ie8 fix

ZDNet Education

Christopher Dawson

Short on space and cash? Try an interactive projector

By | January 25, 2011, 9:23pm PST

Summary: If you’re in the market for interactive whiteboards, be sure to check out interactive projectors before you buy. Lower cost, easier installation, portability, and versatility make them powerful alternatives to traditional smartboards.

Interactive whiteboards (or smartboards as they are often called after SMART Technologies, the company with the largest market share among whiteboard manufacturers) have become the holy grail of classroom instructional technology. There’s good reason for this. If you’ve ever seen one used by a well-trained instructor, you know how transformative and engaging the devices can be.

When used well in class, smartboards tend to keep students interested long after the novelty should have worn off and provides teachers with a vital tool for reaching increasingly visual learners (regardless of age - interactive whiteboards work well from Kindergarten through graduate school). All that being said, smartboards can be prohibitively expensive, difficult or impossible to share and move between classrooms, and challenging to deploy in space-constrained locations (you know, like most schools).

Enter interactive projectors. I’ve had some time to evaluate 2 models from Dell and InFocus and, while neither is a perfect replacement for interactive whiteboards located in spacious, airy rooms with spotless WiFi and SMART Slates for everyone, both are far more realistic for deployments of any size.

Both the Dell S300wi and the InFocus IN3916 share similar form factors (these aren’t ultraportables, by any means, but aren’t circa 2003 beasts either), use short-throw lenses (more on that later), come with e-learning software, have loads of connectivity options, provide widescreen viewing at 1280×800, and offer innovative ways of interacting with computers and screens. Here’s a quick video from Dell on how the interactive projectors work:

As you can see, the projectors are ideally ceiling mounted to ensure that the presenter doesn’t get in the way of the image. However, the ability to stand back from the screen (both projectors support this), as well as the very short throw required to get a large image allows for quite a bit of flexibility. It wouldn’t be a problem, for example, to put the projector on a cart and move it between classrooms as needed.

That is, in fact, one of the greatest advantages of these projectors. Both work very well projected on just about anything. In my testing, I used everything from a standard pull-down screen to a dark-paneled wall. Because the projectors are quite bright and technically don’t require users to touch the screen with the pen, it really doesn’t matter. My favorite “screen”, however, was a large, white drywalled wall. A very large image was available from both and the pen (or light wand, as these devices are technically called, since they rely on light sensors for interactivity) remained quite usable.

The InFocus spec sheet also reads much like Dell’s:

  • Connect your collaboration and classroom tools
    • Easily connect your PC or Mac, DVD player, or document reader via a multitude of inputs. The IN3916 even lets you present from a USB thumb drive, and includes HDMI, networking (LAN), and RS232 inputs.
    • Display over USB port sends audio and video in one cable
    • IT administrators can control the projector remotely via the LAN port
    • Connect wirelessly with the optional 802.11 b/g wireless module
  • Control the display of multiple PCs
    • A presenter or teacher can connect up to 32 computers to one IN3916 projector (via a network or optional wireless connection) and control who presents from one web page.
    • Connect up to 32 computers and select the one(s) you want to project
    • Display up to 4 computer screens simultaneously
  • No special software is required, but we include some that makes interacting easy and fun
    • Education version includes drawing, math, geography, literacy, and curriculum-building tools
    • Works on top of your web browser and other favorite applications
    • PC and Mac compatible
The InFocus is wireless-compatible, while the Dell comes with wireless pre-installed. This allows any wireless computer to connect to the projectors as if they were wireless hotspots and transmit on-screen content without pesky VGA cables. However, doing so precludes wirelessly accessing the Internet, ruling out projecting any Web-enabled content, unless the transmitting computer also has a wired Internet connection.

So both are great, both work very well in a variety of situations, both have remarkably similar specs, and both live up to the claims of their respective manufacturers. They’re even quite close on price (around $1500). What differentiates one from another? And is there a clear “winner” between the two?

Next: Interactive projector cage match results »

Topics

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer and consultant with years of experience in educational technology and web-based systems. In 2011, he became the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network SaaS provider.

Disclosure

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., by day and a freelance writer and educational technology consultant by night. Well, most of his colleagues at WizIQ are based in India, so really he's working with them whenever he can stay awake. He has worked for his local school district as a teacher and technology director, for the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, and for Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen-IDEC, Inc.). He has also consulted with STATNet and Cytyc Corporation and retains close ties with X2 Development Corporation (now owned by Follett Software, the supplier of the student information system he administered for several years). Follett is paying him a monthly honorarium to act as a presenter for their "SIS Voices for Student Achievement" community (he produces occasional blog posts and hosts a monthly webinar on the use of student information systems to inform data-driven instruction and school-wide change. He regularly purchases and/or recommends Dell hardware. This is because Dell makes good hardware and has truly committed itself to education in innovative ways, particularly with their "Connected Classroom" initiative. It isn't because he has dealings with the company through his role at WizIQ (which he does) or because they have provided him with long-term loans of a variety of equipment for in-depth testing (which they have). Intel (reference designer for the Classmate PCs he has implemented in his local schools) has provided him with long-term loans of Classmate PCs for testing, as have Dell and Lenovo with their educational offerings. He may report on any of these companies as his experiences with them have direct bearing on educational technology; positive reports are not necessarily an endorsement and he receives no direct financial compensation from these companies or any others. Intel paid all expenses for his attendance at the 2009 Intel Classmate PC Ecosystem Summit which he attended as the sole representative of the technology press. He was invited to attend in 2010 but his wife would have killed him if he spent 3 days in Vegas geeking out and left her home alone with a new baby. Acer provided him with a 50% discount on an Aspire One netbook in early 2009 after he tested it for 30 days through their educational seed program. He liked the netbook at the time but it has since broken and sits unused in his office. Canonical sent him Ubuntu lanyards, t-shirts, and mousepads for his kids. He stole one of the lanyards and proudly hangs his keys from it and occasionally features his 8-year old wearing an oversized Ubuntu t-shirt on his Facebook profile. Gunnar Optiks sent him a pair of computer glasses to evaluate for a holiday gift guide. He is wearing them now as he types this because they never asked for them back and they rock out loud. Seriously - they work brilliantly and make it much easier to spend 20 hours a day staring at an LCD. If they ever asked for them back, he would fork over the $99 and buy a pair. Microsoft gave him 2 free copies of Office 2010 professional, a desktop clock, and a useless book on Office 2010 when he attended the launch of Office/Sharepoint 2010. He occasionally uses the SharePoint lanyard they gave him instead of the Ubuntu lanyard for his keys, but feels dirty afterwards. Adobe provided him with a pre-release version of the CS5 Master Collection for evaluation and ultimately provided a full, licensed copy for ongoing testing of educational applications of this admittedly expensive software. Like the Gunnars, if the license expires or they come out with CS6, he'd actually go out and buy it himself. Which is saying something, because he's actually pretty cheap. Any other companies wishing to send him cool things to evaluate, wear, or otherwise adorn his kids are more than welcome to; he promises to disclose it here if he keeps any of the stuff. Finally, because WizIQ is a virtual classroom and learning network provider, Chris, as VP of Marketing, frequently interacts with, seeks out deals with, and directly or indirectly competes with a whole lot of LMS, SIS, and other Education 2.0 companies. In general, he'll limit his reporting about these companies to news that does not impact his relationship with them or with WizIQ. If he reports on them, it's because what they are doing is newsworthy or worth the attention of his readers and not because he's trying to broker some deal, damage competition, or otherwise advance his position in his day job. LMS and SIS companies, along with other online learning communities, are a pretty important part of Ed Tech. If he stops reporting on them completely, there won't be a whole lot left. He'll be sure to call out any overt conflicts of interest if they are unavoidable. Finally, Follett Software Company pays him a little tiny honorarium every month to present on their SIS Voices webinars and to write the occasional blog or discussion thread for them. Since Follett recently bought X2 (maker of an awesome web-based SIS that Chris just happened to have used, served in advisory groups for, and frequently reported on), this is probably also worth disclosing.

Biography

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson grew up in Seattle, back in the days of pre-antitrust Microsoft, coffeeshops owned by something other than Starbucks, and really loud, inarticulate music. He escaped to the right coast in the early 90's and received a degree in Information Systems from Johns Hopkins University. While there, he began a career in health and educational information systems, with a focus on clinical trials and related statistical programming and database modeling. This focus led him to several positions at Johns Hopkins, a couple-year stint in private industry, teaching high school math and technology, and 2 years as the technology director for his local school district. Most recently, he started his own consulting business and is now the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network provider. He lives with his wife, five kids (yes, 5), 2 dogs, and a hateful cat in a small town in north-central Massachusetts. Although he is no longer teaching, his roles with WizIQ and ZDNet allow him to continue helping students and teachers add value to education with technology rather than merely adding to the bottom line.
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Finger touch interactive projector
jeff2g 12th Apr
I came cross a new solution that can convert any projector into finger touch from www.gloviewboard.com.
It is amazing. With a little kit on the board only, user uses finger to make writing. Cool
We have switched totally over to the Epson Brightlink projector, which gives you the pen setup of a promethean board, but allows you to do it on any surface. Pluse, at less than $1300 its saves us a ton over smart or promethean boards!
0 Votes
+ -
@jcalamita Yep--we just recently bought a batch of the BrightLinks, too--having previously gotten only SMART boards in the past. Easy install, no more misalignments, and a bigger image for less money.
I otally agree on this "When used well in class, smartboards tend to keep students interested long after the novelty should have worn off and provides teachers with a vital tool for reaching increasingly visual learners (regardless of age - interactive whiteboards work well from Kindergarten through graduate school). All that being said, smartboards can be prohibitively expensive, difficult or impossible to share and move between classrooms, and challenging to deploy in space-constrained locations (you know, like most schools)." I hope more development is on their way....

Free Dating Sites
Hi Chris,

Thanks for a well-rounded review of the two projectors. I am a teacher and have been using the InFocus interactive projector for a few months now. I also do a little work for InFocus as a result of my enthusiastic use of their products. That said, I think the InFocus 3916 really is a marvelous projector.

Like you mentioned on the second page of your review, not being tethered to the board is a feature that makes interactive projectors, like the IN3916, very appealing. In my classroom, being able to be among my kids is critical to me. I like that the wand can travel with me, and I can easily put a kid in the driver's seat.


Thanks again for your review.

Yours,

Chris Craft
6th grade teacher
As someone looking for solutions for students with disabilities, these seem like a backward step. Even a short throw projector casts a shadow and many students can't manage to hold a standard Promethean pen nevermind these larger, more complex wands.
Interactive Plasma/LCDs counteract these problems and are growing in popularity, though the cost of this technology is often a barrier.

Fil McIntyre
Assistive Technologist
BRITE Centre, Scotland
0 Votes
+ -
@Filmac Interactive flatscreens are absolutely the best option for a variety of reasons, and one day they'll be affordable. But until then, we'll have to stick with these other systems.
Just like to share another option from BOXLIGHT interactive projector line, the interactive solutions are available from listed price $599 to $1899 for different needs and budgets.
The $599 unit is An add-on device attached to any ordinary projector, then turn any surface into an interactive whiteboard ! Actually, this device can bring you interactive capability NOT only in the projector setting, if your computer output is displayed on TV, you also can interact with your computer right from the TV screen.
You can set the image size as needed, without being limited by the budget and thus the board size. And it's good to go business trip with you. Teachers love this solution a lot.
FYI here : http://www.classroom-aid.com/interactive_module.html
0 Votes
+ -
I came cross a new solution that can convert any projector into finger touch from www.gloviewboard.com.
It is amazing. With a little kit on the board only, user uses finger to make writing. Cool

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix