So just what is a 21st Century Skill?

Summary: We hear a lot about 21st Century Skills lately; I'm certainly guilty of using the phrase. There's a whole website devoted to building them (actually, there are thousands, but this one has the domain name www.

We hear a lot about 21st Century Skills lately; I'm certainly guilty of using the phrase. There's a whole website devoted to building them (actually, there are thousands, but this one has the domain name www.21stcenturyskills.org). We also know that a lot of our kids don't have them and a lot of their international counterparts are gaining them.

So what are they? My superintendent sent me a brochure on a state initiative to build 21st Century Skills and Classrooms. It was pretty vague, but I definitely got the impression I should be doing something.

Here's my take. 21st Century Skills (I'm officially coining the acronym 21CS) are the broad set of tools, knowledge, and capabilities that allow students to step into a technology-driven global economy and be successful. It doesn't mean that every kid needs to learn Ruby on Rails or have 10,000 followers on Twitter.

Rather, 21CS means getting people working together, generally with some technology making it all happen. We don't need to be in the same office, prairie-dogging over our cubicles anymore and we darn-well better have an understanding of Asian culture, global economics, and telecommunications.

Our students need to know what asynchronous communication is and how that affects collaboration. They need to know how to accept and give criticism, communicate clearly and concisely across cultural boundaries, and use a variety of technology interfaces.

21CS is so bloody broad that it's almost meaningless. Yet when a student can turn social media into a business tool and use them to produce a deliverable with contributors in 5 countries, they've certainly put those 21CS into play.

Help us focus in on 21CS. What does it mean to you and how do you incorporate them into your curricula? Talk back below.

Topics: Browser, CXO, Software Development

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

91 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • What a crock of bull

    You want to see our kids get ahead, Go back to teaching them the three R's.
    No_Ax_to_Grind
    • Agreed.

      In the US we can't even meet that requirement. What point is understanding technology if you can't read the manual when the replacement technology shows up in 18 months? What good is knowing the latest accounting software if you can't even tell when the numbers it gives you are wrong? What's the point in learning Google Doc's if you still don't know how to structure a written report?
      T1Oracle
      • +1 here. NT

        NT
        ajole
      • Reply to agreed

        I think the word you are looking for is ENGAGEMENT. Students learn when they are engaged. How we engage them is the key. Putting them in neat little rows and telling them to learn their times table may have worked in your time mate, but it doesn't seem to work now - all you end up with is behavioural issues.

        It is not about the technology, it is about the student and their needs. What do we need to do as teachers to ensure that our students become responsible citizens in the 21st century? I think technology will play a big role in what the future will look like for students entering the ducation system.
        fastpaddy
    • Not just that

      How about teaching kids how to critically analyse, and
      better still, develop a love life long learning - instead of
      just going to university and never upskill from there.

      Want to know why there is rising unemployment? because
      idiots did university - and that is where their development
      stopped. No more education, no more personal
      development. Everything came to a crashing halt the
      moment they got that degree.

      The next generation need to be flexible enough to be
      continually learning and upskilling, flexibility to change
      when required, and more importantly, the ability to
      actually analyse, critique and formulate original ideas
      rather than just regurgitating a mish mash of different
      ideas from other people (as demonstrated by the lack of
      original development in products these days - they're more
      about stealing other ideas and mashing them together in
      different combinations).
      Kaiwai
      • I think you just nailed

        21st century skills...right on.

        Chris
        mrdatahs
      • agreed...and....

        kids that get degrees in garbage that doesn't apply...who ever heard of "Films of Walt Disney" as being a 3 credit hour course - "Walking" - I kid you not - AND taking those classes and FAILING them both.......and then wondering why you can't get a job - what is the world coming to????
        waytoobusyforthisnonsense
    • How do you plan to evaluate that?

      Standardized testing? Talk about a crock of bull!
      NickNielsen
      • Oh evaluation is EASY

        Can they read "See Dick Run"?

        Can they spell their own name correctly on an employment app?

        Can they look at the change in their hand and tell you how much more they need to equal a dollar?

        Do they understsnd that the President does not make laws and is not the ruler of the US?
        No_Ax_to_Grind
        • The ones I liked . . .

          were the ones who said that since we had a Republican President, the Congress must be Republican too . . .

          Good point. I would add to that list that they have to be able to at least tell you two things that happened 20 years ago (And why they happened) . . .
          JLHenry
        • no duh <EOM>

          <EOM>
          waytoobusyforthisnonsense
    • well yes and no

      They won't really get anywhere unless they learn critical thinking, logic, and maybe a bit of governmental concepts. But, I do agree that focusing on job training for our children is bunk.
      bernalillo
      • When I went to school and especially when

        my parents went to school, learning the three Rs (reading, writing, and arithmetic) included critical thinking, logic and civics. Arithmetic taught the logic by having you understand the concepts behind the problems. Reading taught you critical thinking since most of the books I was required to do book reports on didn't come with many pictures. My high school term papers were more stringent than many college papers today.
        alaniane@...
    • Reply to what a crock of bull

      Thank-you - You just keep thinking like that and the US will lose a further 2000 000 jobs. The rest of us in the rest of the world, will gain 21st century skills and kick your sorry asses.
      fastpaddy
  • It doesn't mean anything.

    You do what's required to get the job now just as you have done before. Defining 21CS is pointless because the only skill truly relevant to this age is the ability to adapt, learn, and keep up. Knowing today's technology may not get you a job tomorrow. You need to know how to learn. Else wise, that new younger and more up to date person, is always going to be a more attractive option than keeping you around. Especially if technology continues to change the landscape of what job roles are viable and what roles are not.
    T1Oracle
    • Does ANYONE think allowing calculators in grade school

      was a good idea?

      Gee, now we need puters for kidergarden kids...

      NO WAY!
      No_Ax_to_Grind
      • It's not the calculator...

        When I was in high school I used my calculator more than any of the other students. I programmed it, I solved the problem on the board before the teacher finished writing it, and did problems that weren't even being covered yet.

        Having a calculator did not hurt me.

        It is not the tool that determines the quality of the education, it is how the tool is used that matters.

        An exercise can always be constructed in a way that requires thinking beyond the easy functions of any tool.

        Regardless, the biggest factor in the quality of education is the teacher. The teacher who proactively finds the learning difficulties that students are actually having, will be far better prepared to effective teach them. The student must have the desire to learn, but the teachers must also be well aware of the state of that progress. Without good teaches it all falls back to student interest and every student fending for themselves.
        T1Oracle
        • In high school fine, but not lower grades

          In the lower grades kids need the EXCERCISE of actualy solving math problems.

          When I was a kid, we had to memorize the multiplication table to 24 x 24. Today, naw, what for, a caluclator can do it for me.
          No_Ax_to_Grind
          • You have a point there

            However that is still an issue of how the technology is being used. In elementary all of the math should be paper and pencil, the material is too basic for more than that.

            Although, a computer could be used to teach a kid 3rd grade math but the student should be required to do the math manually. In that case the computer is not augmenting the students ability to do their school work, it is augmenting the teachers ability to instruct the student.

            Not all school technology needs to be for the student, some should be for the teacher because the teachers we have now need a lot of help.
            T1Oracle
          • Well, maybe but you have to admit

            The education (effective education) that those of us old enough to have missed "technology" aids in the school room seem to have done fine while the latest generation of high school grads can't seem to figure out how to tie their shoes laces.

            Ok, that's over dramatic but I swear when I see employment apps come across my desk I just shake my head and wonder what the heck is going on.

            A poster above ranted about the evils of standardized testing and all I hear is, "I can't meet the standard so they are wrong". Come on, the written word, 2+2=4 is in fact pretty standard and anyone having completed 13 years of schooling should be able to pull it off. As I said, everyone in my generation that attended school managed it. Maybe we were just a lot smarter???
            No_Ax_to_Grind