The one time that it's OK to buy an inkjet
Summary: I try and print as little as possible. Doing otherwise offends my green sensibilities and I can hardly ask teachers to cut down on paper consumption if I'm cranking out reams myself.
I try and print as little as possible. Doing otherwise offends my green sensibilities and I can hardly ask teachers to cut down on paper consumption if I'm cranking out reams myself. When I do print, I tend to send documents to a large shared mopier that we have, since the cost per page is the lowest of any device we own.
However, the other day I picked up an HP OfficeJet Pro L7580. It was on clearance at Staples and I walked out of the store with a high-speed printer/copier/fax/scanner and a complete set of replacement print heads and ink cartridges for $300. Regular readers will know that I'm doing everything I can to get rid of inkjets in the district; the cost of consumables is simply too high. So what the heck am I doing buying an inkjet?
Mostly, I needed a decent scanner. I need to be able to post web content quickly, archive documents, share paper documents with teachers and staff, and otherwise get rid of paper. Since the L7580 has an automatic document feeder plus a large flatbed scanner, it was almost worth the price just for the scanning capabilities. It comes with solid OCR software and scans of photographs came out brilliantly.
I'm not actually endorsing or even reviewing the L7580; in fact, it's been discontinued and replaced by the 7590. What I am suggesting, though, is that devices like this can serve a valuable purpose for some users. For users who need to print a lot, this sort of device will become very expensive over time. For users like me, though, who print very little and just need the occasional memo printed or article copied, a device like this can make a lot of sense.
When I do need to print, it's quite fast. Photographs, brochures, and other rich paper content look great. The scanner works like a champ. As with everything we do, it's simply a matter of weighing requirements to decide if it's worth making an exception to the no-inkjets rule.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Cost per print
Tip: use Ecofont, a font which saves ink
http://www.ecofont.eu/ecofont_en.html
Installation in Ubuntu:
- open your personal folder. Now Nautilus opens with the contents of your personal folder.
- make hidden files and directories visible in Nautilus
(View - show hidden files)
- in your personal folder, create a new hidden subfolder called .fonts (note the dot before fonts)
- copy the ttf into that new subfolder
- repeat the procedure in every user account
- you're done. You can now select the font in every application.
Have fun!
Greeting, Pjotr.
RE: The one time that it's OK to buy an inkjet
fcorless: I agree.
You have the point. If you look for an area where
inkjet does the work
better than a laser, definitively is in the big
formats.
Otherwise, try to justify a bad purchase, with minor
or none technical
approach, is just innocent.
OK repeat after me
Now, I think that they still teach in public schools that cotton plants and saplings are crops that can be grown, harvested, planted and re-grown.
Printing on paper is the ultimate use of a renewable resource.
The green movement is always ignorance based, but sometimes, it becomes truly moronic.
RE: OK repeat after me
RE: OK repeat after me
I agree that the green argument is a a poor one...
Printing to paper is the ultimate in a waste of time and money since much is what is printed can become outdated before it is distributed.
Green-ness is a secondary consideration.
Chris, a question ...
HOWEVER, I *rarely* print. I'm talking ... on average less than one page per month. Except, of course, at tax time. As a result, EVERY time I *did* want to print the cartridge was dried and I would have to buy a new one. I solved *that* problem by buying a monochrome laser.
But here's the problem/question I have: I still have use for the sheet-fed [b]scanner[/b]. The problem is that because the ink cartridge isn't working, the entire unit fails to activate properly. Is there some way I can "trick" it into thinking the cartridge is okay? My understanding is that sensors in the cartridge just measure levels, but putting in water didn't help. (Don't tell me to buy a separate scanner. I don't do THAT much scanning.)
By the way, LOADS of people have old all-in-one units that could serve as donated scanners if this problem can be resolved.
Reset printer
Another exception
Good luck when your chipped ink cartridge ...
Just make sure you print *something* once a week
Just make sure you print *something* once a week
In the HPs, the jets are part of the cartridge, hence new with every replaced cartridge. Hence if they clog from lack of use, the whole printer is not useless as it was with Epson.
Still good to use occasionally!
Big Mistake - Never a good time to buy HP printers
There is never a right time to buy a HP anymore.
About 3 weeks ago, you could have gotten a MFC-240c from Bestbuy for $39 and avoid the bloatware of HP software.
The 240c will even run on a 98/Me machine. I don't believe HP makes any inkjet that would work on Win 9x.
At 1/10th of the money you spent on the HP Officesh*t, you could have a superior product.
Or for $79 they had the 490cw which has Wi-Fi built in.
You can put it anywhere in your wi-fi range and all you need is one wire, the AC cord.
I have one although I didn't need one, as I had installed a half dozen and was very impressed, even tho I am anti-inkjet also.
Good luck.
Win9x ???
Is it responsible...
old one is completing its task to spec?
Up until 08, I still had clients with 98SE
machines that were fulfilling their jobs just
fine.
You didnt by an inkjet..
but ..i do admit..there are probably no adf scanners that dont print that are under 500
Why didn't you buy the Kodak?