Five signs the mobile phone form factor is maxed out
Summary: Smartphones are ubiquitous and capable, but the innovation ceiling has been reached.
Mobile World Congress 2012 wrapped up today in Barcelona, Spain and from the looks of it, the latest crop of mobile devices failed to impress with their homogeneous displays, processors, and mind-boggling app selection. ZDNet Chief Larry Dignan declares, "The big takeaway here is that smartphone makers are competing on hardware specs that can be emulated by others in short order."
Similarly, ZDNet's James Kendrick laments:
Hopefully some company will come along and produce something to catch us by surprise. Something radically different from all the other phones that rekindles the excitement we all felt about smartphones not that long ago. It’s not clear what that might be, but a giant 5-inch phone doesn’t seem to be it.
While smartphones are becoming ever more capable and just about everyone has one (or two), they've reached the ceiling of innovation because of the limitations imposed by their changeless form factor. Battery and display technologies are constrained, which means manufacturers can't pack anything more into phones without sacrificing performance. While the software side looks brighter, the Android platform is becoming more fragmented, making it hard for developers to keep up.
Then there's the growing consumer class "big data" problem. Mobile users are receiving millions of emails, status updates, news reports and other alerts each day. The data avalanche is no match for a user trying to stay on top of it all with a gadget in one hand and a latte or steering wheel in the other. (Federal data suggests there have been 16,000 deaths nationwide due to texting while driving.)
Here are three more signs that the smartphone form factor has hit the innovation ceiling:
- Micro projectors, massive cameras, flexible screens, and other dubious add-ons are the final frontier. Some smartphones double as other devices with great success, such as GPS receivers. But do you really need a 41-megapixel Carl Zeiss camera on your phone? Or how about the Samsung Galaxy Beam, the vendor's second attempt at a device with integrated pico projector. I'm all for new features--I recently wrote about how a new tiny temperature sensor could find its way into phones. But all such features are still at the mercy of the handheld form factor.
- Voice recognition system and interactive projection displays are decoupling computing from the various boxes and devices we call computers. Siri may have yet to prove itself, and gestural computing on-the-go is pretty far off. But many, like visionaries at frog design, say computing is poised to transcend the physical limits of devices to provide flexible, externalized resources distributed throughout a space. Spatial operating systems could help make it work.
- On-person hardware is set to explode, providing the surprise we've been craving. Google's recent decision to sell head-up display (HUD) glasses later this year caused a bit of a stir, and there's no telling if the idea will flop or change the game. But Google is not alone in this endeavor. In fact, HUD displays are commonly used in the military and for industrial purposes, so what is to stop them from trickling into the mass market? Moreover, retinal displays are also in development. If you want cool eyeglass technology sooner, Pivothead video-glasses are due out next month. They'll allow you to record anything you are looking at in high quality. Some futurists envision all of this evolving towards microscopic, wireless, implantable devices linking neural activity directly to electronic circuitry.
Related:
Why the future of mobile is screenless, touchless TI's contact-less temperature sensor opens up possibilities Exploring use cases for electronic clothes New T-rays could lead to Star Trek 'Tricorder' medical scanners Successful test for electronic contact lens
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Out of control?
I think we may have gone a little crazy with our mobile devices. Is that possible?
Ugh, I'm getting sick of statistical manipulation
B. If you want an ACTUAL statistic, no interpretation AT ALL. Since the widespread availability of SMS messaging, total vehicle fatalities are are down 30%, and fatalities per VMT are down 33%.
The projector has a use...
It's not 16,000
heh
You realize you just chastised YOURSELF, right?
Maxed out....
Mind you, the software side still has an enormous way to go - as does ubiquitous network coverage. I've hardly used Siri since I got my 4S as there's rarely enough 3G to use it.
I Saw It Coming....
Old claim, new author
Smeg. Ninja'd.
*Reloads the Ninja-traps*
Android vendors focus on what is right about iOS and do more than Google
Innovations is not a fast food industry
3 Gates of Acceptance
2) Is it technologically possible?
3) Will it fly with the target demographic?
The last one is the one that really decides how successful a product will be, but it is heavily dependant upon what came before it.
If Apple had released the iPhone before all the other PDAs, WM phones, etc, no one would have wanted it, but because there were a large number of early adopters for the earlier technology, it only required a tweak here or there to be ready to 'cross the chasm' to mass acceptance.
Because of the need to have a lot of early adopters already on board with new ideas (conceptually, at least), any radical new technology will not be introduced to the masses suddenly, otherwise it is like planting lawn in the desert - infertile ground.
Mass acceptance of innovation is always evolutionary - just a little ahead of where the masses currently are.
Nonsense Stats?
Excuse Me!?
Deaths in the US were about 40K per years in the later 90s. Texting wasn't happening then. Now it's down to about 35K per year. Are the people putting this out saying deaths would be down to about 20K per years without texting. In other words that traffic deaths would have declined by 1/2 over 15 years if not for texting?
Now you look at the number of deaths due to drunk driving in the last few years and it seems to be about 14K per year. Which means that (ignore there will be some overlap) that, if you buy into the 16K number, almost all non drinking related deaths are due to texting.
Give me a break.
I really doubt it.
Read the stats properly.
May well be true, but need the complete list of causes
But then:
a) Why do you ignore the overlap? It could be significant.
b) There may have been a significant reduction in non-alcohol death causes.
Good lord.
As technology gets better and smaller, you'll be able to pack more into that 3x5x0.5 inches of real estate; the fact that iPwns and clones EXIST is proof of that. The limiting factor here is not the space; it's big enough for an adequate display to use while walking around, and it's big enough to incorporate a useable keyboard for those who MUST have one.
The limitation here is NOT the form factor; that is defined by the need to be convenient for humans to use. It doesn't matter WHAT the device is; if it needs to be portable, those who design it will be pressured to build within some convenient form factor. This is why flashlights are generally cylindrical and less than 2"x10", this is why laptops are generally around 1"x10"x14", this is why lighters are the size and shape they are. Anything much outside those limitations and a thing becomes inconvenient to carry and use, and it gets left behind.
The limitation now is only technology. As processors become more powerful and power efficient, we'll be able to have a portable device which we can talk to and can actually talk back in a useful fashion. As pico projectors become more economical, their technology will become the de-facto answer to the "too-small screen" issue. Incorporate the recently developed laser-projective keyboard technology and add a "touchpad" area as well, and now you have a device which you can keep in your pocket but still serve the functionality of a laptop for at least half the possible users. This would be a game-changer.
These are suggestions that reflect current technology; things which could be a reality in a year or five. I bet there are people out there who have a lot bigger imagination than I do; I'm pretty sure they can come up with something far grander to add to this "used-up form-factor". All this stuff takes time; in the meantime, it has to be developed. And right now, this is the form it will have to take, because this is the form that fits human beings.
Your article boils down to nothing; it is useless fist-waving at the technology we take for granted. What you really need to take a pot-shot at is the carriers, who insist on chopping up all this fabulous technology into ever-finer granular bits, and trying to charge us for every bit individually. Funny thing; no matter what it is or which carrier, you can get the best of everything they have to offer for around the same $100 per month, and the same $100-200 cash outlay for the phone. Only the names of those in the Billing Dept are changed to protect the guilty. ;)
mnem
Frabjous.
weak article
Not a ceiling so much as a cloud deck ...
I've been using cell phones for 18 years, and there's still plenty smart phone creators can do to make these devices more truly useful. What I see now is a mad dash to cram more stuff into phones, whether it's the stuff we need or not. That will pass as cooler heads in isolated locations begin to think "What do people REALLY want next". But the market needs to work through it's "stupid but fast" phase of development before this will happen.
When you've seen enough different products go through their life cycles, you'll realize that some celings aren't ceilings, but merely cloud layers that are "cause to pause", but nothing more. The real developments that will take smart phones to their next stage of development are out there. And when designers and marketers realize that their panicked attempts to dazzle us didn't work, and they settle down and get serious, they will do things that impress and interest us. Stay tuned.
Recognizable?
A Phone is a Phone by any other name
Good reception/transmission/voice/quality/battery life?
Maybe a low-end camera to snap occasional pictures, like a car accident scene.
And an expanded contact list, with full name/address besides phone numbers.
I know, I could get a lower-end smart phone which does all of that.
Except for the bundling (mandatory) of data services. I thought bundling was illegal (remember the IBM decision way back?)