ie8 fix

ZDNet Education

Christopher Dawson

Smartboards vs interactive whiteboards

By | September 11, 2007, 9:20pm PDT

Summary: A few days ago, I posted my thoughts on the Mimio interactive whiteboards we installed. Overall, I liked them much more than I expected and the wow factor for students and staff was actually more helpful than distracting. A few readers posted comments on the other technologies available along these lines, so I [...]

A few days ago, I posted my thoughts on the Mimio interactive whiteboards we installed. Overall, I liked them much more than I expected and the wow factor for students and staff was actually more helpful than distracting. A few readers posted comments on the other technologies available along these lines, so I decided to do some research. Let us know via talkbacks below about your specific experiences, but here’s what I’ve found (and what I’d like to try in the next couple of years as we expand our fleet of interactive boards):

First of all, one reader called me out on the price of SMART boards. While I tossed out the number of 5 grand, he noted that his school had obtained them for much less. I did some looking around online and found overlays for 42″ plasma screens in the $2000 range (not including the 42″ plasma). The larger products from SMART designed to be combined with digital projectors (or including close-mounted projectors of their own) appeared to run quite a bit more. The 680i (including a projector with integrated speakers) was available on TouchBoards.com for $5599.

The Mimio boards we recently installed retail on TouchBoards.com for $999 (educational pricing). Even cheaper versions can be purchased that simply attach to existing whiteboards. In some ways, you get what you pay for. While my research certainly showed some serious price disparities, it was also very clear that the SMART board systems are really impressive in terms of features and interactivity. New integration with SMART’s in-class testing devices and really cool software round out a great package. I also have no doubt that lower-end or older models of the SMART Boards can be had more cheaply; however, the price difference is both significant and real, even if the magnitude is usually less than $4000.

A couple of other readers recommended Promethean Activboards. These seem to offer lower cost, whiteboard-based solutions, as well (although not as cheap as the Mimios, running in the $1400-$2500 range), but included many of the attractive features found on the SMART Boards (interactive handheld devices for the students, Bluetooth connectivity, etc.). I’ll need to track down one of these systems to test since they look like a nice compromise.

The real question to ask here, though, is whether I can satisfy my needs for instructional tools with the cheaper product? Do the full-blown SMART Boards add that much more in terms of in-class value? I’d like some additional feedback on this, so talk back below. For me, though, I’m quite content to post notes, drawings, etc., to the web and re-project captured whiteboards from earlier in a class. This might be from my own lack of experience (after all, I largely ignored interactive board technology until I was forced to implement it; then I really began to find it useful).

As one reader put it,

Welcome to the AV fold. Keep focused on the desired outcome rather than the technology and you’ll make good decisions.

I’m inclined to agree. What satisfies your needs? Of course, most of us are in public education, so taxpayers would probably like for us to be as realistic as we can about our “needs.” Does a touchable plasma screen (or the Microsoft Surface, for that matter) satisfy your needs better than a sensor-loaded whiteboard? For me, I’d say it has less value, largely because of the way I teach. Will I teach differently in 5 years as these devices become more affordable? I’ll let you know in 5 years.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer and consultant with years of experience in educational technology and web-based systems. In 2011, he became the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network SaaS provider.

Disclosure

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., by day and a freelance writer and educational technology consultant by night. Well, most of his colleagues at WizIQ are based in India, so really he's working with them whenever he can stay awake. He has worked for his local school district as a teacher and technology director, for the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, and for Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen-IDEC, Inc.). He has also consulted with STATNet and Cytyc Corporation and retains close ties with X2 Development Corporation (now owned by Follett Software, the supplier of the student information system he administered for several years). Follett is paying him a monthly honorarium to act as a presenter for their "SIS Voices for Student Achievement" community (he produces occasional blog posts and hosts a monthly webinar on the use of student information systems to inform data-driven instruction and school-wide change. He regularly purchases and/or recommends Dell hardware. This is because Dell makes good hardware and has truly committed itself to education in innovative ways, particularly with their "Connected Classroom" initiative. It isn't because he has dealings with the company through his role at WizIQ (which he does) or because they have provided him with long-term loans of a variety of equipment for in-depth testing (which they have). Intel (reference designer for the Classmate PCs he has implemented in his local schools) has provided him with long-term loans of Classmate PCs for testing, as have Dell and Lenovo with their educational offerings. He may report on any of these companies as his experiences with them have direct bearing on educational technology; positive reports are not necessarily an endorsement and he receives no direct financial compensation from these companies or any others. Intel paid all expenses for his attendance at the 2009 Intel Classmate PC Ecosystem Summit which he attended as the sole representative of the technology press. He was invited to attend in 2010 but his wife would have killed him if he spent 3 days in Vegas geeking out and left her home alone with a new baby. Acer provided him with a 50% discount on an Aspire One netbook in early 2009 after he tested it for 30 days through their educational seed program. He liked the netbook at the time but it has since broken and sits unused in his office. Canonical sent him Ubuntu lanyards, t-shirts, and mousepads for his kids. He stole one of the lanyards and proudly hangs his keys from it and occasionally features his 8-year old wearing an oversized Ubuntu t-shirt on his Facebook profile. Gunnar Optiks sent him a pair of computer glasses to evaluate for a holiday gift guide. He is wearing them now as he types this because they never asked for them back and they rock out loud. Seriously - they work brilliantly and make it much easier to spend 20 hours a day staring at an LCD. If they ever asked for them back, he would fork over the $99 and buy a pair. Microsoft gave him 2 free copies of Office 2010 professional, a desktop clock, and a useless book on Office 2010 when he attended the launch of Office/Sharepoint 2010. He occasionally uses the SharePoint lanyard they gave him instead of the Ubuntu lanyard for his keys, but feels dirty afterwards. Adobe provided him with a pre-release version of the CS5 Master Collection for evaluation and ultimately provided a full, licensed copy for ongoing testing of educational applications of this admittedly expensive software. Like the Gunnars, if the license expires or they come out with CS6, he'd actually go out and buy it himself. Which is saying something, because he's actually pretty cheap. Any other companies wishing to send him cool things to evaluate, wear, or otherwise adorn his kids are more than welcome to; he promises to disclose it here if he keeps any of the stuff. Finally, because WizIQ is a virtual classroom and learning network provider, Chris, as VP of Marketing, frequently interacts with, seeks out deals with, and directly or indirectly competes with a whole lot of LMS, SIS, and other Education 2.0 companies. In general, he'll limit his reporting about these companies to news that does not impact his relationship with them or with WizIQ. If he reports on them, it's because what they are doing is newsworthy or worth the attention of his readers and not because he's trying to broker some deal, damage competition, or otherwise advance his position in his day job. LMS and SIS companies, along with other online learning communities, are a pretty important part of Ed Tech. If he stops reporting on them completely, there won't be a whole lot left. He'll be sure to call out any overt conflicts of interest if they are unavoidable. Finally, Follett Software Company pays him a little tiny honorarium every month to present on their SIS Voices webinars and to write the occasional blog or discussion thread for them. Since Follett recently bought X2 (maker of an awesome web-based SIS that Chris just happened to have used, served in advisory groups for, and frequently reported on), this is probably also worth disclosing.

Biography

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson grew up in Seattle, back in the days of pre-antitrust Microsoft, coffeeshops owned by something other than Starbucks, and really loud, inarticulate music. He escaped to the right coast in the early 90's and received a degree in Information Systems from Johns Hopkins University. While there, he began a career in health and educational information systems, with a focus on clinical trials and related statistical programming and database modeling. This focus led him to several positions at Johns Hopkins, a couple-year stint in private industry, teaching high school math and technology, and 2 years as the technology director for his local school district. Most recently, he started his own consulting business and is now the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network provider. He lives with his wife, five kids (yes, 5), 2 dogs, and a hateful cat in a small town in north-central Massachusetts. Although he is no longer teaching, his roles with WizIQ and ZDNet allow him to continue helping students and teachers add value to education with technology rather than merely adding to the bottom line.
35
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Smartbf33oards vs interactive whiteboards
timmellow 15th Sep
The pain purchase cipro 500 mg is a signal of our body that is something that does not go purchase nolvadex 10 mg . It can be because generic nolvadex 20 mg of a physical damage purchase lioresal , a kind of sickness, or of emotional perturbation. The greatest part buy cheap revatio of the types of physical pain can be dealt by analgesics.
0 Votes
+ -
SMART puts the Teacher first
SMART Board Lady 12th Sep 2007
Though I think that you have a valid point with the price structure of the Mimio. Being a former educator, I think that when a school is looking to purchase an interactive technology they really need to look at the whole picture.

SMART Technologies offers several different sizes and prices of SMART Boards from $700-$1400 for the front projection series. The SMART Board is not reliant on a battery operated pen to use the board. They also offer a 5 year warranty, free upgrades of software and unlimiting licensing so teachers can have the software at home, free education website to download free lessons that are correlated to your state standards and free training on how to use the SMART Board. They have certified Master SMART Board trainers that offer professional development in all the states.

I have looked at the other companies of Intereactive Whiteboards, of which there is now over 30, and I found SMART to be the one company that really puts the teacher and education first.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Excellent feedback
mrdatahs 12th Sep 2007
Thanks for the information - I'll contact SMART directly and get some additional information.

cad
0 Votes
+ -
So does Promethean
k12IT 12th Sep 2007
Everything you said about the Smart Board is the same for the Promethean ActivBoard. What's the difference?



Let's see as you say, they also offer a 5 year warranty, free upgrades of software and unlimited licensing so teachers can have the software at home, free education website to download free lessons that are correlated to your state standards and free training on how to use the ActivBoard. They have certified ActivBoard trainers that offer professional development in all the states.



They use one pen, instead of 4, that in conjunction with the software can do 24 colors in many different sizes. You also can erase with the software without picking up an eraser. Using one pen saves your from having to reach down to put one back in it's tray and grab a different one.



With one in every classroom in our district, including all Media Centers (Libraries) we have over 4,000 ActivBoards. Each ActivBoard has a VCR/DVD connected, along with Stereo Speakers, the cable feed and a laptop. So, you can use the ActivBoard for lessons using a flipchart that uses the cable input, the Internet connection from the laptop, all the applications on the laptop or on the network, a VCR or DVD, load a UnitedStreaming video all in one lesson. You can also annotate over a live screen, insert a Flash presentation, a web link....well I could go on and on. Oh, one thing I forgot, we are adding Document camera's (different type of ELMO) also before December for overhead type presentations or still pictures.



ActivBoards accessories that can be purchased include ActivSlates for use at a desk and ActivVotes that let you do a quiz or other polling activities with your class.



The biggest thing is that the kids love it, pay more attention in class and want to be a part of it.
0 Votes
+ -
SMART's better warranty and pens
SMART Board Lady 13th Sep 2007
The Promethean warranty is only for 3 years and is only offers the five year warranty if you have a certified installer install it. That means more money.

Though Promethean uses one pen it is the primary pen and it is mechanical. If it breaks, no way to use the board and it the pen only has a year warranty. SMART Boards pens are not powered and if they are gone you can still use the board by using the Notebook software.

Speaking of software.... SMART Boards only have one software to standardize not two like Promethean. That means that you have to train teachers that work with Elementary and Middle School and High School on two different types of software that means more money.

Being a person that has dealt with budgets and with the cost of technology I would say that SMART is worth the investment.

But at this point I only hope that all schools are considering technology to enhance all students learning opportunities and to make teaching exciting again.
0 Votes
+ -
You can use the Laptop
k12IT 13th Sep 2007
We did have certified installers, of which I was one. BTW, why wouldn't you want a certified installer? The costs in the long run of having non certified person install a piece of equipment that expensive is not wise.



You can use the laptop to use the ActivBoard, why would you think that they couldn't? Pens are easily replaced.



As for different software, Promethean does have ActivPrimary and ActivStudio Professional. We do install ActivPrimary, but it's rarely used because of it's very childish look and feel. ActivStudio has no problems being used in an Elementary school where I work, in fact it helps to use it as it is more full featured and the kids are smart enough to use it with the teachers guidance. The ActivBoards came with both AP and AS without extra cost, at least it did for our district. Now that could be because we had over 4,000 installed.
0 Votes
+ -
SMART Boards are still a better option
SMART Board Lady 14th Sep 2007
That is great that you had certified installers and could afford them. But the great majority of schools have custodians or maintenance people install their boards. I curious about how much did it cost you to get certified as an installer and how difficult is it to install a Promethean Board? My point being that if you can afford the certified installers then you get the 5 year warranty. SMART gives it to you automatically when you register your SMART Technologies.

I never said anything about laptops not working with Promethean.

I am glad that your school district was able to afford certified installation of Promethean Boards but the main thread of this blog was comparative price of Interactive Whiteboards. With that said due to price and what you get for your money, I feel that SMART is the better answer.
0 Votes
+ -
The smarter board is Promethean
lisapoet 22nd Sep 2007
"Though Promethean uses one pen it is the primary pen and it is mechanical. If it breaks, no way to use the board and it the pen only has a year warranty."

Not true. You can still manipulate the images on the board through the laptop or whatever computer is driving the software. The pen's replacement cost is $25. Each board my school purchased and installed came with 2 pens, so I know that I have a backup if I need it at any time.

Speaking of software... how many teachers do you know who work with more than one level of education? Having one level for primary and one level for secondary only makes sense. I don't have to sort through things that are too low for my kids to get what I need. By the way, BOTH programs came with my setup and it wasn't a separate charge... it was bundled. That saves money. The software runs the same way. It's the resource library that is different. Also, the next upgrade will allow two pens to be used at the same time.

The BIG advantage to Promethean is that a kid doesn't have to worry about resting the heal of his hand on the board while he writes. SmartBoards react to every touch, Promethean Boards are "smarter" boards and only react to the pen.

Our district dabbled with SMART and has a few at the district office. They use them as projection surfaces now, and have totally switched to Promethean. My school will haveone in every class by the end of the year.

I'm glad you're happy, but I say you can keep your SILLY board, 'cause to me, ActivRocks.
0 Votes
+ -
You're right
lisapoet 22nd Sep 2007
Not to mention the fact that a Promethean Board is LARGER than a SmartBoard. I could go on and on about how great it is, but to tell you would be "preaching to the choir." We won't be able to convince the SmartBoard people that we've got the better toy... so let's just enjoy our luck.
0 Votes
+ -
Hi Chris,

You are wrong about SMART Board pricing. They do have boards for around $1000 with education pricing. Also - dollar price alone, as you note, is not the measure of true value. As an example, SMART offers a wide range of free training including in-school training by education consultants who are former teachers....huge bonus when you are the IT director and need to figure out how to train teachers! Plus, one person I was talking to recently said he just took out of commission a 98' SMART Board, and not because it didn't work, but because it had the old phone cable/input which is just too slow for the Internet age. You should contact a SMART reseller in your district and do a 'taste test' - you'll be impressed. LA
0 Votes
+ -
smart boards
rivcbett 12th Sep 2007
our school has a few smartboards but 9 times out of 10 the teachers just use it as a flat surface to project on.. we just got a grant this year to buy some interwrite pads and they are considerably cheaper (around $500) and so far the teachers seem to prefer them alot better because they can move around the room while demoing something - maybe the "wow" factor will wear off after a while, but still for the cost i would say to consider these..
0 Votes
+ -
interwrite
rivcbett 12th Sep 2007
sorry i forgot to include a link to the interwrite if anyone was interested http://www.interwritelearning.com/products/pad/detail.html

there may be other companies out there with similar products as well, these are just the ones we got with our grant
0 Votes
+ -
Re: interwrite
dgalb 13th Sep 2007
ooh ok, those look like the airliner my teacher got with his smartboard. I'd always hope it was passed to me.
0 Votes
+ -
interwrite
rivcbett 13th Sep 2007
i think another reason that people like these are because it doesnt require purchasing a board as well - i believe smartboard and promethean both have wireless pads similar to interwrite - but they require that you already have purchased a board to go along with it or else it wont function..
0 Votes
+ -
SMART Airliner can be purchased separately
SMART Board Lady 13th Sep 2007
You can purchase the SMART Airliner separately and use it with the SMART Board Software. It is a great tool to use in the classroom and it works well with the SMART Board. But I still like the ability to have my students interacting with the SMART Board. Especially those with vision problems and hand-eye coordination issues.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Smartboards, Mimio boards
at78rpm 12th Sep 2007
I think it's all about why you want an interactive whiteboard to begin with. If you've used a computer lab and thought, "Gee, I wish I had another way to display this...", then pretty much any whiteboard will do. If you've just been presented with one, and need ideas on how to use it, sure, Promethean and Smart both have great software. Mimio's isn't bad, but it's not as bottom-up as the competition. But for the money difference, I'd much rather get a Mimio for a teacher who already has ideas than a SmartBoard for someone who needs inspiration.
0 Votes
+ -
Just got 3 "Smart" boards
alohmeyer@... 12th Sep 2007
FYI: I got my 77" boards for $1200 each (board/software). While that sounds steep so far they have been worth every penny!!! On the other hand I wouldn't get it for just anybody, actual usage will depend on the teacher...
0 Votes
+ -
SMART and Promethean
ksmerritt@... 12th Sep 2007
Our school district has installed about 200-300 SMART Boards and over 1000 Promethen Boards. Come visit us in Greenville, SC for some first hand experience with BOTH!

kmerritt AT greenville.k12.sc.us
0 Votes
+ -
Hi-,

I love Interwrite Learning???s products! Not only are they considerably cheaper like rivcbett mentioned, but they???re also proven to improve attention, test scores and overall scholastic achievement.



The Interwrite Pad is extremely versatile and allows the instructor to write notes, highlight key points, insert images and graphics or control any application on their computer.



Students who have a hard time listening and taking notes at the same time really benefit from the Pad. It allows for modifications for those with special needs. A teacher can make a hard copy of the lesson and send it home with the student or the instructor can send it electronically to the student???s home computer.



There???s also a way to win an entire Interwrite Makeover for your classroom for free right now! Interwrite Learning and TeacherTube just announced their first interactive makeover video contest where three winners will receive an Interwrite Makeover??? by creating a music video of a song of their choice. Prizes are valued at more than $15,000


Check it out at http://www.interwritelearning.com/contest/. Sounds pretty cool to me!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Smartbf33oards vs interactive whiteboards
Folk Explorer 17th Sep 2007
If it takes you five (5) years for your teaching methods to change, then you'll be long left behind as even newer technology peeps across the horizon by then. Let us know in six months how your methods have changed.
I've been selling "interactive" Whiteboards since 1992. I sold Smart (Brand name for an interactive whiteboard) for nearly 13 years and a company called Microfield Graphics; which became Polyvision. I'm very educated on Smart, Polyvision, Interwrite and Hitachi Corporate companies, the product lines themselves and the support around each.

While selling Smart (we dropped Microfield Graphics), I picked up two other "like" products and found there to be MAJOR differences in the technology. I want to point out a few of the MAJOR differences of the Smart (touch sensitive) vs. the electro magnetic technology. I will compare the top three manufacturers in this industry - Smart, Promethean and Interwrite Learning.

1)Resolution - A Smart Board has roughly 70 lines of resolution per inch, compared to 500 of Promethean and 1,000 of Interwrite. Resolution shakes out to be accuracy. You'll note that when the higher resolution Boards came out, Smart put out a marketing spin as to why resolution really wasn't all that important. Basically comparing the resolution of their Board to the resolution of a projector. This is false information and a complete marketing spin on the truth behind the story.

Do you know how many teachers I've watched over the years try to use their Smart Board? For example: You're working within Microsoft Office. You want to click on File, but because of the accuracy and constant need to re-calibrate a touch sensitive Board you're "off" and unable to click directly on File to open a document. This isn't an all the time problem, this is a most of the time problem.

2.Touch Sensitive vs. Electro Magnetic: Smart's technology is 16 years old. They have not changed their technology in 16 years. How many of you would purchase a 16 year old computer for use in your classroom? I don't know of one educator who would, however they continue to purchase 16 year old technology because of a name. Touch sensitive is old and has fallen behind the newest technology available; electro magenetic. Promethean and Interwrite Learning offer the electro magnetic Boards - and they are all comprable in pricing out of the gate. Smart is a Canadian owned company (they keep their tax dollars out of U.S. eductor's hands), Promethean is a UK owned company (same deal with tax dollars) and Interwrite Learning is a U.S. owned company. When all the employees and bills are paid - they still pay the U.S. Government a hefty chunk in taxes. Which of course, helps teachers in the U.S. purchase technology and other needed items for their classrooms.

The touch sensitive technology does not allow you to use a pen and touch the Board at the same time. When a student first starts Kindergarten, they are taught to hold down the piece of paper with one hand and write with the other. You then expect them to engage a large, interactive whiteboard in a hands off manner. This isn't fair to the student and/or educator, because it isn't natural? How many teachers do you see at the end of the day, with dry-erase marker on the base of their hand from writing on the dry-erase board? A lot...why? Because it's natural to write this way. You can't with a touch sensitive Board, but you CAN with an electro magnetic Board.

Did you know that dry-erase markers will stain the Smart Board? I've seen this quite often over the last 15 years, and continue to see it today. They aren't designed for dry-erase capabilities. Throw in the occasional mistaken PERMANENT marker and you're in real trouble. Gone on vacation for a week and return to find permanent marker all over your Smart Board, you're in trouble. I don't know about Promethean, but this comes off of the Interwrite Board. Durability is crucial in your classroom, you've procured this technology with funding. When you ruin it, funding is what will replace it - not the Manufacturer's warranty.

Oh, the battery operated myth. Of course, Smart will put out a marketing spin on this technology. Why? Because they are losing major market share to it. If you're losing out to it, and you can't switch to it - your only other option is talk it down. Promethean uses a non battery pen, seems to work great. Interwrite Learning has changed to a rechargeable pen, they used to operate on AAA batteries. The rechargeable comes with a small docking station that mounts to the side of your Board. No need for batteries. Guess how many pens I've had to replace because they were either lost or stolen? ZERO! That's a myth too, the old if you lose the pen you still have your finger trick with Smart. Smart wants you to use your finger, so that you won't be prone to actually touch the Board. If you touch, you can't write with a Smart Board. If I did have a customer contact me about a lost pen (mind you, none in four years with 1000's or products in the field) I would replace it free. Why? Customer service is crucial to our business.

3 Training and Support I had found over the many years that we sold Smart Boards that training was not their forte. They claim to offer great teacher training, but like Jerry McGuire - show me the money! I was guilty of it as well. Place Smart Boards in the classroom and forget about it. Why? Smart Boards sold themselves, we didn't have to demo them. A teacher saw one at a show, heard about them, whatever - they just ordered them. We faxed off the orders, the orders shipped (usually delayed shipping because Smart is continually on back order - let me remind you, they ship from Canada) and once the client had the order, we were done. Very little support! Something I'm not proud of. However, we picked up GTCO CalComp/Interwrite Learning products 4 years ago and picked up Hitachi. I think we were still officially able to sell Polyvision, but really haven't. However, once we picked up the Interwrite Learning product line, the desire to support the product changed. First, nobody had really heard about them. Our work was cut out for us, because we had to actually demontrate the Board. The days of grabbing a crayon (that's basically what my finger on a Smart Board is) and writing over a document were gone. I had to show the nuts and bolts of the newer technologies to schools and school districts. That caused two things to happen. 1) I learned all about that technology/software and 2) so did the educator. Do you know how many classrooms I've seen where the Smart Board doesn't get any use? Or it's a projection screen? Or, or, or... complete lack of support. Unless you want a Webex. You can dial an 800 number to Alberta, Canada and get a "teacher" with Canadian teaching credentials to show you how to use your Smart Notebook software via the web.

I know how to not only sell the newer technologies, but effectively train on it. As do the trainers and support staff at Interwrite Learning. The teachers are trainers out of the classroom, with U.S. teaching credentials. If you need/want to take a Webex with an Interwrite trainer, they are U.S. based with U.S. based teaching credentials. You aren't dialing Canada for training.

I haven't seen Promethean's training, but I hear they are awesome. I have seen their software and although confusing, it looks amazing. I would like to carry both Promethean and Interwrite, but that isn't possible.

Oh, Smart. Having sold it for I don't know how many years, that relationship is over. We started selling so much Interwrte Learning technology over the Smart Technology (our conscience got in the way, it's a better product) and because of that, Smart determined we shouldn't be selling their product. No worries, as our largest customers have now standardized on Interwrite Learning. School districts chose Interwrite Learning over Smart, because of the better product, the software is much easier to use and better support from the company.

4 Airliner vs. the Interwrite Pad Hands down, the Interwrite Pad is the better product. Interwrite Learning manfuactures their IW Pad, Smart does not. Smart buys the Airliner from a company called Wacom. Smart puts the Airliner logo on their device, and ships out to the customer. The Wacom/Airliner product is completely inferior, with a low grade battery technology (always needs replaced, and susceptible to damage; over charging can lead to fire and/or explosion - Wikipedia their battery technology) and they use a Class II Bluetooth, compared to Interwrite's Class I Bluetooth. The Class I Bluetooth gives you 300' from the computer and a wireless technology that won't interfere with like devices or wireless networks. The Class II gives you 25' to 30' connectivity and it will interfere with other wireless devices.

If you want to pay less for an Airliner, go ahead. However, you don't get the same technology as the IW Pad. You'll more than likely need to replace your battery at least once, if not more. It doesn't work anything like the IW Pad, and with the IW Pad you can connect up to 7 in a classroom and share them with students in work groups. Or use just the one to control everything in your classroom. The IW Pad works independent of your Interactive Whiteboard, but just like the whiteboard. You can manage your curriculum from anywhere in the classroom, annotate over your documents and allow your students to interact with it as well. Any age of student can use the IW Pad, including those with special needs.

The IW Pad is what converted our older Smart customers over to Interwrite Learning. When it was all said and done, we made the right choice. Smart was losing market share, and continues to lose market share because it's an old technology. They have one thing going for them, and that's their name. Aside from that, they've been left in the dust.

I'm sure Interwrite Learning has something new and great coming. I'm sure Promethean does as well. As they continue to introduce new products, Smart will continue to copy it. Only, they can't put out a better product.

I'd say I'm unbiased, but I can't be - having sold 4 of the products available in this space. I did learn one thing along the way, that just because you're number one (that might be changing) - doesn't mean you have the best product available.

Have fun in the classroom, that's what it's all about!
0 Votes
+ -
Extremely Helpful
jmmckeown29@... 11th Feb 2008
Thanks so much for this info, it is extremely helpful. Do you know anything about the E-Beam or the Mimio? And, is this correct, that if damage occurs to the Smart Board, it is ruined, but the Promethian board is basically just a whiteboard?

Thanks so much
1. Resolution: Resolution yes adds a deal of questioning but what would be the additional advantage for having more lines when you can already use AutoCad with a SMARTBoard. AutoCad being a precision application is suitable enough for a SMARTBoard. Don't really see the need for the additional lines. It makes it just look better. How can you even see 1/1000 of a line in an inch. I don't think a human eye can see that individual line. So basically all it does is add a level of crispness.

2. Touch Sensitive vs. Electro Magnetic : This technology has been around just as long as touch sensitive. Yes, touch sensitive has been around longer in IWB's but is it really broken? The answer is no. It boils down to user preferences. Me personally gain a higher level of interacting when I get to use something with my hands vs. a pen, but then of course someone else may view otherwise. The argument of not being able to rest your hand on a SMARTBoard is legitimate, but could you do that with a regular whiteboard without erasing what you already wrote. End discussion.

3. Training and Support: Yes Canada and the US have different requirements, but doesn't every state as well. It is like saying we shouldn't bring up anyone from Washington because their standards are different. SMART also does recruit local teachers to be educational consultants. I don't see this as a valid argument. Yes SMART is a Canadian based company. But almost everything we buy these days is from a different country.

4. Airliner vs Interwrite Pad: Can you see your IWB 300' away. I know my eyesight isn't that good. I would rather be within 20-30' of my computer/IWB so I could engage my students.

I am not for or against any of these companies I just hate when there is a lack of validity in arguments.
0 Votes
+ -
Interwrite is Preferred by Educators
jhuddie 24th Sep 2008
I think this article pretty much says it all!

We are a professional development company that trains teachers how to use technology in the classroom. I work with 1,000's of teachers as a tech coach and trainer. I am a former teacher of 10 years and have seen all kinds of technology in the classroom. Hands down Interwrite is the best product for your classroom and overall cost. As stated SMART boards will stain if written on. Imagine having a huge screen in your room and you can ONLY use it digitally. What happens to the board when you are not using it digitally? It takes up precious space in the class. Dead Space. We've seen these boards sitting in a room stained and unused. Also without proper training for the "Digital Immigrant" teacher, they simply become a projection screen for class movies or powerpoints. With NO interaction at all.

The Interwrite (now an eInstruction company) board is dual purpose. It works as a Dry Erase board and Digital Board. The software is easy to use and teacher friendly. The open architecture software allows you to pull in any image from any application you are running and annotate over it. You can easily run Powerpoint, Word, Explorer, or any iLife Mac applications while Interwrite is running. The software also allows teachers to create their own templates and store them in the content gallery for easy access. The gallery already comes with over 8,000 images that cover k-12 grade levels.

The newest version of Interwrites software: Workspace 7.6 Exam View Edition now integrates student response systems in the software. It makes for seamless digital lessons that include digital assesment. This will save teachers time from correcting papers and assessing students. Allowing more time for teaching students. I haven't seen any other software that will integrate all those components as seamlessly and easily.

Prometean seems to be difficult to use and the product is not very durable from what I've heard. They are also a foreign company as is SMART. Interwrite/eInstruction is based in Maryland, USA!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Smartbf33oards vs interactive whiteboards
amyelizabeth94@... 2nd Mar 2008
The SMART Board is very durable! You can write on it with regular dry erase markers, and get permanent marker off. I have seen a board with scissors in it that still worked. I've also heard stories about people running over a board and it still working.
0 Votes
+ -
Would be nice if the Airliner worked. Dead batteries, costly replacements, SEVERE lag and latency, disconnecting, faulty foreign made technology. Another dead in the water produt from Smart. Tried their Senteo yet? Another dead in the water product.

Have you stopped to wonder why their losing SO MUCH market share? Same story told a 1000 different ways. Innovation is no longer their strong point; technology gimmicks - their strong point.
The pain purchase cipro 500 mg is a signal of our body that is something that does not go purchase nolvadex 10 mg . It can be because generic nolvadex 20 mg of a physical damage purchase lioresal , a kind of sickness, or of emotional perturbation. The greatest part buy cheap revatio of the types of physical pain can be dealt by analgesics.
Christopher and others: I have read a lot about educators
wanting more computers in the hands of students and
teachers. What is your take on spending the dollars on more
computers and LCD projectors vs. interactive whiteboards?
0 Votes
+ -
I am getting a mimio board because I am in a portable and
have been told Smartboards would be impossible to keep
calibrated in a portable. Would this be the case with the
mimio boards? Also, the portables are rented and nothing
can be put in that is not company installed. Many reasons,
but need to know if I am making a wise decision.
0 Votes
+ -
The best board is the one you have; if you learn to use it. This has always been the main issue with technology. The limit of most technology is the user. In the days of overhead projectors many great presentations were made. Photocopying gave us benefits but lost us colour from banda (spirit based copying). Stop whining, use your tools well with imagination and even pencil and paper can be great.
0 Votes
+ -
mimio vs Smartboard
tiger lily 22nd Mar 2009
I've used a Smartboard (brand) in the past, and frankly found the equipment cumbersome. I teach in a very small system, with very little money. The few Smartboards we have must be shared. This means the boards stay in one teacher's classroom or the media center, and rarely are used by more than 2 or 3 teachers. I recently started using mimio, and am a convert - completely. The equipment is portable, durable, and very user friendly. I just purchased a mimio pad, and absolutely love it. I will never go back, and am encouraging my building administrator to purchase these instead of any other interactive board technology. Training and support are phenomenal. I guess it doesn't hurt that mimio was purchased by Newell-Rubbermaid, and all sorts of money now is flowing.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey all!! I am a first year teacher in a
brand new school and I am writing a
grant. I hope to recieve a smart board
for my classroom to enhance learning
however, I do not know that much
about them or what they can offer in
terms of actual classroom learning.
Any tips or opinions would be helpful.
My big question is which brand is the
most beneficial? And, when thinking
about price which is the best for the
least amount of money? If you could
help with these questions i would be
very greatful! Thanks!!
0 Votes
+ -
Hey All!!
I am a first year teacher in a brand
new school! I am writing a grant and
hope to recieve a smart board. Can
anyone help me out by providing their
opinions on the smart boards? Which
smart board is the best? Which is the
best for the least amount of money?
Thank you so much your input will be
extremely useful.
0 Votes
+ -
Panaboard Experiences
solutionsguy 4th Sep 2009
Can anyone out there help me with comparing the Panasonic Elite Panaboard with the other interactive or educational white boards? I've heard of the Smartboard, Mimio and E-Beam.
0 Votes
+ -
I am using Panasonic Panaboard and I am pretty satisfied with the results. It can help the teachers and their students integrate images, video and the Internet into everyday lessons?. Anything that computer is able to do; we can do it in front of your classroom
0 Votes
+ -
I am also Panasonic Panaboard and I am pretty satisfied with the results. It can help the teachers and their students integrate images, video and the Internet into everyday lessons?. Anything that computer is able to do; we can do it in front of your classroom

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix