RE: More e-readers - more misconceptions
Get a netbook, a smartphone or a small laptop
It's still a moot point . . .
on those machines, either.
Do try to keep pace with the conversation and not
wander off . . .
What do you call an eBook without DRM?
As for making textbooks into eBooks, the reason we have text books is so that the professor can make some money on those $600/semester courses. My own book costs me about $2.50 to print and maybe $2.00 shipping (4th class books?). On a $100 textbook, you can save 5 bucks with an eBook? Yeah, that's REAL attractive.
Textbooks would be. . .
school pays a yearly subscription, which goes to
help keep the book updated/current.
Kind of like buying a software license . . .
Content v Media
Software has site licences - so should textbooks.
Presently we have the information age with Luddite rules.