ie8 fix

Facebook blocks Open-Xchange contact exporter tool

By | July 11, 2011, 10:40am PDT

Summary: Facebook has blocked another tool that lets you export your Facebook friends so you can import them elsewhere, like to Google+.

On Sunday July 10, 2011, Facebook blocked Open-Xchange’s tool that lets Facebook users export their friends so that they can be imported into other products and services. As I reported last week, the tool used approved Facebook APIs and was not in violation of Facebook’s Terms and Conditions, or at least that’s what Open-Xchange’s management thought.

Facebook sent the following email to Open-Xchange:

We’re writing to inform you that your app Connector for ox.io has been disabled for the following violations:

You cannot use a user’s friend list outside of your application, even if a user consents to such use, but you can use connections between users who have both connected to your application. (FPP II.11)

Our expectation is that developers do not provide users with poor experiences, such as those resulting from inappropriate or misleading content, privacy and security vulnerabilities, and general spam in the Stream, Requests, and elsewhere. We appreciate your commitment to improving the application ecosystem on Platform.

Unsurprisingly, Open-Xchange was not amused. The company strongly believes that Facebook’s data should be accessible to the users that have access to it on the site.

“If you want to see what a future looks like where a single company controls YOUR personal data for its own profit, this is a glimpse,” Open-Xchange CEO Rafael Laguna said in a statement. “Clearly, Facebook management does not want you to have the ability to take your personal information outside their walls to, say, Google+ and will do everything in their power to stop you, including violating their own terms and conditions. From a technical standpoint, Facebook’s claim of violation of terms is preposterous. All we are doing is using the Facebook API to extract the last name and first name fields. We are not parsing or scraping the email address. That same data is available on Facebook under Account->Account Settings->Download Your Information in the resulting friends.html file. This is not about user experience. It is about Facebook NOT wanting anyone to control their personal information - except Facebook.”

The tool in question uses a demo Open-Xchange user account, the official APIs from social and business networks, and emails you have sent from your email account, to match all your contact information. It works by merging all your networks, address books, and contacts from your emails into one big address book. This newly merged address book can then be exported as a vCard and imported into whatever service you like.

For each email account, Open-Xchange goes through every folder and uses the first 6,000 emails to look for contacts. At the end of the process, you’re allowed to download the merged address book and then import it into Apple iCal, Gmail, Google+, Facebook, Outlook, and/or whatever other product or service you like. In my previous post describing the product’s launch, I outlined the steps you needed to follow to use the tool, but they are unfortunately now useless.

Last week, Facebook blocked a Google Chrome extension for exporting Facebook contacts. Mohamed Mansour developed Facebook Friend Exporter to let you grab all the information about your Facebook friends so you can import them elsewhere. Because it got popular after the launch of Google+, Facebook noticed an increase in its usage and began to hide emails on its mobile site, which the extension requires. Mansour is working hard to make the tool work again.

Seeing Mansour’s efforts thwarted, Open-Xchange wanted to offer some help. The company’s approach was not as thorough or efficient as Facebook Friend Exporter, as it only focused on emails. Still, that’s really all the information you need to import your contacts elsewhere. The process took a while because of the indirect route it takes to build a merged address book, but the advantage was that didn’t appear to break Facebook’s Terms of Service (while Facebook Friend Exporter does). In the end, this didn’t matter, as Facebook found that the tool was in violation after all.

I asked Open-Xchange if the company plans to keep trying to make the tool work or if will simply accept Facebook’s rules. “Stay tuned – this story is not over with by a long shot,” an Open-Xchange spokesperson said in a statement.

See also:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications.

Disclosure

Emil Protalinski

Emil has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Emil Protalinski

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications, including Neowin for two years and Ars Technica for three years. He has written 1,000s of articles for both, with a particular focus on scrutinizing Microsoft products and services. Recently, Emil has expanded his coverage to non-Microsoft technologies, including the social networking giant Facebook.

63
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Facebook blocks Open-Xchange contact exporter tool
LeonObo 23rd Nov
@charley cross I agree that the story appears slanted -- but FB really IS evil.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Isn't this the same kind of behavior exhibited by oppressive regimes whenever their citizens want to move to another country? Things like this only INCREASE a citizen's desire to escape.
@Scott Raymond I've been concerned about FB's blatant disregard of individual rights for as long as I've been using them (or should I say "they've been using ME"). This last episode may be enough to cause me to quit.
The only problem is that FB has become an alternate Web for many people and organizations -- who use no direct websites or email accounts.
And limit my choices! And keep me in his walled garden! Boooooooo! Hisssssssss!
BTW---Open-Xchange isn't a subsidiary of Google, is it?
0 Votes
+ -
No, Not That I've Ever Heard
CFWhitman 12th Jul
@Userama
Open-Xchange does not appear to be connected to Google in any way from the immediately available information about them. I've never heard of a Google involvement in the past.
Sounds like FB fears G+
Sounds like FB fears G+ [2]
@neverhome
Sure does because their IPO will be soon I think. There are people who want to max their billions.
0 Votes
+ -
bye bye facebook
twiddly 11th Jul
I am SO happy I'm on google+, which is far better than facebook anyway, so I'll be dumping facebook just as soon as google+ is open to all.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know about G+ (not on it), but..
shawkins Updated - 11th Jul
@twiddly
it sounds like FB is just trying to delay the inevitable. What a stupid, juvenile tactic. There has never been any doubt in my mind that FB thinks it owns its users, so this maneuver is not surprise. The problem is though that if someone really wants to use G+ they eventually will, regardless of any stunts that FB pulls.
0 Votes
+ -
Or Because of Them
CFWhitman 12th Jul
@shawkins
Pulling stunts like that tends to make users more interested in leaving.
This is getting interesting...
0 Votes
+ -
Two sides?
charley cross 11th Jul
Perhaps Facebook is as evil here as this story makes them sound, but from a journalistic perspective, this is way slanted. Someone from Facebook should have been interviewed to get the other side of the story. They deserve a chance to speak too.
@charley cross
This is a blog, not a news story. Journalists must state the facts and insure they are verified by multiple sources. Bloggers can say anything they want.

It's time people learn the difference!
@MedicNYC

I agree a blogger doesn't have to do do those things. Just because a blogger isn't required to verify sources, doesn't mean they shouldn't. It also doesn't mean that readers shouldn't be pushing them to be a better blogger. Do you really think it is unreasonable to complain about a blog post that appears to favor one company over another, without collecting the opinions of both sides?
@zoredache
He had the response from Google, quoted. He had the response from the other side.

It seems you don't want to read Bloggers, you want journalists.
0 Votes
+ -
@charley cross I agree but what good would that have really done? They [Facebook] would have most likely sent the same response that they sent to Open-Xchange.

Also, I agree with MedicNYC when he/she states, "This is a blog, not a news story. Journalists must state the facts and insure they are verified by multiple sources. Bloggers can say anything they want."

Although interviewing only one side is fine in a blog, it gives more credence to the blogger when interviewing both sides instead of just one.

Also, I don't see what the big deal is since Facebook gives the end user the option to download all their information. I may be speaking too soon since I do not know exactly what they [Facebook] includes in this zip file of information we, the users, have shared but I assume the info I need is available - it just is in an html file so importing it into another social network, your own address book, etc. may not be so easy, especially if you have many friends.

John
@charley cross I appreciate your attempt to be fair, but Facebook was cited. They just didnt appear to have a reasonable explanation for their action.
Theres nothing wrong with journalisitc "analysis". (stating opinioin) Makes things interesting.
@charley cross
I wouldn't give them a chance to speak. You'll only get some PR dribble.
@charley cross I agree that the story appears slanted -- but FB really IS evil.
0 Votes
+ -
Power
pwatson Updated - 11th Jul
"Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely."
-John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton
@pwatson Exactly..... Zuckerman hails from the same tradistion as Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison, and Bill Gates.
Actually, although he has been vilified more than the rest... Gates appears to the most open with platforms and interfaces.
Of course - tMS may have learned that the hard way! (in court) My bet is we will see FB in front of a judge too.
0 Votes
+ -
Facebook. what a little b1tch.
msg464 Updated - 11th Jul
this is bs. fb's interface sucks, anyway. it doesn't even flow. even as an IT person I find it perplexing and devoid of some simple navigation functions.
@msgvb@... TOTALLY agree. FB is really going to be one one of those phenomenum that defined a really cool idea, but ultimate fails because of mediocre execution and ... bitchiness.
says the accused, "All we are doing is using the Facebook api to extact ..." oh? convergence, we don't need no stinking convergence! the author says, "It is about Facebook NOT wanting anyone to control their personal information..." oh? i thought it was about privacy and theft. i expect that though, everybody wants something for nothing. why start your own company data base when you can use someone else's. a user may intend for the exported data to stay safe, but, we know safe and intenet are oxymorons.
@middleageman
So you are saying that the users have NO right to THEIR data, but only Facebook.
You really have a warped mind. You should join some fascist party somewhere.
@hkommedal

lol - I agree with you.
0 Votes
+ -
@middleageman In the beginning of time when shareware was starting one of the rules was that you could not hold the user's data hostage. That is, if you app had a thirty day trial period it still had to provide a way for the user to export any data they put in during the trial after the trial was over. This was part of the rules for qualifying an app for inclusion in the Association of Shareware Professional's distribution.
Now Facebook could reasoably block the export of your "friend's" information if you did not put it in. But if you entered your "friend's" name to connect with them then you should be able to export a list of "friends". If you uploaded pictures you should be able to export them and delete the online copies. If you found "friends" by uploading their email addresses you should be able to export the email addresses and delete the online copies. Any information you provided should be exportable.
If you maintain an online address book and calendar you should be able to export all of the information in them and delete the online copies.
A company that holds a user's data hostage is a pirate and deserves to be treated as such. If facebook wants to fly the jolly roger it should expect incoming cannon balls.
@z_saberman
Amen !
@middleageman Dude... you are giving MiddleAged men a bad name. I resemble that. Your premise is nutty... the users can simply re-type the information plainly displayed. Its not secure in the first place.
0 Votes
+ -
It's Not Open-Xchange That Gets the Data
CFWhitman Updated - 12th Jul
@middleageman
The data is extracted by the user and exported to another program/site by the user. Open-Xchange is just a tool that allows the user to do this (actually, it's a tool that allows them to do this more quickly and easily; typing was always an option).

Open-Xchange is not a social networking site. It's collaboration/email server software, like Microsoft Exchange.
The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin (Facebook), the more star systems (Social Media users) will slip through your fingers! ~ Princess Leia
Never realised you could export your data! Doing it now. Facebook says it will send me an email when my archive has been assembled. I can't wait!
I've tried "Download Your Information" three times. I never seem to get that email telling me they're done exporting my info...
Maybe someone can comment.....wasn't it Zuckerberg that 'borrowed' the original email list from his pal so he could seed the FB???
0 Votes
+ -
Power to the People (read Users)
Ubuntu Warrior 11th Jul
It has to happen at some point, Social Media systems need to find a happy balance in collaborating amongst providers. Currently FB is the 500lb gorilla but with a load of people migrating to G+ there will be enormous pressure on the providers to open up. Same old tech-stance of the early 80s ala IBM, Microsoft, Brittanica, etc., etc., etc. Trying to close all the doors often results in the close of the venture... eventually!
No surprise.Anyway,you can use Yahoo mail to do that.
I guess FB is afraid of G+.
Pure protectionism and anti-competition.
BOO ! ! !
Honestly...neither I, nor most people I 'friend' on FB would approve of some other app snooping around without my permission, or the permission of my friends FIRST! I have been 'hacked' too many times, by holes in apps that make it possible for others to get into my business! without my permission. Why ask for trouble?
I don't do facebook. It is a violation of my privacy. Microsoft is EVIL. They want to take over the world and be the antichrist
0 Votes
+ -
Good advertising for G
ibsteve2u 11th Jul
I presume that is what Facebook intended? Seems like everything they do is intended to convince people to flee as soon as a viable alternative exists.

Guessing people will increasingly assert their opinion that they don't like being steers on Facebook's feedlot.
0 Votes
+ -
Rules and Tyranny
radar_z 11th Jul
I have a web email of the free type with a company. If someone reports me as having posted copyright material, my account is immediately closed and I have no access to the group of which I am a member. This happened to a friend when a mentally ill person reported my friend for posting copyrighted material.

This situation is all the more reason to be able to export any and all messages and email addresses from FB or any other service.
0 Votes
+ -
Having long been a student of spin speak, I was amused by this one. For those new to the language I will translate.
Facebook says "Our expectation is that developers do not provide users with poor experiences, such as those resulting from inappropriate or misleading content, privacy and security vulnerabilities"
Translated that means - "Holy crap. Users may be unhappy enough to leave! We need to block this hole up and blame the other guys for doing what we do!!"
Simple solution - don't use Facebook's API. Write a program that can parse HTML and harvest the membership data.
0 Votes
+ -
@wrcousert That's what I was thinking! Great minds think a like!
Mark Zuckerberg is a repeat performer of the ilk of Bill Gates & Steve Ballmer. Microsoft has another entry called Facebook but as soon as I have Google plus up & running I'll be inviting everyone & then I'll dump FB completely...
Why would FB allow a situation that benefits their rivals? Google would do the same if the tables where turned.
@bemi Insane! That's like saying a bank shouldn't have to allow you to withdraw your money if they think you might be switching banks.
Shall see more
0 Votes
+ -
Say NO to FB
zdnetnme 12th Jul
I have no idea what's all the fuzz about keeping complaining about Facebook ... why still use such a "crook" platform after all.

Stop using Facebook and you have nothing to complain. It's just so easy!
0 Votes
+ -
stop using facebook
zdnetnme 12th Jul
If you put waste into a cook pot, what do you get?
Exactly!
cooked waste
Hence, I have no idea why all this fuzz and winch about that waste called Facebook ...
Stop using it and you will live a much better life!
It's just so easy!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix