An operating system for smart cities

Summary: Cities could be virtually running themselves with an operating system that looks just like a PC OS but keeps buildings, traffic and services running smoothly.

The game is on to link up networks of billions of distributed sensors, systems, and intelligence across urban environments via city-scale operating systems. (How else would a smart city be smart?).

The BBC recently reported about an operating system for cities that looks just like a PC operating system but keeps buildings, traffic and services running smoothly. Developed by Living PlanIT, the Urban OS channels all the data coming from sensors and services into an over-arching control system.

Its purpose is to intelligently monitor and automate traffic lights, air conditioning, water pumps, and other systems that influence the quality of urban life while driving down the costs of operating a city.

The underlying technology of the Urban OS is based on software created by McLaren Electronic Systems, the same company that creates sensors for Formula One cars. Living PlanIT is partnering with IT vendors such as Microsoft, Cisco Systems and Deutsche Telekom on various pieces of the operating system.

Said Steve Lewis, the head of Living PlanIT:

"If you were using an anatomy analogy, the city has a network like the nervous system, talking to a whole bunch of sensors gathering the data and causing actions. We distribute that nervous system into the parts of the body - the buildings, the streets and other things."

If the vision sounds lofty, consider this: the investment in smart city technology is projected to total $108 billion between 2010 and 2020, according to a new research report from Pike Research. That figure includes information and communications infrastructure, all which will require adequate monitoring and management.

Related:

Report: Smart cities taking off Handy infographic tells you if your city has a future Interview: MIT's SENSEable City

Topics: CXO, Operating Systems, Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

16 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • blue screen on city OS snarls traffic ...

    film at 11pm ... oh wait ... traffic cams are down too ... and the city employees that need to fix it can't get their e-mail ... and crap ... the sewage treatment system has stopped ...

    This is truly a BRILLIANT plan
    BrentRBrian
    • RE: An operating system for smart cities

      @BrentRBrian : LMAO - indeed even if there are never ever again any "blue screens", just wait for the first natural disaster to hit, and the next, etc. In the midst of all that, the places will have to put up with untrained humans trying to manage things they have no understanding of, because the trained individuals were "put out to pasture".... It's not just the "central processors" that are important, but maintenance of the entire organization-wide infrastructure.
      Willnott
  • Intriguing

    Lots of heavy hitter partners like Cisco and Microsoft are involved. What does the underpinnings of UrbanOS look like? The details are a little vague on how the system is put together.
    Your Non Advocate
    • RE: An operating system for smart cities

      @facebook@... <br><br>Thanks for reading and I agree details are light, much of it the fault of my own. I extracted more detail from Living PlanIT and provided it down below. Having researched this, I think the main driver will be adoption of smart grids. This will provide the backbone to tie it all together. Also, noteworthy is that all tech titans are staking a claim, including IBM (<a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/software/industry/intelligent-oper-center/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/software/industry/intelligent-oper-center/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www-01.ibm.com/software/industry/intelligent-oper-center/</a></a>) and Oracle (<a href="http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/public-sector/smart-cities.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/public-sector/smart-cities.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/public-sector/smart-cities.htm</a></a>). <br><br>"Living PlanIT's products and services address the entire lifecycle of a set of buildings and infrastructure from envisioning through to decommissioning. The lifecycle is enabled through the Urban Operating System (UOS) which provides a unified platform for the instrumentation, control, and optimization of urban environments, based on network and data center hardware. UOS software allows a router to replace traditional building controllers, which are normally single-purpose devices. The building benefits from a shared infrastructure that supports deep sensing, responsive real-time control, and high-speed flexible networking.<br><br>A wide range of sensors and actuators, supplied by Living PlanIT and its partners, communicate over IPv6 and allow a complete picture of building state, usage, and operations to be continually maintained, allowing constant optimization of energy, resources, environment, and occupant support and convenience systems. The UOS provides near-real-time communication of events across an entire city and beyond, meeting multi-level control needs via applications such as energy generation / storage / distribution / demand shaping and traffic and transportation management.<br><br>The UOS provides a rich set of application services, which support 'PlaceApps': applications that are context-sensitive - including location - and can be experienced via a wide range of devices. PlaceApps can be thought of as the equivalent of an iPhone app in an urban environment. The UOS makes building such applications easy and ensures through its extensive security and privacy framework that applications only have access to data and control capabilities that they should have, depending on the user."
      christopher_jablonski
  • We're not that smart

    About a third of the human race has an ingrained bias in favor of ever-more-centralized authority in the hands of an ever-wiser and smarter entity. It is these people who build things like the European government in Brussels, and who dream of things like this article. They always imagine that they are working to make the world a better place.

    Their fallacy lies in believing that human beings are capable of understanding and guiding systems of nearly infinite complexity -- something that human beings cannot in fact do. The people in Europe are about to learn The Hard Way that the Peter Principle applies to human beings as a whole; that there is a level of complexity that no human or collection of humans is competent to manage.

    The people who believe in centralized control of everything will never stop trying to achieve it no matter how much human misery they create in the process. They think they're helping.
    Robert Hahn
    • But, who is?

      @Robert Hahn - Someone must make the five-year plan. Yes, comrade? :-)
      pwatson
    • RE: An operating system for smart cities

      @Robert Hahn I've heard of self-hating gays and self-hating Jews... you're the first self-hating human I've ever run across!

      I'm sorry you believe we're such limited creatures, but meanwhile we'll continue unraveling the genetic code - and even design our own new life forms! - building machinery so complex that no one person knows how it all works (space shuttle), and controlling whole cities through smart systems to conserve water and energy and optimize traffic flow and reduce risks of traffic accidents, etc. As we build ever-more-complex computers (including quantum computers soon!) and unravel the secrets of intelligence, perhaps we'll turn over regulating our economy to the new hyper-intelligences we create. We won't let the libertarian philosophy stop us from working together to achieve together what we can't achieve alone.
      jgm@...
    • RE: An operating system for smart cities

      @Robert Hahn I think you grossly overestimate the complexity of the systems involved. Nearly infinite complexity? Hardly. We have computers now that are capable of accurately simulating the planet we live on. All variables can be quantified when it comes to the tangible aspects of our existence, in other words the aspects that can be controlled by a centralized system. Now I tend to agree that as humans we can't do the number crunching that is involved in managing all the variables of existence but, we are a tool using species and our tools are pretty darn good at this point and can, in point of fact, do that number crunching. The way I see such a system operating is to have everything linked back to a single central hub so that when traffic lights go down or the sewer backs up instead of waiting on someone to pick up a phone and call it in the system recognizes the problem and contacts the appropriate human agencies to deal with it. I don't see anyone advocating putting Joe Human out of the loop entirely, just making it more efficient to deploy Joe Human where he needs to be in a timely manner.
      Str0b0
    • The system will never happen, especially in Europe, and it certainly

      won't happen in the U.S.

      With all of the progressives and union workers complaining about technology taking over their jobs, the system is immediately doomed to work only in the imaginations of the developers and architects.
      adornoe
  • RE: An operating system for smart cities

    and no one will EVER figure out a way to hack a building. <br><*/sarcasm*><br>A network worm might now become a serious terrorist weapon, capable of doing ACTUAL damage. Woe be unto the company that tries to migrate to a new building OS, or doesn't pay their upgrade/maintenance fee, or the NEW TENANT that moves into an old building and is used to (or simply wants) a different system.
    michael.tindall@...
  • UrbanOS - not ready for prime time

    Humans can fill in and adjust when someone can't perform a task or functions. Even when they do, emergencies stretch our capabilities. Any UrbanOS would need the ability to use many servers which could take over with very little information or support. Something like the kind of infrastructure Google and Amazon use, self healing, redundant, and very loosely coupled. I doubt that they have worked out the details.
    devils_advocate
  • Beam me out of here...

    As if Microsoft Corporation does not already have a monopoly control on most of the planet...<br><br>The only way anything like this should be considered is if all specifications from Living PlanIT and Urban OS are devoid of any brand names and product names. Only open standards may be specified. ISO, ITU, ANSI, etc.<br><br>The problem with that is that we will now have the theater of operations mapped out in public for attackers. We do not yet know enough about security to do this.<br><br>Yes, individual systems are under attack. Better to leave it as individual systems until we understand and implement adequate security. At least this would make it less likely that entire states or countries could be taken down just by clicking one OK button.
    pwatson
    • RE: An operating system for smart cities

      @pwatson We will never know enough about security. Security is not static it evolves and as the means to secure systems evolve the means to circumvent those systems also evolves. It's an arms race.
      Str0b0
  • RE: An operating system for smart cities

    I am most curious about <b>whose</b> building <i>they</i> plan to monitor and control!

    If they are referring to governmentally owned buildings, then that is one thing. If they plan to <i>stick their noses (and sensors) inside my house,</i> <b>they can stick it where the sun doesn't shine.</b> End of discussion.
    fatman65536
  • RE: An operating system for smart cities

    if microsoft is in it then it is mess up again
    ttx19
  • RE: An operating system for smart cities

    What happens when you have to re-boot? Or worse yet, wipe and re-build??? Yikes!
    tobeaman