NASA unveils new deep-space rocket design

By | September 14, 2011, 11:59am PDT

Summary: The Space Launch System (SLS) is NASA’s next-generation rocket system that will serve as the centerpiece for deep space exploration for the coming decades.

NASA unveiled Wednesday the design for the Space Launch System (SLS), a next-generation rocket system that will serve as the centerpiece for deep space exploration for the coming decades.

Credit: NASA

The rocket would be the most powerful since the Saturn V that took Americans to the moon four decades ago. NASA expects it to propel astronauts on missions farther than anyone has ever traveled, including an asteroid by 2025 and Mars the following decade.

The agency said that SLS will provide the nation with a safe, affordable and sustainable means of reaching beyond our current limits and open up new discoveries from the unique vantage point of space.

“This launch system will create good-paying American jobs, ensure continued U.S. leadership in space, and inspire millions around the world,” NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said. “President Obama challenged us to be bold and dream big, and that’s exactly what we are doing at NASA. While I was proud to fly on the space shuttle, kids today can now dream of one day walking on Mars.”

The SLS rocket will be designed to carry the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, as well as important cargo, equipment and science experiments to Earth’s orbit and beyond. It will also serve as a back up for commercial and international partner transportation services to the International Space Station.

To speed up development and control costs, NASA relied on pieces from the just-retired space shuttles for thew new rocket design (shuttle tiles are going to schools). The first stage would essentially be an elongated shuttle fuel tank, and it would use the same rocket engines. Initial test flights would use strapped on solid rocket boosters–stretched versions of the shuttle boosters–to provide additional thrust.

The first unmanned test flight of the first iteration of the rocket, able to lift 70 metric tons (154,000 pounds) to low-Earth orbit, is targeted for the end of 2017.  Future iterations are to be more powerful, capable of lifting up to 130 metric tons (286,000 pounds).

The cost of the program is estimated at $18 billion through an initial test flight in 2017, and about $30 billion through the first piloted mission in 2021.

According to an article in New York Times, it would take roughly $62 billion to fly up to two missions a year and start developing deep-space habitat and other components needed for a mission to an asteroid.

Related:

Nuclear power plants for settlements on the Moon and Mars
Acts of space warfare likely by 2025
100 Year Starship Study

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Christopher Jablonski is a freelance technology writer.

Disclosure

Chris Jablonski

Christopher Jablonski has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Chris Jablonski

Christopher Jablonski is a freelance technology writer. Previously, he held research analyst positions in the IT industry and was the manager of marketing editorial at CBS Interactive. He's been contributing to ZDNet since 2003.

Christopher received a bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign. With over 12 years in IT, he's an expert on transformational technologies, particularly those influential in B2B.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: NASA unveils new deep-space rocket design
ExCorpGuy 8th Nov
Instead of designing another all new rocket, NASA should just fly the way more capable Saturn V. It never had a launch failure and a perfect safety record. Why reinvent the wheel?
It's about time we started getting back to rockets. Reusable equipment is great from a financial standpoint (sort of), but there's no doubt that disposable rockets are more reliable...which is what I'm more worried about for something like the Space Program.
0 Votes
+ -
@Aerowind
Would you replace the $35 Billion Dollar Disposable rocket with another $35 Billion Dollar rocket Mr. Economist? How many times?
Wow, very awesome job. replica watches
Oh great. Something else that costs too much and does too little.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't worry it's only a Press release
Richard Flude 14th Sep
It'll cost as budgeted, even more, but you won't see anything. Like much of America, a once great agency reduced to press releases. Sad.
Do we not already have enough space debry? We are quickly becoming prisoners of our own planet.
So we can put a man on the moon eight years after putting him into space using completely new technology that was barely on the drawing boards with only three human casualties, but... It will take us 8 years to get a rocket designed enough to be tested and another four years to get a man into space based on existing technology? How far have we fallen?
0 Votes
+ -
And those casualties where on the ground
William Farrell 14th Sep
@nucrash

but I'm following what you're saying.

I guess they have to follow those new union rules - I knew that slowed things down, but this is ridiculous
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrell

Yeah, have to get in those mandatory coffee breaks so an important bolt will not get tightened because someone forgot where they left off. Then they will blame it on a deteriorating seal so no one gets fired.
@nucrash,

In the 1960's NASA had far more resources, because the space race was a big part of the Cold War. If NASA was funded at those levels, of course it would go faster. It's all about the money.
I'm sorry. This is just too expensive. I'm not even sweating the development costs, which would make this far more expensive than Hubble ($6 billion) or the Webb telescope (estimated $6.8 billion).

I want to see NASA workers back to work, but I also want the money spent wisely.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: NASA unveils new deep-space rocket design
christopher_jablonski 14th Sep
@JohnVoter

To clarify, that's two missions PER year.

The $62B would be the estimated total cost over the next 14 years to move up the first manned flight by three years and build the 130-metric-ton rocket by 2021.
0 Votes
+ -
@JohnVoter What should NASA be doing?
0 Votes
+ -
The shuttle SRB (Solid Rocket Booster) and the shuttle fuel tank with a "cargo cone" on at the top is not an improvement, but just returning to the old technology that has show to be unnecessarily expensive.

If we are going to return to capsules (revert back 50 years in time), why not just return to using the "Saturn" rockets? They cost a lot less than a single fuel ring for the SRBs and with current engine technology the thrust to weight ratio would be at least 10 times better than the Apollo era.
0 Votes
+ -
The shuttle SRB (Solid Rocket Booster) and the shuttle fuel tank with a "cargo area" on at the top is not an improvement, but just returning to the old technology that has show to be unnecessarily expensive.

If we are going to return to capsules (revert back 50 years in time), why not just return to using the "Saturn" rockets? They cost a lot less than a single fuel ring for the SRBs and with current engine technology the thrust to weight ratio would be at least 10 times better than the Apollo era.
0 Votes
+ -
For only One Billion, I will design and build a real Spacecraft, using the technology of the Flying Saucer, discovered and patented. It could have a crew of forty, in all professions.
A Rocket is not something new, it is just a make work scheme for schemers and their hangers-on in the Government.
0 Votes
+ -
Good news!
SDTangler 15th Sep
To anyone that thinks this is a waste of money:
1) This program put Americans back to work, in skilled science jobs here in the US.
2) The TSA has a bigger budget and more employees than NASA. And provides what? The illusion of security? With high-paid, unskilled labor.
3) The commercialization of technology from this program will start thousands of new businesses.
0 Votes
+ -
SpaceX is taking orders for 117K lb to low earth orbit. $80M to $125M per flight beginning 2013. http://www.spacex.com/falcon_heavy.php

Govt (NASA included) is the least efficient way to get a job done. Their focus should be on doing things that industry can't or won't do.

This appears to be an unnecessary competition with commercial space flight efforts and will only benefit the 'old-school' companies instead of stimulating innovation.
0 Votes
+ -
It is sad...
darije.djokic@... 2nd Nov
... to see that von Brown???s rocket lobby is still at power blocking any intelligent attempt to develop a truly advanced XXI century space flight system, namely a true space-plane for orbital tasks and a nuclear powered craft for interstellar travel, attempts started decades ago and killed-off for the convenience of the rocket/missile producers. All with the dubious justification of excessive cost in the making and exploiting such devices, when the space-shuttle has clearly shown that the expenses of the named system were severalfold superior of what was promised by its promoters.
Instead of designing another all new rocket, NASA should just fly the way more capable Saturn V. It never had a launch failure and a perfect safety record. Why reinvent the wheel?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix