Mark Zuckerberg: Facebook users eventually get over privacy anxiety

By | May 30, 2011, 1:01pm PDT

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg believes that users eventually get over their privacy anxiety: they get used to new features that initially worried them. Zuckerberg was at the e-G8 Forum in Paris last week, and as always had some very interesting and controversial things to say.

“We’ll roll it out, and pretty often there’ll be this backlash, and people will say, ok, we don’t like this new thing,” Zuckerberg said according to CNET. “It’s I think a real anxiety. People were really afraid of more people being able to be involved in the social network. People thought that, you know, it was just too much, right, they wanted to share stuff on the site but they didn’t want it to be so much in people’s face,” said Zuckerberg. “You know now it’s just part of the site that I think most people in a way would be like ‘What’s going on? How can there be Facebook without this?’”

Facebook users are known to almost always initially reject the social network’s latest features, but this is not representative of what they will think a little later down the road. Back in 2006, 1 million Facebook users (or 10 percent of the Facebook user base at the time) were against the new News Feed. The feature is now an integral part of Facebook as it gives you a glimpse of what your friends are up to.

Zuckerberg also said that Facebook has so far weathered its various backlashes from subsets of its 600 million users. He also added, “One of the good things about the Internet is you can just kind of build something, and people will choose to use it or not, and that’s how we win debates.”

Zuckerberg notes that while users are skeptical of new changes at first, they tend to change their minds over time. I would argue that this happens for two reasons. First of all, users realize that the feature or change is actually useful as they begin to use it. Secondly, Facebook tweaks and fixes issues as users complain about certain aspects of the feature.

In short, Zuckerberg is saying that users will follow their friends in complaining about something new. The backlash tends to be short-term, however, so there is nothing to worry about. If the majority of your friends stay on Facebook, then so will you, despite the latest change you may have been complaining about most recently.

This is just one of many topics that Zuckerberg discussed. If you want to hear more, I’ve embedded the full one-hour interview with Maurice Lévy, Chairman & CEO Publicis Groupe:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications.

Disclosure

Emil Protalinski

Emil has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Emil Protalinski

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications, including Neowin for two years and Ars Technica for three years. He has written 1,000s of articles for both, with a particular focus on scrutinizing Microsoft products and services. Recently, Emil has expanded his coverage to non-Microsoft technologies, including the social networking giant Facebook.

59
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Zuckerberg, you're clueless!
kentuckywoman2 10th May
I haven't gotten over my privacy concerns with Facebook. In fact, I rarely use it anymore BECAUSE of the privacy concerns. I've adjusted my settings to give me more privacy, but that doesn't help when so many websites these days REQUIRE one to sign in to make comments, subscribe to newsletters, etc., using Facebook. These 3rd party sites then require you to grant THEM access to your account! I'd say that this is something that Facebook must have agreed to and they should change that policy. Just because I might want to leave a comment on any article, program, etc., doesn't mean I want that website, company, etc., to have access to my Facebook account in order to glean my private information for their own marketing uses or even to post advertising, etc., on my wall. Screw you, Zuckerberg, I know you're out to make billions of dollars, but not off me you won't! I just won't use Facebook. Pretty soon I'm afraid the entire corporate community will make it mandatory to participate in Facebook, and then what? Heil Zuckerberg? Privacy in this country may be one of the last freedoms we have, and it's fast disappearing, thanks to this brat.
0 Votes
+ -
People who care about privacy...
Anne Nonymous 30th May
...simply don't subscribe to Facebook. Not only does it exploit users; it spams. Smart Internet users don't patronize spammers.
0 Votes
+ -
Have to agree
Economister 30th May
@Anne Nonymous

I have NEVER been there and have no plans to go.
0 Votes
+ -
1
wright_is 30th May
@Anne Nonymous I dealt with my anxiety over Facebook privacy and deleted my account.

I haven't missed it a bit.
0 Votes
+ -
@Anne Nonymous
What an insensitive jerk!
Talk about sheep!!!!!
@Userama
I use it as a communication tool, nothing else. I'm not a sheep, I just like being able to contact my group of friends easily. Unfortunately, they don't really use anything else for online communications.
0 Votes
+ -
um... email?
SonofaSailor 31st May
@kris_stapley@...

Unfortunately, they don't really use anything else for online communications.

Not using Facebook, I can't be 100%, but I'm pretty sure you have to have an email address to have an account on Facebook?
@Userama Not sheep -- frogs. Boiled frogs. You know what they say about how to boil a frog, don't you?
@Userama

Your as stupid as the following quote.

Mark Zuckerberg: Facebook users eventually get over privacy anxiety
1 Vote
+ -
Zuckerberg is a douche
cameigons Updated - 30th May
I'm still against the newsfeed, since 2006, didn't change my mind, still many times do what I can to move around it. And actually currently my facebook is "deleted", since march. True that I only closed my account cause I have the option of restoring it just like it was before. But I'm feeling more and more comfortable without FB, connecting with my friends through other means and avoiding the hassle of too much people knowing too much about my routine.

I hope facebook get beat-up and dismantled soon. If I must pick one to take over the world, let it be Google.
0 Votes
+ -
@cameigons

Surely these services only put up the information that you supply? If you don't post about your every move, then how can it know?

I was (am?) concerned about the data mining that could be done on networks and content, but I have the same concern for Twitter and other social sites. However, I never put any information about my routine and never use locations. (Only been on FB for 2 weeks)

Having said that, I see people - people who should know better, putting every inch of their life up there. Over sharing. But we all know people who over share IRL too.
0 Votes
+ -
To whom?
guihombre 31st May
@cameigons, yeh, but WHO do you post it to?
The whole point of facebook is it turns a narrow conversation into a wide conversation for it's promotional benefit.
So you may want to send a photo to your mother, sister and brother, but you end up posting it on your wall. That is then read by your work colleagues, and pretty much anyone who shares their computer with.

It's great for FB to promote itself and generate traffic, but that traffic is largely unwanted privacy problems.

As for Google, I think if Zuck gets away with it, Google would follow suit. You can see the elements of that already in their handling of buzz.
@guihombre

I have a Facebook account but because of scams, security risks and privacy issues I haven't been on and only go on when I need to because of the group for a good cause decided to get the word out using it. Causes are great but all can be abused. I don't use any apps and share very little and even my name is fake on there. None of my family have "connected" with me as family but as friends and one friend connected to me as my "sister" even though I have none. Despite all this I just have no interest in following the crowd in being glued to facebook and telling the world when I did this or that. And so what my point is is that yes people complain and not all get used to it. A lot leave but just still have accounts and have changed their accounts to private (but is there really such a thing with Facebook?). It is funny when he said "in your face" because of the name FACEbook it does seem to be living up to its name. And really what do people expect out of any Social Networking site? It is to network you with anyone you MIGHT want to be Social with ... even if you don't know them yet or even if you haven't seen them for 30 years. You just have to be smart. Don't use your real name, don't put your real birthday (just your birth year and don't like if you are under age .. there are safer sites to be on than Facebook) and don't post pictures, even if only viewable to private friends and family, that you would be embarrassed about if it got out in the public. Everything online in general has a way of getting out there. Also don't use the same password on Facebook that you use on ANY of your other sites you visit including email.

Also I won't let my 14 year old niece on there or my 60 year old mother. Why? Because frankly if they get connected with Facebook they are not net-savvy enough to be able to tell scams from real (they don't in general on the net as it is .. especially my mother .. who clicked on a link from a hijacked email account "because I knew the sender" even though she knew his account had been hijacked) and then there are scam emails that claim to be Facebook. If they are not members of Facebook they will know that those emails are scams right off the bat. Being a member of Facebook requires you to know how to keep yourself safe on the net.

I agree with everything you said guihombre:
The whole point of facebook is it turns a narrow conversation into a wide conversation for it's promotional benefit.
So you may want to send a photo to your mother, sister and brother, but you end up posting it on your wall. That is then read by your work colleagues, and pretty much anyone who shares their computer with.

It's great for FB to promote itself and generate traffic, but that traffic is largely unwanted privacy problems.

As for Google, I think if Zuck gets away with it, Google would follow suit. You can see the elements of that already in their handling of buzz.
0 Votes
+ -
I think he's right.
JohnMcGrew@... Updated - 30th May
It's my prediction that our contemporary notion of "privacy" will be obsolete in the very near future, and forgotten altogether in a generation. Consider that
those now under 30 spent their most impressionable years in a world of reality TV and YouTube; where nearly all forms of public exhibitionism not matter how crude or stupid is not only tolerated, but is encouraged. Kids today tweet details of their daily lives that would have horrified our parents, and even install applications on their smartphones with the sole purpose of broadcasting their exact whereabouts and activities to anybody who cares in realtime.

How many are going to be left to care about privacy when nearly everyone is already literally and purposely broadcasting every minute detail of their personal lives to the entire planet?
0 Votes
+ -
The problem...
wright_is 30th May
@JohnMcGrew@... I deleted my Facebook account, but I still have Twitter. Privacy means a lot to me, which is why I deleted Facebook.

I used Facebook to communicate with friends. But the private information I was sending my friends kept being leaked by Facebook as it constantly added new security settings and defaulted to open. It changed from being a private social network to an open Schlamassal (dog's breakfast).

With Twitter (and blogs and forums), you already know that what you release there is open, so you adjust the content to fit, and anything that is private and just for friends doesn't get broadcast around.

With Facebook, something you published a couple of weeks ago to a semi-private audience is likely to escape into the wild with the next update, until you realise and cut it off, which is then probably too late...
@JohnMcGrew@...
You might be right, but that doesn't make it any less stupid....
@JohnMcGrew@... Let's not forget the Rethuglican dismantling of the 4th Amendment via the Anti-Patriot Act. Invasion of privacy made legal.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
ccocoo Updated - 1st Jun
0 Votes
+ -
No, they'll do what my missus did when she had a privacy issue with Facebook, she'll delete all the personal info and stop using it.

No company is ever bigger than its customers, and Facebook is no different, just more hyped.
0 Votes
+ -
Stay Away
jpr75_z Updated - 31st May
Don't and would not use Facebook or any other social network site, but 600 million+ people feel differently (who has the time?). Just be careful what you put on these sites. God only knows what they are collecting from users, and what you put out there today, could come back to haunt you in 5 years (cause it never goes away!)
0 Votes
+ -
Dear Mark Zuckerberg
nucrash 31st May
Please go sacrifice a goat or something.

Oh wait... too late.
@nucrash Or even better: HIS privacy !
Zuckerberg is delusional. We remember. I no longer use Facebook for personal purposes, only for business purposes where I WANT my information spread to the entire world. Zuckerberg turned Google's "do no evil" slogan into "do whatever makes me feel big, strong, and powerful". Like killing goats and chickens.
This is an appalling attitude! The issue is that Facebook allows identity theft because so much personal information is out there and, like cigarettes, is being justified because people "want them" without regard to the future impact. The rate of identity theft for those under 18 is 10% in comparison with identity theft for adults (0.2%). That's 50 times MORE! What happens when these kids start applying for credit or trying to buy a house or when a prospective boss does a credit check on them? Unfortunately, it's going to take a catastrophe to change the cavalier attitude towards personal digital security.
Will not use facebook. Why do I need it.
0 Votes
+ -
not so bad
j_eyon@... 31st May
i'm not as alarmed at Zuckenberg as other commenters - he's making a valid point worthy of contemplation - Zuckenberg is saying that people will become accustomed to what they initially consider loss of privacy - as long as it has benefits -- and no obvious drawbacks
0 Votes
+ -
Get used to...??
triktags@... 31st May
Yeah sure! Like we get used to tornado's!
(My sincerest apologies to the tortured people of Joplin and elsewhere. In no way do I mean to undermine or inject humor into the terrors you have received.)
Rapid change deployment is antisocial.
As for information gathering, it is possible to gather information on anyone anywhere.

It is what tip of content you place out there that others can see. Control the content, responsibly, and the rest takes care of itself. You have to go back to the profile and settings too frequently to control your privacy settings, but you should review these frequently anyway.

If users are to trust the stability of the product, it should not be changed too rapidly, and users would fully be made aware of what the upgrades will do to their accounts, once deployed.

Mark has a brilliant statistical mind, but remember that the original project was to find a way to connect horny Harvard nerds to attractive females?
Facebook users fall into two groups:

1. Naive people who don't know or don't care about privacy.

2. People who get pissed over new opt-out only features and choose to opt-out.
0 Votes
+ -
Privacy?
jsonok 31st May
Well actually, in any real sense of the word, even commenting on "talkback" requires you give up a level of privacy...the question is how much are you willing to give up, or does "just a little" constitute all your privacy compromised? Food for Thought
0 Votes
+ -
Stockhom syndrome
CobraA1 31st May
Why yes, if you can give all of your users Stockholm syndrome, you must be doing the right thing.

Umm, no. This is turning into a nightmare . . .
0 Votes
+ -
His brain hasn't matured enough to know any better.

Wisdom comes with age and experience and knowledge. His knowledge is just on the technical side, and he lacks the wisdom and social skills that only come from maturity.
I deleted my FB account 2 weeks ago. It has been a very refreshing change in my life. I now spend more time reading news and science articles, broadening my mind which is less cluttered with all the farmville minutiae and other garbage that facebook purveys.
It just goes to show that if you do bad things to people long enough, we get used to it and learn to accept it. That's how pliable humans are. That's the kind of people that megalomaniacs love.

Then there are the rest of us who hate these features and either quit, disable these features, or provide less information/disinformation. These are the types of people that companies like Facebook don't want anyways because they can't make money off them.

As long as we accept the monetization of our personal info, this will only get worse.
My account is actually a violation of Facebook's TOS just by existing. Everything about me on there is a pack of lies. Only certain people know who I am on there and we just use messaging, not the wall to communicate.

My life is MINE, not Zuckerberg's. I don't "tweet" or any of that other crapola. The government is already intrusive enough and M$ is leading the way for them. Gmail is right up there and Hotmail is a joke. I use multiple email accounts and each has it's own use. One is strictly a "starter" account. Anyone I don't know gets that one and, if I don't see an uptick in spam, I'll give that one a second account. By the time they get to my "seventh heaven" account, it stays spam free as very few get that far.
Tell Mark that Computers, the Internet and Facebook are a terrible waste of people's time and that a mind is a terrible thing to waste
I for one, am in total diagreement with Mark Zuckerberg: I have completely stopped using Facebook for any purpose. The "improvements" have only made Facebook even less trustworthy than it was when it first came out. If Mr. Zuckerberg would be willing to share how one can totally remove a Facebook site. it would be the one "new" thing he could do that would be of interest to me.
Or people will eventually get over Facebook....
Frogs slowly being boiled show the same behavior of incrementally accommodating to small changes in their increasingly dangerous environment.
Should note that the cost of privacy, because of Facebook and its like, is actually rising. Soon only the wealthy, like Mr Zuckerberg, will be able to afford it.
So glad he knows best for everyone, what a pretentious weasel! Facebook-get out before you are assimilated in to the collective...
I have a Facebook account but because of scams, security risks and privacy issues I haven't been on and only go on when I need to because of the group for a good cause decided to get the word out using it. Causes are great but all can be abused. I don't use any apps and share very little and even my name is fake on there. None of my family have "connected" with me as family but as friends and one friend connected to me as my "sister" even though I have none. Despite all this I just have no interest in following the crowd in being glued to facebook and telling the world when I did this or that. And so what my point is is that yes people complain and not all get used to it. A lot leave but just still have accounts and have changed their accounts to private (but is there really such a thing with Facebook?). It is funny when he said "in your face" because of the name FACEbook it does seem to be living up to its name. And really what do people expect out of any Social Networking site? It is to network you with anyone you MIGHT want to be Social with ... even if you don't know them yet or even if you haven't seen them for 30 years. You just have to be smart. Don't use your real name, don't put your real birthday (just your birth year and don't like if you are under age .. there are safer sites to be on than Facebook) and don't post pictures, even if only viewable to private friends and family, that you would be embarrassed about if it got out in the public. Everything online in general has a way of getting out there. Also don't use the same password on Facebook that you use on ANY of your other sites you visit including email.

Also I won't let my 14 year old niece on there or my 60 year old mother. Why? Because frankly if they get connected with Facebook they are not net-savvy enough to be able to tell scams from real (they don't in general on the net as it is .. especially my mother .. who clicked on a link from a hijacked email account "because I knew the sender" even though she knew his account had been hijacked) and then there are scam emails that claim to be Facebook. If they are not members of Facebook they will know that those emails are scams right off the bat. Being a member of Facebook requires you to know how to keep yourself safe on the net.

I agree with everything you said guihombre:
The whole point of facebook is it turns a narrow conversation into a wide conversation for it's promotional benefit.
So you may want to send a photo to your mother, sister and brother, but you end up posting it on your wall. That is then read by your work colleagues, and pretty much anyone who shares their computer with.

It's great for FB to promote itself and generate traffic, but that traffic is largely unwanted privacy problems.

As for Google, I think if Zuck gets away with it, Google would follow suit. You can see the elements of that already in their handling of buzz.
Come on now...Mr. Zuck, how much of your data is out there for us to see? Make your data public like the way you make our data public to advertisers and applications. We need to be able to better control who can see our data online.

Privachi (www.privachi.net), a privacy-centric social network, gives users the benefits of a social network while letting them own their social information. On Privachi, messages that a user posts are ?locked? in such a way that even Privachi servers can?t unlock them, only the user?s friends can. In addition, user updates, photos, and videos are stored in locations that the user chooses (even locations outside Privachi servers, if the users chooses them) ?to prevent any one service from knowing everything about the user. Photos, videos, or comments deleted by a user are truly erased since they are stored in the user specified location such as the user?s box.net or dropbox account. We hope Privachi provides a fun social network for users while helping them protect themselves from social profiling and putting them back in control of their social data.
Well.. I haven't gotten over the privacy anxiety yet! Anyone who wants to disable the feature, follow this instruction:
http://goo.gl/5hLkW
"Get over"? No. Resent it, use it minimally, and wait for something better to come along.
U know my fiance and i have had nothing but problems with facebook as we want to be left privet and still u have ways to make things worse. When we dont want anybody find us even when we change that setting, they always do and want to be added. We changed our accounts 3x already to avoid this but it keeps coming back. U have another thing on fb called fb looking at oeople and i found it to be a back door to other people to get on ur account and change things with out ur knowing. I had to add the guy who was using this on both our accounts to block him and that apps. So change if u will but i garuntee u there will be less using fb.
This is an excellent article. The following publish supplies genuinely high quality info. My spouse and i?meters bound to check in it. Truly extremely helpful points are given listed here. Many thanks a great deal. Carry on favorable functions. vintage snapback hats best solid state drive
This is a really good read for me. Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I have ever read. Thanks for posting this informative article. baby gifts for boys baby gifts for girls
I like the article you wrote here; it is very informative and useful for the internet users like me. I will come back to read more blog posts on your website and I have bookmarked your website as well Thank You know style clothing store girls clothing stores online
0 Votes
+ -
Zuckerberg, you're clueless!
kentuckywoman2 10th May
I haven't gotten over my privacy concerns with Facebook. In fact, I rarely use it anymore BECAUSE of the privacy concerns. I've adjusted my settings to give me more privacy, but that doesn't help when so many websites these days REQUIRE one to sign in to make comments, subscribe to newsletters, etc., using Facebook. These 3rd party sites then require you to grant THEM access to your account! I'd say that this is something that Facebook must have agreed to and they should change that policy. Just because I might want to leave a comment on any article, program, etc., doesn't mean I want that website, company, etc., to have access to my Facebook account in order to glean my private information for their own marketing uses or even to post advertising, etc., on my wall. Screw you, Zuckerberg, I know you're out to make billions of dollars, but not off me you won't! I just won't use Facebook. Pretty soon I'm afraid the entire corporate community will make it mandatory to participate in Facebook, and then what? Heil Zuckerberg? Privacy in this country may be one of the last freedoms we have, and it's fast disappearing, thanks to this brat.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix