Proactive IT support in higher education

Summary: By now, on most college campuses students are finishing finals and leaving campus for the holidays.  In K-12, educators and staff -- even in Ed Tech -- are also on their way home for a few short weeks but what about Education IT on the typical college campus?

Marc WagnerBy now, on most college campuses students are finishing finals and leaving campus for the holidays.  In K-12, educators and staff -- even in Ed Tech -- are also on their way home for a few short weeks but what about Education IT on the typical college campus?

The time constraints faced by Education IT in higher education are often quite different than those faced by most local school districts.  While Ed Tech in K-12 has to meet the needs of students each and every day, the length of the school day, combined with an extended summer vacation, leaves the typical school district with ample time for infrastructure maintenance when students are not in need of services.  On the typical college campus however, IT services are delivered 24 hours per day, year-round.  The only opportunities for upgrades are often during those short windows of time when very few students are on campus and no classes are in session.  This means Christmas break, spring break, and those short windows between summer sessions are the only opportunities for maintenance of wide ranging services. 

Because of these severe time constraints, the need for careful planning and coordination becomes critical.  Reactive IT support -- putting out fires -- just won't work on a college campus supporting tens of thousands of students year-round.  To support this many students, IT departments in higher education are often composed of hundreds of employees organized into small groups with specific responsibilities.   Coordination between these groups becomes absolutely critical. 

Projects which can be phased in -- those affecting only a portion of the student body at a time (such a lab upgrades) -- can be performed over the course of the summer, when student populations are relatively low but centralized services which impact all users must be coordinated across multiple groups both inside of and outside of Education IT -- including comprehensive communications with students and faculty -- who are critically dependent upon your services.

Do you have some Education IT experiences to share?

Topic: CXO

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Bifurcating my team

    Granted, we're not a typical college, but we too have slim windows of opportunity to implement projects. To help keep things moving, I've started to bifurcate my staff into those dedicated to support and those dedicated to projects. My reasoning is simple: when teams are integrated, support gets all of the attention and projects are neglected.

    I'm only a couple of months into this process, but so far it is working well.
    Chad Strunk
    • This is a great approach ...

      ... because it permits your "projects" staff to do some strategic planning as well. Besides, some people are better suited to "support" and others are better suited to longer-term, big-picture kinds of projects.
      M Wagner
    • Splitsville

      This is a good answer for business as well. One concern you may want to consider though is the impact of the projects team to the "steady state" team. It can become a point of contention as the "projects team" has definite end states of projects and commitments completed that are easy to recognize and measure. Whereas the steady state - break fix - whatever you call them feels sidelined into the grunt work - "fixed the psych proff's machinge again..".

      I would recommend a plan to cross polinate this process at various points in the year - and publish that to the teams before they get to the point there is a "them vs. us" stage of the game. Also the steady state folks live with the end support of the projects teams work, and may have future improvements to the deployment projects that will make things easier in the future. You may be surprised at those folks that did not seem to fit in a projects mold, initially, becoming avid supporters with good ideas and skills.

      My .02.
      Jim888
  • Virtual Cluster...

    There are two technologies that can really help here: virtualization and clustering. With virtualization, project leaders can have their own machines without the need for expensive hardware and they can create restore points for testing. VMs can also be immutable so that when they restart they return to a known state. This is VERY helpful in a lab environment as it is easy to undo malicious or accidental changes while also making it easy to deploy. Clustering can be used for those "always on" services so that physical machines can be maintained while the users have access. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-availability_cluster

    Mark W.
    wonsil@...
  • Do you have some Education IT experiences to share?

    Unfortunately, not many good ones. IT at my school (4-yr+ Univ.) likes to do things like: a week ago (weekend before final exams) they "upgraded Groupwise [email, calendar, etc., but primarily email for every employee on campus]" which changed the server address for 1/2 the campus, and then [b]sent out the notice of the address change over email![/b]; or changed the entire accounting software for the university at the change of the fiscal year, when everyone had to close out all old accounts and start new ones; or spread out the upgrading of the on-campus network such that some of us in the sciences (incl. me) are still on CAT 3, and there's no telling when they'll get around to this building. And, I don't even want to go into wireless and 5+ yr old notebooks for faculty issues.
    cd2_z