ZDNet Education

Christopher Dawson

.XXX domain: A bit like Amsterdam...only different

By | June 26, 2010, 9:08pm PDT

Summary: Does the .xxx top-level domain actually mean anything for us? Not really. Playboy.com isn’t going anywhere.

For some time now, many groups have called for a special .xxx domain that clearly designates pornographic content on the Internet. How easy would it be to simply filter everything in the so-called “Internet Red-Light District?” Now that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has tentatively agreed to create such a top-level domain, don’t go dumping your content filters just yet.

Guess what? It’s just a name. Have you ever been to Amsterdam? It’s an incredibly cool city with rich history, beautiful museums, countless cultures and all of their associated tasty food, easy walks through the canals, friendly people, and a Red Light District that must be seen to be believed. Even if you have no interest in the pot, the prostitutes, or the live sex shows, it’s worth a quick walk through just to say, “Huh…I don’t think I’m in Kansas anymore.” However, coffeeshops selling marijuana and hash can be found throughout Amsterdam. The concentration is highest in the Red Light District, but they certainly exist elsewhere. Same for prostitution. It’s legal and regulated throughout the Netherlands.

The .xxx domain will be no different. According to an article in the New York Times,

…Most…members [of the Free Speech Coalition] planned to continue operating out of their dot-com domains…

In fact, the Times story suggested that only about 10% of the adult sites on the web would adopt a .xxx domain name. It is, after all, just a name. ICANN doesn’t set laws or policies. It simply decides, among other things, what top-level domains are available for registration and to whom. It isn’t in a position to force Hustler to change the domain name for which it has paid.

So here’s what this development boils down to for schools, parents, and anyone else who wants to regulate how much pornography kids see online: nothing. Even some large religious groups opposed the creation of the .xxx domain, suggesting that creation of such a domain would actually encourage online pornography. Interestingly, the city of Amsterdam has moved in recent years to restrict their own Red Light District, citing criminal activity and abuse of the laissez-faire laws in the city. Will the use of the .xxx domain end any differently? Probably not.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer and consultant with years of experience in educational technology and web-based systems. In 2011, he became the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network SaaS provider.

Disclosure

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., by day and a freelance writer and educational technology consultant by night. Well, most of his colleagues at WizIQ are based in India, so really he's working with them whenever he can stay awake. He has worked for his local school district as a teacher and technology director, for the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, and for Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen-IDEC, Inc.). He has also consulted with STATNet and Cytyc Corporation and retains close ties with X2 Development Corporation (now owned by Follett Software, the supplier of the student information system he administered for several years). Follett is paying him a monthly honorarium to act as a presenter for their "SIS Voices for Student Achievement" community (he produces occasional blog posts and hosts a monthly webinar on the use of student information systems to inform data-driven instruction and school-wide change. He regularly purchases and/or recommends Dell hardware. This is because Dell makes good hardware and has truly committed itself to education in innovative ways, particularly with their "Connected Classroom" initiative. It isn't because he has dealings with the company through his role at WizIQ (which he does) or because they have provided him with long-term loans of a variety of equipment for in-depth testing (which they have). Intel (reference designer for the Classmate PCs he has implemented in his local schools) has provided him with long-term loans of Classmate PCs for testing, as have Dell and Lenovo with their educational offerings. He may report on any of these companies as his experiences with them have direct bearing on educational technology; positive reports are not necessarily an endorsement and he receives no direct financial compensation from these companies or any others. Intel paid all expenses for his attendance at the 2009 Intel Classmate PC Ecosystem Summit which he attended as the sole representative of the technology press. He was invited to attend in 2010 but his wife would have killed him if he spent 3 days in Vegas geeking out and left her home alone with a new baby. Acer provided him with a 50% discount on an Aspire One netbook in early 2009 after he tested it for 30 days through their educational seed program. He liked the netbook at the time but it has since broken and sits unused in his office. Canonical sent him Ubuntu lanyards, t-shirts, and mousepads for his kids. He stole one of the lanyards and proudly hangs his keys from it and occasionally features his 8-year old wearing an oversized Ubuntu t-shirt on his Facebook profile. Gunnar Optiks sent him a pair of computer glasses to evaluate for a holiday gift guide. He is wearing them now as he types this because they never asked for them back and they rock out loud. Seriously - they work brilliantly and make it much easier to spend 20 hours a day staring at an LCD. If they ever asked for them back, he would fork over the $99 and buy a pair. Microsoft gave him 2 free copies of Office 2010 professional, a desktop clock, and a useless book on Office 2010 when he attended the launch of Office/Sharepoint 2010. He occasionally uses the SharePoint lanyard they gave him instead of the Ubuntu lanyard for his keys, but feels dirty afterwards. Adobe provided him with a pre-release version of the CS5 Master Collection for evaluation and ultimately provided a full, licensed copy for ongoing testing of educational applications of this admittedly expensive software. Like the Gunnars, if the license expires or they come out with CS6, he'd actually go out and buy it himself. Which is saying something, because he's actually pretty cheap. Any other companies wishing to send him cool things to evaluate, wear, or otherwise adorn his kids are more than welcome to; he promises to disclose it here if he keeps any of the stuff. Finally, because WizIQ is a virtual classroom and learning network provider, Chris, as VP of Marketing, frequently interacts with, seeks out deals with, and directly or indirectly competes with a whole lot of LMS, SIS, and other Education 2.0 companies. In general, he'll limit his reporting about these companies to news that does not impact his relationship with them or with WizIQ. If he reports on them, it's because what they are doing is newsworthy or worth the attention of his readers and not because he's trying to broker some deal, damage competition, or otherwise advance his position in his day job. LMS and SIS companies, along with other online learning communities, are a pretty important part of Ed Tech. If he stops reporting on them completely, there won't be a whole lot left. He'll be sure to call out any overt conflicts of interest if they are unavoidable. Finally, Follett Software Company pays him a little tiny honorarium every month to present on their SIS Voices webinars and to write the occasional blog or discussion thread for them. Since Follett recently bought X2 (maker of an awesome web-based SIS that Chris just happened to have used, served in advisory groups for, and frequently reported on), this is probably also worth disclosing.

Biography

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson grew up in Seattle, back in the days of pre-antitrust Microsoft, coffeeshops owned by something other than Starbucks, and really loud, inarticulate music. He escaped to the right coast in the early 90's and received a degree in Information Systems from Johns Hopkins University. While there, he began a career in health and educational information systems, with a focus on clinical trials and related statistical programming and database modeling. This focus led him to several positions at Johns Hopkins, a couple-year stint in private industry, teaching high school math and technology, and 2 years as the technology director for his local school district. Most recently, he started his own consulting business and is now the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network provider. He lives with his wife, five kids (yes, 5), 2 dogs, and a hateful cat in a small town in north-central Massachusetts. Although he is no longer teaching, his roles with WizIQ and ZDNet allow him to continue helping students and teachers add value to education with technology rather than merely adding to the bottom line.

Talkback Most Recent of 34 Talkback(s)

  • The Net has become a cesspool
    Pornography upon more pornography, malware of every stripe, phishing scams, keyloggers and botnets. The criminal underworld - and anti-social derelicts by the score - are having a feast on us. The WWW has morphed into a modern day acronym for the wild, wild west. Less lethal, but infinitely more degrading. It's like having a not particularly attractive neighbor running around in the nude 24/7 with every window wide open, to including the bathroom portals.

    The Internet remains the only communications medium still largely unregulated, and that's basically due to its embryonic state. While it could be argued that certain upsides derive from its seminal liassez-faire status, riding shotgun in the shadows is layer upon layer of murk and mire -- filth by any other name. I'm all for a designated electronic playground for adults (if that's your bag), but splashed over every corner of the medium, to include ready access to our young, crosses the bounds of acceptability and responsibility imo.

    The time for a designated .xxx domain zone has come. If nations can't decide to do it unilaterally, then it is up to each one to design its own pipe sieve for the fix. Before one's libertarian or anarchistic impulse kicks into gear, it might be worth asking what other part of society remains as patently unregulated? While many of us prefer governmental control(s) scaled to an absolute minimum, who in their right mind would advocate the elimination of regulatory facets like police and military forces, let alone legislative and judicial oversight? Why should the Net and its delivery pipeline be any different?

    Such action(s) will naturally spur debate and challenges pertinent to free speech (and its regulation) as it tabs our virtual world, but so be it. Like everything else in "civilized" society, the necessary particulars can be hammered out in due course - and hopefully reined to a bare minimum. But segregating smut on the internet should be held to the same standard as it is anywhere else. In much the same way as the majority of rational folks don't want to see the spread of red light districts to each and every street corner!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    klumper
    27th Jun 2010
  • Got news for you, the Internet IS regulated.
    @klumper

    Just because something is on the internet as opposed to printed on a piece of paper doesn't make it any less illegal. Child porn is just as illegal on a computer as it is would be in a magazine or videotape. Threats in emails are just as illegal a they are in regular mail. Fraud is just as illegal.

    You are wrestling with two different problems that have nothing to do with regulating the internet. First, whether you like it or not, porn is legal. The internet just makes it a lot cheaper and easier to access than it used to be. Your second problem is more pernicious: how to enforce your particular values on the internet without having to adhere to the values of others.

    If I had my preference, there are many types of speech and information that would be suppressed on the internet, including some types that are undoubtedly near and dear to your heart. Fortunately for everyone, neither you nor I seem to be getting our wishes.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    terry flores
    28th Jun 2010
  • Got news for you, the Internet IS regulated.... Really?
    @terry flores... You think the internet is regulated? Maybe so... some places (like China) actively regulate access to content originating from outside their borders. They get lots of criticism from those who don't agree with their "what's allowed versus what's forbidden" policies. It's an effort that cannot succeed.

    Since (as you yourself describe) content is regulated in the jurisdiction where the storage hardware resides, we see many servers are in jurisdictions where the content is either legal, or the laws are not effectively enforced.

    So we are left with enforcing "our laws" by focusing enforcement on "our citizens" that cross the line.

    I agree with that, I say forget about restricting content (the Chinese method) and just make sure that we can use the internet infrastructure to track down and prosecute the USA citizens who might set up USA servers that violate USA laws as well as track down and prosecute those USA citizens who view and download content that violates the USA laws.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jilindi@...
    28th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    @terry flores

    Well said, that man, (assumption made) - the internet is really just a microcosm of the world in which we live. I've travelled quite a lot and have found that the best way to explore places is to get lost in them, armed with some basic information about where it might be unwise or unsafe to go, and have a contingency plan in case I wander into a dodgy area.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    chrispy7
    28th Jun 2010
  • Yes, really
    @klumper...

    As terry flores points out, porn is legal, child porm is illegal. It does not matter whether in hard copy or in electronic format.

    You can ask that people that host child porn be prosecuted. You can ask that people downloading such child porn be prosecuted. You would be totally right. But you cannot ask that people who are hosting or viewing straight porn in the USA are prosecuted because porn is legal (in the USA, not necessarily in other countries).

    The problem comes when something is legal in one country and not in another. Child porn is illegal everywhere. Straight porn is forbidden in a significant number of countries, most of them authoritarian ones. In others, it is simply a matter of bad taste. If you try to stop that, you end up setting filters like China has.

    But the solution that you indicate, such as the censorship being performed in China, is no good. Why? Because you start censoring porn "for the good of the citizens". Then you start censoring other things. By the time that they start censoring the opposition -like China does- you realize that you are in a dictatorship. Do you really prefer that?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Samun56
    28th Jun 2010
  • Wandervogel impulses
    @chrispy7

    Well said, that man, (assumption made) - the internet is really just a microcosm of the world in which we live. I've travelled quite a lot and have found that the best way to explore places is to get lost in them, armed with some basic information about where it might be unwise or unsafe to go, and have a contingency plan in case I wander into a dodgy area.

    Does this same hip, wandervogel kindly look below since orderly replies rarely take with this new layout.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    klumper
    28th Jun 2010
  • It won't!
    @klumper

    A .xxx domain will not segregate 'smut' besides what is smut? I've never considered nudity or sexual acts between consenting men and women as in any way 'smutty' or 'dirty'. No-one HAS to access pornography and for those who choose to (incidentally a far larger group of people than most self-righteous people will admit) it is far easier and less degrading at free online sites than eg buying an adult magazine at the local or not so local shop! I'm VERY concerned at your use of 'unregulated due to 'embryonic state' '. WHAT NONSENSE... The Internet in its present form has been around for nearly 20 years, rather a grown-up status. Heaven help us if so called do-gooders for power or control reasons of their own had any say in most of the Internet. Basically most free and many paid for 'porn' sites will (sensibly!) choose not to register as .xxx and as many are out of US influence, SO WHAT!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    chaz15
    28th Jun 2010
  • PS to the zdnet webmaster
    It's like having a not particularly attractive neighbor running around in the nude 24/7 with every window wide open, to including the bathroom portals.

    Simple typos could be fixed on the fly, if the EDIT CONTROLS worked as they should! Is that asking too much to provide?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    klumper
    27th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    @klumper How would you want the "EDIT CONTROLS" to work? "to" and "including" are both legitimate words. The WAY in which they are put together is NOT legitimate.
    Neither word is misspelled therefore a spell checker would not find either of them as typos.
    Do you know of any "EDIT CONTROLS" that correct syntax as well as spelling? I don't. Therefore, I found no reason to "correct" the typos made and, yes, I DO find that "too much to provide" so I have to defend the webmaster in this case.
    He/she should have recognized the error upon proofreading but, too many times, we seem to read what we MEANT to write rather what what we actually wrote when we reread it. "To err is human...", etc., etc.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    xffcapt01
    28th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    It's way overdue. It will not impede adults from accessing porn while making it easier for those who want to avoid it do so -- including parents for their kids. The range of ******** AND WAY BEYOND is too crazy to leave on the mainstream web. Some of the $h!t I've seen... well, just when you thought you've seen it all, Two Girls One Cup comes along!

    And, yes, that should even include Playboy. Publications like Maxim, otoh, where we're talking revealing clothing but not actual nudity (maybe a little butt cheek and cleavage -- what would be "cheesecake shots" today) -- AND it's at least interspersed with actual articles and opinion columns -- while obviously geared towards MEN and not kids I think should stay in the .com realm.

    The comparison to Amsterdam is ridiculous. There is NOTHING culturally redeeming at say, http://throatgaggers.com/ (never been there before, I just had a hunch that domain would exist -- too easy a guess). And yet, even though I personally think that the "Piss Christ"... er... "piece of art" is totally idiotic I would think it would go under the .com umbrella ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ ). And Helmut Newton? I say .com -- even though a Google flagged a webpage I just clicked on through an image search as being known to be dangerous to my computer -- if I used Windows ( http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://ytodolodemastambien.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/helmut-newton1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.datakun.com/wp/helmut-newton.html&usg=__GYx4uJqWSscNMUzmMXHrdzvgUGw=&h=1024&w=828&sz=260&hl=en&start=3&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=YFxOiA9KxnLm7M:&tbnh=150&tbnw=121&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhelmut%2Bnewton%2Bphotos%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dsafari%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Den%26tbs%3Disch:1 )

    Having said all that I know interpretation would be difficult and whoever decides what goes where will surely get some things wrong. But my God, just imagine how much ******** spam and tricks will be rendered inert? Yeah, not all -- but a lot!

    It's the lessor of two evils and I'm all for it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dropzone@...
    28th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    @dropzone@...

    "whoever decides what goes where will surely get some things wrong"

    You have completely missed the main point--there is NOBODY empowered to make such decisions. While ANYBODY can decide for themselves that they consider ANY given site to be "pornographic," NOBODY has the authority to force any site to use the "xxx" domain. It's purely voluntary.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    6502coder
    28th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    @6502coder

    it's VOLUNTARY??

    How lame. I apologize because I skimmed this column.

    Regardless, just because there is currently no enforcement does not mean it is a bad idea; they just have to enforce it! Movies, games, music and magazines are rated to make it easier for people to make decisions (or at least for those parents that do). The web is too fluid a thing to leave such things to self-governance.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dropzone@...
    28th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    @dropzone@... Agree. But creating the domains is only part of the issue, the other is worldwide legal measures to move the content. I'd suggest that .XXX is hard core and .AO is anything you wouldn't want your children to see. No barriers to adults, easy to set up home and education routers for security, and even if you are a total luddite the router is not allowed to be sold in your country unless it is preconfigured appropriately. Why do I believe this? Because I live in Australia where we have a total flip called Senator Conroy who plans to monitor every packet I look at ....to protect the kiddies he says! We think he is more interested in ultimate population control than protecting children. Doing this is no silver bullet...but it is arguably the most sensible start and infinitely preferable to doing nothing or to monitoring every packet. I was in the Paris recently and in a Musee d'Orsay I saw a painting called 'The Origin of the World' by Courbet. Is this art? Maybe, but I wouldn't want a bunch of 11 year olds acccessing it on school computers. Letting politicians and bureaucrats decide our social and sexual and political mores can only end in draconian states (China?). Applying draconian laws to offenders who promote inappropriate behaviours to children (drugs and sexuality) is not. I think this will be a win win situation. If I am an education worker I can feel reasonably confident the children are protected, if I am a sex worker I won't get so many time wasters. And if I am a gormless parent who does not care or understand, or worse, believes my little johnny wouldn't do that, I'll have a measure of protection I do not have now. As an I.T. person who has spent countless hours recovering computers from little johnny's foolishness ( click here to get free porn and destroy the planet...click!) I believe that it is not an all or nothing debate, but a what do we monitor and why debate. Unless I am missing it, those who oppose this idea have no alternative that will work.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    leigh@...
    28th Jun 2010
  • LOL!
    So, this zdnet.com site is set to automatically sensor the word in my post, "hrdkr" (even though that word can have nothing to do with porn), but I snuck $h!t through and it let "piss" through but not "blsh!t"

    Hmm... let's try this: This b!tch was dissing the Mac so I shoved her onto the floor and pissed on her face. I'm a Mac ******** who doesn't take no ********.

    lol. Sorry ZDNET; I won't do that again. But it IS a relevant post! happy
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dropzone@...
    28th Jun 2010
  • RE: .XXX domain: What's in a name?
    I don't see the ".XXX" domain names protecting anybody from anything. The sex trade will undoubtedly move into these "new addresses" to make it easier for their "new clients" to find their products easier. They will also keep their "old addresses" because (1) in general, they don't want to lose their old customers, (2) more specifically, they don't want to lose their high dollar wall street wizards, bankers, and elected officials whose daytime sex purchases from their office computer might be more easily blocked by the office IT staff.

    Even though sex trade (like prostitution) is legal in some jurisdictions, it still thrives where it is not legal (or wanted by the moral majority). Why would we expect the virtual sex trade to evolve differently?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jilindi@...
    28th Jun 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources