47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity

By | May 24, 2011, 2:13pm PDT

Summary: Around 47 percent of users have profanity on their Facebook Wall. Do you care?

Social media monitoring service Reppler launched over a month ago, and has been collecting information from users’ Facebook Walls ever since. After analyzing data from over 30,000 users, the company has made the following observations:

  • 47 percent of our users have profanity on their Facebook Wall.
  • 80 percent of our users who have profanity on their Facebook Wall have at least one post/comment with profanity from a friend.
  • 56 percent of the posts/comments with profanity on a user’s Facebook Wall come from friends.
  • Users are twice as likely to use profanity in a post on their Facebook Wall, versus a comment. Whereas friends are twice as likely to use profanity in a comment on a user’s Facebook Wall, versus a post.
  • The most common profane word is a derivation of f*ck, the second most common profane word is sh*t, and b*tch is a distant third.

Reppler argues that the prevalence of profanity on Facebook is something that you need to look out for, especially given that profiles are coming under increasingly closer scrutiny by employers, schools, and other parties that may want to indirectly learn more about you. They are all looking for professionalism, or lack thereof.

While 44 percent of content with profanity can be limited or completely eliminated by simply watching what you write, the rest comes from your friends. This means that you don’t have complete control over the language used on your profile, and your friends can have an impact on how others perceive you. Of course, you can always clean your Wall from any such posts, but that’s a hassle, and by then it could be too late.

The reason Reppler has published this data is simple: it has a vested interest in doing so. If you sign up for the service, it will help keep your Facebook image “clean” by making you aware of inappropriate content and showing how others could perceive you. It also makes sure to highlight your public information that should be private and flagging malicious links that could result in malware, spam, and so on.

My Wall currently does not include any profanity. That being said, I have definitely sworn on my status before. I simply felt that it was necessary at the time.

What are your thoughts on profanity in general? I personally believe that swearing and cussing are part of every language and I am not offended if someone uses profanity. If profanity is used to insult me, then I am just as offended as when “normal” words are used to insult me.

I have one last inquiry. How did you feel when I censored the three words of profanity above? Would you have preferred if I didn’t or would you have rather I avoided including that statistic completely?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications.

Disclosure

Emil Protalinski

Emil has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Emil Protalinski

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications, including Neowin for two years and Ars Technica for three years. He has written 1,000s of articles for both, with a particular focus on scrutinizing Microsoft products and services. Recently, Emil has expanded his coverage to non-Microsoft technologies, including the social networking giant Facebook.

114
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
good one. for me i think one should watch what he/she says on FB...but for prospective employers invading my privacy through FB that i dont get. for crying out loud FB is a social networking site..............
0 Votes
+ -
Last time I checked, profanity is protected under freedom of speech. Employers who fire people based on what is said on facebook, unless it's directed at the company in which they work for, other then they hate their job type stuff, should be illegal and should be considered wrongful termination.

Profanity although is unprofessional and should not be used a your jobsite when you are getting paid for it, anything that is posted online by yourself, and employer has no right to punish you for it.

So what if 90% facebook walls contain profanity, who the heck cares. I know I don't give a rats behind.

And for those who don't like profanity on your walls and are asking for a filter, maybe you should look for new friends. Or if it's your children you are trying to censor, maybe you should talk to your child and find new friends for them if you are that worried about it.
0 Votes
+ -
freedom of speech
Cyraxote 25th May 2011
@papokergod: The First Amendment constrains only the government. Private citizens and companies can limit speech and set up consequences for exceeding that limit. For example, the private citizen can say, "Get out of my house if you're going to talk like that." The company can say, "You're fired."

Wrongful termination involves breach of an employment contract or of employment law.

Long story short, if Facebook decided to ban profanity, good luck finding a lawyer to help you sue them.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Doesn't everyone hate their job now and then? Even if an employee is writing on their FB page that they hate their job i don't believe this is a reason for termination. People need to vent, it is unhealthy not to do so. Using a social network like FB makes it quick and easy to vent and get some empathy making that hard day at work more bearable.
@papokergod
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Profanity is just a strong verbal modifier representing a negative emotion. Drunk, mad, sad, or hurt; profanity lets you screw the cap off your steamrolling rampage. Facebook is a SOCIAL network its a cyber house party where people find that drunk chick from last nights party or at least I think it was a chick(jokes). If a company is going to look at all their employees profiles and fire them for profanity, unless you live in Pleasantville noones that perfect hell even priests from the vatican dip their sticks in the pedophile pool from time to time.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
dougchappell 25th May 2011
@papokergod : So a teacher gets on Facebook and vents about your kid being the stupidest f*cker in the class. Would you be O.K. with that?
@Cyraxote: Would a public school teacher be protected while a private school teacher would not?
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@papokergod I couldn't possibly agree more!!!! Companies should be held liable for any losses incurred on the individual as well by about ten times. This would discourage them from nosing into your personal life. (Cyraxote)If the police can't pry into your personal life, then the law didn't somehow imply for companies to be able to! It's called "private" for a g*& d@#$*ed reason!
0 Votes
+ -
Whole lotta flaggin going in
Mr. Copro Encephalic to You Updated - 25th May 2011
Seems ironic that so many people appear to be being flagged during a discussion about free speech.

I did a quick law/caselaw search and it seems that firing someone over FaceBook chatter can in fact get an employer in hot water. That being said, it seems that those cases may be the exception, not the rule and usually involved people in "protected classes" or protected work discussions (e.g., among workers about work conditions).

That being said, I suspect that we'd all rejoice at a hospital which decides not to hire a brain surgeon, or a school district who decides not to go with a bus driver because he posted a picture of himself passed out drunk with the caption "I got myself so ****ing ****-faced that night again. Can't wait for my shift to be over"

But maybe that's just me.

Now, will my asterisks get me flagged as well?
0 Votes
+ -
@Enodano ... Which anyone who will allow all kinds of logger and tracking cookies can attest to: It is open to the PUBLIC! If you don't want it seen, get rid of it; it's actually that simple.
You sound as though you think it's a private area; it's NOT.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
Eaglehawk_z Updated - 26th May 2011
@tom@... I, too, am shocked at the recent news about Facebook. I thought I could enjoy communicating with others online ...
Let's keep Facebook an area for clean, pleasant communication that people can enjoy, shall we?
0 Votes
+ -
I have nothing against venting. I'm just telling you that an employer can terminate an employee for any reason whatsoever unless there is a contract or the employer is breaking a law by doing so (i.e., age, race, or gender discrimination). The idea is that if the government prevents you from speaking, you have no recourse; if a company seeks to prevent you from doing so, you can quit. It may not be the most convenient solution, but it is recourse of some kind.

@dougchappelle: That's a good question. I think that some abridgment of free speech by the gov't is thought to be permissible (e.g., you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre). In your example, what the teacher said could be defamation, and if you argued that a Facebook post is a "publication," you could call it libel, perhaps. Your rights end at the tip of your nose, and as soon as you push up against somebody else's rights, you're in trouble (and a big gray area).

Disclaimer: I am not an attorney, so you can take what I say with a grain of salt. I've learned about employment law from being on the receiving end of it...
0 Votes
+ -
I thought it was a little lame that you used the asterisk when spelling the profane words. On the other hand, I understood why you did and also appreciated that you gave enough of the word so that I could know what word you were saying. I hate it when cuss words are censored to the point that you have no idea what the word was. On a movie on television this can sometimes completely obfuscate the essence of the interaction and it's possible to lose the thread of the plot because an important part of the conversation was censored out because of the cuss words.
0 Votes
+ -
@josh92 ,,, Bull Pucky!
0 Votes
+ -
@josh92
If the "important part" of the conversation consisted of profanity, then the individual in question has a very poor grasp of the English language.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
hideki.yamamoto 26th May 2011
@cal67
Yeah... and if i really wanted to comunicate a feeling of disgust...? isn't that just the exact way for doing so.

Bad words also exists in the languages of every country... it' a world wide phenomenon that occurred naturally.

That you can't simply say it's bad or wrong... that would be SO NAIVE.
0 Votes
+ -
In Other News
bobiroc 24th May 2011
The Sun rises in the East and Sets in the West and if it is raining out you may get wet if you go outside in the rain.

Who cares really.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc ,,, Mothers, fathers, siblings if any, bosses, customers, clients, co-workers can, friends from church, man on the street, many people you don't know, other relatives/friends who always though you were better than that, instead of short of the English language, and a host of others.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc Darn straight!
0 Votes
+ -
yawn...
0 Votes
+ -
Most article containing profanities will also get comments with profanities. F$#@!
0 Votes
+ -
Yet FB at work is a great idea...
Bruizer 24th May 2011
eyes rolling.

FB has little value in the professional work place and this is a perfect example of why.
0 Votes
+ -
@Bruizer Eggzzzzactly!! I recently followed a FB comment thread on a Planned Parenthood post. One person (a woman, I believe, not that it really matters) was all up in arms because the post was a video about breasts and penises and other sundry ("private") body parts. She didn't want people at work to be upset about seeing it on her screen. Welll, duhhh.
0 Votes
+ -
So if I want my FB page to represent my thoughts "while I am on FB", profanity may be a part of it.
Not all people consider the same words to be profane.

and btw... was this only for sites done in English? shocked
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Roque Mocan Updated - 25th May 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
davebarnes Updated - 25th May 2011
0 Votes
+ -
I've ask REPEATEDLY for a simple app to allow me to censor foul language. I'm not asking FB to censor people's speech, just my ability to mask it from my page. Seems simple to me, I have several forum's that have the feature. Why not FB?
0 Votes
+ -
@Steve_47

Good question. Needs an answer from FB.
0 Votes
+ -
@Steve_47 Basic answer, they are lazy son of B*tches that put just enough effort into add features as they need to, and as they facing zero competition, they seem to be implementing zero new features I have any interest at using what so ever. This one I might use and I might not, depending on how it was design and implemented, for instant if simply change all messages with profanity in it to private, my view only I would use, if it change it so the words are change **** I would probably get fed up of it after a while.
0 Votes
+ -
If you want real profanity, just visit any multi-player game. However, unlike FB, you'll find profanity filters in most of them.

Don't like the language, click the button.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
mlmiller1959@... 25th May 2011
Or just avoid Farcebook altogether.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree that a simple app to remove profanity would be welcome.
0 Votes
+ -
Asterisks in profanity
james.tatlow@... Updated - 25th May 2011
What's the point? We know it says **** if it says f*ck... You might as well just say it.

edit: Totally asterisking out profanity as this site apparently does makes more sense, but often the sentence wouldn't convey it's meaning properly.
0 Votes
+ -
Language is dynamic and the concept that saying FOCK is OK but change that to a 'U' and it's suddenly very naughty and expect to be sent to bed with no tea... is very strange. Oh well, one mans Feck is another mans Fook I spose.
0 Votes
+ -
Face book walls
mrdealer@... 25th May 2011
The day Facebook goes the same way as the Berlin Wall we will be a better world. Facebook is a complete waste of time.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
Daniel Levine 25th May 2011
You're confusing me with someone who gives a ****
0 Votes
+ -
When friends get around to using what I consider offensive language, I simply 'unfriend' them. I don't use that kind of language in public, and don't want to see it from others. If they don't like it, tough.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
JOHN_TUOHY Updated - 25th May 2011
@rphunter42 It must be a lonely life, Mr Bible basher.
BTW, how's the Rapture going ?
0 Votes
+ -
Just gos to show how desensitized we have become to profanity in general.
0 Votes
+ -
Swearing in public and FB, shows a certain lack of civility. I try not to, but I'm not always successful. No one is perfect. Thanks for editing in your article.
0 Votes
+ -
Did they "Age Test"?
mattmuir 25th May 2011
My guess is that a very large portion of the 47% comes from 14, 15, & 16 year olds who have accounts. Between my niece & her mates, they'd make up 98% of my FB friends who have posts containing profanities. I'm absolutely disgusted & ashamed of my otherwise beautiful niece. Don't know how she'll go in years to come, particularly as Google loves to cache....
0 Votes
+ -
Why do people think that by replacing a letter with an asterisk it's no longer a swear word? You still read it in your mind as a swear word.
0 Votes
+ -
@chris_black then do not read it in your mind as a swear word.
0 Votes
+ -
Helps me know who to unfriend. happy
0 Votes
+ -
I don't understand why your Facebook profile would be used to determine how 'professional' you are by employers. Wouldn't they want to look at your Linked-In profile for stuff like that? Facebook by its very nature is 'social'...the way one interacts with friends is not at all like the way someone interacts in a work environment. Anyone who has ever been to an unsanctioned birthday party for a co-worker at a local club can attest to that.
0 Votes
+ -
Agree with papokergod...
KarrasB 25th May 2011
It's all about one's selection of friends, as it is in all aspects of life.
0 Votes
+ -
I could not care less whether you munged profanity or not as nothing any dummy on FB or any other group of unknowns offends me in particular. BUT I do NOT use FB or any of those services. And, that fact that they are allowed there is just one more nail in their coffin because I wouldn't want my own kids & their friends seeing such junk on my screen anyway.
FB et al are toys for tiny minds in most cases.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 47% of Facebook Walls contain profanity
dhays Updated - 25th May 2011
Without a login, it is no big deal to me. However, any use of profanity shows a lack of verbal skills in finding words to describe what you meant to say. Ergo, I detest ists usage and try to avoid any use by myself and cringe when anyone else uses it.
Most of the words used are not used in context of its meaning but as a expletive that should ahve been deleted. I don't appreciate the more and more usage in TV shows or movies. In my younger days I saw a movie where nearly every other word was a cuss word--I think it was called "Joe" (1969), then there was the movie where someon ewas getting laid everytime you turned around--"Candy" (1968).
In most cases the use of profanity is not needed, it is just used for "shock value" and as it becomes the norm, then it loses that. I would venture to guess that many who use the words do not even have any idea of what it means, which is the point why use it? M*A*S*H was one of the first to use the F word in a movie. Did it make it any better, not in my opinion.
Many years ago Bob Greene wrote a newspaper article called "Everyday obcenity--the curse of the casual age" (Field Enterprises) "...If the language of ugliness and anger becomes so routine that we use it even when do not mean to convey ugliness or anger, then we tear down whatever the veneer of civility remains in our society. There's probaly nothing to be done about it, by the time you notice something like this, it's already too late"
I have a copy still.
Another newspaper article by Jenkin Lloyd Jones called "Used of Profanity Obliterates Artistry of English Language" (Los Angeles Times Syndicate) ends with:
"The danger is that much of young America may get the idea that dirty talk is the proper norm. There goes precise Thought. there go the colorful and descriptive adjectives and adverbs that have rendered English, with its world record 500,000 words, the most expressive language on Earth.
"There is no gain in talking filth if it only makes us dull."
So again why use it? As a non FB user, it doesn't get to me at all, there.
There is no need for profanity, it is useless and PROFANE by definition, why does anyone want to stoop to that level? There are many euphemisms out there, of course, if you use them as well, you might as well say the real word.
0 Votes
+ -
@dhays I find Verbosity more offensive than Profanity happy
0 Votes
+ -
@JOHN_TUOHY

Nice!
0 Votes
+ -
1st Amendment is a must. No question. Rants and profanity or creating an event for a party where there is underage drinking or whatever (just an example), that's never a place for facebook. Then it's a 2nd tier of information to personal lives. Folks should learn to protect their own privacy than airing out dirty laundry to everyone. Simple app? I hope so!
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix