ie8 fix
madison

Google real-time search + Twitter = a wake-up call for brands

By | December 9, 2009, 2:24pm PST

Marketing and public relations people take heed: the game has changed.

Until today I admittedly hadn’t thought too much about Google’s real-time search and its impact on brands using Twitter. That all changed when Stuart Robertson of DesignMeme sent me a link to a blog post in which the author calls out potential examples of Google allegedly being used as a spam engine. Spam aside, the mixture of Twitter and Google’s real-time search is a scary and uncertain reality for brands or, quite frankly, anyone who diligently watches his or her online reputation.

For example, take a look at this screen shot that Robertson sent me of my very own tweets popping up in Google real-time search:

Since I’m widely known as “mediaphyter” a Google search on my long-time nickname is now that much more revealing than it would’ve been only a week ago. Though I am pretty careful not to tweet anything that I wouldn’t want seen by a much wider audience, not everyone is that careful. Suddenly, the ability to choose whether or not one wants to integrate his or her business and professional lives is gone.

This is already starting to scare some business-focused users, including Robertson, away from engaging as publicly as they once did.

“I’m finding I’m using the direct messages much more today for things I would have @replied to yesterday,” he said.

Next: Brand management & spam –>

Topics

Jennifer Leggio, aka "Mediaphyter," writes about the "social business" side of social media - including enterprise, security and reputation issues.

Disclosure

Jennifer Leggio

Jennifer is employed full-time with Fortinet, a leading network security appliance vendor. She is also actively involved in the network security community and works with the Security Bloggers Network. She co-manages the annual Security Bloggers Meet-UP at RSA Conference.

Jennifer is also involved with Silicon Valley Tweet-Up, a philanthropic networking event that brings people together to raise money for local family-oriented charities.

The blog posts here are solely her opinion and do not represent her employer or any other organization with which she may be affiliated.

Biography

Jennifer Leggio

Jennifer Leggio (@mediaphyter) has been a communications professional for more than 15 years, focusing primarily on enterprise technology and security. She is currently the director of strategic communications for a leading network security vendor. Jennifer is also passionate about all things social media, especially enterprise, security, privacy and reputation issues, which is why she writes about these things for ZDNet.

A well-connected communicator, Jennifer has led or supported interactive social networking efforts for security industry conferences including RSA Conference, Black Hat USA and SOURCE Conference, and founded the Security Twits, a community for network security professionals. She also helps run communications for the Security Bloggers Network.

Finally, Jennifer co-hosts the Quick'n'Dirty social media podcast with Aaron Strout, is a founding member of Technically Women, a communal blog project, and manages marketing and public relations for Silicon Valley Tweet-Up, a networking group that raises money for family-oriented charities. Jennifer was profiled in Silicon Valley San Jose Business Journal's "40 Under 40" edition, as a rising star for 2009.

9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google real-time search Twitter = a wake-up call for brands
cyhex 27th Feb 2011
@bhc3 the is a need for a different approach when dealing with live streams, one of those can be found on http://www.streamcrab.com . Its main advantage that it actually gives you the results of what people are talking about rather then what they are saying (bloging/posting)
0 Votes
+ -
Need a "pagerank" of Twitter users
bhc3 Updated - 9th Dec 2009
In some ways, this problem is no different than people setting up websites and posting stuff. Google manages that by assigning an authority score to websites.

While the inputs will be different, the way to manage for this is to create a pagerank for Twitter accounts. Google can then display the tweets only for those who have a minimum reputation. You wouldn't wants the shown tweets to be dominated by the same ol' social media A-Listers. So the reputation threshold should be somewhat low. But it should be high enough to keep the spammers out.

As for people saying something bad about your brand...well, that's a reality that all companies will have to deal with.

Hutch
@bhc3 the is a need for a different approach when dealing with live streams, one of those can be found on http://www.streamcrab.com . Its main advantage that it actually gives you the results of what people are talking about rather then what they are saying (bloging/posting)
0 Votes
+ -
Twitter is for twits.
No_Ax_to_Grind 10th Dec 2009
wink
0 Votes
+ -
Perhaps you need some clearity on Twitter...
B.O.F.H. Updated - 10th Dec 2009
trouble with twitter

So many people with no lives...
Twitter is a spam gateway. Most genuine users have merely got themselves caught up in hysteria over media hype. It's an old story. Google only sat up and looked because of the monumental size of Twitter's database, which can probably be reduced by seventy five percent when you take out all the spam, rubbish and malicious links.
We are all sheep and we follow one another without even knowing why, or where we're going or with whom.
I can't wait to see what happens next.
It will be interesting to see how it all gets deciphered because humans will undoubtedly need some assistance in processing it all. As the pipeline gets wider and more real time data is generated, businesses will be pushed in a position to really weed out the really good and really bad content from just the neutral noise that will increase.
~Christine
Sorry for not replying sooner, folks. It's interesting that a handful of you are saying that Twitter is for people with no lives / or it is lame, etc. I am certainly not a Twitter fangirl for everything (for some things, and personal use, sure) but how can you explain its widespread adoption if there is no use for it? Just curious for your opinions.
Most Twitter fans are probably too young to remember the CB (citizen's band) radio craze of the 70s. It started by everyone saying "cool, look what I can do." After a few years, most were thinking "but why would I want to do it?" The novelty wore off. The medium originated as a vertical solution (helping long-haul truckers) and returned to that after the consumer frenzy died down. There may be one or more good 'vertical' uses for Twitter, but I would be very surprised if it is still widely used in five years.
3 poss outcomes - 1. Revenue shift to Google from SEO to PPC 2. Twitter's influence with influencers dwindles 3. Google shoots self in foot by reducing the value of organic search.
Nigel Sarbutts

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix