Google: Facebook is becoming "a closed walled garden"
Summary: A Google executive believes that Facebook is becoming "a closed walled garden" and will soon end up like AOL and IBM: it will have to completely change its business in order to survive.
Vint Cerf, Google's chief internet evangelist and the designer of TCP/IP, warns that Facebook's "closed" architecture means the company will eventually fail to keep up with the public's desire for the flexibility of an open standard. Speaking at an event organized by The Guardian, Cerf said that Facebook was at risk of following the path of companies such as AOL and IBM, suggesting the social networking giant has no long-term future.
His comments come in the same week that Google released Google+ as a public beta. Also this week, Facebook released its updated News Feed, the Ticker, and hosted its f8 developer conference where it announced a new Timeline feature to replace the current profile.
Cerf said AOL began in the 1980s as "a walled garden model" that "persisted for quite a while until the users of AOL forced it to be made accessible to the internet" – the company's original business model of providing its own version of the Internet became irrelevant and it had to transition into an online publisher. He also noted IBM's proprietary networking systems were rendered obsolete after it was forced to adopt Internet technology for its computers because "users didn't want to be locked in" to one brand of hardware.
Facebook is becoming "a closed walled garden" and its problem is that the "ability to connect to people inside the walled garden" will be overwhelmed by "a desire to interconnect" to other social networks and websites, according to Cerf. If Palo Alto is going to reach such a point, it's not happening anytime soon. The company recently passed 800 million active users and is expected to make $4 billion in revenue this year.
The Google executive is likely referring to Facebook's insistence on not letting any other service access its data, which the search giant is particularly annoyed by. The social networking giant, meanwhile, is slowly getting better at sharing with others: it recently started supporting microformats for your exported Facebook data and plans on pushing out official Twitter support soon.
Cerf uses Facebook, but notes he was "mortally insulted" unhappy when the social network began blocking friend requests because he had too many friends. After complaining to Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, he was allowed to increase the number of his friends, but this left him overwhelmed with information about "what these friends were doing" – news he conceded "I couldn't care about." Cerf's solution was of course to use Google+ and its Circles feature, which he argues gives people more control over who they share news and personal information with.
Facebook and Google have a complicated history, but recently their disagreement has become much more heated. The two Internet giants are essentially fighting a social war, one in which the only clear winner is the consumer.
See also:
- Google+ is the best thing that ever happened to Facebook
- Facebook: export your friends' email addresses, if they let you
- Facebook blocks Open-Xchange contact exporter tool
- Open-Xchange offers Facebook contact exporter
- Facebook blocks Google Chrome extension for exporting friends
- Facebook engineers bring Google+ Circles to Facebook
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
He actually makes quite a good point, even though his motives are purely commercial.
FB *IS* trying to be a one-stop shop, aping every other service going; while Google appraoch is to tout its own wares, but ultimately leave you the choice. I use some Google services, and love 'em; others I can live without - but that doesn't matter to Google, whereas FB tries to manipulate members into sharing everything, including their toenail clippings. It's an inward looking model, just like early AOL, Compuserve and others. It'll work for a good while, but unless they can keep up with every development, in every area of the Internet, people will start to bust out. Just like AOL, Compuserve.
All-in holiday camps are great for kids - I'm guessing you are one - but as you mature, you'll find that *choice* is much more important. Or not; we're all different.
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
And even if it WAS the walled garden...who cares? If that is what people want, then they will use it.
Only an idiot (are you included?) think that the walled garden approach is why AOL failed. The truth is, if AOL had partnered with cable companies to jump on the broadband bandwagon early on, AOL would still be by far the number one ISP. Broadband and cheap $8 local dial up ISPs were what killed AOL. Nothing else.
And they said that with a straight face?
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
Apparently, so are you . . . .
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
Google is EXACTLY what the OP said. They only whined like little bitches about patents after they were unable to buy a whole bunch. They are ON RECORD with telling someone "If you don't play ball with us, we are going to scrape your site from our search results completely"
And that is the company whose founders you masturbate to every night.
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
FB Privacy model Sux
You are exactly right. The FB Privacy model seems like it was architected by someone in middle skool. What little control they provide is far too inadequate.
The problem for Google+ is that FB owns the install base. Even if you decide to leave to join G+, there is no guarentee that all your family and friends will follow. So you could end up sitting in this shiny new Social Place all alone. It will require a Coordinated Exodus.
He has a point.
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
But that little scrolling window on the right -- if you hover over an item with its two-line description, you get a nice pop-up with the full information! Even nicer than the old "news feed" that you got if you selected "Recent Posts" rather than taking the dumb default selection. The new scrolling box with the pop ups gives all the details.
The problem is that when Facebook moves something to the right, it seems to sooner or later disappear. Like the "Recent News" in the middle, now at the right. Soon it will be gone.
It took me one click to sign up for Google+ (I have a gmail address that I don't use). I couldn't find anyone I know there, but when they arrive, they can find me. When critical mass is reached, goodbye Facebook.
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
UmeNow.com is the private alternative to Facebook --
Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
Google + sucks as not avaliable worldwide so no competition.
Yes Facebook is always changing things around to try and confuse you. You have a job tracking items posted. They change things then in different place.
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
Delete your Facebook account now and sign up for Google+.
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'
Google and Facebook are one BS
RE: Google: Facebook is becoming 'a closed walled garden'