Judge tosses law banning sex offenders from Facebook

Judge tosses law banning sex offenders from Facebook

Summary: A federal judge has struck down a Louisiana law meant to keep registered sex offenders from Facebooking with minors because it encompasses too many types of websites.


Chief Judge Brian Jackson has thrown out a state law banning sex offenders from using Facebook and other social networks saying it was unreasonable and unconstitutional. In the Middle District of Louisiana, Jackson ruled that the law, which took effect in August, was too broad, as it encompassed many commonly read news websites, as well as social networks. During a hearing a few months before his ruling, Jackson noted the statute's definition of "chat room" meant that the court's own federal website could be included. He did, however, hint at the possibility of approving a more narrowly-defined law.

"Although the Act is intended to promote the legitimate and compelling state interest of protecting minors from internet predators, the near total ban on internet access imposed by the Act unreasonable restricts many ordinary activities that have become important to everyday life in today's world," Jackson wrote in his 17-page ruling (embedded above), according to CBS Houston. "The sweeping restrictions on the use of internet for purposes completely unrelated to the activities sought to be banned by the Act imposed severe and unwarranted restraints on constitutionally protected speech. More focused restrictions that are narrowly tailored to address the specific conduct sought to be proscribed should be pursued."

"We take the safety and security of our users, especially the many young people on Facebook, very seriously," a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement. "We have consistently supported bills that criminalize usage of social networking sites by registered sex offenders. Our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities already bars these individuals from using Facebook and we would welcome the potential of criminal penalties to strengthen these provisions."

The ACLU of Louisiana filed the lawsuit challenging the law in August on behalf of two sex offenders, identified only as John Doe and James Doe in court filings. The organization argued the terms used in the law barred sex offenders from browsing any website that allows users to create profiles about themselves or that has chat rooms, instant messaging, and e-mail.

The attorney general's office meanwhile defended the statute, and said it would appeal Jackson's ruling. Lawmakers, backed by Governor Bobby Jindal, insisted said the law was designed to keep sex offenders from preying on children in online forums, including Facebook.

"Louisiana families should have the comfort of knowing their children are able to go online without the threat of sex predators," Jindal said in a statement. "It's offensive that the Court would rule that the rights of sex predators are more important than the rights of innocent children. As the father of three young kids, I will do everything in our power to protect Louisiana families and that includes appealing to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and bringing legislation this upcoming session to fortify and strengthen the law. The Internet is the virtual playground where sex offenders are trying to strike and prey on our kids. We must have the tools to crack down on monsters that are preying on our kids. If these predators want to search the internet for a victim, they won't be able to do it in the State of Louisiana."

See also:

Topics: Social Enterprise, Browser

Emil Protalinski

About Emil Protalinski

Emil is a freelance journalist writing for CNET and ZDNet. Over the years,
he has covered the tech industry for multiple publications, including Ars
Technica, Neowin, and TechSpot.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Judge tosses law banning sex offenders from Facebook

    Cut off their fingers, if that does not work cut off other parts.
  • RE: Judge tosses law banning sex offenders from Facebook

    Of course the judge signed the order with his left hand, as his right hand was busy under the desk.
  • RE: Judge tosses law banning sex offenders from Facebook

    Given the increasingly broad definition of a "sexual offence", to now include taking a wizz against a tree in some jurisdictions or even a boy kissing a girl in the playground, and that going to [s]gaol[/s] prison is supposed to rehabilitate the offender, so that afterwards they are put back into society, because they "are no longer a threat", it does seem very predjudiced.<br><br>If they are such a threat to the public, that they shouldn't be allowed to join a social network, wtf are they doing roaming the streets in the first place?
  • RE: Judge tosses law banning sex offenders from Facebook

    Since the majority of sexual offenses against children are by people that they know (i.e., family members or friends of family) this law is like the TSA - performs little useful function but makes people feel good.
    "Families should have the comfort of knowing their children are able to go online without the threat of sex predators." This statement is so far from reality that I wonder what planet he's living on. You and your children will always be at risk, on the internet and in the real world. Your job as a parent is to manage that risk and teach your children to recognize it and avoid it as much as possible.