A telescope in a cubic kilometer of ice

By | December 10, 2008, 10:29am PST

University of Delaware (UD) scientists and engineers are currently working at South Pole under very harsh conditions. This research team is one of the many other ones working on the construction of IceCube, the world’s largest neutrino telescope in the Antarctic ice, far beneath the continent’s snow-covered surface. When it is completed in 2011, the telescope array will occupy a cubic kilometer of Antarctica. One of the lead researchers said that ‘IceCube will provide new information about some of the most violent and far-away astrophysical events in the cosmos.’ The UD team has even opened a blog to cover this expedition. It will be opened up to December 22, 2008. I guess they want to be back in Delaware for Christmas, but read more…

IceCube neutrino telescope

You can see above a drawing of IceCube. Here are the comments from Tom Gaisser, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at UD about these images. “Each line represents one cable. The darker dots between 1400 meters and 2400 meters each represent a digital optical module (DOM). The Eiffel Tower is shown for scale. The dots on the surface represent IceTop stations. Each station has two tanks filled with clear ice, and each tank has two DOMs embedded in the ice. IceCube is now half finished with 40 “strings” of DOMs and 40 IceTop stations. This season we are installing 16 more strings and 19 surface stations. The DOM consists of glass pressure vessel that contains a sensitive photomultiplier tube (PMT) that can detect individual photons of light, a computer and an atomic clock. Each clock is synchronized to a single GPS clock on the surface. The computer digitizes the profile of each signal, provides a time stamp and sends the data to the surface.” (Credit: Tom Gaisser, UD; link to a larger picture)

The UD team is composed from many scientists and students belonging to the Bartol Research Institute which is part of the Department of Physics and Astronomy. They are maintaining a specific website about their Antarctic Research expedition. The blog mentioned above is accessible from this link.

But what is exactly the IceCube telescope? “Rather than a giant lens aimed at the heavens, the IceCube telescope consists of kilometer-long strings of 60 optical detectors frozen more than a mile deep in the Antarctic ice like beads on a necklace. Atop each string of deep detectors sits a pair of 600-gallon IceTop tanks, each containing two optical detectors. Ironically, it takes about seven weeks for the water in the IceTop tanks to freeze perfectly, without bubbles or cracks, which could obstruct the tiny flash that occurs when particles pass through the ice.”

And why this future telescope is exclusively focused on neutrino research? “Neutrinos are among the most fundamental constituents of matter. Because they have no electrical charge and interact only weakly, these particles can travel millions of miles through space. Neutrinos can pass right through planets, and they can emerge from deep inside regions of intense radiation such as the accretion disk around a massive black hole. The surface IceTop detectors measure cascades of particles generated by high-energy cosmic rays showered down from above, while the detectors deep in the ice monitor neutrinos passing up through the planet from below. When a flash of light is detected, the information is relayed to the nearby IceCube Lab, where the path of the particle can be reconstructed and scientists can trace where it came from, perhaps an exploding star or a black hole.”

For more information about the IceCube neutrino telescope, you can read
this Wikipedia page if your time is limited. On the other hand, you can spend hours reading tons of information available from the IceCube official website at the University of Wisconsin, which is coordinating 33 institutions worldwide collaborating to this project.

Sources: Tracey Bryant, UDaily, University of Delaware, December 9, 2008; and various websites

You’ll find related stories by following the links below.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Roland Piquepaille

http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?page_id=566

Biography

Roland Piquepaille

Roland Piquepaille passed away in early January 2009. He lived in Paris, France, and spent most of his career in software, mainly for high performance computing and visualization companies, working for example for Cray Research and Silicon Graphics. He left the corporate world in 2001 after 33 years immersed into it. In 2002, he started a blog about technology trends and how they will affect our lives.
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

They are detected
seanferd 14th Dec 2008
Neutrino detection has been going on for a long time. What is being done now is building a better neutrino telescope with which to map the sky. Another type of neutrino detection is used elsewhere to learn more about the nature of neutrinos which, among other things, would help to refine the Standard Model.

There are always practical applications for the knowledge gained through research. If all research were directed only at ideas that would provide some perceived economic benefit, we wouldn't know half of what we know. We most likely would not even have modern computers, for example.

As far as funding goes, 300 mil is not a whole lot, and it comes from several different entities. Then again, perhaps Belgium would be better off providing scholarships for marketing majors, or the NSF could fund more weapons-oriented research. For some forms of "alternative" energy, we are well past the research stage, and into the "build it, already" phase.

I can easily understand why different people would like to see different projects promoted, as we all have our own interests. However, I can't see why certain projects should be funded to the exclusion of others. Frankly, I think that U.S. corporations and governments alone waste enough money to fund everybody's favorite research projects four or five times over.
0 Votes
+ -
ice
Monosdeja 10th Dec 2008
what a waste of money
0 Votes
+ -
Who really cares what you think?
ths40 10th Dec 2008
(nt)
0 Votes
+ -
cares
Monosdeja 10th Dec 2008
money could be used for scholarships, instead it is putting tubes in the ice
0 Votes
+ -
Re: What a waste of money
V@... Updated - 11th Dec 2008
I'd have to agree.

I love scientific discoveries and science in general.
However, when it comes to the elusive neutrino, I just can't see the point in all the effort. It just hasn't any practical use whether they detect them or not. They've been trying for 30yrs to detect these elusive buggers.

Even if they did detect something, it might just turn out to be a detector glitch.

It sets a bad example for the pursuit of science, when there are better things to invest time and money in. Like alternative energy, carbon-neutrality etc.
0 Votes
+ -
They are detected
seanferd 14th Dec 2008
Neutrino detection has been going on for a long time. What is being done now is building a better neutrino telescope with which to map the sky. Another type of neutrino detection is used elsewhere to learn more about the nature of neutrinos which, among other things, would help to refine the Standard Model.

There are always practical applications for the knowledge gained through research. If all research were directed only at ideas that would provide some perceived economic benefit, we wouldn't know half of what we know. We most likely would not even have modern computers, for example.

As far as funding goes, 300 mil is not a whole lot, and it comes from several different entities. Then again, perhaps Belgium would be better off providing scholarships for marketing majors, or the NSF could fund more weapons-oriented research. For some forms of "alternative" energy, we are well past the research stage, and into the "build it, already" phase.

I can easily understand why different people would like to see different projects promoted, as we all have our own interests. However, I can't see why certain projects should be funded to the exclusion of others. Frankly, I think that U.S. corporations and governments alone waste enough money to fund everybody's favorite research projects four or five times over.
0 Votes
+ -
But this is bad.. they are destroying the ice flow.. What about global warming ? oh wait a min.. I forgot GW is just another market rip off like the y2k computer problem..

Got to keep Al Gore rich
0 Votes
+ -
Speaking of Mr. Gore
DevMan99 12th Dec 2008
Did you know that in JUST 1 month Mr. Gore's home consumes 1.6 times more energy than the average home does in an ENTIRE year!
Oh yes, and he invented the internet. Why does anybody believe anything that baffoon says?
0 Votes
+ -
Costs
Gradius2 14th Dec 2008
Well, the cost will be around $271 millions, is nothing compared to what Bush used on Iraq (over $2 trillions) and thanks to him the terrorism is global and for all eternity now (no kidding).

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix