Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

Summary: Twitter's spam-blocking efforts have falsely identified popular company Twitter feeds and individuals as spammers, creating a definite damper in community engagement.

SHARE:

Twitter co-founder Biz Stone wrote yesterday that its fight against spam is an "ongoing battle" but his team has taken big steps in stopping the unwanted follows from bots. According to Stone, Twitter's already implemented a serious action plan:

To combat aggressive following directly we have recently imposed new limits on following—spammy accounts following too many users have been drastically curbed. Those that existed prior to this new limit await review. Our administrative tools for finding and dealing with spam grow more sophisticated as we learn more.

Unfortunately, in doing so three companies who use Twitter to engage with their customers have been limited in their ability to add new followers. Comcast, Jet Blue and Pandora have all confirmed that as of yesterday they were unable to follow folks who have followed them -- a swift kick to their customer engagement outreach. The companies aren't even going around trying to add random new users. These are users who have reached out to them.

I just learned this is hitting individuals as well. Last night Chris Brogan (who follows just under 11,000 -- a reciprocated amount) told me that he was, indeed, able to add followers. But as of this morning he cannot. Around midnight last night I heard from Robert Scoble (who follows about 20,000 people -- also a reciprocated amount) that he can still follow but I haven't yet heard back about whether or not he can still do so today.

Frank Eliason of Comcast, who runs the company's Twitter feed, said when he first found out he could not follow-back customers he immediately contacted Twitter support. What he received was a lackluster reply.

"The first response was to delete followers," Eliason said. "The second response was it may take a few days but they will look into it."

So both Comcast and Pandora began deleting followers and in Pandora's case, only after deleting about 600 followers was the company able to follow new fans who were already following them.

"I do want to be completely respectful in how I use Twitter, so if anyone thinks I'm being too spammy, I'm open to changing how I communicate with Pandora fans on Twitter," said Lucia Willow, community manager for Pandora.

But these companies, nor individuals, should have to go to these great lengths. None have been flagged for spamming and all have a principle to follow customers who have engaged directly with them or who discuss their companies. As more and more companies turn to Twitter for customer loyalty and customer engagement, it is critical that they, at the very least, be able to follow back the folks who follow them. While Twitter's stability issues are improving this new battle-gone-awry with spammers might be the next thing to make users look to other services for customer engagement through microblogging.

It appears, according to the Twitter blog, that the service is stabbing at spammers based on a ratio of followers to followees. This works, but it creates issues like the above -- something that security experts might call a "false positive" -- and it's nowhere near refined enough.

"Rather than looking at the ratio of followers to following, which could artificially deflate because of people unfollowing a user, Twitter should look into the probability of a user being reciprocated on a following notice to a given individual within a limited period of time" said Adam J. O'Donnell, Ph.D., director of emerging technology at Cloudmark.

"It is computationally cheap to perform that ratio computation, and probably why Twitter decided to do that first," O'Donnell said. "It's a great first step but it definitely needs some fine-tuning. Spam is a continuous battle and you need to have many mechanisms to prevent abuse, including this kind of throttling and blacklisting on behavior on a social network."

While Twitter was not reachable for comment, it said on its blog that its measures may not be as sophisticated as required and the service will continue to grow.

Part of our work will be to keep iterating and evolving our approach to spam so we can provide a good experience on Twitter.

In the meantime, what can companies, community managers and individuals do to not lose reader or customer loyalty?

  • Whether or not you can immediately follow folks back, engage with them directly. Keep your notification emails handy and reach out to those folks through "@" messages until you can add them directly.
  • Keep your communications active with your existing Twitter follower base and engage in conversations versus using your feed to merely push information (which could inadvertently get you categorized as a spammer).
  • If you've been forced to unfollow people to keep your account from getting completely blacklisted, communicate honestly to your customers and fans, and let them know that this move was due to Twitter's current spam policies and not due to your lack of interest in engaging with them. Let them know you WILL be back.
  • Keep a log of which customers you've had to unfollow and re-follow them immediately after Twitter updates its spam procedures.

[Update 7/22/2008: 11:44 a.m. - Receiving word from folks who follow as few as 50 people that they are being capped as well. This does not appear to be a volume issue.]

Topics: Security, Social Enterprise

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

9 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Large services such as this can not...

    are too big to manage. Managing this type of technology with technology will time after time result in mismanagement. Just like Gmail and other that are spamming the Internet.

    Networks require real human intervention to manage properly. Anything less is just sloppy and nonprofessional.

    Any company willing to use these types of sloppy services need to be considered sloppy themselves. Companies need to manage their own cloud if they want it done right. If I am using a company to provide mine with goods and services, they better have a better IT implementation than Twitter or Gmail or some other ill-managed service. Why would I trust a company that can't control their own IT.

    A third party provided cloud is a poor way to implement your IT. This is becoming more appearant as and the increase in articles reporting on the failures backs this up.
    bjbrock
  • RE: Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

    Honestly? I think it's a glitch.
    I have the same issue and only have 2k follow/ing - my ratio has always been very 1-to-1.

    I have been trying to communicate with new followers that I will follow them back as soon as Twitter lets me - but I think it's more of a bug with their newly implemented anti-spam code than an intent to block 'power-users' from adding more.

    I put in a ticket yesterday - I expect if enough of us do that, they'll resolve it quickly.
    GeekMommy
    • Definitely a glitch

      But a glitch that could be easily fixed and addressed. It's not just happening to power users, either. I celebrate Twitter's efforts to defeat spam but I also think they need to get people in who understand the intricacies of deploying anti-spam solutions.
      Jennifer Leggio
      • Utterly Agree

        I did put in support tickets at both Twitter Help and GetSatisfaction - but I'm fairly certain it will take days to resolve. Meanwhile, I'll have to be apologizing to folks who have followed me in the past few days that I can't return the favor to :(
        GeekMommy
  • RE: Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

    Wow! This could seriously affect the way business owners are trying to do business, not just big businesses but also small ones too. Many have incorporated Twitter into their customer service framework and to have this as an issue will definitely have an affect on businesses putting their trust in Twitter. This is going to be an interesting topic to watch as time goes by.

    Kim Beasley
    http://CustomizeWordPress.com
    kbeasley@...
  • RE: Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

    I think it will all balance out. This is the shakedown portion of the cruise that is Twitter. Personally I am VERY glad they are doing it as I was getting followspammed by 2-5 people a day using various MLM crap schemes.
    TarotByArwen
  • RE: Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

    Here's another thing we can do - send a note to Twitter, via their support (Help) form, or one of the Twitter team directly and Tell Them how we feel about this.

    Twitter is a community. Capping following is hurting the ability to build that community. It's the wrong answer to the spam "problem" (and in Twitter land, spam is a pretty minor problem in the first place.)
    vlbcfcl
  • What cyber-crime units doing ?

    Nada
    Web Smart
  • RE: Twitter anti-spam efforts go overboard

    I really do not understand how they can define someone as Spamming if users willingly followed a person / company within Twitter. They can easily unfollow them if they do not like their tweets. It is the same thing as signing up for someones email list and then unsubscribing if you don?t like their content.

    Of course I use a process to find people and follow them in hopes that they checkout my twitter page and follow me back. That?s called marketing and trying to reach out to your audience. if they choose to follow then great?. if not then no harm done.

    I have been reduced to following a small amount of people a day now on twitter and there is no explanation why and how these new limits are being determined.
    jaybenoit