ie8 fix

Facebook’s 2011 revenue and profit numbers leak?

By | January 30, 2012, 8:20am PST

Summary: A new rumor suggests Facebook made $3.8 billlion in revenue, and $1.5 billion in profit, for the year 2011. These numbers seem a little off when compared to recent leaks and projections.

Although Facebook’s finances have leaked before, the last numbers were only for Q1 2011 through Q3 2011. CNBC correspondent Julie Boorstein claims she has the latest data, encompassing all four quarters from last year, and has posted the numbers on Twitter:

Sources tell me facebooks’s 2011 revenue was $3.8B, operating profit around $1.5B

These numbers of course haven’t been confirmed, although we may know more as soon as this week, when Facebook is rumored to file for its initial public offering (IPO). The numbers don’t really line up with the last leak, which said Facebook made $2.5 billion in revenue for Q1 2011, Q2 2011, and Q3 2011, and had an operating cashflow of $1 billion. Assuming both sets of numbers are accurate, this would mean Facebook saw a whopping $1.3 billion in revenue and made $500 million in profit during Q4 2011.

That’s a great fourth quarter, but the numbers are still much lower than what has been predicted for Facebook by eMarketer. Four months ago, the digital marketing firm projected Facebook made $4.27 billion in 2011. This total revenue includes advertising as well as Facebook Credits and other sources. This was of course quite a prediction: the number is more than double the $2 billion Facebook is estimated to have earned in 2010.

All this speculation and estimation will soon be laid to rest. When Facebook releases the numbers everyone is waiting for, we will finally have a benchmark to work with. The company’s first official numbers will be the baseline everything is compared to: future quarters, future revenue, future profit, and thus overall growth. Previous estimations and projections simply won’t matter. I would be lying if I said I wasn’t at least a little excited to see how much money Facebook is making and how profitable it is.

See also:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications.

Disclosure

Emil Protalinski

Emil has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Emil Protalinski

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications, including Neowin for two years and Ars Technica for three years. He has written 1,000s of articles for both, with a particular focus on scrutinizing Microsoft products and services. Recently, Emil has expanded his coverage to non-Microsoft technologies, including the social networking giant Facebook.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

What should Facebook do?
RichDavis1 2 days ago
I think they should charge $5 an account per month and forgo ads since ads are annoying. Then for every account they would bring in $60 per account, per year. So for 100 Million accounts, that's $6 Billion dollars. How many of the 900 Million accounts would they retain? 100, 200, 300? If they retained 100 Million users, they would bring in $6 billion in gross revenue, they wouldn't have to deal with having to administrate the ads, which would save money. It would free up a certain amount of hard drive space. The customers would be happier since they wouldn't have these stupid ads in the first place. And then Facebook could make it a better product that warrants paying money for it. When something is free, it many times ends up being worthless and becomes annoying.
They have 800 million users and revenue of $4 billion? User growth is going to slow just because there are only so many people on the planet. I just don't see a lot of revenue upside here (unless they start charging subscription fees). I think another wildcard is that there are millions of users that really hate Facebook and more and more are either quitting or just not going anymore. Granted, they can afford to lose a few million users and still pay the bills - but the bad world of mouth buzz should be alarming to anyone involved in the IPO.

http://mankabros.com/blogs/onmedea/2012/01/27/facebook-and-the-disappearing-valuation/
My wife and I just cancelled our subscription. The timeline thing scares me. We are going to Google+
@Uncle_walt
You trust Google more than Facebook?

Try Diaspora.
0 Votes
+ -
What should Facebook do?
RichDavis1 2 days ago
I think they should charge $5 an account per month and forgo ads since ads are annoying. Then for every account they would bring in $60 per account, per year. So for 100 Million accounts, that's $6 Billion dollars. How many of the 900 Million accounts would they retain? 100, 200, 300? If they retained 100 Million users, they would bring in $6 billion in gross revenue, they wouldn't have to deal with having to administrate the ads, which would save money. It would free up a certain amount of hard drive space. The customers would be happier since they wouldn't have these stupid ads in the first place. And then Facebook could make it a better product that warrants paying money for it. When something is free, it many times ends up being worthless and becomes annoying.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix